Re: Multiple scheduled builds on the same project...

2007-10-31 Thread Antonín Faltýnek
Dne středa 31. října 2007 Emmanuel Venisse napsal(a):
 Antonín Faltýnek a écrit :
  Dne středa 31. října 2007 Eric D. Nielsen napsal(a):
  I'm a little confused over how multiple build definitiions on different
  schedules interact within a project.  After reading several threads
  it looks like my understand was correct, yet my installation doesn't
  seem to behave as expected.
 
  I have three schedules set up:
  Hourly
  Every four hours
  Nightly
 
  I have four build definitions
  Hourly: clean test
  Every four hours: clean integration-test
  Nightly: clean install
  Nightly: clean site site:deploy
 
  When a SVN commit occurs, the next hourly build shows that it detects
  the
  changes and builds.  The nightly and four-hourly builds don't seem to
  respond.
  I thought that each schedule had its own dirty checker for SCM, so
  that the fact
  that their were no changes since the hourly build shouldn't stop
  these other schedules
  from running.  However when I looked in the continuum working
  directly, I see only a
  single checked out project directory, so I wouldn't expect it to
  think that the project
  needs to be built
 
  So my questions are
 
  a) should the different builds function independently of each others
  updated-ness
 
  b) if yes, where should I look to debug this?
  c) if no, what's the correct configuration to establish my desired
  build schedules?
 
  Thank you.
 
  Eric
 
  I had same issues Eric with version 1.0.3, then we upgraded to 1.1b3,
  which enables configuration, that specific build definition should be
  performed ALWAYS, and that should be used CVS CO instead of CVS
  UPDATE.

 With the latest 1.1 beta (1.1-beta-4), you don't need to run a clean build
 with a checkout. All build definitions are independant and found all
 changes from other builds since last execution even if the update return
 nothing.

Thats great. This will help very much. Many thanks to whole continuum team.


  These two features can help you.
 
  Also there is issue, that if you have several build definitions (as in
  your example), then if your nightly clean install fail, but nightly
  site site:deploy performs successfully, you will se green success icon
  in project list and you have not good view on project state until you
  check build results.

 We'll try to find a solution for this in 1.2, but your 2 nightly builddef
 clean install + site site:deploy can be rewrite with one builddef
 clean install site-deploy

Some times we had situation, that we need site even if, for example, fail any 
junit test. So we've divided these to execuions into separate build defs.

Tonda


Re: Problem in 1.1-beta-4

2007-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Venisse



Christian Edward Gruber a écrit :
Hmm.  further to this, it works on my Mac, and doesn't on my OpenBSD 
box, running jdk 1.5.0.  Before I had some problems with hte database 
not being created, which turned out to be related simply to available 
file descriptors.  At this point, I have pushed every ulimit category to 
its maximum, and I get no actual errors or problems that wuould indicate 
why it's not accepting the login.


I tried more ways, and explicitly tried bad passwords and bad usernames 
to ensure that it does, indeed, fail in more obvious ways in those 
cases.  It does.  In this case, it take it, accepts the password, but 
fails to set soemthing somewhere that is necessary for it to determine 
that the user IS logged in.  Maybe it's not creating a session 
properly?  I'm not sure.


Can I run continuum such that I get the debug output?  I'm sure I can, 
but I'm not sure what files to edit to do so.  Maybe something's showing 
in the logs.  Btu there are no ERROR logs showing at all.  Very 
frustrating.  It's probably configuration of the user, but I can't see 
what, since I've maxed it all out.


You can modify log levels in 
$CONTINUUM_HOME/apps/continuum/webapp/WEB-INF/classes/log4j.xml

Emmanuel


Christian.

On 30-Oct-07, at 4:29 PM, Christian Edward Gruber wrote:


Hi,

  I've unzipped beta4, run it, and it asks to create the admin user.  
I do that, and it goes to what seems like it should be system 
configuration, but it requires login.  I then attempt to login as 
admin (which was just created) and for a minute it looks like it was 
about to succeed, but then returns to the login screen.  This is 
distinct from a bad username/password, which show an error.  this just 
goes there like if you go to any url and you haven't been 
authenticated.  No matter what, whether I login or go elsewhere it 
just sends me back to the login page.


