RE: [Cooker] More intellegent logging postprocessing
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
>
> > > > In addition to the failure caused by the config bundled
> > > > inside RPM :(
> >
> > Oh, I forgot to ask - what is the problem with distributed config?
> > Without detailed study it looks more or less O.K.
> >
> > -andrej
>
> It's this line:
>
> source remote { udp(); };
>
# Logs from remote hosts
#log { source(net); filter(f_kern); destination(remote_kern); };
#log { source(net); filter(f_daemon); destination(remote_daem); };
#log { source(net); filter(f_authonly); destination(remote_auth); };
#log { source(net); filter(f_user); destination(remote_user); };
#log { source(net); filter(f_boot); destination(remote_boot); };
Actually if you put space between # and next word it works. Else it
complaints about unresolved "net". Commenting out "remote" makes it work
as well.
The whole smells the hell like a bug in syslog-ng parser.
-andrej
Re: [Cooker] evolution broken and fixed
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:03:09PM -0400, Liam R. E. Quin wrote: > > Evolution stopped working a few days ago for me with a weird message > about the Evolution Shell unable to start up. > > I'm having all sorts of Evolution weirdness, and the solution is to always 'rm -rf /tmp/orbit-', but having to do that all the time is getting annoying. Anybody know what's up with that? -- Ryan T. Sammartino http://members.shaw.ca/ryants/ f u cn rd ths, u r prbbly a lsy spllr.
Re: [Cooker] PLF site down
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 09:15:28AM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > Not really a cooker :-) but > > http://plf.zarb.org/ > > Forbidden > You don't have permission to access / on this server. yep, aware. we change the machine, thus seems i have forgottent some thing in config. gonna fix it. (ml will be up asap too). thx -- Yves Duret [EMAIL PROTECTED] piouk toujours et meme apres !
RE: [Cooker] More intellegent logging postprocessing
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > > In addition to the failure caused by the config bundled
> > > inside RPM :(
>
> Oh, I forgot to ask - what is the problem with distributed config?
> Without detailed study it looks more or less O.K.
>
> -andrej
It's this line:
source remote { udp(); };
If it's not commented out, syslog-ng simply refuses to start.
Even running syslog-ng -d on command line doesn't help tracing
the problem.
--
Abel Cheung
GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
RE: [Cooker] More intellegent logging postprocessing
> > In addition to the failure caused by the config bundled > > inside RPM :( > > Oh, I forgot to ask - what is the problem with distributed config? Without detailed study it looks more or less O.K. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] gconf-editor missing?
On 28 Apr 2002, Steve Fox wrote: > Any idea why gconf-editor wouldn't be on my system? It used to be. I > noticed something on one of the gnome lists about a build fix, so maybe > that's why it's not in the current packages? > > libGConf2_4-1.1.9-2mdk > libGConf1-devel-1.0.9-2mdk > pkgconfig-0.12.0-1mdk > GConf-1.0.9-2mdk > GConf2-1.1.9-2mdk > libGConf2_4-devel-1.1.9-2mdk > libGConf1-1.0.9-2mdk It has never been in cooker (yet), gconf-editor is a seperate package. -- Abel Cheung GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
[Cooker] PLF site down
Not really a cooker :-) but http://plf.zarb.org/ Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Apache-AdvancedExtranetServer/1.3.23 Server at plf.zarb.org Port 80
[Cooker] gconf-editor missing?
Any idea why gconf-editor wouldn't be on my system? It used to be. I noticed something on one of the gnome lists about a build fix, so maybe that's why it's not in the current packages? libGConf2_4-1.1.9-2mdk libGConf1-devel-1.0.9-2mdk pkgconfig-0.12.0-1mdk GConf-1.0.9-2mdk GConf2-1.1.9-2mdk libGConf2_4-devel-1.1.9-2mdk libGConf1-1.0.9-2mdk -- Steve Fox http://k-lug.org "When i think of the OpenBSD commiters, I picture the two old muppets that sit in the theater and gripe at everyone" - mrx, on BlueNet
Re: [Cooker] gnomemeeting
> It only happens when your NFS server doesn't have lockd enabled.. lockd and rpc.statd IS running for me am I missing something? I know this is a 'tech support' question, but I figured while we were on the topic . . . . -Dave
[Cooker] evolution broken and fixed
Evolution stopped working a few days ago for me with a weird message about the Evolution Shell unable to start up. The problem seems to be that I had to install arts2 and the sound libraries. Evolution had not changed, but I had installed gnome2. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net www.valinor.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org Author, Open Source XML Database Toolkit, Wiley August 2000 Co-author: The XML Specification Guide, Wiley 1999; Mastering XML, Sybex 2001
Re: [Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 07:15:01PM -0500, nDiScReEt wrote: > > I installed LM 8.2 with gcc 3.04 only. I can not rebuild > libraw1394-0.9.0-2mdk.src.rpm. I get the following error: > > checking for working automake... found > checking for working autoheader... found > checking for working makeinfo... found > checking for gcc... gcc > checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes > checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no > checking whether we are using GNU C... yes > checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes > checking host system type... configure: error: can not guess host type; you > must specify one > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74472 (%build) you probably need %configure2_5x. -- Geoff.
