Re: [Cooker] 7.0 release delayed!

2000-02-03 Thread Roger

nope.

On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 Go figure?  Could it be that there is problem with Windows and your
 configuration then Mandrake?
 
 
  

 Roger

 rogerz@home.To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   

 com cc: 

  Subject: Re: [Cooker] 7.0 release 
delayed!  
 01/31/00 

 11:25 PM 

 Please   

 respond to   

 cooker   

  

  

 
 
 
 to be honest, i agree.
 
 still i'm strong on the backup policytho' i've been around for awhile
 so i
 know i won't crash my system (lol).
 
 backing up is something you just have to do, as if it were a reflex.  you
 have
 to know that anything you may do, may crash the computer and lose data.
 
 actually, sometimes i pray that my win98 crashes so that i would have to do
 a
 re-install. always seems to run better on first boot after the
 re-install...go
 figure...
 
 On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, you wrote:
  You make it sound as though I was dealing with beta software. I was
  commenting on the inadequacy of a released product (
  http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/announce-air.php3 ) to deal correctly
 with
  my data (I got it 3 days after it was released), when there was no
 mention
  anywhere of any problems re partitioning. In fact, Mandrake use this as a
  big marketing tool with no mention of any problems anywhere on the
 site
  There is still no reference to 7.0 in the updates area of the site.
 
  Problems with partitioning on install have now been acknowledged as have
  other install problems. There are just too many problems with 7.0 for it
 to
  be considered release quality.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/02/2000 12:05:30 PM
 
  Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  cc:
  Subject:  Re: [Cooker] 7.0 release delayed!
 
  first off...as i said, resizing windows or "adding partitions" was a
  no-no".
  did that and when booting back to dos and using pqmagic stated,
 "partition
  errorpartition wasn't visible or no partitions to show".  to resolve,
  had
  to go back a delete the swap partition that i added.
 
  tell ya one thing, your confidence is won pretty quick!  me, i said,
 "ahh,
  what
  the heck, i'll let it make "just" my swap partition."  glad i was safe
 with
  my
  data. just had to go back and delete the swap.  also, you could have
 given
  powerquest a call for techsupport, could have just been a "value" that
  needed
  to be edited with their utility apps w/i /utitilites/dos somewhere.  (had
  to do
  this also)
 
  last item, "data not backed-up" is "lost data"!  This is a primary rule
  when
  dealing with any computer.  what would you do if a lightning bolt struck
  your
  hdd?  Me?  I would simpley say "oh well" and pop in my cd-rom and
  re-install
  (windows98? probabely needed to be reinstalled anyways..usually is the
 case
  with mine anyways).
 
 
 
   On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, you wrote:  This idea didn't work for
  me.  Here's what happened  I went to install MDK7.0 on an 8 GB disk
 with
  WIN98 on it.  Told partitioner to give 2 GB to Linux (leaving 6GB for
  Windows)
   After it all went horribly wrong and I ended up with a corrupt Windows
  that 
  wouldn't boot, I started from scratch.  I deleted the Linux partition
 (and
  swap) using the MDK 7 installer,  rebooted to DOS, ran fdisk, deleted
 and
  recreated my DOS partition.This said everything was fine and showed
  an
  8GB partition. I reinstalled  WIN98 (and all my apps), only to find it
  thought
  I had a 6GB drive still. 
   Partition Magic 5 fixed it, but only after I resized the Win98
 partition
  to
   6GB, then back to 8GB.
  
   So, after a day of re-installing, the cost of Partition Magic 5, I
 would
   concur that these sorts of problems should have been cleared up before
   release.
  
   On my second machine, which has had about every prior release on
 Madrake
  on
   it without a problem, the install 

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] kernel-2.2.15-0.7mdk

2000-02-03 Thread Jeff Garzik

On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 --=-=-=
 Name: kernel  Distribution: Linux-Mandrake
 Version : 2.2.15Vendor: MandrakeSoft
 Release : 0.7mdkBuild Date: Mon Jan 31 14:02:45 2000
[...]

 * Mon Jan 31 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.2.15-0.7mdk
 
 - 2.2.15pre5.

Be careful, there are reports of problems with pre4 and pre5, probably
due to the VM changes Alan put in his patches.