The log doesn't say much - just:

2007-10-30 11:37:45,428 [SocketListener0-0] INFO  
com.opensymphony.xwork.Action:redback-admin-account  - user = 
UserCredentials[username=admin,fullName=Build 
User,[EMAIL PROTECTED],password=***,confirmPassword=***] 

2007-10-30 11:37:46,123 [SocketListener0-0] INFO  
com.opensymphony.xwork.interceptor.Interceptor:redbackForceAdminUserInterceptor  
- Admin user found. No need to configure admin user.
2007-10-30 11:37:47,172 [SocketListener0-0] INFO  
com.opensymphony.xwork.Action:configuration  - 
baseUrl='http://207.188.87.165:8080/continuum'
2007-10-30 11:38:17,102 [SocketListener0-0] INFO  
com.opensymphony.xwork.Action:configuration  - 
baseUrl='http://207.188.87.165:8080/continuum'



These last two are the results of logging in as admin in the 
subsequently delivered login screens.


Any thoughts?

Christian.









Re: Multiple scheduled builds on the same project...

2007-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Venisse



Eric D Nielsen a écrit :

With the latest 1.1 beta (1.1-beta-4), you don't need to run a clean
build with a checkout.  All build definitions are independant and
found all changes from other builds since last execution even if
the update return nothing.

Thanks.  I'll update ASAP and see how it goes.


We'll try to find a solution for this in 1.2, but your 2 nightly
builddef clean install + site site:deploy can be rewrite with
one builddef clean install site-deploy


I have the same issue as Tonda,  I want the site built and deployed,
even if the build fails -- for instance I want the new Surefire report
and the new Cobertura report to be deployed.  (For instance if a
cobertura check test or unit test failed, that should be reflected on the
site.)

I'm almost tempted to add the project multiple times to the project group,
but I'm not sure how legit that would be.  Ie if I could add the project
times.
  Instance A: With the Unit/Integration Test builds
  Instance B: Nightly Builds
  Instance C: Site Builds

Of course there's no way of giving a project an alias, or alternate description
from whats in the POM, so that would get confusing fast.  On the upside, it
would also separate the nearly always successful site builds from masking a
failed nightly build.

I could do the same with three different project groups... all containing the
same project...  Are any of these options more normal for people's continuum
configurations?


I don't recommend to add more than one instance of a project (same 
groupId/artifactId/version) because it can generate some weird result like 
wrong ordering or wrong dependencies check result.

Emmanuel




Re: automate an ant build scripts work in Continuum

2007-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Venisse



Serkan Costu a écrit :

Hello,

 


I need your advice about ant with continuum. I have an Ant script; that
does some tasks in particular order;

 


1-   Checks-out about 60 projects from the CVS to a local folder in
my computer, accordingly to some tag version.

2-   Compiles all of the projects and generate .class files of  Java
resources.

3-   Then packages projects as  Jars/wars.

4-   After that generates an ear file and deploy to the web
application server.

 


Is there a way to automate this work by Continuum? I could set-up one
ant project in Continuum, but exactly I want to do is; Continuum will
just execute my ant script at a certain time and post the resulting
output to my mail. I dont want to configure all of my projects one by
one.



1- Create your Ant file
2- Add your ant file in your CVS
3- Add a ANT project in Continuum that use the scm url of your Ant file
4- Configure a schedule you want to use
5- Set the build definition to always build (in 1.1-beta-4) and attach the 
schedule

Emmanuel



1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

2007-10-31 Thread Madsen,Bryan
Is this feature enabled on a clean install? What are the steps to
configure it? I can't find any documentation in the Administrator guides
for this. 

Currently our committers are not receiving a failure email and they are
a developer in the pom. The declared notifiers are receiving emails
however.

Bryan




--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information 
contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or 
non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the 
delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas 
City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.