[Cooker] A bunch of PHP stuff
Hi Cookers. I have spent a considerable amount of time with the following stuff for latest Cooker and its apache-1.3.24-1mdk: imap-2001a-5mdk imap-devel-2001a-5mdk mod_php-4.2.0-2mdk php-4.2.0-2mdk php-bzip2-4.2.0-2mdk php-calendar-4.2.0-2mdk php-common-4.2.0-2mdk php-curl-4.2.0-2mdk php-dba_bundle-4.2.0-2mdk php-devel-4.2.0-2mdk php-domxml-4.2.0-2mdk php-ftp-4.2.0-2mdk php-gd-4.2.0-2mdk php-gmp-4.2.0-2mdk php-imap-4.2.0-2mdk php-ldap-4.2.0-2mdk php-manual_en-4.2.0-1mdk php-mcrypt-4.2.0-2mdk php-mhash-4.2.0-2mdk php-ming-4.2.0-2mdk php-mysql-4.2.0-2mdk php-pgsql-4.2.0-2mdk php-pspell-4.2.0-2mdk php-readline-4.2.0-2mdk php-recode-4.2.0-2mdk php-snmp-4.2.0-2mdk php-sybase-4.2.0-2mdk php-sysvsem-4.2.0-2mdk php-sysvshm-4.2.0-2mdk php-unixODBC-4.2.0-2mdk php-xml-4.2.0-2mdk php-xslt-4.2.0-2mdk php-yp-4.2.0-2mdk php-zip-4.2.0-2mdk php-zlib-4.2.0-2mdk Get these packages here: http://d-srv.com/Cooker/ For some unknown reason some of the extensions won't mix, for example recode..., I haven't had the time to find out exactly which combination that doesn't work and why. But with the help from real coders these problems will probably vanish in a flash. One notable change is that the "php-dba_gdbm_db3" is gone and exchanged with my "php-dba_bundle", it's the same thing but with additional cdb support. Another (cosmetic) thing is my hack for the phpinfo() page (in info.c), which will list the extensions _not_ compiled into the main php stuff, also there's a hint on how to install these. (check php-4.2.0-2mdk.src.rpm) php-imap should work now if built against my "imap-devel-2001a-5mdk" package, it has pam and ssl but no kerberos support. Thanks to Troels Arvin for the imap hints. Thanks goes also to Alexander Skwar for some of his packages. Maybe later we/I can make these work for apache-2.0.36 too... ;) Chears. -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
On 29 Apr 2002 01:59:45 +0200 Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > alas, things are not that bright. Seems like the libpng disease that plagued > us is back with a new name... libasound :-( > > fortunately (hopefully?) libasound is less used than libpng... > > % rpm -qpR /RPMS/libSDL1.2-1.2.4-1mdk.i586.rpm | grep libasound > libasound.so.1 > % rpm -qpR /RPMS/libSDL1.2-1.2.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep libasound > libasound.so.2 > This only indicates that libSDL1.2 has been rebuilt to use libalsa2. I maintain my systems at current cooker using urpmi so I have both libalsa1 and libalsa2 installed and there was no conflict during installation. Those programs that now require .so.2 operate properly as do those that still require .so.1, so I do not see the problem. Not to mention the fact that libalsa2 is kernel dependent and is listed as belonging to the system/kernel and hardware group,where as libalsa1 is not kernel dependent and belongs to the system/libraries group. Charles
[Cooker] libraw1394 Rebuild Problems
I installed LM 8.2 with gcc 3.04 only. I can not rebuild libraw1394-0.9.0-2mdk.src.rpm. I get the following error: checking for working automake... found checking for working autoheader... found checking for working makeinfo... found checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking host system type... configure: error: can not guess host type; you must specify one error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74472 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.74472 (%build) -- Altoine B Maximum Time Unlimited Chicago Based and Operated Steady movement is more important than speed, much of the time. So long as there is a regular progression of stimuli to get your mental hooks into, there is room for lateral movement. Once this begins, its rate is a matter of discretion. -- Corwin, Prince of Amber --- 2.4.18-6mdk
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > This is just my 2 cent opinion but both libasla1 and libasla2 can co-exist > without conflict. This being the case it would seem to me to be prudent to > reintroduce the libalsa1 rpm until such time as the majority of pkg requiring > libasound.so.1 have been rebuilt. alas, things are not that bright. Seems like the libpng disease that plagued us is back with a new name... libasound :-( fortunately (hopefully?) libasound is less used than libpng... % rpm -qpR /RPMS/libSDL1.2-1.2.4-1mdk.i586.rpm | grep libasound libasound.so.1 % rpm -qpR /RPMS/libSDL1.2-1.2.4-2mdk.i586.rpm | grep libasound libasound.so.2
[Cooker] Re: tcltk bugs parade
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 11:36:58PM +0600, Ural Khassanov wrote: > Putting an yoke on this beast... Ugh. Yuck. > - tix is completely broken and unfunctional in 8.2 and cooker (15mdk). > Crucial directory /usr/lib/tix8.1/* is not installed. Fixed here, see > attached diff. By the way, /usr/lib/libtix*.so had been made executable. > Ok. I'll fix this. (I dunno how I could have missed that ..) > - rebuiling tcltk.src.rpm requires binary tcl package to be installed. In > other words tcltk requires itself to be built. Problems are in tcllib > configure and itcl makeinstall scripts. Not fixed. > Ok, I'll take a look at this. It shouldn't be hard, we just need to point to the existing tcl that we have. > - man tixwish.1.bz2 is installed to /usr/share/man/mann. Tix %makeinstall > problem. Not fixed. > I'll hack around this. > - expect pkgIndex.tcl and cat-buffers is installed to /usr/lib instead of > /usr/lib/expect5.32. Fixed in attached diff. > Ok. > - Minor pbs: > /usr/lib/tclConfig.sh: TCL_BUILD_LIB_SPEC='-L/usr/include... > TCL_BUILD_STUB_LIB_SPEC='-L/usr/include... > TCL_BIULD_STUB_LIB_PATH='/usr/include... > /usr/include is incorrect, should be something like > /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/tcltk... > the same for tkConfig.sh. -I for /usr/include, or -L for /usr/include? I disagree with changing it in /usr/src/RPM/BUILD because (1) you need to ask the sysadmin to install it for you if you don't have root access in /usr/src (2) we have the include files and lib files so if you want to develop tcl/tk apps you should be able to do so, unless you want to touch the tcl/tk core and tinker with the internals. -- Geoff.