Regards,

Jeff







[Cooker] URGENT! Your E-mail is being misdirected

2000-02-03 Thread Mark_Gordon



Cooker:
 I am receiving your e-mail intended for you at my home e-mail account  --
HUNDREDS of e-mail since the beginning of the year (a random example of one is
being forwarded to you -- I am also curious as to whether I will receive this
particular e-mail).  I have contacted my ISP, @home -- they are at a lose as to
what is happening.  Since you seem technically proficient, perhaps you can check
the mail server at your ISP so see what is going on -- I included the header
information, XXXing out my e-mail address.

Mark Gordon



Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from h3.mail.home.com ([24.2.2.27]) by mail.rdc1.nj.home.com
(InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP  id
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  for
[EMAIL PROTECTED];  Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:13:46 -0800
Received: from mx4-e.mail.home.com (mx4-e.mail.home.com [24.2.2.25])   by
h3.mail.home.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA22565   for [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:13:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com
[216.71.84.35]) by mx4-e.mail.home.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA24593
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:13:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sympa@localhost)   by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com
(8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA31295 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:04:26
-0600
Received: from leia.mandrakesoft.com (office [195.68.114.34]) by
mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA29747 for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:55:17 -0600
Received: by leia.mandrakesoft.com (Postfix, from userid 505) id E8DDC5694;
Wed,  2 Feb 2000 20:06:37 +0100 (CET)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 7 ISO V2  soon avalaible
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 02 Feb 2000 20:06:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: Gary Lawrence Murphy's message of "02 Feb 2000 13:52:43 -0500"
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Sequence: 685
Precedence: list
X-Mozilla-Status2: 



Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  "l" == linux-gorius  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 l You could find the Mandrake 7 V2 ISO on the mandrake FTP server
 l today.

 I know it's extra bother, but for those of us who had to arrange for
 CD's to be burned and mailed to us, is there any way we could create
 an 'updates/7.0v1' directory for just those packages that were
 corrected in 7.0v2?


take the images from updates/images

they do the same fixes, except for the 75dpi fonts for iso8859-[29]








This e-mail message and any attachments may contain information that is
privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure and is
intended only for the named addressee.  If you are not the named addres-
see, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
named addressee, you are prohibited from reading, printing, disseminating
or copying this e-mail or the information contained herein.  If you have re-
ceived this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail,
discard any paper copies, and delete this e-mail from your system.

E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as inform-
ation could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
incomplete, or contain viruses.  The sender therefore does not accept
liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which
arise as a result of e-mail transmission.  Thank you.




Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 7 ISO V2 soon avalaible

2000-02-03 Thread Jeff Garzik

On 2 Feb 2000, Gary Lawrence Murphy wrote:
  "l" == linux-gorius  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
 l You could find the Mandrake 7 V2 ISO on the mandrake FTP server
 l today.  

 I know it's extra bother, but for those of us who had to arrange for
 CD's to be burned and mailed to us, is there any way we could create
 an 'updates/7.0v1' directory for just those packages that were
 corrected in 7.0v2?

For any 7.0 bugs there will be updates.

Jeff






Re: [Cooker] tickled pink

2000-02-03 Thread Tom

On Thu, 03 Feb 2000, you wrote:

 I also had no Problem installing  Mandrake ...
 I like the new design of the installer
 Is there any books out there on mandrake 7.0 .
 I have enough books on linux
 I need i for mandrake itself
 Been ytrying to learn linux for the last 2 years
  stilll have a lot to learn...
 
 
 Thanks Roach

   I'm fairly new too.  I've found the best help, tutorials,
instructions, etc are right here

http://www.mandrakeuser.org/
 -- 
..   Tom Brinkman  [EMAIL PROTECTED]   .



Re: [Cooker] Vmware vs last kernels

2000-02-03 Thread Quel Qun




From: Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] Vmware vs last kernels
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 00:30:16 -0600

  
 Seems like the problem is the kernel headersthe
  /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version-up.h file says
  
  #define UTS_RELEASE "2.2.14-1mdk"
  
  while uname -r reports:
  
  [vox@vox vox]$ uname -r
  2.2.14-1mdklinus
  
  and vmware module building doesn't like that at allis this only
  my case or what? btw, this is happening in two different boxes with
  Mdk7 in em.
  
  Mmmh... looks OK here:
  $ cat /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version-up.h
  #define UTS_RELEASE "2.2.15-0.7mdk"
  #define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 131599
  #define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a)  16) + ((b)  8) + (c))
 
  $ uname -r
  2.2.15-0.7mdk
 
  I am using the standard kernel, not the "linus" one.

