Re: Non-public projects
I think this is what it's planned for 1.1 by adding security through Acegi On 4/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new feature I need and I'd like to get feedback from the group on how it may be implemented. Don't know if I'll end up writing, but at least I'd like to get some discussion going for now. We at Geronimo desperately need to be able to setup a couple projects in continuum that aren't public -- they're tck related. So basically, we need some way to mark a project as viewable by only logged in individuals in a specific group. Having them listed on the main page with the other projects is ok, just clicking on anything there should require you to be properly authenticated and authorized to do so. This is a big new can of worms for Continuum, so what does everyone think? Good feature/bad feature? Any thought's on what'd be required to implement it? -David -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
Re: Non-public projects
Yes, it will be in 1.1. Emmanuel Carlos Sanchez a écrit : I think this is what it's planned for 1.1 by adding security through Acegi On 4/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new feature I need and I'd like to get feedback from the group on how it may be implemented. Don't know if I'll end up writing, but at least I'd like to get some discussion going for now. We at Geronimo desperately need to be able to setup a couple projects in continuum that aren't public -- they're tck related. So basically, we need some way to mark a project as viewable by only logged in individuals in a specific group. Having them listed on the main page with the other projects is ok, just clicking on anything there should require you to be properly authenticated and authorized to do so. This is a big new can of worms for Continuum, so what does everyone think? Good feature/bad feature? Any thought's on what'd be required to implement it? -David -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
Re: Non-public projects
Woohoo. So what's the status of 1.1 these days? -David On Apr 13, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Yes, it will be in 1.1. Emmanuel Carlos Sanchez a écrit : I think this is what it's planned for 1.1 by adding security through Acegi On 4/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new feature I need and I'd like to get feedback from the group on how it may be implemented. Don't know if I'll end up writing, but at least I'd like to get some discussion going for now. We at Geronimo desperately need to be able to setup a couple projects in continuum that aren't public -- they're tck related. So basically, we need some way to mark a project as viewable by only logged in individuals in a specific group. Having them listed on the main page with the other projects is ok, just clicking on anything there should require you to be properly authenticated and authorized to do so. This is a big new can of worms for Continuum, so what does everyone think? Good feature/bad feature? Any thought's on what'd be required to implement it? -David -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
Re: Non-public projects
Sure, was thinking more high-level. Last I knew 1.1 was torn up and at the beginning of a webwork (or something) conversion. I guess the better phrasing is what state is 1.1 in these days? -David On Apr 13, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: 1.1 development is suspended until the release of 1.0.3 in few days. We don't have for the moment a release date for 1.1 Emmanuel David Blevins a écrit : Woohoo. So what's the status of 1.1 these days? -David On Apr 13, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Yes, it will be in 1.1. Emmanuel Carlos Sanchez a écrit : I think this is what it's planned for 1.1 by adding security through Acegi On 4/13/06, David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is a new feature I need and I'd like to get feedback from the group on how it may be implemented. Don't know if I'll end up writing, but at least I'd like to get some discussion going for now. We at Geronimo desperately need to be able to setup a couple projects in continuum that aren't public -- they're tck related. So basically, we need some way to mark a project as viewable by only logged in individuals in a specific group. Having them listed on the main page with the other projects is ok, just clicking on anything there should require you to be properly authenticated and authorized to do so. This is a big new can of worms for Continuum, so what does everyone think? Good feature/bad feature? Any thought's on what'd be required to implement it? -David -- I could give you my word as a Spaniard. No good. I've known too many Spaniards. -- The Princess Bride