Re: [Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
»R.I.P. Deaddog« sagte am 2002-04-29 um 05:06:02 +0800 : > Probably check the access/modification time as well. I'm afraid > that problem is deeper than mere md5 sum. Hm, why is access/modification time important? Does Nautilus (the pkg which I mentioned in one of my last mails) depend on those times? Or gataxx (pkg from my first mail)? I'd say, that the majority of programs doesn't care that much about mtimes, no? Anyhow, I think that if just the mtime has changed and not the md5 sum, RPM should go ahead and overwrite the "changed" config file and maybe update the mtime to the time when the pkg is upgraded. This way, programs which depend on the times will find a newer config file and use this. But the current way is *very* annoying. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 17 hours 45 minutes
Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch
True... very true... - Original Message - From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 2:26 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch > On Sundayen den 28 April 2002 20.20, Nelson Bartley wrote: > > I haven't yet, but I'll be sure to try that mirror, just in case sunet is > > buggered up > > I think they compete, and sunet always wins the battle of the most f*cked up > repository... > > -- > Regards // Oden Eriksson > >
Re: [Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
On Sunday 28 April 2002 02:49 pm, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > On Sunday 28 April 2002 01:38 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > Why are .rpmnew files created? > > > > I just want to add an Me too to that question. > > > > Very annoying to have to go and upgrade all of the config files by > > hand! > > Take a look at the etc-update RPM (comes with Mandrake 8.2, at least!). > It will let you either interactively or non-interactively merge/replace > your config files with the appropriate .rpmnew version. I tryed running that program and every time it would error out saying that ed failed and the merged file would be empty -- Mr. Jeremy Salch - Data Services Granbury.Com, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email www.granbury.com - Business Website www.tblx.net - Personal Website
Re: [Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:45:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > > The user or any script or something.. > > In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for > which .rpmnew files are being created. > > Next time I do an update I will rpm -Va first and verify that none of > the .rpmew files had and "md5" errors during the rpm -Va. > > b. Probably check the access/modification time as well. I'm afraid that problem is deeper than mere md5 sum. -- Abel Cheung GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
Re: [Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
»Brian J. Murrell« sagte am 2002-04-28 um 16:53:40 -0400 : > In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for > which .rpmnew files are being created. AOL! > Next time I do an update I will rpm -Va first and verify that none of > the .rpmew files had and "md5" errors during the rpm -Va. Yes, that's exactly what I'm going to do as well! Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 16 hours 6 minutes
[Cooker] Re: Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 01:49:41PM -0600, Wesley J Landaker wrote: > > Take a look at the etc-update RPM (comes with Mandrake 8.2, at least!). > It will let you either interactively or non-interactively merge/replace > your config files with the appropriate .rpmnew version. I appreciate your comments but in terms of a solution to the .rpmnew config file problem, this is just a bandaid on the real problem. When I don't change a config file, an .rpmnew should not even be created and I should not have to dick around with etc-update to reconcile them all. Thanx anyway, b. -- Brian J. Murrell msg63372/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 09:45:24PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > The user or any script or something.. In my case anyway, no. Nothing has edited these config files for which .rpmnew files are being created. Next time I do an update I will rpm -Va first and verify that none of the .rpmew files had and "md5" errors during the rpm -Va. b. -- Brian J. Murrell msg63371/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Why are .rpmnew files created?