   Mmmthis makes less sence every time I read a msg in this
thread...2.2.15-0.7mdk?? there's no such thing in ftp.tux.org nor in
my CD (burned ISO)there's a bunch of different 2.2.14-15mdk's,
plus the linus-2.2.14-1mdk one I'm running...so...now I'm completely
mixed up...where did that 2.2.15 come from?


This kernel is in the cooker distrib, not Air. Cooker is the always changing 
development version of Mandrake (now 7+). Before a package makes it as an 
Air update, it is tested in cooker. This is also the meaning of the decimal 
0.7 build number, not ready for prime time. When it is, the build number 
will be pumped up to 1, and the 2.2.15-1mdk will appear as an Air update.
Now, this is mainly a guess, anyone correct me if I am wrong.
-=-
kk1
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



[Cooker] Cannot do anything after establishing a dial up connection

2000-02-03 Thread OS

Boot up and start X.

As soon as the pppd has established a connection any attempt to start anything
at all results in :

Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: Client is not authorized to connect to Server
 
Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0 

Anything currently running remains running although they sometimes fail later.
Having started Netscape I can confirm that the dial up connection works just
fine !

Drop out of X.

There are messages on tty1 to the effect that KFM has been stopped and cannot
restart. There is also a message indicating failure to find pppd0.

There will also be AUDIT messages for each application launch attempt repeating
the refusal to connect to X server

Start X again

Everything works fine now and continues to work fine after establishing another
dial up connection.

However root@localhost has now become root@mfs-pci-bqm-vty53 !!!

I am using XFree86 3.3.6-8 (have tried 3.3.6-7mdk), Gtk+ 1.2.6-8mdk, ppp
2.3.11-1 (have tried 2.3.10-5mdk), msec 0.9-13mdk, pam 0.72-1 (have tried
latest mdk).

What is going on !?!?!

I really want to have this system functioning properly so I can demonstrate it
on Feb 17th to sceptical work colleagues.

HELP !

Thanks,
Owen



Re: [Cooker] Still unable to use vmware with last kernel

2000-02-03 Thread Ryan Wahle

I run mandrake 7 and have no problem with vmware 1.1.2 



Quoting Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
  That's the one I am using. I don't want to install the 2.3 kernel, but
 it's 
  good news, Thanks.
  -=-
  kk1
  
  
  From: Alwyn Schoeman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Cooker] Still unable to use vmware with last kernel
  Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2000 11:56:37 +0200
  
  Try VMWare for Linux 2.0 Beta, I'm using it with kernel 2.3.40 and it 
  works,
  might work for you 2 :)
 
   Seems like the problem is the kernel headersthe
 /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version-up.h file says 
 
 #define UTS_RELEASE "2.2.14-1mdk"
 
 while uname -r reports:
 
 [vox@vox vox]$ uname -r
 2.2.14-1mdklinus
 
 and vmware module building doesn't like that at allis this only
 my case or what? btw, this is happening in two different boxes with
 Mdk7 in em.
 
 -- 
 
 Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs.  
 Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use 
 _higher_ technology than everyone else.
 -- Donald B. Marti Jr.
 



Ryan Wahle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
InnerCite



Re: [Cooker] Another problem with 7.0

2000-02-03 Thread Pablo Saratxaga

Kaixo!

On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 09:27:31PM +0100, Kai Nielsen wrote:

 I just noticed (and it took a little time to figure this out) that
 the /etc/sysconfig/i18n may be problematic.
 
 I did just a complete recompile of all GNOME libs and apps (the "normal"
 distribution tarballs, not the mdk SRPMS) and didn't have any locales
 installed afterwards.
 
 After examining the ./configure scripts I became aware that it must
 be the fault of the LINGUAS variable.

Yes;

 But even "export LINGUAS="
 before configuring did not help.

No; that defines LINGUAS to null; that is *not* the same as undefining it.
To undefine it do 'unset LINGUAS'. (or remove it from the i18n file)

The reason for that is that rpm previously only installed the language files
for the locale of the person launching the rpm tool; which in some cases
would be wrong. The rpm tool has been patched to accept a different
variable; but sadly it has been the LINGUAS variable that is also used
for other purposes. When we realized that we changed DrakX and patched rpm
to use a variable of its own (RPM_INSTALL_LANG) instead.
But the final 7.0 CD images were already out.

