Re: [Discussion] Continuum 2.0 Roadmap
On Feb 6, 2008 6:52 AM, Christian Edward Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LOL. I'm so out of date. I used to work with TopLink way back in the > earliest days, and tracked it up to the Oracle buyout. After that I > didn't pay attention, and it's clearly changed direction. Never knew > the core was open-sourced. > > Anyway, it's always been one of the better OR/M platforms, so I'd be > cool with it if the license is Apache-compatible. BTW Hibernate is LGPL so as far as I know it's not Apache-compatible. Regards, Tomek
Re: [discuss] Graduate Continuum to its own TLP
On 9/29/07, Mauro Talevi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would also be good to have a comparison page with other open-source build > tools - eg CruiseControl. there's such a comparision here: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix However I do not know, if it's actually maintained and up to date for projects listed there. Regards, Tomek
Re: Release Management for Maven/Continuum
I'm jumping into middle of discussion with some kind of separate (but not too separate) question/problem. As I understood Continuum should be located in some kind of 'dedicated' location, so it won't have influence on main development (developers decides, when to push new snapshot to shared repository, when perform release and so on, Continuum 'just check current versions'). So (and maybe here I was wrong) Continuum should be separated from repositories. Now, if users will be able to perform releases through Continuum (which is a super thing), picture changes a bit. So my question is - will there be a possiblity to integrate Continuum and Archiva, so they may run together on one host/address/port/plexus instance? So both of them will make a kind of 'maven server'? Regards, Tomek