»Guillaume Cottenceau« sagte am 2002-04-28 um 21:45:24 +0200 : > The user or any script or something.. ? I doubt that the "user or any script or something" touches hidden files like /etc/X11/serverconfig/.directory. And since I don't use Nautilus as root, it cannot change the file. And this happens *WAY* too often for that to explain this "problem". Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 15 hours 51 minutes
[Cooker] Wrong pointer in Gnome apps when running KDE
Hi! When I use Gnome apps like Galeon, Gabber, pan..., the pointer used for scrollbars is wrong. When I point the mouse at a scrollbar, the pointer changes to something like "<->", which normally is used for resizing windows horizontically. Anyone else having this problem? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 15 hours 47 minutes
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
On 28 Apr 2002 22:06:30 +0200 Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >Well let's rebuild all the shit. It's the best time to do that. > > > > > I hope you're joking... > > No. Why? > This is just my 2 cent opinion but both libasla1 and libasla2 can co-exist without conflict. This being the case it would seem to me to be prudent to reintroduce the libalsa1 rpm until such time as the majority of pkg requiring libasound.so.1 have been rebuilt. Charles
[Cooker] kernel-smp-2.4.18.12mdk = up
Hello, I just booted to kernel-smp-2.4.18.12mdk-1-1mdk, and it doesn't seem to like my second cpu. It only recognises 1 cpu in /proc/cpuinfo. Both cpu's get recognised and used 2.4.18-10mdksmp and 11mdksmp. # cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 6 model name : Celeron (Mendocino) stepping: 5 cpu MHz : 503.928 cache size : 128 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 2 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr bogomips: 1005.97 Some snips from my dmesg: # dmesg Linux version 2.4.18-12mdksmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.0.4 (Mandrake Linux 8.3 3.0.4-5mdk)) #1 Wed Apr 17 14:56:42 CEST 2002 [snip] found SMP MP-table at 000f5ae0 hm, page 000f5000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f6000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f7000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f1000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f2000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f3000 reserved twice. On node 0 totalpages: 65536 zone(0): 4096 pages. zone(1): 61440 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4 Virtual Wire compatibility mode. OEM ID: OEM0 Product ID: PROD APIC at: 0xFEE0 Processor #0 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 Processor #1 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 I/O APIC #2 Version 17 at 0xFEC0. Processors: 2 Kernel command line: hdb=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi devfs=mount vga=0x318 root=/dev/hdg1 [snip] Initializing CPU#0 Detected 503.928 MHz processor. [snip] CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff , vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff CPU: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) stepping 05 Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel [snip] Here's a similar dmesg from 2.4.18-10mdksmp: Linux version 2.4.18-10mdksmp ([EMAIL PROTECTED] drakesoft.com) (gcc version 3.0.4 (Mandrake Linux 8.3 3.0.4-5mdk)) #1 SMP Wed Ap r 10 13:53:12 CEST 2002 [snip] found SMP MP-table at 000f5ae0 hm, page 000f5000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f7000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f1000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f2000 reserved twice. hm, page 000f3000 reserved twice. On node 0 totalpages: 65536 zone(0): 4096 pages. zone(1): 61440 pages. zone(2): 0 pages. Intel MultiProcessor Specification v1.4 Virtual Wire compatibility mode. OEM ID: OEM0 Product ID: PROD APIC at: 0xFEE0 Processor #0 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 Processor #1 Pentium(tm) Pro APIC version 17 I/O APIC #2 Version 17 at 0xFEC0. Processors: 2 Kernel command line: hdb=ide-scsi hdd=ide-scsi devfs=mount vga=0x316 root=/dev/hdg1 [snip] Initializing CPU#0 Detected 503.932 MHz processor. [snip] CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff , vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0 CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff , vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0 CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff CPU0: Intel Celeron (Mendocino) stepping 05 per-CPU timeslice cutoff: 366.30 usecs. enabled ExtINT on CPU#0 ESR value before enabling vector: ESR value after enabling vector: Booting processor 1/1 eip 3000 Initializing CPU#1 masked ExtINT on CPU#1 ESR value before enabling vector: ESR value after enabling vector: Calibrating delay loop... 1005.97 BogoMIPS CPU: Before vendor init, caps: 0183fbff , vendor = 0 CPU: L1 I cache: 16K, L1 D cache: 16K CPU: L2 cache: 128K CPU: After vendor init, caps: 0183fbff Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#1 CPU: After generic, caps: 0183fbff CPU: Common caps: 0183fbff
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >Well let's rebuild all the shit. It's the best time to do that. > > > I hope you're joking... No. Why? -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
> > >>At the moment many packages require libasound.so.1, but >>libasound.so.1 isn't in the distro anymore... Is there any way to >>keep libasound.so.1 in the distro, or a lot of packages will need >>to be rebuilt: >> >> > >Well let's rebuild all the shit. It's the best time to do that. > I hope you're joking... Stefan
Re: [Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
On Sunday 28 April 2002 01:38 pm, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Why are .rpmnew files created? > > I just want to add an Me too to that question. > > Very annoying to have to go and upgrade all of the config files by > hand! Take a look at the etc-update RPM (comes with Mandrake 8.2, at least!). It will let you either interactively or non-interactively merge/replace your config files with the appropriate .rpmnew version. -- Wesley J. Landaker - [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP FP: C99E DF40 54F6 B625 FD48 B509 A3DE 8D79 541F F830
Re: [Cooker] Why are .rpmnew files created?
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I've never touched /etc/sound/events/mailcheck.soundlist, so it > has to match the version supplied with the old gnome-panel package. I > always thought, that rpmnew files are only created, when the user > modified the config file. The user or any script or something.. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At the moment many packages require libasound.so.1, but > libasound.so.1 isn't in the distro anymore... Is there any way to > keep libasound.so.1 in the distro, or a lot of packages will need > to be rebuilt: Well let's rebuild all the shit. It's the best time to do that. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
[Cooker] Re: Why are .rpmnew files created?
