Re: [Cooker] KDE2 RPMs

1999-10-01 Thread David barth

Hi all,

In the spec files, the "Quick hack" part can be simpler. I use a modified
spec script for compiling from CVS sources with some reasonable defaults
for my Mandrake system. It seems only 'configure' needs patching to work with
-lqt2.

[...]
make -f Makefile.cvs MOC=/usr/bin/moc2

sed -e 's/-lqt/-lqt2/g' configure \
| sed -e 's/-lqimgio/-lqimgio2/g' \
| sed -e 's/-lqimgio/-lqimgio2/g'  configure.tmp
mv configure.tmp configure
rm -f configure.tmp
chmod +x configure

# then do the ./configure ; make ; make install stuff
[...]

Hope this helps
David



Re: [Cooker] Is the Tekram dc-390u2w Supported?

1999-10-01 Thread Francis GALIEGUE

Jeff West wrote:
 
 I am currently using this card with an IBM DRVS 10,000 RPM Ultra2 LVD SCSI
 Drive - works great, but the current drivers do not support the 80 MB / sec
 only 40 MB /sec - still good enough for my purposes.  The installation
 should autodetect the controller and recognizes the NCR / Symbios Logic
 chipset.  Hope this helps!!
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jake Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, September 30, 1999 5:18 PM
 Subject: [Cooker] Is the Tekram dc-390u2w Supported?
 
  I was wondering if the Mandrake 6.1 or cooker is
  supporting the Tekram dc-390u2w card.  Really I was
  hoping that someone was using it for reasurance
  reasons.  It has the symbios chipset so I think it
  will work but will autoprobe find it?  Please add some
  insight to this if you know of anything about these
  cards.
  Thanks in advance,
  Jake Johnson
 
 

To be precise, the driver is ncr53c8xx.

Note however that there are two drivers for this kind of cards: the
aforementioned ncr53c8xx and sym53c8xx, which supports more features of
*recent* controllers.

From /us/sr/li/Do/Configure.help:


  This driver supports all the features of recent 53C8XX chips (used
  in PCI SCSI controllers), notably the hardware phase mismatch
  feature of the SYM53C896.

  Older versions of the 53C8XX chips are not supported by this
  driver. If your system uses either a 810 rev.  16, a 815, or a 825
  rev.  16 PCI SCSI processor, you must use the generic NCR53C8XX
  driver ("NCR53C8XX SCSI support" above) or configure both the
  NCR53C8XX and this SYM53C8XX drivers either as module or linked to
  the kernel image.


Hope this helps,
-- 
fg

# rm *;o
o: command not found



[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] NAME: Mesa VER: 3.0.99 REL: 5mdk

1999-10-01 Thread Michael Irving

On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, you wrote:
 --=-=-=
 Name: MesaDistribution: Mandrake
 Version : 3.0.99Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 5mdk  Build Date: Wed Sep 29 09:05:17 1999
 Install date: (not installed)   Build Host: locutus.mandrakesoft.de
 Group   : Libraries Source RPM: (none)
 Size: 1911322
 Packager: Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Summary : OpenGL 1.2 compatible 3D graphics library
 Description :
 Mesa is an OpenGL 1.2 compatible 3D graphics library.
 --=-=-=
 
 Last Changelog:
 
 * Wed Sep 29 1999 Bernhard Rosenkraenzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  - 3.1beta3

This one is not working. It is missing lots of files (or symlinks) that were in
-4mdk ...

Michael Irving



Re[2]: [Cooker] panoramix.diff

1999-10-01 Thread tracer

Hello Jeff,

Friday, Friday, October 01, 1999, you wrote:

Jeff Garzik On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Nora Etukudo wrote:
 On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 11:40:55AM -0500, Timothy Litwiller wrote:
  They should but,   cards with more than 8 meg memory are not using it for
  more colors they are using it to store lighting effects, textures and
  bumpmaps.

 Well, I don't understand the details behind that, but Xconfigurator
 shows an option for "32-Bit Colors" and many people think of it as
 4,294,967,296 colors (alias 4 billion colors) :-).