Continuum Release Process Documentation

2007-10-31 Thread Andreas Guther
I noticed that Continuum provides a Release function.

So far I failed located documentation on this function.  We are using
the Maven Release process and I am exited about the possibility to
execute a release from within Continuum.  Unfortunately I do not have
the time to play with the function and rather would like to see some
examples before considering digging into it.

Is there any documentation about the Continuum Release function
available and ideally a tutorial that walks through a few examples?

Andreas



RE: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

2007-10-31 Thread Madsen,Bryan
Does the id in the pom have to exactly match the id of the committer? I would 
hope this is equivalent: SP012456 vs sp012456

From build email:


SCM Changes:

Changed: SP012456 @ Tue 30 Oct 2007 13:26:00 -0500


In the pom:

  developer
idsp012456/id
emailthe address/email
/developer

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:42 AM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

Do they have their id defined in pom set to their committer id?
Do you have changes authors in build results?

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Is this feature enabled on a clean install? What are the steps to
 configure it? I can't find any documentation in the Administrator guides
 for this. 
 
 Currently our committers are not receiving a failure email and they are
 a developer in the pom. The declared notifiers are receiving emails
 however.
 
 Bryan
 
 
 
 
 --
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
 Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information 
 contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or 
 non-public information under international, federal, or state securities 
 laws. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of 
 such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not 
 the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of 
 the delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in 
 Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.



Re: Continuum Release Process Documentation

2007-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Venisse



Andreas Guther a écrit :

I noticed that Continuum provides a Release function.

So far I failed located documentation on this function.  We are using
the Maven Release process and I am exited about the possibility to
execute a release from within Continuum.  Unfortunately I do not have
the time to play with the function and rather would like to see some
examples before considering digging into it.

Is there any documentation about the Continuum Release function
available and ideally a tutorial that walks through a few examples?


Not yet but a page will be available in few days.

Emmanuel



Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

2007-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

Do they have their id defined in pom set to their committer id?
Do you have changes authors in build results?

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :

Is this feature enabled on a clean install? What are the steps to
configure it? I can't find any documentation in the Administrator guides
for this. 


Currently our committers are not receiving a failure email and they are
a developer in the pom. The declared notifiers are receiving emails
however.

Bryan




--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information 
contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or 
non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the 
delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas 
City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.




Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

2007-10-31 Thread Emmanuel Venisse

I mean the notifier configuration (where you set the TO mail address) in the 
Continuum interface.

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :

Where do I find that configuration? This is my current config and it is working 
for notifiers.

This is my config in .\installdir\conf\plexus.xml

component
  roleorg.codehaus.plexus.naming.Naming/role
  implementationorg.codehaus.plexus.naming.DefaultNaming/implementation
  role-hintdataSources/role-hint
  configuration
resources
  !--
   Mail Session
  --
  resource
namemail/Session/name
typejavax.mail.Session/type
properties
  property
namemail.smtp.host/name
valuemail.company.net/value
  /property
  property
namemail.smtp.port/name
value25/value
  /property
...

This is the config in the 
.\installdir\apps\continuum\webapp\WEB-INF\classes\META-INF\plexus\application.xml
!--
| The mail notifier
|--
component
  roleorg.codehaus.plexus.notification.notifier.Notifier/role
  role-hintmail/role-hint
  
implementationorg.apache.maven.continuum.notification.mail.MailContinuumNotifier/implementation
  requirements
requirement
  roleorg.codehaus.plexus.velocity.VelocityComponent/role
/requirement
requirement
  roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.store.ContinuumStore/role
  role-hintjdo/role-hint
/requirement
requirement
  roleorg.codehaus.plexus.mailsender.MailSender/role
/requirement
requirement
  
roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.configuration.ConfigurationService/role
/requirement
requirement
  roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.Continuum/role
/requirement
  /requirements
  configuration
from-mailbox[EMAIL PROTECTED]/from-mailbox
from-nameContinuum 1.1-Beta-3/from-name
timestamp-formatEEE d MMM  HH:mm:ss Z/timestamp-format
includeBuildResulttrue/includeBuildResult
alwaysSendtrue/alwaysSend
  /configuration
/component




-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:48 PM

To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

Do you have configured you mail notifier to send to committers too?

