RE: Different JDKS
Yes, this is obviously, but my goal not to have the same java for all version type of compilations but have different jdks, since it unknown how application will behave if it was compiled with jdk 1.6 but with specified source and target as 1.5 or at least requires additional testing. Best regards, Juri. -Original Message- From: Victor Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 11:54 AM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: RE: Different JDKS > Could you please tell me if continuum 1.1 can help to > separate the building of the some projects under java 1.5 > for example and some other projects under 1.6 or this is > certainly maven settings? This is definately a mvn issue, you can add the following to your pom as required org.apache.maven.plugins maven-compiler-plugin 1.6 1.6 Cheers, Vic -- Victor Kirk Analyst Serco Integrated Transport Cavendish House Clearwater Park Prince's Wharf Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6QY Tel: +44 (0)1642 636894 This e-mail and any attachments are for the intended addressee(s) only and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not a named addressee, do not use, retain or disclose such information. This email is not guaranteed to be free from viruses and does not bind Serco in any contract or obligation. Serco Limited. Registered in England and Wales. No: 242246 Registered Office: Serco House,16 Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire RG27 9UY United Kingdom. Help cut carbon...please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
Different JDKS
Hi All, Could you please tell me if continuum 1.1 can help to separate the building of the some projects under java 1.5 for example and some other projects under 1.6 or this is certainly maven settings? Does anyone can suggest some variant except -DJAVA_HOME specifying as parameter for mvn? Thanks, Juri.
RE: Maestro 1.5
Asked this question on Maestro support forum: http://www.devzuz.org/?q=node/43 Can you please answer it there? -Original Message- From: Wendy Smoak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 5:03 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Maestro 1.5 2008/1/18 Artamonov, Juri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I know that Maestro 1.5 containing release of Continuum 1.1 has been released. > Perhaps somebody knows the public location of the artifact for Windows and can share it? Please use the Maestro support forum for questions: http://www.devzuz.org/?q=forum/1 -- Wendy
RE: Continuum file url to pom.xml
Try this one: file:/c://project/pom.xml -Original Message- From: Roosendaal, Maarten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2007 3:37 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Continuum file url to pom.xml Hi, We are trying to add a Maven 2(.0.7) project to Continuum (1.0.3). The pom.xml is part of a clearcase view so we have to fill in the M2 POM Url. Unfortunatly whatever we try it does not work: * file://localhost/c://project/pom.xml * file://c://project/pom.xml * file://localhost/c:\\project\pom.xml and then some. We've also tried following the instructions on: http://maven.apache.org/continuum/faqs.html#can-i-use-file-protocol-in-a dd-project-view but the specified folder is not there. I added it and changed all the application.xml's but with no luck We keep getting the message:[ You must provide a valid url (http, https, ftp and file protocols are allowed) ] Is this a bug or are we doing something wrong? There is a clearcase view already present there. Thanks, Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groeten, Maarten Roosendaal / Capgemini / Netherlands Senior Consultant / Java Assembly Line / ADC Technologies T. +31 30 68 970 77 / Mob. +31 6 248 216 12 www.nl.capgemini.com Join the Collaborative Business Experience This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
RE: Performance collapse when logged as admin
What I did is just installed Maestro 1.1 and created admin user. Then I just added simple single module project and defined several goals for it. That's all. After I saw that it's slow comparing with Maestro 1.0.1 and I couldn't start any goal I created except default goal I decided to move back to Maestro 1.0.1. Please let me know if you have more questions. Best regards, Juri. -Original Message- From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:55 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance collapse when logged as admin k, then my bet is its something up with that authz behavior there. do you have any custom roles? what is the name of the project in question? (ie, The Doxia Project) you can make something up that follows the same naming structure thanks, and I'll try and nail this down in continuum jesse On 11/7/06, Artamonov, Juri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe the same that goes with Continuum, yea I suppose this is > derby. > > -Original Message- > From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:48 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: Performance collapse when logged as admin > > > hm, that sounds to me like it would be an issue with the speed of > authz activities on those pages, they had been really slow until I put > in abit of per page caching in the session to speed it up...and it was > a lot faster from then on...but this could be something related to > that. > > what database are you guys using for this? the derby one with the > release? > > jesse > > On 11/7/06, Artamonov, Juri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I had the same and also I see th bug which not allowing me to > > start every created goal for project. I also decided to return to > > 1.0.1. > > > > Best regards, > > Juri. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Samuel Langlois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:28 PM > > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > > Subject: Performance collapse when logged as admin > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I find Continuum web console very slow, especially when logged as > > admin, and I think there is something wrong. > > > > For instance, to display the summary page of a project group > > containing 3 projects, it takes a few seconds when not logged in, > > and 20s when logged as admin. For a project group containing 58 > > projects, it goes from 15s (which is already quite long...) to an > > amazing 130s when logged as admin. > > > > I use Continuum 1.0.3-maestro-1.1 with all default settings. I have > > the feeling (but cannot confirm) that the version shipped with > > Maestro > > > 1.0.1 did not show this problem. My server is a Pentium4, 1.5GHz > > under > > > Fedora Core 5. Not really a speed king, but still... I recently > > upgraded it to 1Go RAM without much effect. > > > > Am I the only one in this situation? > > How can I help diagnose the problem further? > > > > Thanks for your help > > > > Samuel > > > > > > > > > -- > jesse mcconnell > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Performance collapse when logged as admin
I believe the same that goes with Continuum, yea I suppose this is derby. -Original Message- From: Jesse McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:48 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance collapse when logged as admin hm, that sounds to me like it would be an issue with the speed of authz activities on those pages, they had been really slow until I put in abit of per page caching in the session to speed it up...and it was a lot faster from then on...but this could be something related to that. what database are you guys using for this? the derby one with the release? jesse On 11/7/06, Artamonov, Juri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, I had the same and also I see th bug which not allowing me to > start every created goal for project. I also decided to return to > 1.0.1. > > Best regards, > Juri. > > -Original Message- > From: Samuel Langlois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:28 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Performance collapse when logged as admin > > > Hello, > > I find Continuum web console very slow, especially when logged as > admin, and I think there is something wrong. > > For instance, to display the summary page of a project group > containing 3 projects, it takes a few seconds when not logged in, and > 20s when logged as admin. For a project group containing 58 projects, > it goes from 15s (which is already quite long...) to an amazing 130s > when logged as admin. > > I use Continuum 1.0.3-maestro-1.1 with all default settings. I have > the feeling (but cannot confirm) that the version shipped with Maestro > 1.0.1 did not show this problem. My server is a Pentium4, 1.5GHz under > Fedora Core 5. Not really a speed king, but still... I recently > upgraded it to 1Go RAM without much effect. > > Am I the only one in this situation? > How can I help diagnose the problem further? > > Thanks for your help > > Samuel > > > -- jesse mcconnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Performance collapse when logged as admin
Yes, I had the same and also I see th bug which not allowing me to start every created goal for project. I also decided to return to 1.0.1. Best regards, Juri. -Original Message- From: Samuel Langlois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 12:28 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Performance collapse when logged as admin Hello, I find Continuum web console very slow, especially when logged as admin, and I think there is something wrong. For instance, to display the summary page of a project group containing 3 projects, it takes a few seconds when not logged in, and 20s when logged as admin. For a project group containing 58 projects, it goes from 15s (which is already quite long...) to an amazing 130s when logged as admin. I use Continuum 1.0.3-maestro-1.1 with all default settings. I have the feeling (but cannot confirm) that the version shipped with Maestro 1.0.1 did not show this problem. My server is a Pentium4, 1.5GHz under Fedora Core 5. Not really a speed king, but still... I recently upgraded it to 1Go RAM without much effect. Am I the only one in this situation? How can I help diagnose the problem further? Thanks for your help Samuel
RE: Continuum thinks a build is running
Yes, that works, thank you Emmanuel. -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:33 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Continuum thinks a build is running ok, you need to modify the state and end time in buildResult table too. Emmanuel Artamonov, Juri a écrit : > Ok, Emmanuel, > > Seems you didn't get the issue. > > The issue that states for all components in the database are set to > "2" but me and as you see another user still has the projects listed > in "History" that are building. For example, this from histroy > > Build # Start Time End Time State > 9 29.08.2006 15:06:40 29.08.2006 15:07:07 Duration : 27 sec Result > 8 29.08.2006 14:40:37 29.08.2006 14:41:04 Duration : 27 sec Result > 29.08.2006 14:31:25 Started since : 21 h 49 min 9 sec Result > 7 29.08.2006 14:25:59 29.08.2006 14:26:28 Duration : 28 sec Result > 29.08.2006 14:15:34 Started since : 22 h 5 min 0 sec Result > 