some issues for rescheduling?
Hi, I took a look through future for things that could be adjusted, and came up with the following list. I didn't want to 'just do it', since I'm not that close to the status of the project right now, so if someone could review these it'd be much appreciated. to close: CONTINUUM-933 (acegi branch) CONTINUUM-450 (the wagon notifier does this?) CONTINUUM-37 (superceded) CONTINUUM-516 (can't see why it's neeeded, enqueue is fast) CONTINUUM-924 (already exists?) CONTINUUM-841 (duplicate of 678, no longer an issue) CONTINUUM-1112 (seems fixed already) CONTINUUM-882 (from acegi) CONTINUUM-938 (I think it no longer applies - test and close) CONTINUUM-960 (out of date) CONTINUUM-128 (no longer needed) CONTINUUM-640 (I think it dupes 347?) CONTINUUM-467 (I think it dupes 347?) CONTINUUM-344 (out of date) CONTINUUM-721 (out of date) CONTINUUM-737 (out of date) CONTINUUM-660 (out of date) CONTINUUM-751 (out of date?) CONTINUUM-752 (out of date?) CONTINUUM-1176 (out of date) CONTINUUM-1247 (not a Continuum bug?) CONTINUUM-1248 (not a Continuum bug?) CONTINUUM-1249 (not a Continuum bug?) CONTINUUM-1253 (won't fix - use mvn deploy instead) to schedule for 1.1: CONTINUUM-692 (possibly - talks about profile dependency being the only blocker) CONTINUUM-347 (documentation) CONTINUUM-815 (documentation) CONTINUUM-1063 (just do it) CONTINUUM-618 (it's really annoying, and simple to fix) CONTINUUM-1037 (seems a fatal flaw in Ant use) CONTINUUM-811 (documentation) CONTINUUM-1079 (the feature exists, it's just not visible due to this problem and probably related security issues) CONTINUUM-1310 (goes with above) CONTINUUM-1333 CONTINUUM-1265 (NPE should generally be fixable) CONTINUUM-1255 (is ugly, should be easy to disable) Thanks, Brett
Continuum with a url mapped proxy
We're trying to put Continuum behind a url mapped proxy -- Continuum thinks it's running at http://localhost:8080/continuum, but it's actually being accessed via http://otherserver/apps/something/continuum. Most things are working fine, the proxy rewrites the urls as needed and Continuum is none the wiser. Unfortunately, we're having major problems with the 'Add Project' button. There, the "url" is in a select option such as: Add M2 Project (Is this method used elsewhere in the app? Will save me some time tracking it down...) The proxy doesn't recognize this as a url, doesn't rewrite it, and we get a 404 because there is nothing at http://otherserver/continuum (continuing the example above.) And could the 'add project' navigation be done another way so it's friendlier to this type of proxy? Thanks, Wendy Smoak
Re: [vote] release continuum 1.1-beta-1
On 7/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't know for know how to resolve it, so I think I can do the release tomorrow morning and resolve it for beta-2. What do you think? But if you know how to resolve it, you're welcome to fix it. You have the votes for the release. I'll take a look at it tonight and look at my notes from Archiva to see if I can figure it out. -- Wendy
Re: [vote] release continuum 1.1-beta-1
Wendy, I don't know for know how to resolve it, so I think I can do the release tomorrow morning and resolve it for beta-2. What do you think? But if you know how to resolve it, you're welcome to fix it. Emmanuel Emmanuel Venisse a écrit : Wendy Smoak a écrit : On 7/23/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can I change them? They aren't files stored in Continuum svn. They're created by the remote resources plugin. I think it's working okay in Archiva, you might compare the pom configuration there. The 0.9 branch is closer to Continuum's structure than trunk. It seems I have the same conf for the resources plugin in Continuum and in Archiva
Re: [vote] release continuum 1.1-beta-1
Wendy Smoak a écrit : On 7/23/07, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: How can I change them? They aren't files stored in Continuum svn. They're created by the remote resources plugin. I think it's working okay in Archiva, you might compare the pom configuration there. The 0.9 branch is closer to Continuum's structure than trunk. It seems I have the same conf for the resources plugin in Continuum and in Archiva
Re: [vote] release continuum 1.1-beta-1
Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, I'd like to do a release of the 1.1-beta-1 +1, works for me. -- Trygve