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:17:24PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > Why are .rpmnew files created? I just want to add an Me too to that question. Very annoying to have to go and upgrade all of the config files by hand! b. -- Brian J. Murrell msg63361/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] gnomemeeting
Surlignage Frédéric Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It seems you have gconf2 installed on your system.. > > Try running gconf-sanity-check-2 to find where the problem is.. I've lok around, and yes /etc/gconf/2/path was missing. deleted the package reinstalled, and the file was back. But, gnomemeeting wouldn't start up. (same message) I've seen that all rep under /etc/gconf/ have "root.root 0700" for access. I've set 755 for all rep, and gnomemeeting has started. Emmanuel
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] libalsa2-0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk
Thierry, >--=-=-= > >* Wed Apr 24 2002 Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0.9.0-0.4rc1mdk > >- update to alsa-0.9.0 release candidate 1 > At the moment many packages require libasound.so.1, but libasound.so.1 isn't in the distro anymore... Is there any way to keep libasound.so.1 in the distro, or a lot of packages will need to be rebuilt: (the list from cooker, contrib & plf): 3dwm:requires:libasound.so.1 abuse_sdl:requires:libasound.so.1 AlephOne:requires:libasound.so.1 amphetamine:requires:libasound.so.1 armagetron:requires:libasound.so.1 asc:requires:libasound.so.1 avifile-player:requires:libasound.so.1 avifile-samples:requires:libasound.so.1 BomberInstinct:requires:libasound.so.1 boycotadvance:requires:libasound.so.1 brahms:requires:libasound.so.1 bumprace:requires:libasound.so.1 chromium:requires:libasound.so.1 chromium-setup:requires:libasound.so.1 circuslinux:requires:libasound.so.1 crimson-field:requires:libasound.so.1 csmash:requires:libasound.so.1 DivXripper:requires:libasound.so.1 drip:requires:libasound.so.1 freeamp:requires:libasound.so.1 freecraft:requires:libasound.so.1 freesci:requires:libasound.so.1 frozen-bubble:requires:libasound.so.1 glame:requires:libasound.so.1 glaxium:requires:libasound.so.1 gltron:requires:libasound.so.1 gnuboy-SDL:requires:libasound.so.1 icebreaker:requires:libasound.so.1 kdeaddons:requires:libasound.so.1 kwave:requires:libasound.so.1 lbreakout2:requires:libasound.so.1 lib3dwm0:requires:libasound.so.1 libao2:requires:libasound.so.1 libavifile0.7:requires:libasound.so.1 libbrahms0:requires:libasound.so.1 libopenal0:requires:libasound.so.1 libparagui1.0:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDL_image1.2:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDL_image1.2-test:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDL_mixer1.2:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDLmm0.1:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDL_net1.2:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDL_ttf2.0:requires:libasound.so.1 libSDL_ttf2.0-test:requires:libasound.so.1 libsmpeg0.4:requires:libasound.so.1 luola:requires:libasound.so.1 Maelstrom:requires:libasound.so.1 marbles:requires:libasound.so.1 mirrormagic:requires:libasound.so.1 mplayer0.90:requires:libasound.so.1 mures:requires:libasound.so.1 nethack_falconseye:requires:libasound.so.1 nil:requires:libasound.so.1 ocaml-SDL-devel:requires:libasound.so.1 ohphone:requires:libasound.so.1 penguin-command:requires:libasound.so.1 perl-SDL:requires:libasound.so.1 pinball:requires:libasound.so.1 pingus:requires:libasound.so.1 rocksndiamonds:requires:libasound.so.1 ruby-SDL:requires:libasound.so.1 sdlbomber:requires:libasound.so.1 SDL_mixer-player:requires:libasound.so.1 sdlroids:requires:libasound.so.1 smpeg-player:requires:libasound.so.1 smurf:requires:libasound.so.1 soundtracker:requires:libasound.so.1 synaesthesia:requires:libasound.so.1 toppler:requires:libasound.so.1 transcode:requires:libasound.so.1 tuxpuck:requires:libasound.so.1 tuxracer:requires:libasound.so.1 vcd:requires:libasound.so.1 vlc-sdl:requires:libasound.so.1 xawdecode:requires:libasound.so.1 xawdecode:requires:libasound.so.1 xine-alsa5:requires:libasound.so.1 xmmp:requires:libasound.so.1 xmms-more-vis-plugins:requires:libasound.so.1 xmms-smpeg:requires:libasound.so.1 xmp:requires:libasound.so.1 zsnes:requires:libasound.so.1
Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch
On Sundayen den 28 April 2002 20.20, Nelson Bartley wrote: > I haven't yet, but I'll be sure to try that mirror, just in case sunet is > buggered up I think they compete, and sunet always wins the battle of the most f*cked up repository... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch
I haven't yet, but I'll be sure to try that mirror, just in case sunet is buggered up - Original Message - From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:11 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch > On Sundayen den 28 April 2002 18.40, Nelson Bartley wrote: > > Well, the tool worked after a vanilla 8.2 install, and it rebuild the > > hdlist.cz and the deplist.ordered, however when I attempted to perform the > > network install it would not perform, stating that the deplist.ordered > > mistmatch against hdlist.cz > > Hmm..., I thought gentristrib fixed that..., maybe I was wrong. have you > tried to rsync from uninett.no then? > > -- > Regards // Oden Eriksson > >
Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch - urgent
