[Cooker] Numbering

2002-04-09 Thread Bill Kenworthy

# rpm --rebuild abiword-0.99.5-1mdk.src.rpm
Installing abiword-0.99.5-1mdk.src.rpm
error: failed build dependencies:
libgal-devel is needed by abiword-0.99.3-1mdk


0.99.5-1mdk - 0.99.3-1mdk ??

BillK






Re: [Cooker] Numbering

2002-04-09 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Not libgal but the numbering.  But its still my problem - my sync script
failed - renamed file but modem logged off before rsync updated the
contents!

sorry
BillK


On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 06:35, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
 Bill Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  # rpm --rebuild abiword-0.99.5-1mdk.src.rpm
  Installing abiword-0.99.5-1mdk.src.rpm
  error: failed build dependencies:
  libgal-devel is needed by abiword-0.99.3-1mdk
 
 then, install it !
 
 -- 
 Still untested beyond 'it compiles' (davej)
 
 





[Cooker] How come drakxtools ...

2002-03-16 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Question: How come drakxtools requires a new version (src rpm) almost
daily?

BillK








Re: [Cooker] Moz src rpm's

2002-03-15 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Thanks, I missed the obvious.

Maintainer, QA for cooker  PPC?

BillK


On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 18:58, Stew Benedict wrote:
 
 On 15 Mar 2002, William Kenworthy wrote:
 
  Trying to compile last two versions of src rpms from cooker of Mozilla
  gives the following error on a pentium and an athlon system.  Note that
  these are both mixed 8.1/cookers, but prev Moz src rpm's (and all others
  I am doing at the moment) seem ok.
  
  Ignoring chrome/inspector.jar
  Ignoring defaults/pref/inspector.js
  Ignoring res/inspector/viewer-registry.rdf
  Ignoring res/inspector/search-registry.rdf
  + build/package/rpm/SOURCES/mozilla-copy-package-files.sh
  /var/tmpmozilla.list /var/tmpmozilla.package
  /var/tmp/mozilla-0.9.8-root/usr/lib/mozilla
  /usr/src/RPM/BUILD/mozilla/dist/bin /usr/lib/mozilla
  build/package/rpm/SOURCES/mozilla-copy-package-files.sh list file not
  found
  error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63419 (%install)
  
  
  RPM build errors:
  Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.63419 (%install)
  
 
 Same thing on PPC.  Change your %{_tmpdir} variable to have a trailing
 slash.
 
 Stew Benedict
 
 -- 
 MandrakeSoft  OH/TN, USA http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/
 PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/PPC/FAQ/
 Cooker-PPC IRC:  irc.openprojects.net/#cooker-ppc
 
 






Re: [Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Love the idea.  Having one of these beasts and just getting the
knowledge to set it up has been a long haul - but worth it in the long
run!  Too late for 8.2, but in the next release would allow Mandrake to
take over the laptop Linux market! - no competition in sight, a
perfect niche!

BillK

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 17:10, SI Reasoning wrote:
 Since laptops seem to have the most peculiarities,
 while at the same time being populated by quite a few
 newbies... why not create an rpm with known specifics
 for certain laptops.
 
 For instance a Dell Inspiron rpm would include a
 script that would place noapic on the append
 statement, load the Dell modules for volume control
 and maybe even enable the cdrom control with xmms or
 some other such program.
 
 Then during install you could ask a question along the
 lines of laptop, server, desktop? and if laptop, they
 could choose their laptop or even brand (like Dell) or
 just a generic if not on the list. Then most issues
 would be resolved up front. You also have the added
 bonus of dedicated users doing fine tweaks for their
 laptops that can make it into these rpms. Can I see a
 Mandrake laptop users club? :-}
 
 
 =
 SI Reasoning
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change.  Creativity keeps
 the creator alive.
 
 -FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
 http://mail.yahoo.com/
 






Re: [Cooker] If ns4 removed, a link needs to be created to mozilla

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Bad move removing Netscape.  I keep tripping over websites (especially
banking!) that wont accept other than netscape 4.7/8 or ie.  In some,
even the menu script in the web page tests for netscape ver 4.?,
refusing galeon (reports itself as ver 5) and mozilla.  Wish galeon had
the ability of konquerer to report whatever version you want, but then
konquerer has other incompatibilities and wont display the pages for
other reasons (flaky java support?)

BillK

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 17:46, SI Reasoning wrote:
 There are several programs that send help files to
 netscape. Some of them do not even allow for
 configuration changes to a preferred browser. If ns4
 is to be removed then there should still netscape and
 netscape-communicator should be linked to mozilla or
 some other such browser. 
 