Jeff Garzik 32-bit means 32 bits-per-pixel (bpp).  I would disagree that many people
Jeff Garzik think of it as 4 billion colors:  32 bpp includes three separate color
Jeff Garzik components, red, green, and blue, and possibly transparency (alpha) also.
Jeff Garzik So total colors is approximately '4 billion / 4' or '4 billion / 3',
Jeff Garzik depending on how the colormap is set up.

Jeff Garzik Regards,

Jeff Garzik Jeff


so why not just say it is 32 bpp...


Best regards,
 
tracer

mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
NOTE: 1 MAILRUN PER DAY ONLY




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] NAME: initscripts VER: 4.42 REL: 1mdk

1999-10-01 Thread Pablo Saratxaga

Kaixo!

Chmouel wrote:

   Name: initscripts Distribution: Mandrake
   Version : 4.42  Vendor: MandrakeSoft
  
  
  Plesae pablo could you see if i have not spoiled your i18n patchs ?

Yes you have :)

I will re-merge them, and upload.

With that version users are allowed to have a $HOME/.i18n that will
have priority over /etc/sysconfig/i18n 

Michael Irving wrote:

 I know i18n is translation parts..

In fact it isn't; i18n is internationalization, that is the fact of adapting
programs so they can be translated (adding gettext() use in the sources, 
adding bidirectional feature etc); the translation itself is part of l10n
(localization) process, that is doing the adaptation to the strings of text,
numbers, dates, etc to conform to the choosen locale by the user.

Of course there is a big relationship between the two; l10n is not
possible without i18n; and i18n has no sense if it isn't to allow l10n.

-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975



RE: [Cooker] Panoramix failed on x configuration

1999-10-01 Thread Thomas M. Beaudry

You have to configure the mouse with the keyboard before touching the mouse.
I remember it being stated on the startup screen someplace.

 -Original Message-

 I re-installed cooker with the old installer and installed XF86Setup.
 It now no longer works at all, no matter what I do. The IMPS/2 mouse
 is not recognized and causes the mouse cursor to activate the button
 in the top right corner. I made a bug report 6 weeks ago about this.

 I think I'm going to put Linux away for a few months and check back in
 the new year.

 On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:08:30 -0700, you wrote:

 Terrapin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  I also cannot run XF86Setup with a linux 3 boot. File not found. How
  come the path has not been set? I could fudge this setup to get it to
  write a good enough XF86Config file.
 
 Found out that XF86Setup was not installed. I installed it and got the
 following error when trying to run it:
 
 "Not all of the configuration and application default files are
 installed. The file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xinit/xinitrc is missing"





[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] NAME: initscripts VER: 4.42 REL: 3mdk

1999-10-01 Thread Pablo Saratxaga

Kaixo!

On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 07:49:39AM -0500, ChangeLog Automate wrote:

 Name: initscripts Distribution: Mandrake
 Version : 4.42  Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 3mdk  Build Date: Fri Oct 01 06:45:06 1999

 Last Changelog:
 
 * Fri Oct 01 1999 Pablo Saratxaga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  - modified kdelang script to allow each user to have a different
locale environment 
  - adapted /etc/profile.d/lang* for the same reason
  - corrected a bug of rc.sysinit with Red Hat kernels (an espace instead
of a tab is not the same for grep :) )
  - changed kdeicon to use a source *.kdelnk file (that will be provided
by mandrake_desk) and do some sed magic on it; that allow to have better
description and more translations of the icon caption and tooltips,
without risking to break initscripts.

I only tested the modified scripts, I don't tested rebooting; please test it.

-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975



[Cooker] Desktop Update Updates From Where?

1999-10-01 Thread Hoyt

Does the desktop update in cooker update from the cooker ftp sites? (I don't
have cooker installed or I could answer my own question.)

I remember a post about a hack to do it and a promise that it would be done
and included.

Hoyt




Re: [Cooker] Desktop Update Updates From Where?

1999-10-01 Thread Mandrake Bugs

 Does the desktop update in cooker update from the cooker ftp sites? (I don't
 have cooker installed or I could answer my own question.)

The question that has been on my mind ALL week!

Ditto here. I had cooker installed (but because of it not being fully up to
date, I reverted back to 6.0), and it did not appear that way.

Having cooker's update app linked to an appropriate cooker directory would
make running cooker, and updating it, *MUCH* easier.