I have the same problem with a network install (deplist.ordered mistmatch against hdlist.cz). >From: "Nelson Bartley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch >Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 12:40:39 -0400 > >Well, the tool worked after a vanilla 8.2 install, and it rebuild the >hdlist.cz and the deplist.ordered, however when I attempted to perform the >network install it would not perform, stating that the deplist.ordered >mistmatch against hdlist.cz > >Has anyone else experienced this problem recently? Does it just go away >eventually? > >NB >- Original Message - >From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 11:00 PM >Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch > > > > try the same command from the rpmtools package instead. > > > > use something like "gendistrib --noclean --distrib /path/to/Cooker" > > > > On Sundayen den 28 April 2002 02.45, Nelson Bartley wrote: > > > Interesting... I attempted to use the utility and it didn't work... > > > segfaulted... > > > > > > What is this tool attempting to do? > > > > > > NB > > > - Original Message - > > > From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 2:50 PM > > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch > > > > > > > On Saturdayen den 27 April 2002 18.49, Nelson Bartley wrote: > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > > > I've now just rsynced about 5 times from sunet, I've even deleted >the > > > > > cooker/i586/Mandrake/base directory on the last update, and I am >unable > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > perform any cooker install. > > > > > > > > > > I am continually getting a deplist.ordered mistmatch against >hdlist.cz > > > > > before selecting packages, which causes the installed to drop back >to > > > > > HD preparation. > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way I can correct this? in a few hours when I return >I >can > > > > > write down the error message in the 3rd window for you guys. > > > > > > > > Use the "gendistrib" command in your Cooker/misc/ directory. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards // Oden Eriksson > > > > -- > > Regards // Oden Eriksson > > > > > > = _ MSN Photos est le moyen le plus simple de partager et d'imprimer vos photos : http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
[Cooker] tcltk bugs parade
Putting an yoke on this beast...
- tix is completely broken and unfunctional in 8.2 and cooker (15mdk).
Crucial directory /usr/lib/tix8.1/* is not installed. Fixed here, see
attached diff. By the way, /usr/lib/libtix*.so had been made executable.
- rebuiling tcltk.src.rpm requires binary tcl package to be installed. In
other words tcltk requires itself to be built. Problems are in tcllib
configure and itcl makeinstall scripts. Not fixed.
- man tixwish.1.bz2 is installed to /usr/share/man/mann. Tix %makeinstall
problem. Not fixed.
- expect pkgIndex.tcl and cat-buffers is installed to /usr/lib instead of
/usr/lib/expect5.32. Fixed in attached diff.
- Minor pbs:
/usr/lib/tclConfig.sh: TCL_BUILD_LIB_SPEC='-L/usr/include...
TCL_BUILD_STUB_LIB_SPEC='-L/usr/include...
TCL_BIULD_STUB_LIB_PATH='/usr/include...
/usr/include is incorrect, should be something like
/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/tcltk...
the same for tkConfig.sh.
--- tcltk.spec.orig Sun Apr 28 21:40:28 2002
+++ tcltk.spec Sun Apr 28 22:46:39 2002
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@
# Expect
#
cd expect%{expect_major}
-%makeinstall tcl_libdir="$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/lib"
+%makeinstall tcl_libdir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir} libdir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}/expect%{expect_major}
cd ..
# remove cryptdir/decryptdir, as Linux has no crypt command (bug 6668).
@@ -403,11 +403,14 @@
# Tix
#
cd tix-%{tix_major}/unix
-%makeinstall
+%makeinstall datadir=${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}%{_libdir}
cd ../..
# Not needed anymore?
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libdir/libtixsam*
+
+# aesthetic: make libtix*.so executable
+chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libdir/libtix*.so
pushd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir
ln -s tixwish8.1.8.3 tixwish
[Cooker] mc: strange error on exit
hi all, after closing mc, i got the following message: --- snip --- === ERROR ===: [/home/flepied/RPM/BUILD/gpm-1.20.0/src/liblow.c(261)]: strncmp/is digit/consolename failed === ERROR ===: [/home/flepied/RPM/BUILD/gpm-1.20.0/src/l iblow.c(370)]: Oh, oh, it's an error! possibly I die! --- snap --- this only happens as user, not as root. any suggestions? release: mc-4.5.55-9mdk (same behaviour was in 4.5.55-8mdk as well, i think) greets, psic4t. -- Public Key: 0x8078B10C JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] gnomemeeting
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 15:52:28 +0200, Dave Seff wrote : > You don't happen to have your home directory mounted via NFS??? There > seems to be a problem with some Gnome Apps when this is the case. I am > having the same problem but only with home dir's that are mounted via > NFS. It only happens when your NFS server doesn't have lockd enabled.. -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch
On Sundayen den 28 April 2002 18.40, Nelson Bartley wrote: > Well, the tool worked after a vanilla 8.2 install, and it rebuild the > hdlist.cz and the deplist.ordered, however when I attempted to perform the > network install it would not perform, stating that the deplist.ordered > mistmatch against hdlist.cz Hmm..., I thought gentristrib fixed that..., maybe I was wrong. have you tried to rsync from uninett.no then? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch
Well, the tool worked after a vanilla 8.2 install, and it rebuild the hdlist.cz and the deplist.ordered, however when I attempted to perform the network install it would not perform, stating that the deplist.ordered mistmatch against hdlist.cz Has anyone else experienced this problem recently? Does it just go away eventually? NB - Original Message - From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 11:00 PM Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch > try the same command from the rpmtools package instead. > > use something like "gendistrib --noclean --distrib /path/to/Cooker" > > On Sundayen den 28 April 2002 02.45, Nelson Bartley wrote: > > Interesting... I attempted to use the utility and it didn't work... > > segfaulted... > > > > What is this tool attempting to do? > > > > NB > > - Original Message - > > From: "Oden Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 2:50 PM > > Subject: Re: [Cooker] Deplist mismatch > > > > > On Saturdayen den 27 April 2002 18.49, Nelson Bartley wrote: > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > I've now just rsynced about 5 times from sunet, I've even deleted the > > > > cooker/i586/Mandrake/base directory on the last update, and I am unable > > > > to > > > > > > perform any cooker install. > > > > > > > > I am continually getting a deplist.ordered mistmatch against hdlist.cz > > > > before selecting packages, which causes the installed to drop back to > > > > HD preparation. > > > > > > > > Is there any way I can correct this? in a few hours when I return I can > > > > write down the error message in the 3rd window for you guys. > > > > > > Use the "gendistrib" command in your Cooker/misc/ directory. > > > > > > -- > > > Regards // Oden Eriksson > > -- > Regards // Oden Eriksson > >
[Cooker] chkconfig off never resets level 2
Anybody else noticed that "chkconfig service off" never resets level 2 - service remains active here. Is it intentional? -andrej
Re: [Cooker] More intellegent logging postprocessing
thanks to all for the pointer ÷ ÷ÓË, 28.04.2002, × 06:20, Geoffrey Lee ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ: > There is some documentation here : > > http://www.balabit.hu/static/syslog-ng/reference/book1.html > > > But it's not written in an easy-to-undertand format .. it seems to be > quite technical. > It is the same as included with RPM (/usr/share/doc/...) just in pretty format. It would be sufficient if there were any hope it is complete. Unfortunately I suspect it is not. One main thing that is not mentioned anywhere is how incoming messages are processed and if processing stops on first match. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] cdrom/dvd drive and kernel-2418-12
I can't reproduce this problem. All my drives are accessible just fine with 2.4.18-12mdk as with earlier kernels. -andrej
[Cooker] galeon and proxy
Anybody has problems with current Galeon and proxies? It shows directly available pages just fine but segfaults on proxy access. Proxy needs authorization, but previous version did run just fine. Mozilla does not have any problems as well. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] gnomemeeting
You don't happen to have your home directory mounted via NFS??? There seems to be a problem with some Gnome Apps when this is the case. I am having the same problem but only with home dir's that are mounted via NFS. -Dave On Sunday 28 April 2002 8:09 am, Frédéric Crozat wrote: > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:59:20 +0200, Blindauer Emmanuel wrote : > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi > > I wang to test gnomemeeting,but I get into trouble: GM say me: "Please > > check your gconf settings and permissions, it seems that gconf is not > > properly setup on your system" And nothing else. > > I'm running latest packages of gnomemeeting and required packages > > > > (gnomemeeting-0.85-2mdk > > openh323_1-1.8.0-4mdk > > gnome-mime-data-1.0.7-1mdk > > gnome-session-1.5.17-1mdk > > libgnome32-1.4.1.5-1mdk > > gnomemeeting-0.85-2mdk > > gnome-vfs2-1.9.12-1mdk > > libgnomeui2-1.115.0-1mdk > > gnome-libs-1.4.1.5-1mdk > > libgnome-vfs2_0-1.9.12-1mdk > > libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas1-0.17.0-1mdk libgnome2-1.115.0-3mdk > > libgnomeui2_0-1.115.0-1mdk > > libgnomecanvas2_0-1.115.0-1mdk > > libgnome2_0-1.115.0-3mdk) > > It seems you have gconf2 installed on your system.. > > Try running gconf-sanity-check-2 to find where the problem is..
Re: [Cooker] Gnome has close to no menu items
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 20:56:14 +0800 (HKT) "R.I.P. Deaddog" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > When starting Gnome 2, I've got close to no menu items in the Gnome > > menu. That's with a "blank" user I created for testing. > > > > Is this expected? > > > > Alexander Skwar > > Yes, I think fcrozat has posted many times on cooker list that > at least a completely working Gnome 2 desktop is to be > packaged before adding any mandrake customization. If you do not mind cheating you can get back all the menu listings as well as still be able to add most of the the old applets to the panel by doing as I have done and re-install gnome-core-1.4.0.6-12mdk. I run enlightenment with only the gnome panel (panel as in gnome1 where as gnome-panel is gnome2) and I am able to still use all my shortcuts and seti-applet as well as access the full menu listing. Charles
Re: [Cooker] Gnome has close to no menu items
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Alexander Skwar wrote: > When starting Gnome 2, I've got close to no menu items in the Gnome > menu. That's with a "blank" user I created for testing. > > Is this expected? > > Alexander Skwar Yes, I think fcrozat has posted many times on cooker list that at least a completely working Gnome 2 desktop is to be packaged before adding any mandrake customization. -- Abel Cheung GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc
[Cooker] Gnome has close to no menu items
Hi. When starting Gnome 2, I've got close to no menu items in the Gnome menu. That's with a "blank" user I created for testing. Is this expected? Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 7 hours 36 minutes
[Cooker] SUB cooker
[Cooker] Why are .rpmnew files created?