 =
 SI Reasoning
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change.  Creativity keeps
 the creator alive.
 
 -FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
 http://mail.yahoo.com/
 






Re: [Cooker] If ns4 removed, a link needs to be created to mozilla

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Does anyone have any more information on this - search of mozdev and
google doesnt turn up anything interesting.  The mozilla prefs.js
which has a version string gets overwrittem when the browser starts.

BillK


On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 18:43, Buchan Milne wrote:
 This can be done with Mozilla quite easily (see archives for a similar 
 thread) using some tool from mozdev.org. Galeon can thus also do this, 
 though you would have to hack the preferences.js.
 
 It's time to start complaining about websites not supporting 3 of the 4 
 most standards-compliant web browsers (1: Mozilla and friends, 2: Opera, 
 4:Konqueror). Number 3 is IE5 on Mac. IE5,6 on windows don't come close.
 






Re: [Cooker] lpddaemon

2002-03-07 Thread Bill Kenworthy

[root@rattus rpm]# urpmi openoffice
no package named openoffice
[root@rattus rpm]# 

yes?

BillK


On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 17:21, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
 On 7 Mar 2002, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
 
  Have given up trying to compile the cooker contrib src for open office
  for the moment and now trying the binary from cooker contrib to get a
  start.  It wants a package called lpddaemon which I cannot find.  Can
  some kind sole give a hint as to where this is hiding!
 
 urpmi openoffice suggests 4 alternatives (including cups). Using urpmi,
 you should.
 
 






Re: [Cooker] lpddaemon

2002-03-06 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Thanks,

BillK

On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 07:08, Charles A Edwards wrote:
 On 07 Mar 2002 06:32:43 +0800
 Bill Kenworthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Have given up trying to compile the cooker contrib src for open office
  for the moment and now trying the binary from cooker contrib to get a
  start.  It wants a package called lpddaemon which I cannot find.  Can
  some kind sole give a hint as to where this is hiding!
  
 
  LPRing-3.8.6-2mdk
 
 
Charles
 






[Cooker] openoffice src rpm in cooker contrib

2002-03-05 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Can someone confirm the openoffice src rpm in cooker contrib builds ok
(rpm --rebuild openoffice-6041-4mdksrcrpm)  I am getting errors in
the sleepycat db stuff

BillK








Re: [Cooker] Advice - please

2002-01-15 Thread Bill Kenworthy

There are some html validators that you can point to web pages and it
will pass them and report on standards compliance.  I think w3c have
some for different standards like html versions and possibly xml.

BillK

On Wed, 2002-01-16 at 02:51, Reinhard Katzmann wrote:
 Hi Guran!
 
  
  What is the standard? How can I show to him that certain rules has to be 
  followed to give all visitors the capacity to view the page?
 
 There is no real standard. Of course there are HTML4.x,HTML3.x,XHTML
 etc. standards available for the HTML language but most of the Designers
 of homepages do not care much for that. I do not accept cookies as
 well but there are pages which are cookie-overloading like all the
 pages from yahoo (especially the former egroups).
 
 Sometimes cookies are used for sending informations or storing user
 settings (the useful part), other times they are used to track down
 how you used the webpage and how often. There are organisations out
 there which try to do something against it and others trying to
 create superior technics to cookies (php is a very good way to
 never have the need to use cookies again ;). But I personally
 doubt that we will have a cookie free Internet in the far future...
 
 Reinhard
 -- 
 Software-Engineer, Developer for Embedded Devices
 Project: HyperPen Tablet USB Driver for Linux 
 GnuPG Public Key available on request






[Cooker] old gal version in cooker

2002-01-12 Thread Bill Kenworthy

A number of cooker packages are asking for gal 0.19 when installed or
built from src.  Latest in cooker seems to be gal-0.18.1-1mdk.src.rpm,
same with binaries.

BillK






Re: [Cooker] old gal version in cooker

2002-01-12 Thread Bill Kenworthy

[root@rattus i686]# rpm -ivh *
error: failed dependencies:
libgal.so.19   is needed by gnumeric-1.0.1-1mdk
libgal.so.19   is needed by Guppi-0.40.2-3mdk
[root@rattus i686]#

There were others as well.  I recently cleaned out the rpm's I have
built so these are just the latest ones.  I do build gal, gtkhtml,
bonobo, bonobo-conf and evolution from cvs so it may be some nested
dependency issue, but at least one other person has a similar version
problem which has led me to post.

