Re: [Cooker] error compiling DrakX

2002-05-13 Thread Fabrice MARIE

On Tuesday 14 May 2002 14:55, Mohamed Kamil Mansor wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002, Mohamed Kamil Mansor wrote:
> now i got another problem, the compilation didn't find term.h. which
> package(s) should i install?

Hello,

just install
libncurses5-devel-5.2-24mdk
or whatever version of it you need for your version of mdk.
Have a nice day,

Fabrice.
--
Fabrice MARIE
Senior R&D Engineer
Celestix Networks
http://www.celestix.com/

"Silly hacker, root is for administrators" 
   -Unknown




Re: [Cooker] error compiling DrakX

2002-05-13 Thread Mohamed Kamil Mansor

On Tue, 14 May 2002, Mohamed Kamil Mansor wrote:


Thanks terry & fabrice,

now i got another problem, the compilation didn't find term.h. which
package(s) should i install?


> make
> make -C perl-install all
> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/cvs/gi/perl-install'
> install -d auto
> make -C c
> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/cvs/gi/perl-install/c'
> test -e Makefile_c || C_RPM=1 C_DRAKX=1 perl Makefile.PL
> make -f Makefile_c LD_RUN_PATH=
> make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user/cvs/gi/perl-install/c'
> cc -c -I/usr/include/rpm `gtk-config --cflags` `glib-config --cflags`
> -I../../mdk-stage1/pcmcia_ -I../../mdk-stage1/pcmcia_/..
> -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -Os   -DVERSION=\"0.01\"
> -DXS_VERSION=\"0.01\" -fpic -I/usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux/CORE
> stuff.c
> stuff.xs:47:18: term.h: No such file or directory
> make[3]: *** [stuff.o] Error 1
-

regards // kamil





Re: [Cooker] sawfish loses config

2002-05-13 Thread Victor

J.A. Magallon wrote:

>Hi all.
>
>The new sawfish is giving me some problems. It loses its configuration
>each time I log out (for example, focus behaviour and so on).
>
>And there are some other things that do not work:
>- can not get rid of solid window dragging (i am not able to find the
>  config option again...)
>- it doesn't obbey the font selection
>
>Some problem with GConf ???
>
>TIA
>
>  
>
Hi,
I just wanted to confirm this problem. It seems that the settings are 
still in ~/.sawfish/custom but for sawfish doesn't use that file 
anymore. My solution was just to downgrade back to the one on the 8.2 cds.

-Victor





Re: [Cooker] mkcd makes images much larger than requested

2002-05-13 Thread Murray J. Root

On Mon, 13 May 2002 20:58:13 -0400 "Murray J. Root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> Using 100% cooker
>   Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020513 23:05
> 
> /common/RSync/cooker/i586/misc/MakeCD --discsize 73400 --catto CD.log -a 
>/common/RSync/cooker/i586
> 
> produced:
> 
> [root@Master Cooker]# ls -l
> total 3146336
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 777256960 May 13 20:19 1-Cooker.iso
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 73358 May 13 20:20 2-Cooker.iso
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 733413376 May 13 20:22 3-Cooker.iso
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 733347840 May 13 20:24 4-Cooker.iso
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 244285440 May 13 20:24 5-Cooker.iso
> 
> As you can see, the first iso is too large and not within the limit specified.
> 
> Changing the discsize to 7 still made 
> 
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 743211008 May 13 20:46 1-Cooker.iso
> 
> which is still too large, yet SHOULD have created an iso much smaller than
> the capacity of the CD
> 

Followup - 
  using mkcd from the install instead of MakeCD from cooker/i586/misc works correctly.

-- 
Murray J. Root

DISCLAIMER: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/

Mandrake on irc.openprojects.net:
  #mandrake & #mandrake-linux = help for newbies
  #mandrakeguru = advanced discussions  #mdk-cooker = Mandrake Cooker




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-1.1.8-3mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD

Have had problems all day - even with the latest version loaded.
What it took to fix it was to completely remove postfix - uninstall it
and clean up loose ends.. then re-install it.  Worked flawlessly since then

V.

On Monday 13 May 2002 11:11 pm, Steve Fox wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:32, Pascal Terjan wrote:
> [snip symlink info, thanks for the info]
>
> > Did you, as told in yves' mail, make a fresh install ? It just worked
> > fine for me (while an update had made the situation worse).
>
> No, I did an upgrade. I haven't been following this thread, but I will
> go back and read it. Thanks.





[Cooker] xemacs-21.4.6-7mdk & ftp

2002-05-13 Thread Fabrice MARIE


Hello,

Usually with xemacs, it's possible to get
the list of xemacs packages and install them.
It supposed to be done by the menu :
Tools => Packages => Add download site => xemacs.org
Tools => Packages => List and Install

Then xemacs is supposed to download the list of packages,
the display the list of packages for you to
remove/install/upgrade the ones you want.

However, it stops for it seems that its FTP module is not
quite working any more, the error message being :

open ftp.xemacs.org
Connected to xemacs.org.
220 ProFTPD 1.2.5rc1 Server (Xemacs FTP Archives) [207.96.122.9]
quote user "anonymous"
500 AUTH not understood.

or if you choose a mirror:

open sunsite.ualberta.ca
Connected to sunsite.ualberta.ca.
220- 
220- Welcome to SunSITE Alberta
220- 
220- at the University of Alberta, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
220- 
220- All connections to and transfers from this server are logged. If 
220- you do not like this policy, please disconnect now.
220- 
220- You may want to grab the index file called "ls-lR.gz" in /pub.  It is 
220- updated nightly with the contents of the ftp tree.  
220- 
220- If you have any questions, hints, or requests, please email
220- 
220-[EMAIL PROTECTED]
220- 
220 merlin FTP server (SunOS 4.1) ready.
quote user "anonymous"
500 'AUTH GSSAPI': command not understood.

If I'm not wrong, it's supposed to send a

user anonymous

and not a

quote user "anonymous"

Have a nice day,

Fabrice.
--
Fabrice MARIE
Senior R&D Engineer
Celestix Networks
http://www.celestix.com/

"Silly hacker, root is for administrators" 
   -Unknown




Re: [Cooker] sawfish loses config

2002-05-13 Thread Steve Fox

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:51, J.A. Magallon wrote:
> 
> The new sawfish is giving me some problems. It loses its configuration
> each time I log out (for example, focus behaviour and so on).

I'm in the same boat. It was so bad I had to downgrade to the 8.2
packages. It also doesn't give you the option to remember window sizes
and such. Therefore every time I launch a gvim session out of
gnome-terminal, it keeps the window the same size as my terminal! Ack!

-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.1mdk

2002-05-13 Thread skidley

Does the mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.1mdk.src.rpm require gcc3.1 as well? Can I
build a binary with gcc-2.96 and get the java plugin working again? 
-- 
Chad Young
Linux User #195191 




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-1.1.8-3mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Steve Fox

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 16:32, Pascal Terjan wrote:
[snip symlink info, thanks for the info]
> 
> Did you, as told in yves' mail, make a fresh install ? It just worked 
> fine for me (while an update had made the situation worse).

No, I did an upgrade. I haven't been following this thread, but I will
go back and read it. Thanks.
 
-- 

Steve Fox
http://k-lug.org




[Cooker] xmms is unhappy since gcc3.1

2002-05-13 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD

Hi,

I think xmms is unhappy - it bombs with the following:

[meyerv@localhost meyerv]$ xmms
/usr/X11R6/lib/libGLU.so.1: undefined symbol: _Unwind_GetIP
xmms: simple.c:1070: snd_mixer_selem_get_id: Assertion `elem && id' failed.
Aborted

V.