 When I changed "LINGUAS=de_DE:de" to "LINGUAS=" in /etc/sysconfig/i18n
 and logged in again, it was fine afterwards.

That is because the script reading the i18n file does an "unset VARIABLE"
when the VARIABLE is set to null. But what you want to do is in fact remove
the line.

 Now all the locales
 got installed when trying again.

If you want all the locales being installed when you install an rpm package;
you cna put RPM_INSTALL_LANG=all (or =de if you want only german, or =de:fr
if you wnat German and French, etc).
That doesn't work with the current rpm you have; but will with the next one;
and once that will correctly work with rpm tool we will begin to massively
use that possibility on the produced rpm files.

 This was not working with LINGUAS set in i18n. Just to tell you...

Yes, in fact would have thought that LINGUAS would accept several locales,
but it doesn't seem to (or it uses a different syntax).

The problem is known and a correct solution has finally been found; it will
be used by default on future versions.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

 Kai.

-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975



RE: [Cooker] 7.0 release delayed!

2000-02-03 Thread Nael Mohammad

I know Im using windows to send this message, so no flames.

I work with Linux at my office. I use a utility called "fips" that resizes
the unused partition and converts it for linux use. When Lilo boot managers
loads, you can configure it to boot into windows and linux. So therefore,
Why use partition magic 5.0? If its incompatable and its preventing froms
RTM release, scratch it and just include fips in your errata with
instructions.
Its trivial if someones wants to do it, can do so by reading the following
howto

-Original Message-
From: Roger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 12:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Cooker] 7.0 release delayed!


I feel like i'm repeating myself, but there are compatability problems
between
using the mdk partitioning prg and partition magic 5.0.

dunno which does what, but it doesn't look good as this user even verified.
most people (or the probabely the majority) do dual boot by havign win98 and
linux on the same hdd.  although it is getting somewhat tight, with a ~25 gb
7200rpm hdd - it fits well on these.

again, yes the the compatability issue is somewhat a "bug".  doesn't wipe
out
the hdd, you just need to do some reconfiguring of the data, etc.

do have pq magic 5.0 and haven't seen much difference in error fixing (as
it's
said to have).  eh, i even tried just tossing the $ into pq 5.0 hoping it
would
fix the problems, but didn't

think you need to use the pq utility found within the /utility/dos directy
and
verify all the numbers look in a "familar" format.  powerquest tech support
can
help on this.  think a colomn on mine said all "127's" 'cept one which read
"126".  changed that to a "127" and everything became visible again.

dunno.

On Wed, 02 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 I think your comment is not a fair assessment of Mandrake 7.0.  Your
 assessment is only a fractional portion of what the software offers.  Have
 you checked to make sure the Harddrive does not have any problems prior to
 installing Mandrake 7.0.  I have read this note and your previous note to
 understand your problem.   Was there maintenance done on this hard drive?
 Could even repartition this hard drive with Partition magic.  I would bet
 PM would have problems too.  To go one step further I have a spare hard
 drive (6 gigs)  which I installed Windows 98 Revision 2 on first then
 installed Mandrake 7.0; I did not run into a problem.   Maybe I am
 prejudice in discounting what could be a problem in your eyes, but I was
 able to run the whole install and launch Linux.

 I also read the announcement you are referencing.  It mentions the
 repartitioning for the installation process.  It is a marketing tool for
 all types of computers-- not just a computer which has Microsoft Windows
 already installed on it.  You are trying to site this for your example
with
 is just one type of use.  I belong to a User Group which has not reported
 problems.  I personally have used the resizing on a Linux Install for my
 hard drive (to have Linux as the only operating system) it never errored.

 What you call an acknowledgement has only for those people who tried
 windows and linux on the same box.  Microsoft does many things with their
 products which could result in problems for the hard drive.  How can
 Mandrake be expected to fix all problems with a hard drive if Microsoft
did
 something bizarre.

 I disagree on your assessment of Mandrake's quality.



 John.Pigdon@Su
 rePlan.NetTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   cc:
 01/31/00 10:47Subject: Re: [Cooker] 7.0
release delayed!
 PM
 Please respond
 to cooker







 You make it sound as though I was dealing with beta software. I was
 commenting on the inadequacy of a released product (
 http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/announce-air.php3 ) to deal correctly
with
 my data (I got it 3 days after it was released), when there was no mention
 anywhere of any problems re partitioning. In fact, Mandrake use this as a
 big marketing tool with no mention of any problems anywhere on the
site
 There is still no reference to 7.0 in the updates area of the site.