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :

I had the committer update the pom to match the SCM sign-on and they still did 
not receive an email.

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:59 AM

To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

yes, it must match exactly. SP012456 != sp012456

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :

Does the id in the pom have to exactly match the id of the committer? I would 
hope this is equivalent: SP012456 vs sp012456

From build email:


SCM Changes:

Changed: SP012456 @ Tue 30 Oct 2007 13:26:00 -0500


In the pom:

  developer
idsp012456/id
emailthe address/email
/developer

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:42 AM

To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

Do they have their id defined in pom set to their committer id?
Do you have changes authors in build results?

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :

Is this feature enabled on a clean install? What are the steps to
configure it? I can't find any documentation in the Administrator guides
for this. 


Currently our committers are not receiving a failure email and they are
a developer in the pom. The declared notifiers are receiving emails
however.

Bryan




--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The information 
contained in this message is confidential and may constitute inside or 
non-public information under international, federal, or state securities laws. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the 
delivery error by e-mail or you may call Cerner's corporate offices in Kansas 
City, Missouri, U.S.A at (+1) (816)221-1024.













RE: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

2007-10-31 Thread Madsen,Bryan
I understand now. I never went to that screen since I declare my notifiers in 
the pom. It is working for me now. Thank you.

Is there a way to enable this for the entire box instead of on a per project 
group basis? That would cut down on my admin time.

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:20 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

I mean the notifier configuration (where you set the TO mail address) in the 
Continuum interface.

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Where do I find that configuration? This is my current config and it is 
 working for notifiers.
 
 This is my config in .\installdir\conf\plexus.xml
 
 component
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.naming.Naming/role
   
 implementationorg.codehaus.plexus.naming.DefaultNaming/implementation
   role-hintdataSources/role-hint
   configuration
 resources
   !--
Mail Session
   --
   resource
 namemail/Session/name
 typejavax.mail.Session/type
 properties
   property
 namemail.smtp.host/name
 valuemail.company.net/value
   /property
   property
 namemail.smtp.port/name
 value25/value
   /property
   ...
 
 This is the config in the 
 .\installdir\apps\continuum\webapp\WEB-INF\classes\META-INF\plexus\application.xml
 !--
 | The mail notifier
 |--
 component
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.notification.notifier.Notifier/role
   role-hintmail/role-hint
   
 implementationorg.apache.maven.continuum.notification.mail.MailContinuumNotifier/implementation
   requirements
 requirement
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.velocity.VelocityComponent/role
 /requirement
 requirement
   roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.store.ContinuumStore/role
   role-hintjdo/role-hint
 /requirement
 requirement
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.mailsender.MailSender/role
 /requirement
 requirement
   
 roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.configuration.ConfigurationService/role
 /requirement
 requirement
   roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.Continuum/role
 /requirement
   /requirements
   configuration
 from-mailbox[EMAIL PROTECTED]/from-mailbox
 from-nameContinuum 1.1-Beta-3/from-name
 timestamp-formatEEE d MMM  HH:mm:ss Z/timestamp-format
 includeBuildResulttrue/includeBuildResult
 alwaysSendtrue/alwaysSend
   /configuration
 /component
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:48 PM
 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605
 
 Do you have configured you mail notifier to send to committers too?
 
 Emmanuel
 
 Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 I had the committer update the pom to match the SCM sign-on and they still 
 did not receive an email.

 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:59 AM
 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

 yes, it must match exactly. SP012456 != sp012456

 Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Does the id in the pom have to exactly match the id of the committer? I 
 would hope this is equivalent: SP012456 vs sp012456

 From build email:

 
 SCM Changes:
 
 Changed: SP012456 @ Tue 30 Oct 2007 13:26:00 -0500


 In the pom:

   developer
 idsp012456/id
 emailthe address/email
 /developer

 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:42 AM
 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

 Do they have their id defined in pom set to their committer id?
 Do you have changes authors in build results?