[Cooker] Software installer suggestion

2002-05-13 Thread Vincent Meyer, MD

Hello,

This may be a silly suggestion, but when the software installer is loading
and updated package list, there is the box in the middle of the screen with 
the box that goes back and forth... yet on the console is a working progress 
bar!  How difficult would it be to put the progress bar and what file is 
loading on the screen instead of the box that goes back and forth?

Just a thought, as if it isn't run from a console, is hard to tell how fast 
it's going.

V.




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.1mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy


Is there a set of mozilla RC2 binaries compiled for Mandrake 8.2?
I have some machines sitting on RC1 where they have some issues with
the Mozilla update, but I'm not quite ready to jump them all the way
up to the cooker gcc libs.

-- 
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TeleDynamics Communications Inc
Business Innovations Through Open Source Systems: http://www.teledyn.com
"Computers are useless.  They can only give you answers."(Pablo Picasso)





[Cooker] mkcd makes images much larger than requested

2002-05-13 Thread Murray J. Root


Using 100% cooker
  Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20020513 23:05

/common/RSync/cooker/i586/misc/MakeCD --discsize 73400 --catto CD.log -a 
/common/RSync/cooker/i586

produced:

[root@Master Cooker]# ls -l
total 3146336
-rw-r--r--1 root root 777256960 May 13 20:19 1-Cooker.iso
-rw-r--r--1 root root 73358 May 13 20:20 2-Cooker.iso
-rw-r--r--1 root root 733413376 May 13 20:22 3-Cooker.iso
-rw-r--r--1 root root 733347840 May 13 20:24 4-Cooker.iso
-rw-r--r--1 root root 244285440 May 13 20:24 5-Cooker.iso

As you can see, the first iso is too large and not within the limit specified.

Changing the discsize to 7 still made 

-rw-r--r--1 root root 743211008 May 13 20:46 1-Cooker.iso

which is still too large, yet SHOULD have created an iso much smaller than
the capacity of the CD

-- 
Murray J. Root

DISCLAIMER: http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/

Mandrake on irc.openprojects.net:
  #mandrake & #mandrake-linux = help for newbies
  #mandrakeguru = advanced discussions  #mdk-cooker = Mandrake Cooker




Re: [Cooker] [PATCH] fix stat display garbage after pemissions.

2002-05-13 Thread Geoffrey Lee

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 11:57:49AM +0800, Fabrice MARIE wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> stat-3.3-3mdk is printing garbage after the access permissions :
> 
> # stat /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit
>   File: "/etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit"
>   Size: 33837   Blocks: 72 IO Block: 4096   Regular File
> Device: 302h/770d   Inode: 3401Links: 1
> Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x??p?)  Uid: (0/root)   Gid: (0/root)
> Access: Fri Mar 15 23:46:43 2002
> Modify: Fri Mar 15 23:46:43 2002
> Change: Mon Apr  1 00:37:19 2002
> 
> note the garbage : ??p? after the correct -rwxr-xr-x.
> 


Yikes. You're right. 


Thanks for the patch! :-)


For printf() it should not require the %s since we should be pretty sure
that the access permissions -rwxrwxrwx should not contain any format string
characters. But it should be safe to have %s anyway.



> Here's the obvious fix.
> 
> --- stat.old2002-05-13 11:51:33.0 +0800
> +++ stat.c  2002-05-13 11:51:56.0 +0800
> @@ -247,8 +247,9 @@
> 
>  void print_human_access(struct stat *statbuf)
>  {
> -  char access[10];
> +  char access[11];
> 
> +  access[10] = '\0';
>access[9] = (statbuf->st_mode & S_IXOTH) ?
>  ((statbuf->st_mode & S_ISVTX) ? 't' : 'x') :
>  ((statbuf->st_mode & S_ISVTX) ? 'T' : '-');
> @@ -291,7 +292,7 @@
>  default:
>access[0] = '?';
>  }
> -printf (access);
> +printf ("%s", access);
>  }
> 
> I didn't check the rest of the printf  to see
> if they were missing their format string though..
> 
> Have a nice day,
> 
> Fabrice.
> --
> Fabrice MARIE
> Senior R&D Engineer
> Celestix Networks
> http://www.celestix.com/
> 
> "Silly hacker, root is for administrators" 
>-Unknown






[Cooker] KDE3 - BastilleChooser hangs

2002-05-13 Thread guran

Hi

BastilleChooser hangs in the last window, and has to be closed by Ctrl-c.

[root@One09 guran]# rpm -qa Bastille*
Bastille-Curses-module-1.3.0-2mdk
Bastille-Chooser-1.3.0-2mdk
Bastille-1.3.0-2mdk
Bastille-Tk-module-1.3.0-2mdk

regards
guran
-- 
Mandrake Linux 8.3 Cooker kernel-2.4.18.16mdk-1-1mdk version:2002-05-13-20:34




Re: [Cooker] mail() not supported in current PHP build

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Tuesdayen den 14 May 2002 00.35, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> I have postnuke installed and it uses the mail() function and it worked

check the archives about this.

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




[Cooker] mail() not supported in current PHP build

2002-05-13 Thread Jeremy Salch

I have postnuke installed and it uses the mail() function and it worked 
properly under the php that is included with mandrake 8.2 but the current 
cooker php build doesn't support this function it keeps telling me


-- 
Mr. Jeremy Salch - Data Services
Granbury.Com, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - email
www.granbury.com - Business Website
www.tblx.net - Personal Website






[Cooker] sawfish loses config

2002-05-13 Thread J.A. Magallon

Hi all.

The new sawfish is giving me some problems. It loses its configuration
each time I log out (for example, focus behaviour and so on).

And there are some other things that do not work:
- can not get rid of solid window dragging (i am not able to find the
  config option again...)
- it doesn't obbey the font selection

Some problem with GConf ???

TIA

-- 
J.A. Magallon   #  Let the source be with you...
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
Linux werewolf 2.4.19-pre8-jam2 #3 SMP lun may 13 00:49:15 CEST 2002 i686




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-1.1.8-3mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Pascal Terjan

Steve Fox wrote:
> [root@tp drfickle]# mailq
> bash: mailq: command not found
> [root@tp drfickle]# locate mailq
> /usr/bin/mailq
> /usr/share/doc/postfix-20010228/html/mailq.1.html
> /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.1.bz2
> [root@tp drfickle]# /usr/bin/mailq
> bash: /usr/bin/mailq: No such file or directory
> [root@tp drfickle]# mailq.postfix
> 
> the last command seems to just hang
> 

# ls -l /usr/bin/mailq
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   27 mai 13 23:22 /usr/bin/mailq 
-> /etc/alternatives/mta-mailq*

# ls -l /etc/alternatives/mta-mailq
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   22 mai 13 23:22 
/etc/alternatives/mta-mailq -> /usr/bin/mailq.postfix

mailq.postfix hangs here too, but when running it trought the symlink 
/usr/bin/mailq it works fine.

Did you, as told in yves' mail, make a fresh install ? It just worked 
fine for me (while an update had made the situation worse).





Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.1mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Frédéric Crozat

On Mon, 13 May 2002 19:44:39 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote :

> »Frederic Crozat« sagte am 2002-05-13 um 16:16:12 +0200 :
>> - Plugins support is broken for plugins compiled with gcc < 3.x.y
> 
> Hm, what about closed source plugins like flash?  Will they (eventually)
> work?

They will need to be recompiled with gcc 3.0 or 3.1 ...

In the mean time, I'd added an ugly hack to mimic old gcc 2.x ABI for
those plugins : flash works..