 Problems with partitioning on install have now been acknowledged as have
 other install problems. There are just too many problems with 7.0 for it
to
 be considered release quality.







 Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 01/02/2000 12:05:30 PM

 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 cc:
 Subject:  Re: [Cooker] 7.0 release delayed!

 first off...as i said, resizing windows or "adding partitions" was a
 no-no".
 did that and when booting back to dos and using pqmagic stated, "partition
 errorpartition wasn't visible or no partitions to show".  to resolve,
 had
 to go back a delete the swap partition that i added.

 tell ya one thing, your confidence is won pretty quick!  me, i 

Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 7 ISO V2 soon avalaible

2000-02-03 Thread Pixel

Gary Lawrence Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 In lieu of an updates directory, is there a place were you have
 summarized all of the packages that have been updated in v2?  I don't
 mind fetching them the old-fashioned way ;)

maybe the cause of misunderstanding is not there's really not much update in
term of packages. There's only drakxtools that has been updated and only a for
the resize fat bug.



[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mandrake_desk-1.0.1-20mdk

2000-02-03 Thread Pablo Saratxaga

Kaixo!

On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 04:29:41AM -0600, Francis Galiegue wrote:

 - Icons in KDE can do more than launching apps - try and drop an image file
   icon onto the GIMP :)

On Gnome too. But I have yet to understand how to create them easily
(that is, other than writting a program to call directly the desktop icon API)

 - No CVS update - instructions as to where and how to update are unclear. I
   WANT DOCS!

I don't understand your comment...

-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975



Re: [Cooker] netscape and mdk welcome

2000-02-03 Thread Pablo Saratxaga

Kaixo!

On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 05:29:30PM -0800, Roger wrote:

 after i switch off teh "default page" w/i prefs (it now shows to "open blank
 page" on startup), i still get the "file:/usr/doc/HTML/index.html" page
 operning whenever i start netscape.
 
 bug? (probabely reported before)

That page isn't opened as home page (that is trough the 'home' button
of netscape); but instead it is the 'netscape' shell script wrapper that,
when called without arguments, opens it.

The scripts reads the $HOME/.netscape/preferences.js file to see if
a home page ahs been set, and if set doesn't load the mandrake page.

So it seems Netscape does some strange thing when the home page is set to
blank.
Testing it (with 4.08, I hope it is the same for other versions)
I see that the blank page is defined with 

user_pref("browser.startup.page", 0)

So the following patch should correct it (Cc: to netscape mantainer)


--- /usr/bin/netscape.old   Sun Dec 13 06:13:35 1998
+++ /usr/bin/netscape   Thu Feb  3 20:53:21 2000
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@
$HOME/.netscape/preferences.js  /dev/null; then
HOMEPAGE=""
fi
+   # blank page
+   if grep '"browser.startup.page", 0' \
+   $HOME/.netscape/preferences.js  /dev/null; then
+   HOMEPAGE=""
+   fi
fi
exec $I/lib/netscape/$which $HOMEPAGE
 else


-- 
Ki ça vos våye bén,
Pablo Saratxaga

http://www.ping.be/~pin19314/   PGP Key available, key ID: 0x8F0E4975



[Cooker] unsubscribe

2000-02-03 Thread Ed Rivera



unsubscribe


Re: [Cooker] Vmware vs last kernels

2000-02-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Mmmh... looks OK here:
  $ uname -r
  2.2.15-0.7mdk
  I am using the standard kernel, not the "linus" one.
   Mmmthis makes less sence every time I read a msg in this
 thread...2.2.15-0.7mdk?? there's no such thing in ftp.tux.org nor in

this is the current version of cooker of our kernel. It's basically
the 2.2.15pre3 with a bunch of patch.

 my CD (burned ISO)there's a bunch of different 2.2.14-15mdk's,
 plus the linus-2.2.14-1mdk one I'm running...so...now I'm completely
 mixed up...where did that 2.2.15 come from?

Choose the kernel for your need :

kernel (the standard kernel of distribution)
kernel-smp (same of normal but with multi processor support).
kernel-fb (same of normal but with frame buffer support).
kernel-secure (a kernel fb  smp with special (annoy) patch for security).
kernel-linus (the kernel like you find on ftp.*.kernel.org in rpm).

And well if want the bleeding on the edge, you can get the hackkernel
from contrib, it's the kernel 2.3 with patch. (Bugs reports go to Jeff
;)).