 Emmanuel

 Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Is this feature enabled on a clean install? What are the steps to
 configure it? I can't find any documentation in the Administrator guides
 for this. 

 Currently our committers are not receiving a failure email and they are
 a developer in the pom. The declared notifiers are receiving emails
 however.

 Bryan




 --
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
 Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The 
 information contained in this message is confidential and 

RE: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

2007-10-31 Thread Madsen,Bryan
I'm not configuring the notifiers in the Continuum interface. They are all 
pulled in from the pom. The committer in this scenario is not a notifier in the 
pom.

-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 2:20 PM
To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

I mean the notifier configuration (where you set the TO mail address) in the 
Continuum interface.

Emmanuel

Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Where do I find that configuration? This is my current config and it is 
 working for notifiers.
 
 This is my config in .\installdir\conf\plexus.xml
 
 component
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.naming.Naming/role
   
 implementationorg.codehaus.plexus.naming.DefaultNaming/implementation
   role-hintdataSources/role-hint
   configuration
 resources
   !--
Mail Session
   --
   resource
 namemail/Session/name
 typejavax.mail.Session/type
 properties
   property
 namemail.smtp.host/name
 valuemail.company.net/value
   /property
   property
 namemail.smtp.port/name
 value25/value
   /property
   ...
 
 This is the config in the 
 .\installdir\apps\continuum\webapp\WEB-INF\classes\META-INF\plexus\application.xml
 !--
 | The mail notifier
 |--
 component
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.notification.notifier.Notifier/role
   role-hintmail/role-hint
   
 implementationorg.apache.maven.continuum.notification.mail.MailContinuumNotifier/implementation
   requirements
 requirement
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.velocity.VelocityComponent/role
 /requirement
 requirement
   roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.store.ContinuumStore/role
   role-hintjdo/role-hint
 /requirement
 requirement
   roleorg.codehaus.plexus.mailsender.MailSender/role
 /requirement
 requirement
   
 roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.configuration.ConfigurationService/role
 /requirement
 requirement
   roleorg.apache.maven.continuum.Continuum/role
 /requirement
   /requirements
   configuration
 from-mailbox[EMAIL PROTECTED]/from-mailbox
 from-nameContinuum 1.1-Beta-3/from-name
 timestamp-formatEEE d MMM  HH:mm:ss Z/timestamp-format
 includeBuildResulttrue/includeBuildResult
 alwaysSendtrue/alwaysSend
   /configuration
 /component
 
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 12:48 PM
 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605
 
 Do you have configured you mail notifier to send to committers too?
 
 Emmanuel
 
 Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 I had the committer update the pom to match the SCM sign-on and they still 
 did not receive an email.

 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:59 AM
 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

 yes, it must match exactly. SP012456 != sp012456

 Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Does the id in the pom have to exactly match the id of the committer? I 
 would hope this is equivalent: SP012456 vs sp012456

 From build email:

 
 SCM Changes:
 
 Changed: SP012456 @ Tue 30 Oct 2007 13:26:00 -0500


 In the pom:

   developer
 idsp012456/id
 emailthe address/email
 /developer

 -Original Message-
 From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 10:42 AM
 To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.1-beta-3 Commiter build failure notifier Continuum-605

 Do they have their id defined in pom set to their committer id?
 Do you have changes authors in build results?

 Emmanuel

 Madsen,Bryan a écrit :
 Is this feature enabled on a clean install? What are the steps to
 configure it? I can't find any documentation in the Administrator guides
 for this. 

 Currently our committers are not receiving a failure email and they are
 a developer in the pom. The declared notifiers are receiving emails
 however.

 Bryan




 --
 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and any included attachments are from 
 Cerner Corporation and are intended only for the addressee. The 
 information contained in this message is confidential and may constitute 
 inside or non-public information under international, federal, or state