But Java don't :(

-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] postfix-1.1.8-3mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Steve Fox

[root@tp drfickle]# mailq
bash: mailq: command not found
[root@tp drfickle]# locate mailq
/usr/bin/mailq
/usr/share/doc/postfix-20010228/html/mailq.1.html
/usr/share/man/man1/mailq.1.bz2
[root@tp drfickle]# /usr/bin/mailq
bash: /usr/bin/mailq: No such file or directory
[root@tp drfickle]# mailq.postfix

the last command seems to just hang

-- 

Steve Fox
IBM Linux Technology Center
http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
http://k-lug.org





Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Dmitri Tikhonov

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 08:58:45PM +0200, Coulonges Philippe wrote:
> Le Lundi 13 Mai 2002 19:47, Borsenkow Andrej a écrit :
> >
> > ... then this Require is needed for every single
> > package. Instead of adding it to every single package it is silently
> > assumed that it is always installed.
> >
> > You may (want to) do it differently. In this case you strictly speaking
> > leave Mandrake ground and this becomes off topic :-)
> >
> > If you have Mandrake distribution you have basesystem. If you have a
> > collection of PRM you may do anything with this collection but it is
> > unrelated to Mandrake.
> 
> Sorry to interfere in a topic I don't masterize.
> 
> I remember trying to uninstall some packages, and being empeached because 
> these packages where saying they would have to uninstall basesystem.

In this case, you are talking about a package that basesystem depends on,
not a package that depends on basesystem.  I am talking about arrangement
like this:

chkconfig <- [depends] <- basesystem <- [depends] <- ntp

- Dmitri.




Re: [Cooker] KDE2 must die

2002-05-13 Thread Brad Felmey

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 13:49, Warwick Bruce Chapman wrote:

> How do I stop KDE2 from existing, but still have the benefit of the libs for 
> those non-ported KDE2 apps.
> 
> I want KDE2 gone from kdm's list of WM's.

I just rpm -e'd all kde2 packages except kdelibs.
-- 
Brad Felmey





Re: [Cooker] trouble to rebuild sudo src.rpm on sparc architecture

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 19.31, fv wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2002 01:07:10 +0200
>
> Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 19.02, fv wrote:
> > > + %make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> > > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403: fg: no job control
> > > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403 (%build)
> >
> > 2 alternative answers.
> >
> > 1. You should not attempt to build Cooker stuff on a non Cooker machine.
> >
> > 2. Edit the spec file.
> >
> > --
> > Regards // Oden Eriksson
>
> About 1:
> the src.rpm is not from cooker.
> it's an official release from MandrakeSoft.

Aha, ok. I don't know but I guess there is no "make" RPM macro in corpo as 
it's based on older core(?). Edit the sudo.spec file and replace "%make" with 
"make". There might be other macros in there that needs to be replaced. But, 
as I don't run corpo or sparc I can't really tell. Also this is a Cookerl ist.

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




[Cooker] Cursor not moving in MozRC2 Mail

2002-05-13 Thread SpamKill


In the new Mozilla RC2, the cursor doesn't move ahead as you type in mail.

All new files from Cooker freshened.


BTW, would it possible to compile in the spellchecker into Mdks Moz??


--Bill Greenwood
Mandrake Club Member







Re: [Cooker] trouble to rebuild sudo src.rpm on sparc architecture

2002-05-13 Thread fv

On Tue, 14 May 2002 01:07:10 +0200
Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 19.02, fv wrote:
> 
> > + %make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403: fg: no job control
> > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403 (%build)
> 
> 2 alternative answers.
> 
> 1. You should not attempt to build Cooker stuff on a non Cooker machine.
> 
> 2. Edit the spec file.
> 
> -- 
> Regards // Oden Eriksson
> 

About 1:
the src.rpm is not from cooker.
it's an official release from MandrakeSoft.


--
franck Villaume
website under construction
http://f.villaume.free.fr
--
this message has been send with Sylpheed using GNU/Linux




Re: [Cooker] trouble to rebuild sudo src.rpm on sparc architecture

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 19.02, fv wrote:

> + %make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE'
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403: fg: no job control
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403 (%build)

2 alternative answers.

1. You should not attempt to build Cooker stuff on a non Cooker machine.

2. Edit the spec file.

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Coulonges Philippe

Le Lundi 13 Mai 2002 19:47, Borsenkow Andrej a écrit :
>
> ... then this Require is needed for every single
> package. Instead of adding it to every single package it is silently
> assumed that it is always installed.
>
> You may (want to) do it differently. In this case you strictly speaking
> leave Mandrake ground and this becomes off topic :-)
>
> If you have Mandrake distribution you have basesystem. If you have a
> collection of PRM you may do anything with this collection but it is
> unrelated to Mandrake.

Sorry to interfere in a topic I don't masterize.

I remember trying to uninstall some packages, and being empeached because 
these packages where saying they would have to uninstall basesystem.

That's certainly something I don't want to happen.

I don't know exactly how dependancies are resolved.
Is there a difference between dependances for installation and 
desinstallation ?

If not, having a basesystem dependance would be dramatic.

CU
CPHIL
-- 
Dors, dors dans le souffle du dragon.
-- Excalibur (Film de J. Boorman).




[Cooker] trouble to rebuild sudo src.rpm on sparc architecture

2002-05-13 Thread fv

Hi, everyone.

I'm using corpo 1.0 on one SS10 sparc machine.
MandrakeSoft has released some updates for corpo.
For sparc architecture, there is only src.rpm available.
So I decided to rebuild the src.rpm.

It seems that sudo has some problems...
Here is my command line :
rpm --rebuild sudo-1.6.4-3.1mdk.src.rpm

Here is what I got at the end of the configure.

config.status: creating config.h
config.status: creating pathnames.h

You will need to customize sample.pam and install it as /etc/pam.d/sudo

+ %make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE'
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403: fg: no job control
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.71403 (%build)

If anyone can help me...
That would be really appreciate.

Regards

--
franck Villaume
website under construction
http://f.villaume.free.fr
--
this message has been send with Sylpheed using GNU/Linux




[Cooker] KDE2 must die

2002-05-13 Thread Warwick Bruce Chapman

Yo

How do I stop KDE2 from existing, but still have the benefit of the libs for 
those non-ported KDE2 apps.

I want KDE2 gone from kdm's list of WM's.

Buchan I tried what you suggested, which reinstated all the session entries in 
kdm's list of WM's, but didn't help the problem.

Ciao
Budgee

-- 
Warwick Bruce Chapman
The eSpot Technology Company
Durban, South Africa
http://www.theespot.co.za
+27 83 7797094




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-3.3-25mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

François Pons wrote:

>Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>  
>
>>François,
>>
>>I have a question about some urpmi behaviour. I'm not sure if it's meant to be.
>>
>>Take a look at this example:
>>
>># rpm -q --whatprovides automake
>>automake1.6-1.6.1-2mdk
>>
>>"automake" is provided by automake1.6-1.6.1-2mdk.
>>
>>Now if I want to add some packages (say automake and qt2-devel) I get the
>>following:
>>
>># urpmi -p --auto-select --auto automake
>>installing /mirrors/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/automake-1.4-20.p5.mdk.noarch.rpm
>>error: failed dependencies:
>>automake < 1.6.1 conflicts with automake1.6-1.6.1-2mdk
>>Installation failed
>>
>>Wouldn't it be the better behaviour of urpmi to skip the packages that are
>>already provided on the system and get the others installed?
>>
>>
>
>It is not implemented currently, it only uses package name when searching
>through the installed database (it uses package name or provides for urpmi db),
>it should have checked conflicts and remove request to install automake-1.4.
>urpmi will get some extensions to support such things in the future.
>
Thanks! For now I've made a workaround in my scripts that invokes urpmi 
against every package, instead calling urpmi once.

Please leave me a note when the feature above is implented. Thanks!!

