Re: [Cooker] SUB cooker

2001-03-27 Thread Amien Salie
Title: SUB cooker



LoL, was he sober at the time?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Eaon 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 11:52 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [Cooker] SUB cooker
  
  He 
  works for a brewery. Let's let him in. ;-)
  
  Eaon
  
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On 
Behalf Of Michael HertelSent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 2:07 
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: 
[Cooker] SUB cooker
Mike Hertel Network Administrator Okanagan 
Spring Brewery Tel: (250) 542-2337 
ext.224 Fax: (250) 542-7780 
  


Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms

2000-08-06 Thread Amien Salie

Peace

I am happy to report that my kernel upgrade 2.2.15 to 2.2.16 went smoothly.
Everything seems to work as before, including sound.
All i did was download the rpms and installed it with kpackage.

I was wondering if I did something wrong to get it working right :)


--
Amien Salie
No Fate But What You Make ...
Registered Linux User #76190. 
register @ http://counter.li.org/




Re: [Cooker] updating kernel through rpms

2000-08-06 Thread Amien Salie

Peace

First, no I am not running ReiserFS.
BTW. i found some good reading material on that topic:

http://devlinux.com/projects/reiserfs/

Second,

On uname -r
2.2.16-9mdk

list for /lib/modules/2.2.16

total 72
  82492 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 block/
  67157 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 cdrom/
  95386 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 fs/
  112982 drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 ipv4/
  21157 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 misc/
  21116 -rw-r--r--  1 root root   34458 Aug  5 03:15 modules.dep
  67209 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 net/
  113108 drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 pcmcia/
  82504 drwxr-xr-x2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 scsi/
  128270 drwxr-xr-x  2 root root 4096 Aug  4 22:07 usb/

This is the second time I performed this update, successfully.

-- 

Amien Salie
No Fate But What You Make ...
Registered Linux User #76190. 
register @ http://counter.li.org/



On Sun, 06 Aug 2000, you wrote:
 Amien Salie wrote:
  
  I am happy to report that my kernel upgrade 2.2.15 to 2.2.16 went smoothly.
  Everything seems to work as before, including sound.
  All i did was download the rpms and installed it with kpackage.
  
  I was wondering if I did something wrong to get it working right :)
 
 Hmmm ...  Check whether you are really running 2.2.16 or still the
 old kernel (uname -r).
 
 Also check whether you have a /lib/modules/2.2.16 directory and that
 it is full of modules.
 
 I would like to know, since previous kernel RPMs left out the
 matching modules, so I lost faith with the process.
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 
 Ron. [AU] - sent by Mandrake Linux.
 To write a poem in 17 syllables is very diffic




Re: [Cooker] imwheel

2000-07-22 Thread Amien Salie

On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, you wrote:
 My logitech mouse just broke after only a few months of use, so my friend
 lent me an MS intellimouse (the only MS product I happen to be using right
 now, ironically), 

Who will admit along with me that the worlds worst sofware maker (Micro$oft) is
ironically one of the better Hardware makers :P


Amin

--
w00




Re: [Cooker] another bad rpm :-((

2000-07-14 Thread Amien Salie

Greetings

I had a problem once with stiffy disk or drive, under dos when booting with the
stiffy i also got a message " Bad Magic". After replacing my stiffy drive and
tossing the disk everything went fine.  I was just wondering, could this be a
virus?

masalie



On Tue, 19 Aug 2036, you wrote:
 # rpm -U librep-0.12.3-2mdk.i586.rpm
 unpacking of archive failed: cpio: Bad magic
 
 I am loosing faith, above all with one update a day :-(
 
 
 =-=
 kk1
 
 
 Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1




Re: [Cooker] RPM(s) worst enemy but Mandrake's best friend...

2000-06-22 Thread Amien Salie

 I have no doubt that your reasons for Unix failure in the MS dominated desktop
market is true, what you have explained is what the situation was, which gave MS
there opportunity to take what they now have.

 My reference to "the Unix vendors were divided against themselves" is simply
that while they were focused on each other, MS was allowed to go unchallenged
and gain there foot hold into the market. It was not impossible for Unix
vendors to challenge MS and produce an alternative, infact they were too short
sited to see the threat MS posed. It took a Scandinavian Penguin Lover (Linus)
and other Heroes to prove that Unix has a place on the desktop, when Unix
vendors chose to overlook this. 

 What I was trying to get across in this thread was that while we are fighting
trivial battles like which package management software is better or even worst
which flavor of Linux is better i.e. Linux people divided against themselves,
MS and its like can only gain from this.

 Ask not what we can do for Mandrake or Debian, but ask what we can do for
Linux! :)

Amien
--
No Fate But What U Make...




On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, you wrote:
 On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Pablo Saratxaga wrote:
  On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 11:53:32PM +0200, Amien Salie wrote:
   Someone once posed the question, 
   " Why did Unix fail where Microsoft succeeded?"
   And the simple answer to this was  
   "the Unix vendors were devided against themselves"
  
  And the simple answer is simply dead wrong.
  
  A better answer would be to look at what were at that time the targetted
  markets, the price of the different softwares, the requirements on hardware
  and the price of such hardware...
 
 Heh.  True.  At the time Windows was making inroads into business, you
 needed a mainframe (or at the least an extremely powerful PC) to run Unix.
 Your average desktop machine just didn't have the power.  Unix on the
 desktop wasn't really a possibility until very recently (relatively
 speaking -- seems recent to me, but I've been computing since 1982; ah
 the heady days of the 16K computer plugged into the TV, those were the
 days).  If someone hadn't been kind enough to drop a SPARCstation on my
 desk for free during the early 90's, I'd have never spent the money on
 a Unix workstation.  Today, it's actually cheaper to build a Unix box
 (thanks to Micros~1 Windows license fees).  Funny how things change...




Re: [Cooker] RPM(s) worst enemy but Mandrake's best friend...

2000-06-20 Thread Amien Salie

Someone once posed the question, 
" Why did Unix fail where Microsoft succeeded?"
And the simple answer to this was  
"the Unix vendors were devided against themselves"

May the God of the Penguins save us from this sought of infighting :)


Amien

No Fate But What U Make