29.08.2006 14:12:56 29.08.2006 14:13:04 Duration : 8 sec Result > 6 29.08.2006 13:10:04 29.08.2006 13:10:52 Duration : 47 sec Result > 5 28.08.2006 20:01:28 28.08.2006 20:01:55 Duration : 26 sec Result > 4 17.08.2006 16:06:54 17.08.2006 16:07:23 Duration : 29 sec Result > 3 11.08.2006 16:52:37 11.08.2006 16:52:59 Duration : 21 sec Result > 2 11.08.2006 16:48:04 11.08.2006 16:48:27 Duration : 22 sec Result > 1 11.08.2006 16:45:54 11.08.2006 16:46:17 Duration : 22 sec Result > > You see two times > > 29.08.2006 14:31:25 Started since : 21 h 49 min 9 sec Result > 29.08.2006 14:12:56 29.08.2006 14:13:04 Duration : 8 sec Result > > I started the project and continuum still think that it's required to > be built but in this we can still start another goals from this or any > other component. > > How we can fix this? > > Juri. > > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:14 PM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: Continuum thinks a build is running > > > 2 is ok > > other values for state are: > 2=ok > 3=failure > 4=error > 6=building > 7=checking out > 8=updating > > Emmanuel > > Artamonov, Juri a écrit : >> Emmanuel, >> >> You always saying "you need to modify the project state" but never >> saying on what vakue it should be changed. >> >> Ok, what correct value should be for the projects? I see all >> projects' >> state set to "2", is it ok? >> >> Juri. >> >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:38 AM >> To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Continuum thinks a build is running >> >> >> If the workaround doens't work, you need to modify the project state >> in database with a sql client >> like Squirrel. >> >> Emmanuel >> >> yazsaw7 a écrit : >>> Any other advice that you can offer to stop a particular build? I >>> have >>> a build that appears to be hung for more than 1 day. >>> >>> i have restarted continuum and clicked 'Build All' and my build is >>> still running in the background. I can still kick off new builds, >>> but i can't stop the one build. >>> >>> thx, >>> jason >>> >>> >>> >>> Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >>>> It's a known bug. >>>> >>>> The workaround is: >>>> - restart Continuum >>>> - press the "build all" button at the bottom of the summary page >>>> >>>> Emmanuel >>>> >>>> Jerry DuVal a écrit : >>>>> Our server was restarted during a build and now Contiuum thinks >>>>> the build is still running and will not start any other builds. >>>>> Any way to clear continuum? >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> > > > >
RE: Continuum thinks a build is running
Ok, Emmanuel, Seems you didn't get the issue. The issue that states for all components in the database are set to "2" but me and as you see another user still has the projects listed in "History" that are building. For example, this from histroy Build # Start Time End Time State 9 29.08.2006 15:06:40 29.08.2006 15:07:07 Duration : 27 sec Result 8 29.08.2006 14:40:37 29.08.2006 14:41:04 Duration : 27 sec Result 29.08.2006 14:31:25 Started since : 21 h 49 min 9 sec Result 7 29.08.2006 14:25:59 29.08.2006 14:26:28 Duration : 28 sec Result 29.08.2006 14:15:34 Started since : 22 h 5 min 0 sec Result 29.08.2006 14:12:56 29.08.2006 14:13:04 Duration : 8 sec Result 6 29.08.2006 13:10:04 29.08.2006 13:10:52 Duration : 47 sec Result 5 28.08.2006 20:01:28 28.08.2006 20:01:55 Duration : 26 sec Result 4 17.08.2006 16:06:54 17.08.2006 16:07:23 Duration : 29 sec Result 3 11.08.2006 16:52:37 11.08.2006 16:52:59 Duration : 21 sec Result 2 11.08.2006 16:48:04 11.08.2006 16:48:27 Duration : 22 sec Result 1 11.08.2006 16:45:54 11.08.2006 16:46:17 Duration : 22 sec Result You see two times 29.08.2006 14:31:25 Started since : 21 h 49 min 9 sec Result 29.08.2006 14:12:56 29.08.2006 14:13:04 Duration : 8 sec Result I started the project and continuum still think that it's required to be built but in this we can still start another goals from this or any other component. How we can fix this? Juri. -Original Message- From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 12:14 PM To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org Subject: Re: Continuum thinks a build is running 2 is ok other values for state are: 2=ok 3=failure 4=error 6=building 7=checking out 8=updating Emmanuel Artamonov, Juri a écrit : > Emmanuel, > > You always saying "you need to modify the project state" but never > saying on what vakue it should be changed. > > Ok, what correct value should be for the projects? I see all projects' > state set to "2", is it ok? > > Juri. > > > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:38 AM > To: continuum-users@maven.apache.org > Subject: Re: Continuum thinks a build is running > > > If the workaround doens't work, you need to modify the project state > in database with a sql client > like Squirrel. > > Emmanuel > > yazsaw7 a écrit : >> Any other advice that you can offer to stop a particular build? I >> have >> a build that appears to be hung for more than 1 day. >> >> i have restarted continuum and clicked 'Build All' and my build is >> still running in the background. I can still kick off new builds, but >> i can't stop the one build. >> >> thx, >> jason >> >> >> >> Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >>> It's a known bug. >>> >>> The workaround is: >>> - restart Continuum >>> - press the "build all" button at the bottom of the summary page >>> >>> Emmanuel >>> >>> Jerry DuVal a écrit : >>>> Our server was restarted during a build and now Contiuum thinks the >>>> build is still running and will not start any other builds. Any way >>>> to clear continuum? >>>> >>>> >>> > > > >