Hi. This annoys me for quite some time now, so I'm gonna ask now. Why are .rpmnew files created? For instance, I've just updated the gnome-panel package, and got this message: gnome-panel #Warnung: /etc/sound/events/mailcheck.soundlist created as /etc/sound/events/mailcheck.soundlist.rpmnew # Well, I've never touched /etc/sound/events/mailcheck.soundlist, so it has to match the version supplied with the old gnome-panel package. I always thought, that rpmnew files are only created, when the user modified the config file. Alexander Skwar -- How to quote: http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english) Homepage: http://www.iso-top.de |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen Uptime: 4 days 7 hours 17 minutes
Re: [Cooker] gnomemeeting
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002 13:59:20 +0200, Blindauer Emmanuel wrote : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > I wang to test gnomemeeting,but I get into trouble: GM say me: "Please > check your gconf settings and permissions, it seems that gconf is not > properly setup on your system" And nothing else. > I'm running latest packages of gnomemeeting and required packages > > (gnomemeeting-0.85-2mdk > openh323_1-1.8.0-4mdk > gnome-mime-data-1.0.7-1mdk > gnome-session-1.5.17-1mdk > libgnome32-1.4.1.5-1mdk > gnomemeeting-0.85-2mdk > gnome-vfs2-1.9.12-1mdk > libgnomeui2-1.115.0-1mdk > gnome-libs-1.4.1.5-1mdk > libgnome-vfs2_0-1.9.12-1mdk > libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas1-0.17.0-1mdk libgnome2-1.115.0-3mdk > libgnomeui2_0-1.115.0-1mdk > libgnomecanvas2_0-1.115.0-1mdk > libgnome2_0-1.115.0-3mdk) It seems you have gconf2 installed on your system.. Try running gconf-sanity-check-2 to find where the problem is.. -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
[Cooker] gnomemeeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi I wang to test gnomemeeting,but I get into trouble: GM say me: "Please check your gconf settings and permissions, it seems that gconf is not properly setup on your system" And nothing else. I'm running latest packages of gnomemeeting and required packages (gnomemeeting-0.85-2mdk openh323_1-1.8.0-4mdk gnome-mime-data-1.0.7-1mdk gnome-session-1.5.17-1mdk libgnome32-1.4.1.5-1mdk gnomemeeting-0.85-2mdk gnome-vfs2-1.9.12-1mdk libgnomeui2-1.115.0-1mdk gnome-libs-1.4.1.5-1mdk libgnome-vfs2_0-1.9.12-1mdk libgdk-pixbuf-gnomecanvas1-0.17.0-1mdk libgnome2-1.115.0-3mdk libgnomeui2_0-1.115.0-1mdk libgnomecanvas2_0-1.115.0-1mdk libgnome2_0-1.115.0-3mdk) Emmanuel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8y+QedZBu/bfGsj8RApLnAKCAawEot0ooE9m6ebHugr3dL1VqWQCcD3sA MRkjcPaYs2l/DA8B6o+seCU= =5E/P -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] SoundBlaster Audigy Platinum (Any Drivers for 8.2 orCooker?)
Le jeu 18/04/2002 à 20:51, Sergio Korlowsky a écrit : > > the drivers is already there > > Found it! > > One more question.. > what is in your 'modules.conf' still have no sound, modules load ok... I've got a SBLive ... > everything seems to be fine, I had similar problems with a SB-Live. > sometimes I had to stop sound and re-start it to obtain sound. > modules.conf > alias sound-slot-0 audigy > alias sound-slot-1 audio what's that ? you have a second sound card ? if not remove sound-slot-1 -- http://linux-wizard.tuxfamily.org/index.html - 62. I didn't think anybody would be doing any work at 2am, so I killed your job. --Top 100 things you don't want the sysadmin to say
Re: [Cooker] Re: kernel-secure - back to UP/non-enterprise?
On Sun, 28 Apr 2002, Leon Brooks wrote: > On Sunday 28 April 2002 11:10, Levi Ramsey wrote: > > On Sun Apr 28 9:51 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > >> Running Mandrake 5.2 in front of me is a dual PPro-200 system on a TD6NF > >> mobo. One example does not a statistic make, but... > > > Am I just being stupid, or aren't PPro's i686's? > > It could be me being stupid, but IIRC they didn't make the multi-CPU stuff > entirely happy until very late in the series. > > > IIRC, the chip architecture in the PPro's is the P6, which is the basis > > of everything up to the P4. > > I'm guessing that `basis' != complete feature set. > > Cheers; Leon As I recollect, P-II was electrically the same as the P-pro, but had MMX. In fact, www.Powerleap.com will sell you an accellerator for your UP P-Pro machine using a coppermine celeron processor past 700 MHz, and a PPGA celeron up to 533 MHz for Dual processor systems. So, as long as i686 optimization doesn't include MMX, etc, I think making the SMP kernels i686 optimized is a good move. I think i486 had better SMP support than classic Pentium, and none of the Pentium clones had any. Best Regards, Chuck Shirley