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



Re: [Cooker] Still unable to use vmware with last kernel

2000-02-03 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Vox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 and vmware module building doesn't like that at allis this only
 my case or what? 

why the linus kernel is installed in your system ? Should not be !!.

 btw, this is happening in two different boxes with Mdk7 in em.

Please install others kernel than kernel-linus, for next release i'll
workaround like i do for others kernel in initscripts (detect the
kernel-linus on boot and set the header in /boot/kernel.h and
include/autoconf.h)

You see Brian what the problems to ln -s /boot/vmlinuz-$version
/boot/vmlinuz on %post.

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



[Cooker] XSane for Mandrake?

2000-02-03 Thread WH Bouterse

Just curious why XSane is not included with
Cooker/Mandrake. Its a very well designed
front end for SANE and the designer/programmer
is quite helpful. I have been using it for 
a couple of years now and its latest
incarnation is EXCELLENT !!!
It makes my old Microtek E3 perform nicely.
http://www.wolfsburg.de/~rauch/sane/sane-xsane.html

William Bouterse
Juneau Alaska



[Cooker] New img files lost?

2000-02-03 Thread Ron Stodden

Pixel,

Your latest *.img files seem to have disappeared from the mirrors updates 7.0
directories, and the 7.0-2/images tree seems to only have the old ones.

What gives? To include them, you'll now need a 7.0-3 release coming
up?

-- 

Regards,

Ron. [AU] - sent by Linux.



Re: [Cooker] Mandrake 7 ISO V2 soon avalaible

2000-02-03 Thread Ron Stodden

On Fri, 04 Feb 2000, Quel Qun wrote:

 Hmm... I think the concept of quadrant geometry is mainly used in the US and 
 military which is, mind you, different from every one.
 Have you ever seen how a formula 1 race starts? The cars are stopped under 3 
 red lights, waiting for them to switch to green. Would you guess in which 
 order? From top to bottom, bingo! Somehow, I would prefer this metaphor. 
 Traffic signal...brrr.
 Hey, no offence I hope. Just expressing a different view.

It's just a pot-stirrer, to wake everyone up before they read on g.

 /etc/hosts is not set up - the networking information collected should
 include what is necessary to do this.
 
 That's true. Also, I am using the company dhcp server to get my IPs, but my 
 machine names are not known by the DNS (IS departement by-pass). I would 
 expect the install process to ask me for the host name. The old text install 
 did. The new one just let me with localhost and does not install my NIC 
 3c509 module.

The new installer DOES ask for the host name. It does not ask for other
host names on the same network and their IPs for putting in /etc/hosts.  I
have not tried the new text installer.

 -- 

Regards,

Ron. [AU] - sent by Linux.



[Cooker] gEdit rpm problems

2000-02-03 Thread James Helferty

Hello,

gEdit 0.5.5 is a beta release, and unstable.  Cut/paste have a tendancy
to lose text when you're editing a document.  Version 0.6.1 is out now,
and it's from the stable series, and it works.  (even version number) 
rpm, please?


Thanks!

James
--
http://chat.carleton.ca/~jhelfert



[Cooker] Re: Still unable to use vmware with last kernel

2000-02-03 Thread Brian J. Murrell

from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Please install others kernel than kernel-linus, for next release i'll
 workaround like i do for others kernel in initscripts (detect the
 kernel-linus on boot and set the header in /boot/kernel.h and
 include/autoconf.h)

Indeed.

 You see Brian what the problems to ln -s /boot/vmlinuz-$version
 /boot/vmlinuz on %post.

I guess I don't understand why one would

rpm -ivh kernel-fb

and then

rpm -ivh kernel-linus

and not actually want kernel-linus to be the active kernel.

b.


--
Brian J. Murrell  InterLinx Support Services, Inc.
North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX
Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD



[Cooker] Cooker 7.0 K6-2-450 problems...

2000-02-03 Thread Esko Woudenberg

I was pretty suspicious since this computer used to work fine under Mandrake 
windoze...
Tried other distros and had strange problems with it as well.
Well; to make long story short my hunch seems to have payed off...  Out of
frustration (and since the ftp install from cookers seems to be incomplete) I
mounted a Mandrake 7.0 cd in one computer and am doing an ftp based install
on the one that was having the problems...  So far so good...  (Looks like I'll
be taking the CD-Rom drive out for target practice...)

Esko