Can rpm be used to get a list of all rpm's I have installed that
depend on libgal?

BillK


On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 09:12, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
 On 13 Jan 2002, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
 
  A number of cooker packages are asking for gal 0.19 when installed or
  built from src.  Latest in cooker seems to be gal-0.18.1-1mdk.src.rpm,
  same with binaries.
 
 What packages need gal 0.19? It's very new, and tarballs of gal 0.19
 is not in official site yet, as of now.
 
 Abel
 
 






Re: [Cooker] old gal version in cooker

2002-01-12 Thread Bill Kenworthy

This is a mixed 8.1 and some cooker from src packages, as well as the
cvs mentioned earlier, so I think that it just totally confused as to
what is what!  The urpmi list at the end doesnt mention libgal.19 at
all!  Though I think the other person with the problem has a recent
8.1 install with little else changed (assumption on my part)

BillK


[root@rattus SRPMS]# rpm -qpi gnumeric-1.0.1-1mdk.src.rpm 
Name: gnumeric Relocations: (not
relocateable)
Version : 1.0.1 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon 07 Jan 2002
22:40:29 WST
Install date: (not installed)   Build Host:
bi.mandrakesoft.com
Group   : OfficeSource RPM: (none)
Size: 8554779  License: GPL
Packager: Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
URL : http://www.gnome.org/gnumeric/
Summary : A full-featured spreadsheet for GNOME.
Description :
GNOME (GNU Network Object Model Environment) is a user-friendly set of
applications and desktop tools to be used in conjunction with a window
manager for the X Window System.  GNOME is similar in purpose and scope
to CDE and KDE, but GNOME is based completely on free software.

This is the Gnumeric, the GNOME spreadsheet program. If you are familiar
with
Excel, you should be ready to use Gnumeric.  It tries to clone all of
the good features and stay as compatible as possible with Excel in terms
of
usability. Hopefully the bugs have been left behind :).
[root@rattus SRPMS]# rpm -qpi Guppi-0.40.2-3mdk.src.rpm 
Name: GuppiRelocations: (not
relocateable)
Version : 0.40.2Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 3mdk  Build Date: Tue 08 Jan 2002
13:06:05 WST
Install date: (not installed)   Build Host:
bi.mandrakesoft.com
Group   : OfficeSource RPM: (none)
Size: 1104706  License: GPL
Packager: Mandrake Linux Team http://www.mandrakeexpert.com
URL : http://www.gnome.org/guppi
Summary : GNOME Data Analysis and Visualization
Description :
GNOME is the GNU Network Object Model Environment.
This powerful environment is both easy to use and
easy to configure.

This package will install Guppi, a GNOME-based data
analysis and visualization system. Install this package
if you want to test Guppi.
[root@rattus SRPMS]#

and also

[root@rattus SRPMS]# urpmf --requires  libgal.so
libgtkhtml15:requires:libgal.so.11
evolution:requires:libgal.so.11
gnome-guile:requires:libgal.so.11
gtkhtml:requires:libgal.so.11
pan:requires:libgal.so.11
gnumeric:requires:libgal.so.11
gnucash:requires:libgal.so.11
gabber:requires:libgal.so.11
perl-GTK-GtkHTML:requires:libgal.so.11
evolution-pilot:requires:libgal.so.11
mrproject:requires:libgal.so.11
ximian-setup-tools:requires:libgal.so.11
libgtkhtml19:requires:libgal.so.18
gtkhtml:requires:libgal.so.18
Guppi:requires:libgal.so.18
evolution:requires:libgal.so.18
gnome-spell:requires:libgal.so.18
gnome-control-center:requires:libgal.so.18
gnucash:requires:libgal.so.18
gnumeric:requires:libgal.so.18
evolution-pilot:requires:libgal.so.18
gabber:requires:libgal.so.18
gnome-utils:requires:libgal.so.18
mrproject:requires:libgal.so.18
perl-GTK-GtkHTML:requires:libgal.so.18
[root@rattus SRPMS]# rpm -qa|grep libgal
libgal18-devel-0.18.1-1mdk
libgal11-0.11.2-3mdk
libgal18-0.18.1-1mdk
[root@rattus SRPMS]# 


On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 14:14, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
 Bill Kenworthy wrote:
 
 [root@rattus i686]# rpm -ivh *
 error: failed dependencies:
  libgal.so.19   is needed by gnumeric-1.0.1-1mdk
  libgal.so.19   is needed by Guppi-0.40.2-3mdk
 [root@rattus i686]#
 