--
Beauty, brains, availability, personality  - pick any two.



Re: [Cooker] Desktop Update Updates From Where?

1999-10-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Mandrake Bugs wrote:

  Does the desktop update in cooker update from the cooker ftp sites? (I don't
  have cooker installed or I could answer my own question.)
 
 The question that has been on my mind ALL week!

In it's current state MandrakeUpdate isn't going to do a bit of good for
Cooker. for one there is no updates to point it at, anything updated goes
straight into the distribution.

 Ditto here. I had cooker installed (but because of it not being fully up to
 date, I reverted back to 6.0), and it did not appear that way.

She's way more upto date then 6.0 i'm quite certain

 Having cooker's update app linked to an appropriate cooker directory would
 make running cooker, and updating it, *MUCH* easier.
 
 --
 Beauty, brains, availability, personality  - pick any two.


--
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Axalon



Re: [Cooker] bootnet,dhcp,3c905mba not working

1999-10-01 Thread Quel Qun

Hi,

I noticed that for the net install I had to send twice the dhcp request.

I now understand where it comes from:

The DNS server does not know about my machine name, so the install script 
fails because the reverse name lookup fails.

I just need an IP, and the install goes on at the second time, popping up 
the correct domain name. I then just have to complete the host name.

I think the install script should be modified to warn the user that the name 
lookup failed, instead of saying that the dhcp request failed (which is 
partially wrong).

---
kel


From: Niklas Paulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] bootnet,dhcp,3c905mba not working
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 18:17:42 +

Hi,

I'm trying to make a network installation using the latest cooker
bootnet.img (from ftp.sunet.se).

Dhcp/bootp just refuses to work.

The nic is a 3com 3c905b-mba , mobo is a intel bx2. Dhcp is working
correctly on the same machine when under normal operations and
redhat/lorax bootnet is figuring out the dhcp.

This is _really_ confusing, since I never had any problems before with
3c905 cards, thank you Donald Becker.

When doing a tcpdump at the same time as the installations runs I can
clearly see that the clients sends out dhcpdiscovers and gets a
dhcpoffer from the server but no dhcpack in reply. _Maybe_ there is a
bit to long delay between when the client is doing the dhcp request and
the discover/offer packets show up in tcpdump.

Any suggestions would be welcome, I have some 25 machines with the
905-mba nic waiting to be kickstarted 

/N

--
Niklas Paulsson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator at Dept. of Informatic , Göteborgs University
"Linux isn't just an operating system: It's a way of life."
- Andrew Leonard - Salon Magizine

__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



Re: [Cooker] kinda unrelated - RPM query

1999-10-01 Thread Axalon Bloodstone

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Mandrake Bugs wrote:

  You can use rpm -e with the full package name, version included.
  
  rpm -e rpm-3.0.3-35mdk for example.
 
 Did that - it claims that package is not installed (it is, though)
 
 

rpm --rebuilddb  for i in `rpm -qa|grep package_to_remove` ; do rpm -e $i ; done



Re: [Cooker] bootnet,dhcp,3c905mba not working

1999-10-01 Thread Niklas Paulsson

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Quel Qun wrote:
 I think the install script should be modified to warn the user that the name 
 lookup failed, instead of saying that the dhcp request failed (which is 
 partially wrong).

I don't think this is the same is in my case, I have been sitting around
redoing the dhcp request quite a lot of times trying to figure out what
the heck is happening having a tcpdump session open at the server. Please 
not that I don't see any dhcpack comming from the client to the server.

When I tried to use the mandrake 6.0 bootnet disk I got a warning message
saying something like "install uses obsolete /proc/pci interface"

In my case the host is registred in the dns and afaik the reverse lookup
works when specifying a static ip-adress.

/N

--
Niklas Paulsson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Administrator at Dept. of Informatic , Göteborgs University  
"Linux isn't just an operating system: It's a way of life."  
- Andrew Leonard - Salon Magizine




[Cooker] Mesa

1999-10-01 Thread Michael Irving

I reported a bug yesterday about the new Mesa packages.
Has not anybody else noticed that it is not working?

And is there anyplace where one can find the old packages as fmirror deletes
the old version as soon as it is off the mirror I am using (sunet)

Michael Irving