Stefan





Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.1mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Charles A Edwards

On Mon, 13 May 2002 17:44:39 +
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> »Frederic Crozat« sagte am 2002-05-13 um 16:16:12 +0200 :
> > - Plugins support is broken for plugins compiled with gcc < 3.x.y 
> 
> Hm, what about closed source plugins like flash?  Will they (eventually)
> work?
> 
 
Have not attempted with All plugins but but both Flash and areader Still work in 
1.0-0.rc2.1mdk.


Charles




Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

÷ ðÎÄ, 13.05.2002, × 19:29, Dmitri Tikhonov ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:17:48PM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem
> > as
> > > one of its dependencies, then (it does not)?
> > > 
> > 
> > basesystem is assumed to be always installed so this is strictly
> > speaking redundant. 
> > 
> 
> I understand that this is how the Mandrake install is performed.  However,
> one of the virtues of using RPM packaging is that one can specify what
> packages a package depends on (OK, this part _is_ redundant).  If it is
> known that ntp RPM requires basesystem, why not make ntp package aware of
> that?  This will surely eliminate questions such as mine here.
> 

first ntp RPM does not require basesystem.

and of you do it for ntp  then this Require is needed for every single
package. Instead of adding it to every single package it is silently
assumed that it is always installed.

You may (want to) do it differently. In this case you strictly speaking
leave Mandrake ground and this becomes off topic :-)

If you have Mandrake distribution you have basesystem. If you have a
collection of PRM you may do anything with this collection but it is
unrelated to Mandrake.

-andrej




[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mozilla-1.0-0.rc2.1mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Alexander Skwar

»Frederic Crozat« sagte am 2002-05-13 um 16:16:12 +0200 :
> - Plugins support is broken for plugins compiled with gcc < 3.x.y 

Hm, what about closed source plugins like flash?  Will they (eventually)
work?

Alexander Skwar
-- 
How to quote:   http://learn.to/quote (german) http://quote.6x.to (english)
Homepage:   http://www.iso-top.de  |Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen
   Uptime: 4 hours 20 minutes




Postfix? (Was: Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.)

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 16.20, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote:
> ntp-4.1.0-1mdk.i586.rpm uses chkconfig in its scripts, but chkconfig is

How comes replies often pops up earlier than the original posts?

This is wierd, is it because of postfix?

Well..., I'm just curious...

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




Re: [Cooker] KDE3 Logout Confirmation

2002-05-13 Thread Warwick Chapman

Hey Buchan!

Will take a look. I cannot get kde3's kdm to run without replace the contents 
of prefdm with /opt/kde3/bin/kdm

That is very messy I accept, but it was the only wat it worked.

Any idea about the font bugger-up I sent in that other mail?

Ciao
Budgee

On Monday 13 May 2002 18:47, Buchan Milne wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Warwick Chapman wrote:
> | Howdy
> |
> | I am trying to build a KDE3 setup for an LTSP implementation at our High
> | School here in South Africa.
> |
> | I wanted to use kdm from KDE 3, so I patched the fndSession and prefdm
>
> files
>
> | to run /opt/kde3/bin/kdm. Once that was working I started locking
>
> things down
>
> | to make it all as bullet proof as possible... Then I broke things a
>
> little. I
>
> | was tweaking the kdm configuration in kcontrol, and deleted the KDE3
>
> session
>
> | option. I am now left with only KDE (which loads my local account into
>
> KDE 3,
>
> | but root into KDE 2.2.2 why?). I tried to add KDE3 again, but it
>
> removed all
>
> | my KDE 3 settings and now for both KDE and KDE3 sessions in the session
> | manager (Both those session names produce a KDE 3 desktop) I get the
>
> old KDE
>
> | 2.2.2 logout confirmation, not the new KDE3 one.
>
> Does running /etc/rc.d/init.d/mandrake_everytime (or even
> /usr/sbin/fndSession) fix it? You might want to backup your
> /opt/kde3/share/configuration/kdm/kdmrc file first 
>
>
> Buchan
>
>
>
>
> - --
>
> |Registered Linux User #182071-|
>
> Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
> Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
> Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
> GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
> 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE83+4urJK6UGDSBKcRAhbiAJ93PpNtRfgaXH6xO+QixakfU42k0gCfa5N2
> T1syvBzGWapp/kygL95+hs0=
> =pNlN
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
Warwick Bruce Chapman
The eSpot Technology Company
Durban, South Africa
http://www.theespot.co.za
+27 83 7797094




Re: [Cooker] KDE3 Logout Confirmation

2002-05-13 Thread Buchan Milne

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Warwick Chapman wrote:
| Howdy
|
| I am trying to build a KDE3 setup for an LTSP implementation at our High
| School here in South Africa.
|
| I wanted to use kdm from KDE 3, so I patched the fndSession and prefdm
files
| to run /opt/kde3/bin/kdm. Once that was working I started locking
things down
| to make it all as bullet proof as possible... Then I broke things a
little. I
| was tweaking the kdm configuration in kcontrol, and deleted the KDE3
session
| option. I am now left with only KDE (which loads my local account into
KDE 3,
| but root into KDE 2.2.2 why?). I tried to add KDE3 again, but it
removed all
| my KDE 3 settings and now for both KDE and KDE3 sessions in the session
| manager (Both those session names produce a KDE 3 desktop) I get the
old KDE
| 2.2.2 logout confirmation, not the new KDE3 one.
|

Does running /etc/rc.d/init.d/mandrake_everytime (or even
/usr/sbin/fndSession) fix it? You might want to backup your
/opt/kde3/share/configuration/kdm/kdmrc file first 


Buchan




- --
|Registered Linux User #182071-|
Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE83+4urJK6UGDSBKcRAhbiAJ93PpNtRfgaXH6xO+QixakfU42k0gCfa5N2
T1syvBzGWapp/kygL95+hs0=
=pNlN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





[Cooker] KDE3 Logout Confirmation

2002-05-13 Thread Warwick Chapman

Howdy

I am trying to build a KDE3 setup for an LTSP implementation at our High 
School here in South Africa.

I wanted to use kdm from KDE 3, so I patched the fndSession and prefdm files 
to run /opt/kde3/bin/kdm. Once that was working I started locking things down 
to make it all as bullet proof as possible... Then I broke things a little. I 
was tweaking the kdm configuration in kcontrol, and deleted the KDE3 session 
option. I am now left with only KDE (which loads my local account into KDE 3, 
but root into KDE 2.2.2 why?). I tried to add KDE3 again, but it removed all 
my KDE 3 settings and now for both KDE and KDE3 sessions in the session 
manager (Both those session names produce a KDE 3 desktop) I get the old KDE 
2.2.2 logout confirmation, not the new KDE3 one.

I have stock Mandrake 8.2 download edition with the KDE3 rpms from 
kde.org/../mandrake/8.2 installed.

-- 
Warwick Bruce Chapman
The eSpot Technology Company
Durban, South Africa
http://www.theespot.co.za
+27 83 7797094




Re: [Cooker] gcc3.1 == code bloat? (look at KDE3 packages :(

2002-05-13 Thread Pixel

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> gcc3.1 == code bloat?

well, at least for DrakX stage1, it's 5% to 8% smaller :)




Re: [Cooker] gcc3.1 == code bloat? (look at KDE3 packages :(

2002-05-13 Thread Charles A Edwards

On Mon, 13 May 2002 18:50:24 +0400
Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Kdebase3 with 2.96 = 38MB
>  With 3.1  = 60MB !!!
> 
> Kdeartwork3 with 2.96 = 12MB
> With 3.1  = 16MB
> 
> 30-50% just by using different compiler? 
> 
 
Not the same query but on a system with both kdes currently installed.

 rpm -ba kdebase3.spec
error: failed build dependencies:
kdebase conflicts with kdebase3-3.0-22mdk
kdebase3 conflicts with kdebase3-3.0-22mdk

 
I can understand the conflict if I was rpm -i kdebase3, but for rpm -ba??