 Strange... on today's cooker  contrib:
 
 [stefan@taz buildout]$ urpmf --requires  libgal.so  
 gnome-guile:requires:libgal.so.18
 ximian-setup-tools:requires:libgal.so.18
 sodipodi:requires:libgal.so.18
 libgtkhtml20:requires:libgal.so.18
 Guppi:requires:libgal.so.18
 evolution:requires:libgal.so.18
 gnome-spell:requires:libgal.so.18
 gtkhtml:requires:libgal.so.18
 gnome-control-center:requires:libgal.so.18
 gnucash:requires:libgal.so.18
 gnumeric:requires:libgal.so.18
 abiword:requires:libgal.so.18
 balsa:requires:libgal.so.18
 evolution-pilot:requires:libgal.so.18
 gabber:requires:libgal.so.18
 gnome-utils:requires:libgal.so.18
 mrproject:requires:libgal.so.18
 perl-GTK-GtkHTML:requires:libgal.so.18
 
 none of those are .19
 
 Ther versions of the gnumeric  Guppi packages you mentioned are the same:
 
 /mirrors/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/Guppi-0.40.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
 /mirrors/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gnumeric-1.0.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
 /mirrors/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/gnumeric-devel-1.0.1-1mdk.i586.rpm
 
 Can you provide us with a rpm -qpi of the packages in question?
 
 Stefan
 
 There were others as well.  I recently cleaned out the rpm's I have
 built so these are just the latest ones.  I do

Re: [Cooker] Abit KR7A-RAID

2002-01-11 Thread Bill Kenworthy

This has been done to death a few times.  Basicly if you want to use
raid simply on this board, go redhat.  Whilst I have not done it, it
seems that their install will detect it and install the drivers in
RH7.2.  I was looking over the shoulder of someone doing an install and
it was even a menu choice!

For Mandrake, you are stuck with pure software raid with no use of the
HP chip - I guess the difference between an OS aimed at the desktop and
less towards a server setup.  Can be done but requires a *LOT* of
reading and research - I am trying to figure out how to do this and not
lose any of the 40gb of data already on the system that I have nowhere
to back up to because I could not find the info needed when the machine
was built.

Note that the howto's are very detailed,but quite technical.

BillK

On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 09:11, Eugenio Diaz wrote:
 Well, I finaly finished building my new machine (lots of tie wraps, cable
 routing, etc.), an Abit KR7A-RAID with dual ATA133 60GB maxtors on a stripe.
 But I just found that Linux do not support the HPT372 on board raid controller
 :) Double Damn the assholes at High Point!!! I bought this board with the
 impression that High Point was a Linux friendly company, since when I was doing
 my light pre-shopping research I saw a big prominent Linux Logo on their
 page!!!
 
 Can Mandrake put pressure with Abit on High Point to release specs, or whatever
 is needed for the drivers to be merged into the kernel, and not those stupid
 binary drivers for old Linux distros ...
 
 Do you guys know if it is posible to take the RH7.1 drivers they provide, and
 cram them (some how disabling the versioning of symbols) into an initrd to make
 a custom Cooker install discs?
 
 BTW, this message was copied to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so if you reply,
 do a reply all, so that they can see how stupid they are ... my immediate
 reaction was to return the board, but since I invested so much time building
 the box nicely, I am just going to disable the raid controller, and install on
 the normal ATA100 channels.
 
 THANKS HIGH POINT
 
 =
 
 Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE   
 Linux Engineer
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
 http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
 






[Cooker] rpm -rebuild nautilus-1.0.6-7mdk.src.rpm fails

2002-01-05 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Tring to do a rpm --rebuild on the current cooker src file
nautilus-1.0.6-7mdk.src.rpm and am getting the following error:

nautilus-customization-data.c: In function `load_name_map_hash_table':
nautilus-customization-data.c:468: structure has no member named
`childs'
make[2]: *** [nautilus-customization-data.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/nautilus-1.0.6/libnautilus-private'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/RPM/BUILD/nautilus-1.0.6'
make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.91288 (%build)

Has anyone been able to build this rpm on their system? - If so I am
looking at a local problem.

This is a mixed mdk8.1/cooker system.

BillK






[Cooker] gnumeric depends on evolution?

