Re: Naming status?
It's up to the community. I'm not the authority. If the vote passed, let's just go with it. -Grant On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: I'd prefer that Grant close the deal on the name since he is the one with clout at Apache, but you could do it as well, I suppose - I don't know how these things really work yet. -- Jack Krupansky -- From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:04 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Naming status? The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality. Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I? Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for INFRASTRUCTURE. No other problem with doing it. Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from under the committers, and people who have checkouts. I believe you can fix this with svn switch. On the other hand, I'd prefer to finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them. Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic since we'd lose tickets and history, I think. So I'd prefer to leave those alone if we can. Karl On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name official? Or is it merely a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has any major objection? Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name official: 1. The repository is still lcf. 2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache Dashboard. 3. The mailing list names are connectors-. 4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS. Are there any risks with changing the latter two? -- Jack Krupansky -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Naming status?
I meant to say, I think we met the concerns of others. I don't think we need to go rehash it again. On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: I'd prefer that Grant close the deal on the name since he is the one with clout at Apache, but you could do it as well, I suppose - I don't know how these things really work yet. -- Jack Krupansky -- From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:04 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Naming status? The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality. Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I? Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for INFRASTRUCTURE. No other problem with doing it. Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from under the committers, and people who have checkouts. I believe you can fix this with svn switch. On the other hand, I'd prefer to finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them. Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic since we'd lose tickets and history, I think. So I'd prefer to leave those alone if we can. Karl On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name official? Or is it merely a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has any major objection? Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name official: 1. The repository is still lcf. 2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache Dashboard. 3. The mailing list names are connectors-. 4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS. Are there any risks with changing the latter two? -- Jack Krupansky -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Naming status?
Good enough for me. So I'll consider this deal closed -- by the community, and that the name Apache ManifoldCF is official or as official as it can get. -- Jack Krupansky -- From: Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2010 9:17 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Naming status? I meant to say, I think we met the concerns of others. I don't think we need to go rehash it again. On Oct 16, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote: I'd prefer that Grant close the deal on the name since he is the one with clout at Apache, but you could do it as well, I suppose - I don't know how these things really work yet. -- Jack Krupansky -- From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:04 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Naming status? The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality. Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I? Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for INFRASTRUCTURE. No other problem with doing it. Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from under the committers, and people who have checkouts. I believe you can fix this with svn switch. On the other hand, I'd prefer to finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them. Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic since we'd lose tickets and history, I think. So I'd prefer to leave those alone if we can. Karl On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name official? Or is it merely a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has any major objection? Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name official: 1. The repository is still lcf. 2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache Dashboard. 3. The mailing list names are connectors-. 4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS. Are there any risks with changing the latter two? -- Jack Krupansky -- Grant Ingersoll http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Naming status?
The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality. Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I? Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for INFRASTRUCTURE. No other problem with doing it. Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from under the committers, and people who have checkouts. I believe you can fix this with svn switch. On the other hand, I'd prefer to finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them. Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic since we'd lose tickets and history, I think. So I'd prefer to leave those alone if we can. Karl On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name official? Or is it merely a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has any major objection? Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name official: 1. The repository is still lcf. 2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache Dashboard. 3. The mailing list names are connectors-. 4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS. Are there any risks with changing the latter two? -- Jack Krupansky
Re: Naming status?
I'd prefer that Grant close the deal on the name since he is the one with clout at Apache, but you could do it as well, I suppose - I don't know how these things really work yet. -- Jack Krupansky -- From: Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 7:04 AM To: connectors-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Naming status? The vote made it official, as far as I can tell. If you are referring to incubator-general, someone probably should post, yes, but given that the name originally came from there I think that's a formality. Do you or Grant want to do this? Or shall I? Changing the wiki name requires a ticket to be entered for INFRASTRUCTURE. No other problem with doing it. Changing the repository name will yank any changed workareas out from under the committers, and people who have checkouts. I believe you can fix this with svn switch. On the other hand, I'd prefer to finish off a few things first, so I don't risk losing them. Changing mailing lists and JIRA base name is much more problematic since we'd lose tickets and history, I think. So I'd prefer to leave those alone if we can. Karl On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Jack Krupansky jack.krupan...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Where are we as far as making the ManifoldCF name official? Or is it merely a matter of posting it on the general list and seeing if anybody has any major objection? Some other name references that presumably simply await making the name official: 1. The repository is still lcf. 2. The wiki top level name is Apache Connectors Framework on the Apache Dashboard. 3. The mailing list names are connectors-. 4. The Jira name is CONNECTORS. Are there any risks with changing the latter two? -- Jack Krupansky