Charles




Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Having such list available somewhere, tough, could be useful. gc, could you 
> add it to RPM-HOWTO ?

I don't think it's really important for rpm-howto, and also the
contents is constantly moving.

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Ainsi parlait Lundi 13 Mai 2002 17:29, Dmitri Tikhonov :
> On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:17:48PM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > > This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem
> >
> > as
> >
> > > one of its dependencies, then (it does not)?
> >
> > basesystem is assumed to be always installed so this is strictly
> > speaking redundant.
>
> I understand that this is how the Mandrake install is performed.  However,
> one of the virtues of using RPM packaging is that one can specify what
> packages a package depends on (OK, this part _is_ redundant).  If it is
> known that ntp RPM requires basesystem, why not make ntp package aware of
> that?  This will surely eliminate questions such as mine here.
The same way that no package requires rpm: it is considered an implicit 
dependency.
Having such list available somewhere, tough, could be useful. gc, could you 
add it to RPM-HOWTO ?
-- 
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html




Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Dmitri Tikhonov

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:17:48PM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > 
> > This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem
> as
> > one of its dependencies, then (it does not)?
> > 
> 
> basesystem is assumed to be always installed so this is strictly
> speaking redundant. 
> 

I understand that this is how the Mandrake install is performed.  However,
one of the virtues of using RPM packaging is that one can specify what
packages a package depends on (OK, this part _is_ redundant).  If it is
known that ntp RPM requires basesystem, why not make ntp package aware of
that?  This will surely eliminate questions such as mine here.

- Dmitri.





RE: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

> 
> This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem
as
> one of its dependencies, then (it does not)?
> 

basesystem is assumed to be always installed so this is strictly
speaking redundant. 




Re: [Cooker] glibc upgrade causes disk read failures

2002-05-13 Thread Lonnie Borntreger

On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 05:27, Marcel Pol wrote:
> On 13 May 2002 00:52:39 -0500
> Lonnie Borntreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I tried to upgrade from glibc 2.2.4 to 2.2.5.  Upon rebooting I got a
> > whole bunch of dma read failures on my disk (ext3) right after I got the
> > message that it was starting init. Obviously this made so that none of
> > the filesystems got mounted, and none of the init scripts ran.
> > 
> > Downgrading again (using a rescue CD), corrected the problem.  This
> > doesn't make sense since LILO was able to read everything just fine, and
> > the kernel had no problem reading/loading the modules it needed, it
> > happened after the kernel finished loading.
> 
> Stupid question, but...
> You did upgrade the rest of the distro?
> I mean, you did not install this glibc from cooker on a 8.2 system I hope?

I run 100% cooker, updated with urpmi/rpmdrake every two to three days. 
(although due to gcc 3.1->3.0.4 clashes, I haven't been able to update
gcc and so I'm falling a little behind.)


-- 
TTFN,
Lonnie Borntreger





Re: [Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Dmitri Tikhonov

On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 06:30:46PM +0400, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> 
> > ntp-4.1.0-1mdk.i586.rpm uses chkconfig in its scripts, but chkconfig
> is
> > not listed as one of its dependencies.  Version 4.1.1 does not fix
> this
> > problem, either.  This is a problem if one wants to roll his own
> installs
> > and desires RPM to do the ordering for him.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, I cannot file a bug at qa.mandrakesoft.com.  How would
> I
> > escalate this issue?
> > 
> 
> bor@cooker% rpm -qR basesystem | grep chkconfig
> chkconfig  
> 
> basesystem is assumed to always be present. Any install you roll out
> must include basesystem + everything that is required by basesystem. 

This is all very well; however, should not chkconfig list basesystem as
one of its dependencies, then (it does not)?

- Dmitri.




Re: [Cooker] gcc3.1 == code bloat? (look at KDE3 packages :(

2002-05-13 Thread Maksim Orlovich

On Mon, 13 May 2002, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:

> Kdebase3 with 2.96 = 38MB
>  With 3.1  = 60MB !!!
> 
> Kdeartwork3 with 2.96 = 12MB
> With 3.1  = 16MB
> 
> 30-50% just by using different compiler?

gcc-3.1 switches the debug  symbol format to DWARF2; and these are 
packages with debug info; which probably makes up for a large part of the
difference.. Would be interesting to see how the size of release-mode 
packages varies...

(I am making the assumption here that the new debug info version takes up
more room; I don't truly know it, but it would make sense for it to...)

Thanks,
Maks Orlovich






[Cooker] gcc3.1 == code bloat? (look at KDE3 packages :(

2002-05-13 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

Kdebase3 with 2.96 = 38MB
 With 3.1  = 60MB !!!

Kdeartwork3 with 2.96 = 12MB
With 3.1  = 16MB

30-50% just by using different compiler? 

-andrej




Re: [Cooker] Small improvement freetype (was: Patents)

2002-05-13 Thread Mattias Dahlberg

On 13 May 2002, Frederic Crozat wrote:

> And we really don't want to start fighting with Apple on these
> problems..

I can understand that. And buying licences would be very expensive, right?

> Since you saw the problem with Arial fonts, you can understand why the
> Freetype developers didn't activate the bytecode interpreter.. And we
> can't either..

Am I right in thinking that this is no problem when applications start to
use FreeType 2 with its auto-hinting?

Regards,
Mattias






[Cooker] Kover

2002-05-13 Thread SpamKill



Kover, from  http://apps.kde.com/na/2/info/vid/6358  gives the following
configure error:


--clip

creating cache ./config.cache
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking for strerror in -lcposix... no
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking for -p flag to install... yes
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes
checking for working aclocal... found
checking for working autoconf... found
checking for working automake... found
checking for working autoheader... found
checking for working makeinfo... found
checking for a C-Compiler...
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for a C++-Compiler...
checking for g++... g++
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++  ) works... yes
checking whether the C++ compiler (g++  ) is a cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C++... yes
checking whether g++ supports -fno-exceptions... yes
checking whether g++ supports -fno-check-new... yes
checking whether g++ supports -Wno-long-long... yes
checking whether g++ supports -fno-builtin... yes
checking whether g++ supports -fexceptions... yes
checking whether g++ supports -frtti... yes
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking whether g++ supports -frepo... yes
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/bin/ld
checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes
checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r
checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking how to recognise dependant libraries... pass_all
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for strip... strip
checking for Cygwin environment... no
checking for mingw32 environment... no
updating cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking whether the linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking for dlfcn.h... yes
checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes
checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... no
creating libtool
updating cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
ltcf-cxx: with_gcc=yes ; with_gnu_ld=yes
checking for objdir... .libs
checking for g++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC
checking if g++ PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes
checking if g++ static flag -static works... yes
checking if g++ supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking if g++ supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes
checking whether the linker (g++) supports shared libraries... yes
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build shared libraries... yes
checking whether to build static libraries... no
checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes
checking whether a program can dlopen itself... (cached) yes
checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself...
(cached) no
appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool
checking for object suffix... o
checking for executable suffix... no
checking for msgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for gmsgfmt... /usr/bin/msgfmt
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for main in -lcompat... no
checking for crypt in -lcrypt... yes
checking for the third argument of getsockname... socklen_t
checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet... no
checking for dnet_ntoa in -ldnet_stub... no
checking for inet_ntoa... yes
checking for connect... yes
checking for remove... yes
checking for shmat... yes
checking for killpg in -lucb... no
checking size of int... 4
checking size of long... 4
checking size of char *... 4
checking for dlopen in -ldl... (cached) yes
checking for 

[Cooker] ntp RPM has wrong dependencies.

2002-05-13 Thread Dmitri Tikhonov

ntp-4.1.0-1mdk.i586.rpm uses chkconfig in its scripts, but chkconfig is
not listed as one of its dependencies.  Version 4.1.1 does not fix this
problem, either.  This is a problem if one wants to roll his own installs
and desires RPM to do the ordering for him.