2002-01-04 Thread Bill Kenworthy

# rpm --rebuild gnumeric-1.0.0-1mdk.src.rpm 
Installing gnumeric-1.0.0-1mdk.src.rpm
error: failed build dependencies:
evolution-devel is needed by gnumeric-1.0.0-1mdk

Its a bit strange that gnumeric depends on evolution, or is that some
peculiarity of my (mixed cooker/8.1) system?

BillK







[Cooker] rpm --rebuild error on some cooker src rpms

2001-12-25 Thread Bill Kenworthy

When trying to build some (that is, not all) cooker rpm's on a mixed
cooker/8.1 system, rpm --rebuild gives the following error - on some
src rpm's (latest being openldap.)

___
...
...

Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20994
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD
+ cd openldap-2.0.18
+ rm -rf /var/tmp/openldap-2.0.18-root
+ %makeinstall_std
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20994: fg: no job control
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20994 (%install)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.20994 (%install)


There has been a few mentions of this on the expert list (I think), but
no solutions that worked for me.  Any hints please?

BillK








[Cooker] webfetch in cooker

2001-12-25 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Trying to upgrade to cooker rpm.  urpmi is a dependency which in turn
requires webfetch which I cant find in cooker.

[root@rattus SRPMS]# rpm -Fvh ../RPMS/*.rpm
error: failed dependencies:
webfetch is needed by urpmi-3.1-4mdk
[root@rattus SRPMS]# rpm -q --whatprovides webfetch
no package provides webfetch
[root@rattus SRPMS]# 







Re: [Cooker] Aurora crash at boot

2001-12-21 Thread Bill Kenworthy

How does one get rid of that ugly blue welcome graphic from the text
boot screen whenever a high res boot mode is specified (vga=792)?  I
uninstalled Aurorer and its still there - missed something maybe?  The
Aurorer package is certainly something that Mandrake could do without.

BillK

On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 17:38, Drew wrote:
 On Thu, 2001-12-20 at 21:12, Dave Fluri wrote:
 
   Aurora is unneeded, hides useful boot-time system messages,
   and is oft broken.  So why not -CAN-IT- once and for all?
  
  I'm so happy to hear that I am not alone in my assessment. I've often 
  wondered precisely WHY we have Aurora. What purpose does it serve? I, 
  certainly, can find none.
 
 cuz it looks pretty? Disabling Aurora is one of the FIRST items on my
 post install list of things to do.
 
 Drew
 
 
 






Re: [Cooker] Upgraded SAMBA is turned off!

2001-12-04 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Happens with every samba upgrade - been embarrassed by no printing for
windows clients a couple of time because of it!

BillK

On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 04:47, Alexander Skwar wrote:
 Hi!
 
 I also upgraded Samba today.   Now I noticed that it is turned off!  Why
 is that?  I had it turned on!
 
 Alexander Skwar
 -- 
Wohnung in Gelsenkirchen und Umgebung gesucht!   
 
 iso-top.de - Die günstige Art an Linux Distributionen zu kommen 
Uptime: 2 hours 51 minutes
 






Re: [Cooker] Ton of newbies running into lilo problems.

2001-11-30 Thread Bill Kenworthy

1) is this in 8.0, 8.1?, or just cooker for 8.2 when its released?
2) Documentation?
3) How does it find the bootable partition(s)? - is it automated, asks
questions or depends on the user knowing where his partition is?

Boot disks are ok if you have an up to date one ...

Having been through this (for some reason MOST Mandrake installs fail to
make a boot disk for me - this includes 8.1) and I have to manually
create one afterwards.  During a failed 8.0 install, with no bootdisk I
had to resort to the CD rescue image and manually try to sort it out -
what a timeconsuming, messy operation that was (luckily I had another
installation where I could look up help files etc).  Certainly had the
windows people in stitches over how primitive this aspect of Linux is
when it doesnt work!  Mind you, if I'd some decent hints at the time it
would have been easier!

BillK

On Sat, 2001-12-01 at 12:05, Han wrote:
 Vox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Is this the end of the discussion?
 
  Mmmmit's probably the greatest idea the mandrake team has
  had since the creation of diskdrake...I have only one nitpicking to
  do...the name is hell long :)  Couldn't we get it to be something like
  lilo install instead of linux install_bootloader?  Specially for
  those of us who are in a non-english-speaking country, where we need
  to spell all of that over the phone...it's gonna take a hell of a long
  time :)  (tho yes, I realize, it's a lot faster than telling local
  newbies to go to the LUG's website and follow the instructions for
  getting lilo back in place that we have there)
 
 linux install_lilo 
 
 
 Cya, Han.