Unfortunately, I cannot file a bug at qa.mandrakesoft.com.  How would I
escalate this issue?

Thanks,
   - Dmitri.




Re: [Cooker] rpm-4.0.4 failures [Was: KDE3 - pb's]

2002-05-13 Thread Brad Felmey

On Sun, 2002-05-12 at 20:09, guran wrote:

> I installed everything in kde3 with urpmi but got an error after kdevelop3:
> error: db4 error (-30988) from dbcursor->c_get: DB_PAGE_NOTFOUND:
> requested page not found.

I've gotten this on every single machine I've put rpm-4.0.4 on.
--rebuilldb does NOT work. It doesn't error out on every package, but
every machine will give some errors on some packages. I can't tell
exactly which ones because they're usually being done in a batch.
-- 
Brad Felmey





Re: [Cooker] urpmi behaviour?

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 14.00, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > The thing is that I did like this "for i in *.rpm; do urpmi --auto $i;
>
> done"
>
>
> Well if you prefer to repeat the same task 1000 times instead of doing
> it once it is your choice. It has nothing to do with urpmi.
>
> urpmi --auto --auto-select does exactly the same. Even uprmi $(ls *.rpm
>
> | sed '/\.i586\.rpm$//') is better.
> |
> > This way the hdlists file was uncompressed (and analysed) at each
>
> invocation
>
> > of urpmi. People on the list suggested --auto-select which seems to be
> > faster
> > if you have the nerves to wait ;)
> >
> > Usally I only use "rpm", the urp* tools is new and unfamiliar to me,
>
> but I'm
>
> > slowly getting there.

That's what I just said, wasn't it? 

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




RE: [Cooker] urpmi behaviour?

2002-05-13 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

> 
> The thing is that I did like this "for i in *.rpm; do urpmi --auto $i;
done"
> 

Well if you prefer to repeat the same task 1000 times instead of doing
it once it is your choice. It has nothing to do with urpmi.

urpmi --auto --auto-select does exactly the same. Even uprmi $(ls *.rpm
| sed '/\.i586\.rpm$//') is better.

> This way the hdlists file was uncompressed (and analysed) at each
invocation
> of urpmi. People on the list suggested --auto-select which seems to be
> faster
> if you have the nerves to wait ;)
> 
> Usally I only use "rpm", the urp* tools is new and unfamiliar to me,
but I'm
> slowly getting there.
> 
> Thanks.
> --
> Regards // Oden Eriksson





Re: [Cooker] urpmi behaviour?

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 13.27, François Pons wrote:
> Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The thing is that it seems to take a huge amount of time to uncompress
> > the hdlists files, it would be faster on this P90 machine if this stage
> > of urpmi could be changed.
>
> Most of the time is not taken on uncompression but on analysis and the fact
> that urpmi is perl script and not compiled language.

The thing is that I did like this "for i in *.rpm; do urpmi --auto $i; done"

This way the hdlists file was uncompressed (and analysed) at each invocation 
of urpmi. People on the list suggested --auto-select which seems to be faster 
if you have the nerves to wait ;)

Usally I only use "rpm", the urp* tools is new and unfamiliar to me, but I'm 
slowly getting there.

Thanks.
-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-5.601-13mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 11.16, Pixel wrote:
> Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sundayen den 12 May 2002 22.00, Pixel wrote:
> > > --=-=-=
> > > Name: perl Relocations: (not
> > > relocateable) Version : 5.601 Vendor:
> > > MandrakeSoft Release : 13mdk Build Date:
> > > Sun May 12 22:36:57
> > >
> > > - remove -Uuselargefiles (beware binary incompatibility, esp.
> > > apache...)
> >
> > Huh?
> >
> > How will it affect apache?
>
> well, i've seen some reports about some incompatibility with mod_perl
> (using good). i don't really know if this is an old pb or what.

I don't know either, but maybe jmdault or cbelisle knows?

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] urpmi-3.3-25mdk

2002-05-13 Thread François Pons

Stefan van der Eijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> François,
> 
> I have a question about some urpmi behaviour. I'm not sure if it's meant to be.
> 
> Take a look at this example:
> 
> # rpm -q --whatprovides automake
> automake1.6-1.6.1-2mdk
> 
> "automake" is provided by automake1.6-1.6.1-2mdk.
> 
> Now if I want to add some packages (say automake and qt2-devel) I get the
> following:
> 
> # urpmi -p --auto-select --auto automake
> installing /mirrors/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/automake-1.4-20.p5.mdk.noarch.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> automake < 1.6.1 conflicts with automake1.6-1.6.1-2mdk
> Installation failed
> 
> Wouldn't it be the better behaviour of urpmi to skip the packages that are
> already provided on the system and get the others installed?

It is not implemented currently, it only uses package name when searching
through the installed database (it uses package name or provides for urpmi db),
it should have checked conflicts and remove request to install automake-1.4.
urpmi will get some extensions to support such things in the future.

François.




Re: [Cooker] urpmi formatting

2002-05-13 Thread François Pons

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> ÷ þÔ×, 02.05.2002, × 12:56, Guillaume Cottenceau ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> > David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > Try:
> > > urpmi --auto-select | awk '{for(i=1;i<=NF;i++){print
> > > $i}}'
> > 
> > Use nowadays' tools :-).
> > 
> > urpmi --auto-select | perl -pe 's/\s+/\n/g' 
> > 
> 
> Come on, folks!
> 
> urpmq -r -u -d --auto-select
> 
> urpmi is not the only available command :-)

Ah nice Andrej, this is *effectively* better here ;-)

You can write it urpmq -rud --auto-select too.

François.




Re: [Cooker] urpmi behaviour?

2002-05-13 Thread François Pons

Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The thing is that it seems to take a huge amount of time to uncompress the 
> hdlists files, it would be faster on this P90 machine if this stage of urpmi 
> could be changed.

Most of the time is not taken on uncompression but on analysis and the fact that
urpmi is perl script and not compiled language.

François.




Re: [Cooker] what's up with WEB CVS?

2002-05-13 Thread Frederic Lepied

Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://www.linux-mandrake.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SPECS/kernel:
> 
> Forbidden
> You don't have permission to access /cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/SPECS/kernel on
> this server.

It's fixed. Thx for the report.
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you




Re: [Cooker] glibc upgrade causes disk read failures

2002-05-13 Thread Marcel Pol

On 13 May 2002 00:52:39 -0500
Lonnie Borntreger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I tried to upgrade from glibc 2.2.4 to 2.2.5.  Upon rebooting I got a
> whole bunch of dma read failures on my disk (ext3) right after I got the
> message that it was starting init. Obviously this made so that none of
> the filesystems got mounted, and none of the init scripts ran.
> 
> Downgrading again (using a rescue CD), corrected the problem.  This
> doesn't make sense since LILO was able to read everything just fine, and
> the kernel had no problem reading/loading the modules it needed, it
> happened after the kernel finished loading.

Stupid question, but...
You did upgrade the rest of the distro?
I mean, you did not install this glibc from cooker on a 8.2 system I hope?


--
Marcel Pol

Linux 2.4.18-13mdksmp, up 5 days, 23:55





RE: [Cooker] Software Manager Broken

2002-05-13 Thread Borsenkow Andrej

> 
> Freshly installed the latest cooker by ftp. Software Manager doesn't
work.
> With software manager not working, I can not setup my Update source
list.
> 

you can

urpmi.addmedia updates ftp://bla-bla-bla with
relative-path-to-hdlist-cz-if-you-wish


> This is what I have installed for gcc:

How is it related to software manager?

-andrej


> libgcc3.1-3.1-0.11mdk
> gcc-cpp-3.1-0.11mdk
> gcc-3.1-0.11mdk
> gcc3.1-c++-3.1-0.8mdk
> gcc-c++-3.1-0.11mdk
> gcc-java-3.1-0.11mdk
> 
> and this is what I have for glibc:
> glibc-devel-2.2.5-5mdk
> glibc-2.2.5-5mdk
> libglib2.0_0-2.0.1-1mdk
> libglib1.2-devel-1.2.10-4mdk
> libglib1.2-1.2.10-4mdk
> 
> --
>

> Altoine B
> Maximum Time Unlimited
> Chicago Based and Operated
>

> I always pass on good advice.  It is the only thing to do with it.
> It is never any good to oneself.
>   -- Oscar Wilde, "An Ideal Husband"
> ---
> 2.4.18-16mdk
> Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586
>






[Cooker] Software Manager Broken

2002-05-13 Thread nDiScReEt

Freshly installed the latest cooker by ftp. Software Manager doesn't work.
With software manager not working, I can not setup my Update source list.

This is what I have installed for gcc:
libgcc3.1-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-cpp-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc3.1-c++-3.1-0.8mdk
gcc-c++-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-java-3.1-0.11mdk

and this is what I have for glibc:
glibc-devel-2.2.5-5mdk
glibc-2.2.5-5mdk
libglib2.0_0-2.0.1-1mdk
libglib1.2-devel-1.2.10-4mdk
libglib1.2-1.2.10-4mdk

-- 

Altoine B
Maximum Time Unlimited
Chicago Based and Operated

I always pass on good advice.  It is the only thing to do with it.
It is never any good to oneself.
-- Oscar Wilde, "An Ideal Husband"
---
2.4.18-16mdk
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586






[Cooker] MCC Broken

2002-05-13 Thread nDiScReEt

I freshley installed cooker from ftp and find mcc broken. I type in the 
command mcc as root and there is nothing. Not even an error argument. I do 
strace -c mcc and I get the following output:

[ndiscreet@localhost ndiscreet]$ su -c "strace -c mcc"
Password: 
execve("/usr/X11R6/bin/mcc", ["mcc"], [/* 34 vars */]) = 0
% time seconds  usecs/call callserrors syscall
-- --- --- - - 
 43.120.0078277827 1   poll
 15.800.002868   5   542   _llseek
 12.630.002293  6635   write
  9.230.001675  11   155   read
  3.800.000690  1354 4 open
  2.520.000457  65 7   writev
  2.410.000438   767   mmap2
  1.110.000202   454   close
  1.040.000188   541   brk
  0.960.000174   449   fstat64
  0.880.000160 160 1   execve
  0.860.000157   819   munmap
  0.860.000157 157 1   shutdown
  0.850.000155  78 2 1 connect
  0.820.000149 149 1   fork
  0.590.000107   61818 lstat64
  0.420.76   515   mprotect
  0.400.73  15 5 1 access
  0.260.47  47 1   readlink
  0.210.38  13 3   pipe
  0.200.36  18 2   socket
  0.190.35   4 9   fcntl64
  0.140.26   4 7   uname
  0.100.18  18 1   shmdt
  0.090.17  17 1   shmget
  0.090.16  16 1   shmat
  0.070.13  13 1   readv
  0.070.12   6 2   ioctl
  0.070.12   4 3   rt_sigaction
  0.060.11   4 3   alarm
  0.050.09   3 3   gettimeofday
  0.030.05   5 1   sigreturn
  0.020.03   3 1   getuid32
  0.020.03   3 1   getresuid32
  0.020.03   3 1   getsetgid32
  0.020.03   3 1   shmctl
-- --- --- - - 
100.000.018153  110924 total
[ndiscreet@localhost ndiscreet]$ 

I tried Software Manager, MandrakeUpdate, and Harddrake with all having the 
same results. No error args of any sort.

This is what I have installed as far as my glibc:
glibc-devel-2.2.5-5mdk
glibc-2.2.5-5mdk
libglib2.0_0-2.0.1-1mdk
libglib1.2-devel-1.2.10-4mdk
libglib1.2-1.2.10-4mdk

gcc:
libgcc3.1-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-cpp-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc3.1-c++-3.1-0.8mdk
gcc-c++-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-java-3.1-0.11mdk

-- 

Altoine B
Maximum Time Unlimited
Chicago Based and Operated

Neil Armstrong tripped.
---
2.4.18-16mdk
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586






Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] perl-5.601-13mdk

2002-05-13 Thread Pixel

Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sundayen den 12 May 2002 22.00, Pixel wrote:
> > --=-=-=
> > Name: perl Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 5.601 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 13mdk Build Date: Sun May 12 22:36:57
> 
> > - remove -Uuselargefiles (beware binary incompatibility, esp. apache...)
> 
> Huh?
> 
> How will it affect apache?

well, i've seen some reports about some incompatibility with mod_perl
(using good). i don't really know if this is an old pb or what.




Re: [Cooker] Nisca in conrtib not seeming to work properly

2002-05-13 Thread Oden Eriksson

On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 03.16, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> On Sunday 12 May 2002 10:17 pm, Oden Eriksson wrote:
> > On Mondayen den 13 May 2002 02.52, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> > > php-gd is installed i was running 8.2 and just last week i upgraded to
> > > cooker and since then php has acted a little querky
> >
> > Hmm..., if I were you I should remove all php stuff and "rm
> > /etc/php.ini", and do a clean php install.
>
> yep i did it.. and that fixed things..   strange how that works

Yes unfortenuately. Glad that it worked out.

Can you please also try cacti-0.6.8-1mdk.noarch.rpm from contribs and tell me 
what you think, thanks.

-- 
Regards // Oden Eriksson




[Cooker] MySQL-Max

2002-05-13 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld


What's this? All the '.\c'?

root@tl-dhcp-100:/var/lib/mysql# service mysql restart
Stopping MySQL Server(pid 3019)Wait for mysqld to exit\c
.\c
.\c
.\c
.\c
.\c
.\c
.\c
.\c
[  OK  ]
Starting MySQL Server   [  OK  ]
root@tl-dhcp-100:/var/lib/mysql#







[Cooker] 404 error on

2002-05-13 Thread Colin Murphy

On http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/cookerdevel.php3 the link to libc6 for 
cooker - pointing to page http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/fmirror.tgz
is giving a 404 not found.

-- 
Colin Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A man for all seasons, 'specially pepper.




[Cooker] kde3 + winex

2002-05-13 Thread gerhard aldorf



Hi all
I installed mandrake 8.2 download version and kde3 
nvidiadriver etc. Everything works more or less fine until i install winex or 
codeweavers quicktime plugins. After that i cant start kde3 anymore it hangs on 
"initializing system services". Any ideas what`s wrong here.
Thanks Gerhard
 
 
Gerhard AldorfBuild ASWaldemar Thranesgate 
750175 Oslowww.build.no+47 23 32 
75 81+47 91 13 60 97


Re: [Cooker] GCC3.1 with GCC3.0?

2002-05-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau

Tim Stoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Op maandag 13 mei 2002 07:46, schreef iemand (Lonnie Borntreger 
> waarschijnlijk):
> > Given that Cooker is moving to GCC3.1, and I like to always keep up with
> > Cooker, what is the timeframe for having the following conflicts (as
> > reported by others) resolved?
> 
> This error is a big problem (for me, lazy guy) because a simple 'urpmi 
> --auto-select --auto' doesn't work anymore :( It breaks on gcc3.1 :(

If you can manually move to the following:

gcc-c++-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-3.1-0.11mdk
libgcc3.1-3.1-0.11mdk
gcc-cpp-3.1-0.11mdk

Then urpmi --auto-select works again.

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/




Re: [Cooker] glibc upgrade causes disk read failures

2002-05-13 Thread nDiScReEt

On Monday 13 May 2002 00:52, Lonnie Borntreger wrote:
> I tried to upgrade from glibc 2.2.4 to 2.2.5.  Upon rebooting I got a
> whole bunch of dma read failures on my disk (ext3) right after I got the
> message that it was starting init. Obviously this made so that none of
> the filesystems got mounted, and none of the init scripts ran.
>
> Downgrading again (using a rescue CD), corrected the problem.  This
> doesn't make sense since LILO was able to read everything just fine, and
> the kernel had no problem reading/loading the modules it needed, it
> happened after the kernel finished loading.
>
> Everything ran correctly during the time between upgrading the libs and
> the reboot.  I'm at a loss.
>
> Did I miss something?

I think your problem can be atributed to the headers being tied to the glibc 
libraries.
-- 

Altoine B
Maximum Time Unlimited
Chicago Based and Operated

When a man's wife learns to understand him, she usually stops listening to him
-- Murphy's Laws on Sex n°13
---
2.4.18-16mdk
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586






Re: [Cooker] GCC3.1 with GCC3.0?

2002-05-13 Thread Tim Stoop

Op maandag 13 mei 2002 07:46, schreef iemand (Lonnie Borntreger 
waarschijnlijk):
> Given that Cooker is moving to GCC3.1, and I like to always keep up with
> Cooker, what is the timeframe for having the following conflicts (as
> reported by others) resolved?

This error is a big problem (for me, lazy guy) because a simple 'urpmi 
--auto-select --auto' doesn't work anymore :( It breaks on gcc3.1 :(

-- 
Regards,
Tim Stoop

PGP public key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Random quote/fortune:
The District of Columbia has a law forbidding you to exert pressure on a 
balloon and thereby cause a whistling sound on the streets.




Re: [Cooker] vim-common conflicts

2002-05-13 Thread Warly

"Ryan T. Sammartino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> installing /var/cache/urpmi/rpms/vim-common-6.1-6mdk.i586.rpm
>
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/es from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package koffice-i18n-es-1.1.1-1mdk
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/es from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package kde-i18n-es-2.2.2-1mdk
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/es from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package locales-es-2.3.1.3-1mdk
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/de from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package locales-de-2.3.1.3-1mdk
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/fr from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package libgimpprint1-4.2.1-0.pre5.1mdk
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/pl from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package libgimpprint1-4.2.1-0.pre5.1mdk
> file /usr/share/vim/lang/sk from install of vim-common-6.1-6mdk
> conflicts with file from package libgimpprint1-4.2.1-0.pre5.1mdk

You should have the 5mdk on your system, souldn't you ?

It was mispackaged and conflict with the locales, just force it, or
remove your vim and reinstall it

-- 
Warly




[Cooker] Re: urpmi --auto-select ignores skip.list (was: Re: Why does urpmi --auto-select select bind-chroot for obsoletes?)

2002-05-13 Thread François Pons

Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> »Alexander Skwar« sagte am 2002-04-27 um 00:10:44 +0200 :
> > Why does bind-chroot-8.3.1 obsolete bind (generic)?  I've got bind 9.x
> > installed, and because I've got contrib listed as a urpmi source, urpmi
> > --auto-select also wants to install bind-chroot.  This is because
> 
> Futher, there's a bug in the --auto-select handling.  Because I don't
> want to install bind-chroot, I've put bind-chroot in
> /etc/urpmi/skip.list.  But urpmi-3.3-25mdk still wants to install this
> package.
> 
> Or how can I tell urpmi to not install a package no matter what when
> doing --auto-select?

It should with package name only, but I don't known why it doesn't work here
(maybe last line wihtout LF ?).

I note for checking it.

François.

PS : I was on vacation, sorry for problable (I didn't check) late response.




Re: [Cooker] Java Experiences

2002-05-13 Thread nDiScReEt

> > GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable:
> > export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
>
> That export can cause problems when you are using sun JDK 1.4 under
> Cooker.
>
> I got errors with dirname and ls when using libc 6.
>
> This appeared with Jago (a Java Go client for IGS)
>
> Jago runs fine when I'm launching it with java -classpath Jago.jar Go
> but fails when I use the Go script (LAX launcher).
>
> I detected that the problem came from that export.
>
> Java :
>
> java version "1.4.0"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-b92)
> Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0-b92, mixed mode)
>
>
> Lax :
>
> # LAXUNIX.SH - LaunchAnywhere (tm) version 4.5.0
>
> Distribution : Mandrake Cooker updated daily.

Well, so much for my using java1.4 on the k6-2 for awhile. That sucks as I 
have that as my primary server and really wanted to try out the jakarta. I 
think I still can but I will let every one know of my findings.

-- 

Altoine B
Maximum Time Unlimited
Chicago Based and Operated

Bradley's Bromide:
If computers get too powerful, we can organize
them into a committee -- that will do them in.
---
2.4.18-16mdk
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586






Re: [Cooker] Java Experiences

2002-05-13 Thread nDiScReEt

>
> GLIBC 2.2 / Linux 2.4 users should also define an environment variable:
> export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
>
>
> I might try that when I reimplement java 1.4. It may be stable with tomcat,
> but it sure isn't stable with yahoo! chat or yahoo! games.I want to kill my
> current setup (PHP) and switch to jsp anyway. I want the future now. (xml,
> xsl, xlt, etc, etc, etc..)

So far it is unstable with my k6-2 even with the nopentium option enabled. I 
will see my mileage with the p4. I will try that export option on the k6-2 
and see if that fixes the problem.

-- 

Altoine B
Maximum Time Unlimited
Chicago Based and Operated

There's just something I don't like about Virginia; the state.
---
2.4.18-16mdk
Mandrake Linux release 8.3 (Cooker) for i586






Re: [Cooker] Small improvement freetype (was: Patents)

2002-05-13 Thread Frederic Crozat

Le sam 11/05/2002 à 16:32, Danny Tholen a écrit :
> On Thursday 09 May 2002 06:58 pm, you wrote:
> > > But YANAL, and more importantly, you are not paying if it goes horribly
> > > wrong.
> Well, I was just going to commit myself for 1/10 of the cost for a re-examination
> (about $ 2500), but after some research I think prior evidence is of no importance
> in a re-examination by the US patent office. Very silly IMO. 
> 
> But does Mdk has lawyers? If so, they really should have a look. A document with the
> ttf specs released by Apple in 1990 makes the last patent complete rubbish, and 
>questions the 
> other two, because you should not encourage the use of your patent by trying to make 
>it a standard.

I don't think we have lawyers (nor money) to work on that..

And we really don't want to start fighting with Apple on these
problems..

> 
> > So is this patent the sole reason why true-type (non-antialiased) fonts
> > look jaggy in Mandrake 8.2? That would mean that we are cooked.
> yup
> 
> Again my plea for European mirrors with this stuff, and a direct link in the 
>installer
> to these hosts. Even SAMBA is threathened by MS patents now it seems.
> 
> Slight improvement is perhaps possible. In the freetype2 src you find:
> /src/truetype/ttinterp.c:
> #undef NO_APPLE_PATENT
> 
> defining this seems to disable the specific algorithm that is supposedly patented.
> In other words: you do get a bytecode interpreter (ofcourse you have to enable
> it first) with a few algoritms for font hinting, but not the patented ones.
> 
> It is very font-dependent how this will look. I attach a screenshot of 4 MS-ttf
> fonts enlarged with xmag. Do not use a zoomfactor when comparing them, because
> zooming will affect how it looks.
> 
> I think it looks slightly better, exept for some Arial glyphs with lots of diagonals 
>(this
> is specifically where the algorithm applies) WDYT Frédéric?

Since you saw the problem with Arial fonts, you can understand why the
Freetype developers didn't activate the bytecode interpreter.. And we
can't either..

-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft