Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] drakxtools-9.3-5mdk

[Daouda LO]

FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Le ven 14/11/2003 à 15:02, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
> > FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > > > Name: drakxtools   Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > > > Version : 9.3   Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > > > Release : 5mdk  Build Date: Sat Nov  8 10:59:37 
> > > > 2003
> > > 
> > > There's seems to have a problem with timedrake/draketime
> > 
> > thus, your problem is either with clock.pl from the drakconf package
> > or with ntp wizard from the drakwizard package, but not with the
> > drakxtools package
> 
> Note :
> - I don't use ntp wizard but use ntp support in clock.pl

Do you have the same delay when installing cooker and choosing the ntp
support in install ? 

Re: [Cooker] Error wehn adding media to URPMI

[Daouda LO]

Michael Lothian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I get the following error message:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] fireburn]# urpmi.addmedia main
> ftp://ftp.mirror.ac.uk/pub/Mandrake_Linux/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS
> with ../base/hdlist.cz
> unable to take medium "main" into account as no list file
> [/var/lib/urpmi/list.main] exists
> added medium main
> examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.plf.cz]
> computing md5sum of existing source hdlist (or synthesis)
> examining MD5SUM file
> examining synthesis file [/var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.main.cz]
> examining hdlist file [/var/lib/urpmi/hdlist.main.cz]
> Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.2/i386-linux-thread-multi/URPM/Build.pm
> line 387.

Update perl-URPM to 9mdk (rpm -Uh).

Re: [Cooker] New ISO with updates

[Daouda LO]

Jan Ciger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Robert L Martin wrote:
> | SomeDrake needs to post when the official "LG-SAFE" isos are ready (im
> | going to assume that
> | somebody yelled "STOP THE PRESSES" (aka via BF "ARRÊTEZ LES PRESSIONS")
> | when
> 
> My French is poor, but as far as I know, "pression" in French means also
> "beer" (the one you get in pub, from the keg, not the bottled/canned
> variety). "Stop the beer!" would be also fitting for this mess, though :-))

Really funny :))
Nice catch about the translation, Jan! 

Roger, "Arreter la presse (des CDS)" is a better translation  for
"STOP THE PRESSE(S)".

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6232] [userdrake] BuildRequires: pam-devel missing

[Daouda LO]

"[stefan]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6232

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

[Daouda LO]

Eric Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I wrote a guide about it there :
> http://www.zebulon.org.uk/ICML0.HTML

But i don't see any drakclub wizard material in there.
Launch drakclub to see what it does. It's not mandatory to be root but
you need root password to set up the urpmi sources otherwise only your
one month free club account is created. 
Very handy for newbies who want something graphical and simple. 

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

[Daouda LO]

Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sunday 26 October 2003 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Please, it shouldn't be this hard to find the fsckin' urpmi
> > > setup for club. Someone at Mdk pull their head out and put
> > > this somewhere quasi-prominent. It is THE primary reason for
> > > me to pay for club.
> > You've tried:
> > # drakclub
> > ?
> 
> Hey, that looks like it should be kinda cool.  I say "should be" 
> because it prompts me for my login, password and root password, 
> goes and configures the urpmi source and then hangs without ever 
> going back to the wizard.

Maybe broken links (location of the hdlist) on the server.
I'll take a look with Alexis.

> But at least I got my urpmi source...

Are you able to update from this source ? 

Re: [Cooker] Club RPMs?

[Daouda LO]

Brad Felmey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 10:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > You've tried:
> > 
> > # drakclub
> 
> Curl is broken. I have to run urpmi.addmedia --wget on the command line.

drakclub explicitely use --wget to fetch packages. 

> I finally found it, but the links on the club site are wrong.

what links ?

Re: NTP client in clock.pl [Was: Re: [Cooker] Some wishes for Mandrake 10.0...]

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:

[...]

> > Ok, i just finished putting ntp client feature in mcc (clock.pl). It's
> > aimed to sync with a ntp server in local network but can be used for
> > external ntp servers.
> > Replace /usr/sbin/clock.pl by the one at
> > http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~daouda/misc/clock.pl
> >
> > Feedbacks&BugReports are welcome.
> 
> Well, in case you missed the NTP threads/bugs from about 2 months ago,
> the default configuration (assuming users have full access to outside
> NTP servers) should have 3 entries for 'pool.ntp.org' (IIRC, check in
> bugzilla), since they have round-robin DNS, so ntpd should get 3
> different servers:

I think that this is aimed only at the client part. We assume that the
time server is available only in the local network and has the 'at
least 3 external stratums' correctly (manually) set. External servers list
should be dropped. WDYT ?

Re: [Cooker] Re: NTP client in clock.pl

[Daouda LO]

Thierry Vignaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > Ok, i just finished putting ntp client feature in mcc
> > (clock.pl). It's aimed to sync with a ntp server in local network
> > but can be used for external ntp servers.
> > Replace /usr/sbin/clock.pl by the one at 
> > http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~daouda/misc/clock.pl
> 
> why not just share the installer code 

Why not just check the source before posting 

NTP client in clock.pl [Was: Re: [Cooker] Some wishes for Mandrake 10.0...]

[Daouda LO]

Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Jan Ciger wanted us to know:
> 
> >computers. Setting up NTP server there is :
> >a) overkill
> 
> Maybe, for a dialup, I'll give you that.
> 
> >b) quite tricky if you do not know what you are doing
> 
> I think someone should add to a wiki somewhere:
> 
> urpmi ntp
> echo "server time.ucla.edu prefer" >> /etc/ntp.conf
> echo "time.ucla.edu" > /etc/ntp/step-tickers
> service ntpd restart
> 
> It will automatically be configured to start when the rpm is installed.

Ok, i just finished putting ntp client feature in mcc (clock.pl). It's
aimed to sync with a ntp server in local network but can be used for
external ntp servers. 
Replace /usr/sbin/clock.pl by the one at 
http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~daouda/misc/clock.pl

Feedbacks&BugReports are welcome.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 6148] [drakxtools] New: drakclub security breach - prints root passowrd to console

[Daouda LO]

"[cybercfo]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6148
> 
>Product: drakxtools
>  Component: drakxtools
>Summary: drakclub security breach - prints root passowrd to
> console
>Product: drakxtools
>Version: 9.1-15mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: drakxtools
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> When drakclub is run from the command line, it prints the machine root password 
> in the console after it is entered in the gui with *.  Here is the output of my 
> console.  (Don't worry, I changed the characters of the password.)
> 
> $ drakclub
> ##
> 6 ##
> Password: hgj6873f

Fixed in drakfirsttime-0.92-4.2.92mdk (which should be available in
Security updates) 

Please try 
http://peoples.mandrakesoft.com/~daouda/rpms/Updates/RPMS/drakfirsttime-0.92-4.2.92mdk.noarch.rpm

Re: [Cooker] Re: Mandrake 9.2 update policy

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
> >>>Ok, I must admit, I missed the first time wizzard on 9.2 (and was not a
> >>>clubmember yet when I installed 9.1), for X crashes badly with my dual
> >>>screen  setup. (A known bug in the Matrox driver) After I finished
> >>>hacking, the first  time wizzard has long forgotten that it ever existed
> >>>(and me too).
> >>
> >>You can easily access it after installation.
> >>Start->Configuration->Other->Discover Custom Services (yes, that is a bad
> >>place to put it, file a bug if you want).
> >
> >
> > If you have better place, i wait for your proposal ;p
> >
> 
> Configuration->Packaging->Access Commercial packages
> or
> Configuration->Packaging->Mandrake Club packages
> (or something like that?)

Drakclub is aimed at first to create a one-month-free-trial-account,
adding urpmi sources is one feature amongst others. 
I personnaly don't think that it belongs to Packaging :(
Maybe it should be put on the desktop as before.
Ok, i finished discussing with David and it's highly probable that we put it
in 'Mandrake Galaxy Welcome Screen'. For the menu entry, we have to
find a better location. 

> Now that we look at it (and regarding the rpmdrake thread), maybe
> "Packaging" is a bad name for this section? Maybe it should be "Software
> managemnet" or something (similar to the section in Mandrake Control
> Center).
> 
> Speaking of which, maybe drakclub needs an entry in MCC also (in the
> sofware management section)?

Yes, but not in the software management section. 

Re: [Cooker] Re: Mandrake 9.2 update policy (was: gaim 0.69 and 0.70 are out )

[Daouda LO]

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> > Ok, I must admit, I missed the first time wizzard on 9.2 (and was not a
> > clubmember yet when I installed 9.1), for X crashes badly with my dual
> > screen  setup. (A known bug in the Matrox driver) After I finished
> > hacking, the first  time wizzard has long forgotten that it ever existed
> > (and me too).
> 
> You can easily access it after installation.
> Start->Configuration->Other->Discover Custom Services (yes, that is a bad
> place to put it, file a bug if you want).

If you have better place, i wait for your proposal ;p

[...]

> Must I post screenshots??
> 
> If you missed it, just run 'drakfw' from the command line, and this is the
> same thing you see on first login (if you haven't run it before).

The binary name is _drakclub_ (specific part for the club account
 + urpmi sources managements). 
_drakfw_ is the whole wizard which is not suited to be started from
command line. 

> The first page is default window manager, the 2nd page is email
> client settings, the 3rd is the user survey, and the 4th is the Club
> registration page, which does list the benefits a bit better, and
> has the following options: -I have a product Key and I want to
> register -I am already a member -No thanks.

Yes this is drakfw which is a concatenation of smaller wizards which
can be reused through menus or from command line (drakmail and
drakclub respectively to setup mail accounts and club accounts/club
urpmi sources)

Re: [Cooker] http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ is ...

[Daouda LO]

jokerman64 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> ... anti-aliased. well kinda. read on.
> Ok after wgetting http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/ and taking a closer look at 
> it. It quickly became clear that changind a few lines o css wasn't gonna 
> solve any problems w/ fonts on the site (as i was previously led to believe). 
> Boo hoo. Well since I've (naively) been asking/begging/whining for the fonts 
> to be changed i decided to do something about it. It looked like _someone_ 
> had started changing the fonts already so i decided to help him along.
> the whole english site w/ the exception of the docs directory has been 
> mirrored at
> http://www.i-kubed.org/en/
> 
> See, instead of just whining, and having you ask "where's the code" or tell me 
> "do something about it" (which you guys would never do 'cause you're too 
> nice) i did do something about it. So there you have it. There is the "code". 
> If any mdk employees on here can pass this on to whoever,

I forwarded it to the webmasters. 
It looks very nice. 

Thanx.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5919] [xfig] New: package missing from 9.2 RC2

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [laetitia.frederic] wrote:
> 
> > Everything is in the title : it looks like there is no xfig package in
> 9.2 RC2 :-(
> 
> @resolution=invalid
> 
> There isn't space for all the software in "main" on the 3 CDs, you will
> have to install it from a network source (see
> http://plf.zarb.org/~nanardon for help on setting one up).
> Alternatively, some of the commercial CD sets contain all the packages.
> 
> There are a lot of other packages in main that could not be included on
> the CDs.

xfig is back on CDs. 

Re: [Cooker] VNC - just asking . .

[Daouda LO]

Robert Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Two questions - 
> 
> 1)  I know it's too late, but why do we have 1.2.7 version and not 1.2.9
> of tightvnc?

Frankly, i didn't see this one :(. 
Guillaume's bot didn't tell me that a new version was avalaible.
BTW, it seems that we are the only distro which superseded genuine
vnc by tightvnc (at least Redhat and Suse don't).

> 2)  What is the difference now between RealVNC and TightVNC (if any?)

http://www.tightvnc.org/intro.html

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5875] [drakconf] drakconf bug report use an invalid url

[Daouda LO]

"[rjcooks]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5875
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-21-09 13:36 ---
> 1) This is really a "drakbug" error which is part of "drakxtools-newt".  
> The drakbug perl program line 29:
> my $bugzilla_url = "http://drakbug.mandrakesoft.com";;
> 

[...]

> While I appreciate the more secure nature of that extra step, it defeats the
> entire purpose of reporting with drakbug, IMHO.

Nice catch ;)

For cooker bug reporting i'll put the flag of this report to later.

@resolution=later

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5811] [userdrake] New: confusing text in error box while creating user.

[Daouda LO]

"[glenk]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5811
> 
>Product: userdrake
>  Component: i18n
>Summary: confusing text in error box while creating user.
>Product: userdrake
>Version: 0.92-24mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: trivial
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: i18n
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> When creating a user in userdrake, and you type a user name with a capital first
> letter a error box is shown which states
> 
> "The name must contain only lower cased latin letters, numbers..."
> 
> the error is in the login field not the Name field.
> 
> it should be something like
> 
> "The user login must contain only lower cased latin letters, numbers..."

String freeze, i'll fix asap. 
Thanx

@resolution=later

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4296] [userdrake] Special local characters don't display properly

[Daouda LO]

"[glenk]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4296
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-18-09 21:25 ---
> still valid in 0.92.24
> 
> /Glen

Yes, reproduced here. Seems to be a mess between UTF8 flag in perl
string and libuser which ends in bad writing of Gecos in /etc/{passwd,shadow}
Workaround is to forbid Non ascii-8 characters in Gecos (just like in
username). Anyway, fix (if i find it) should go to updates (after
release) -> don't want to break other things.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] drakfirsttime-0.92-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 12:15:49 +0200 (CEST)
> Daouda LO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Name: drakfirsttimeRelocations: (not
> > relocateable) Version : 0.92  Vendor:
> > MandrakeSoft Release : 1mdk  Build Date:
> > Tue Sep 16 20:10:44 2003 Install Date: (not installed)  
> > Build Host: touba.mandrakesoft.com Group   :
> > System/Configuration/OtherSource RPM: (none) Size: 1826423
> >      License: GPL
> > Signature   : (none)
> > Packager: Daouda Lo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> 
> Now mdkonline also need to be update to prevent file conflict in
> /usr/X11R6/bin/mdkonline

package mdkonline is obsoleted by drakfirsttime.
It was removed from main.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] drakxtools-9.2-11mdk

[Daouda LO]

FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Le ven 12/09/2003 à 19:07, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
> > -=-=-=-
> > Name: drakxtools   Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 9.2   Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Release : 11mdk Build Date: Fri Sep 12 18:42:23 2003
> 
> > - printerdrake: help making printerdrake icon bar be shorter (#5282)
> 
> Could the same thing be done for userdrake ? Toolbar is too long too.

Done (24mdk).

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5734] [userdrake] New: crash of userdrake

[Daouda LO]

"[vincent.lecoq]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5734
> 
>Product: userdrake
>  Component: userdrake
>Summary: crash of userdrake
>Product: userdrake
>Version: 0.92-22mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: userdrake
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> when I unselect the option to filter users in the option menu, userdrake crash ...

Vincent, could you send the output of the error ? 
(Launch it from a console)

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5573] [userdrake] New: Two semicolons instead of one

[Daouda LO]

"[mederic.boquien]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5573
> 
>Product: userdrake
>  Component: i18n
>Summary: Two semicolons instead of one
>Product: userdrake
>Version: 0.92-21mdk
>   Platform: Other
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: i18n
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Hello, 
>  
> In the french version of userdrake, in the window to edit an user, there are 
> two semicolons instead of one : 
> "Confirmation du mot de passe : :" 
> I think one less would look nice ;) 

Fixed in cvs 
Thank you.

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5449] [userdrake] New: userdrake hangs when removing a user

[Daouda LO]

"[camille]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5449
> 
>Product: userdrake
>  Component: program
>Summary: userdrake hangs when removing a user
>Product: userdrake
>Version: 0.92-21mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: program
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] camille]$ rpm -q drakxtools
> drakxtools-9.1-31.3mdk
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] a]# userdrake
> Group could not be deleted: couldn't open `/etc/gshadow': No such file or directory.

Did Someone else already encounter this problem ?

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5330] [linuxconf] New: linuxconf not in distro

[Daouda LO]

"[singho]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5330
> 
>Product: linuxconf
>  Component: packaging
>Summary: linuxconf not in distro
>Product: linuxconf
>Version: 1.29r3-5mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: packaging
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> in Mandrake 9.2 Rc1

linuxconf is moved to contribs 

@resolution=wontfix

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 5293] [drakxtools] New: Mdk9.2rc1 - adduserdrake and userdrake

[Daouda LO]

"[jarillon]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5293
> 
>Product: drakxtools
>  Component: adduserdrake
>Summary: Mdk9.2rc1 - adduserdrake and userdrake
>Product: drakxtools
>Version: 9.2-7mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: adduserdrake
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> userdrake allows to create a user with a very good form, far better than 
> adduserdrake. 
> Question: Is adduserdrake still useful ?

Nope but it has no menu entry (not accessible to newbie) and is very
light. So we'll keep it for one more release before dropping it.

@resolution=invalid

Re: [Cooker] Hd.img installation per Version:200309041022

[Daouda LO]

guran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi
> 

[...]

> 
> In FirstTimeWizard there was no KMail only evolution and mozilla, is this a 
> Mdk decission.

Do you have kdenetwork-kmail installed ? First Time only displays the
mailer if it's installed on your system.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4623] [rfbdrake] no (gnome) menu entry for rfbdrake

[Daouda LO]

"[cory.meisch]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4623
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-28-08 17:20 ---
> This is still an issue in RC1.

Try update-menus -n -vv
Something is wrong with your menus.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4866] [userdrake] New: Order of uid allocated

[Daouda LO]

Pierre Jarillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Le Lundi 25 Août 2003 15:14, Daouda LO a écrit :
> > "[jarillon]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4866
> 
> > > During a fresh install (Mdk9.2b2)
> > > I create one user pierre => uid 501  (correct, the first uid of a user)
> > > After reboot, with userdrake I wish to add two other users :
> > > nicole => uid 500   (uid lower than the first !)
> > > mathieu => uid 502  (ok)
> >
> > Acording to the LSB (see link below), uid for normal user should be >
> > 499; then first valid uid is 500.
> >
> > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/uidrange.html
> >
> > @resolution=invalid
> 
> Then why install begins at 501 instead of 500 ?

I asked Pixel about the change but as Buchan said it's not mandatory to
begin at 500. You can specify uid manually with userdrake so you have a nice
workaround there. 

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4866] [userdrake] New: Order of uid allocated

[Daouda LO]

"[jarillon]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4866
> 
>Product: userdrake
>  Component: program
>Summary: Order of uid allocated
>Product: userdrake
>Version: 0.92-20mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: program
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> During a fresh install (Mdk9.2b2) 
> I create one user pierre => uid 501  (correct, the first uid of a user) 
> After reboot, with userdrake I wish to add two other users : 
> nicole => uid 500   (uid lower than the first !) 
> mathieu => uid 502  (ok) 

Acording to the LSB (see link below), uid for normal user should be >
499; then first valid uid is 500. 

http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/uidrange.html

@resolution=invalid

Re: [Cooker] Bootsplash submissions

[Daouda LO]

Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue Aug 19, 2003 at 04:11:28AM -0400, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
> 
> > Are you taking submissions for bootsplash designs?  If so, I'd like to 
> > add mine.  If not, I'm sorry for wasting everyone's time.
> > 
> > http://bfcomputerconsulting.com/images/mandrake_splash.jpg
> > 
> > I think it would look OK on a corporate desktop, but that's just my opinion.
> > 
> > Any comments?  Be gentle. ;-)
> 
> I like it, but the natural inclination is to read it as "Linux Mandrake" and
> we've stopped using that for a long time now...  if it could be modified to
> make it naturally read "Mandrake Linux", I'd call it a winner.

Also, 'Linux' and 'Mandrake' should have the same appearance :p

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-2.0.4-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Ainsi parlait Daouda LO :
> > > -=-=-=-
> > > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.0.4-1mdk
> > >
> > > - 2.0.4
> > > - spec cleanup
> > > - disable patch0, doesn't match
> >
> > what do you mean by "doesn't match" ?
> Just that it didn't apply directly, and i was too lazy to check if it was easy 
> to solve.

Fair enough but this is very dangerous! Think about dropping security
patches because they don't apply properly :(
Anyway, i let you check and fix or revert.

Re: [Cooker] Beta2 is cool ! comment 1

[Daouda LO]

Teletchéa Stéphane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> <#multipart type=signed>
> <#part type=text/plain nofile=yes>
> 1 - in mandrakefirst time, evolution is not proposed in the email client
> (there is kmail and mozilla-mail but no evolution although it is
> installed). 

Done now. Try drakfirsttime-0.92-0.2mdk.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4623] [rfbdrake] New: no (gnome) menu entry for rfbdrake

[Daouda LO]

"[cory.meisch]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4623
> 
>Product: rfbdrake
>  Component: rfbdrake
>Summary: no (gnome) menu entry for rfbdrake
>Product: rfbdrake
>Version: 0.9.1-11mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
>  Component: rfbdrake
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> under Menu --> Networking --> Remote Access --> there is no entry for RFBdrake.

update-menus -vv ??

Cannot reproduce.

@resolution=invalid
 

Re: [Cooker] Cooker Installation Report (hd.img)

[Daouda LO]

Frederic Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi
> 
> Installing Grub on dedicated boot partition /dev/hde1 (I have xosl on a
> dedicated FAT16 partition on /dev/hda1 which I use to choose which OS to
> boot). I'm then presented with a screen asking me from which drive I'm
> booting. I don't understand the purpose of this screen... I've already
> indicated to the installer I want Grub on /dev/hde1
> 
> Also several packages were missing during the installation (wrong
> hdlist?)
>linuxconf-lib-1.29r3-4mdk
>linuxconf-1.29r3-4mdk

Moved to contribs. Warly is fixing ...

[...]

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4623] [rfbdrake] no (gnome) menu entry for rfbdrake

[Daouda LO]

"[jkeller]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=4623
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>  Resolution||INVALID
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-08 03:53 ---
> Quoting Daouda Lo:
> 
> "update-menus -vv ??
> 
> Cannot reproduce."
> 
> Then marked as invalid (via e-mail that didn't seem to make it to Bugzilla).

Because, someone marked it as resolved.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 4623] [rfbdrake] no (gnome) menu entry for rfbdrake

[Daouda LO]

"John Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:
> > "[jkeller]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Then marked as invalid (via e-mail that didn't seem to make it to
> Bugzilla).
> >
> > Because, someone marked it as resolved.
> 
> Yes, that was me at the same time as I made the comment. The quote was to
> explain why I was marking it as invalid (since I don't consider myself in
> any way capable of making that kind of judgment).
> 
> For whatever reason, e-mail commands to Bugzilla weren't making it in. So
> for a few reports that I found, I played middle-man and manually entered the
> info that never made it to Bugzilla.

Thanx. 

Re: [Cooker] No konsole

[Daouda LO]

w9ya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tuesday 12 August 2003 10:53 am, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >

[...]

> 
> well yes urpmf sezs that.but the file ain't there.  
> 
> (ug more urpm.rpm database issues !...sigh)
> 
> btw...now the new download host I am using (the one in Oregon) is having 
> hdlist (database) issuesdouble sigh

[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ rpm -qpi /RPMS/kdebase-konsole-3.1.3-13mdk.i586.rpm 
warning: /RPMS/kdebase-konsole-3.1.3-13mdk.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 
70771ff3
Name: kdebase-konsole  Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 3.1.3 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 13mdk Build Date: Fri Aug  8 15:17:50 2003
Install Date: (not installed)   Build Host: ke.mandrakesoft.com
Group   : Graphical desktop/KDE Source RPM: kdebase-3.1.3-13mdk.src.rpm
Size: 382193   License: GPL
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Fri Aug  8 16:14:02 2003, Key ID e7898ae070771ff3
Packager: Mandrake Linux KDE Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.kde.org/
Summary : Konsole
Description :
A shell program similar to xterm for KDE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ 

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-2.0.4-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Abel Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 2003-08-11(Mon) 23:04:05 +0200, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
> > > If I have to choose one person for special credit, it would be Per Øvind
> > > Karlsen, since he has gone through the pain to fix various packages one
> > > by one, which nobody has the patience to do.
> > 
> > You're maybe too young to know what all guys did in past.
> > I pngize lot of package, rebuild some rpm when rpm 4.2 can't read olds and I 
> > make a tools to check bad rpm. We are not alone to made job ;)
> 
> Yes yes I know that (I've been in cooker for 2 yrs+), I'm just talking
> about recently. If you count the old days too, the thanks list would
> be much longer.

Yes, maybe a credit file that can be loaded by mcc about Dialog...
The problem is who should figure in and who should not? how to
maintain it ? etc ...

I think that giving visual credits to people who help us build the distro
is really important.

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-2.0.4-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> -=-=-=-
> Name: xchatRelocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2.0.4 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Sun Aug 10 17:36:27 2003
> Install Date: (not installed)   Build Host: klama.mandrake.org
> Group   : Networking/IRCSource RPM: (none)
> Size: 904628   License: GPL
> Signature   : (none)
> Packager: Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://www.xchat.org
> Summary : Graphical IRC client
> Description :
> X-Chat is yet another IRC client for the X Window System, using the Gtk+
> toolkit. It is pretty easy to use compared to the other Gtk+ IRC clients and
> the interface is quite nicely designed.
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.0.4-1mdk
> 
> - 2.0.4
> - spec cleanup
> - disable patch0, doesn't match

what do you mean by "doesn't match" ? 

Re: [Cooker] Few items for wish list

[Daouda LO]

Larry Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Dear developers and fellow cookers,

[...]

> 2. First-time-wizard: please add options to select port for simap.

Don't know if it's a big idea.Ie: i have to also do it for POP(SPOP),
SMTP(SSMTP). Newbies gonna be puzzled by too many choices.
Besides this need to know if there is only the port that is changed
from IMAP to SIMAP. 

> Also, my name and email address are not populated in KMail identity.

Hmm. I need extra infos (Identity Section in
~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc)

Re: [Cooker] split libuser1 package?

[Daouda LO]

Tibor Pittich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> when i play with minimal instalation of mandrake, i'v found that
> lubuser1 package is mandatory and it is inherit from other packages
> which is required basesystem.
> 
> libuser1 package contain a shared module
> /usr/lib/python2.2/site-packages/libusermodule.so and this is reason why
> python-base is required for minimalistic installation:
> python-base >= 2.2 is needed by libuser1-0.51.7-5mdk
> and python-base required for example libstdc++ and others packages..
> 
> what about remove this one shared module from libuser1 package, or
> create something like libuser1-python? i think, that this can lead to 
> minimalize basic installation and i think, that python (and
> libusermodule.so) isn't needed for minimal mandrake installation.

Fixed in 6mdk
Name of the new package is : libuser-python.

Re: [Cooker] what are the new features in Mdk 9.2b1

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Cosmic Flo wrote:
> >  Hello,
> >
> > what are the new features (not new versions of softwares) / what can I
> > do now with it that I can't with Mdk 9.1 ?
> >
> 
> New versions *are* new features (like samba3 if it makes it, which will
> mean integration into AD domains is possible for instance).
> 
> Anyway, .2 releases are traditionally "make it stable, forget new
> features" releases. So, having *all* the drakxtools work reliably and
> easily is probably the most important.
> 
> BTW, userdrake port to GTK2 is one, 


It's a major rewriting. Not a single line of code or concept of the older userdrake
is present in the new one. Let say that it's a completly new tool ;)

Re: [Cooker] Re: libuser and userdrake goofiness

[Daouda LO]

David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:
> > Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> > My bad. 
> > Anyway, it's fixed in latest release (5mdk).
> 
> Nothing was changed regarding this in the newest userdrake or libuser packages.

How can you tell that as libuser-0.51.7-5mdk is currently in the
upload queue ?
Wait till libuser(5mdk) hits your mirror :)
BTW, userdrake doesn't need any changes, stick with the latest in
cooker(13mdk).

Re: [Cooker] libuser and userdrake goofiness

[Daouda LO]

Götz Waschk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Am Donnerstag, 17. Juli 2003, 08:05:26 Uhr MET, schrieb David Walser:
> > Actually, userdrake should just drop the explicit
> > requires because RPM will figure it out.  It kinda
> > makes sense for libuser1 to provide libuser, and the
> > package currently called libuser (accounting for the
> > confusion) should be renamed to something more
> > descriptive of what it actually contains.  Maybe
> > libuser-tools is more appropriate or something.  It's
> > the one that really shouldn't provide libuser.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I think the only bug is that libuser1 provides libuser.

My bad. 
Anyway, it's fixed in latest release (5mdk).

Re: [Cooker] urpmi? Totally fsked!

[Daouda LO]

FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Le lun 07/07/2003 à 15:30, François Pons a écrit :
> 
> > It could have been caused by your forced installation, but anyway, newer
> > perl-URPM should fix this strange behaviour...
> 
> Hum, hum.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --wget --auto-select
> Some package requested cannot be installed:
> drakfirsttime-0.91-13mdk.noarch (perl(Request) non satisfait) (O/n)

This bug comes partly from me and new perl autoreq/autoprov.
fixed in latest drakfirsttime (14mdk)

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2995] [xsane] Help docs default to using netscape

[Daouda LO]

"[qa]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2995

@resolution=fixed

fixed in latest xsane.
You have to set your $$BROWSER (this is usually set by the system)
to one of your installed browser (mozilla, galeon, konquero...)


> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
> Version|0.90-2mdk   |0.90-3mdk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-01-07 17:15 ---
> This bug has been automatically updated to last version of product available. 
> 
> Please check if it is still valid.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 314] [userdrake] Userdrake does not allow to select a UID

[Daouda LO]

"[qa]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=314

@resolution=fixed

fixed in latest userdrake (userdrake-0.92-3mdk).

> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
> Version|0.5-5mdk|0.92-1mdk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-01-07 17:11 ---
> This bug has been automatically updated to last version of product available. 
> 
> Please check if it is still valid.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 475] [userdrake] Adding multiple groups BUG.

[Daouda LO]

"[qa]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

@resolution=fixed

fixed in latest userdrake (userdrake-0.92-3mdk).
Please upgrade.


> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
> Version|0.5-5mdk|0.92-1mdk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-01-07 17:11 ---
> This bug has been automatically updated to last version of product available. 
> 
> Please check if it is still valid.

[Cooker] Re: [Bug 679] [kdebase] Change Password problem

[Daouda LO]

"[qa]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679

@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
> Version|3.1-82mdk   |3.1.2-23mdk
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-01-07 17:11 ---
> This bug has been automatically updated to last version of product available. 
> 
> Please check if it is still valid.

Re: [Cooker] userdrake error

[Daouda LO]

"francesco.melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Alle 10:26, sabato 28 giugno 2003, Daouda LO ha scritto:
> > "francesco.melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] vete]#  userdrake
> > > Can't call method "set_active" on an undefined value at
> > > /usr/sbin/userdrake line 81.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] vete]#
> >
> > Could you test with userdrake-0.92-2mdk ?
> 
> i have two menù entry but maybe it is an italian matter 

What menu entries are duplicated? 
Are they translated ?

> the program works and it is nice :D

thanx.

Re: [Cooker] userdrake error

[Daouda LO]

"francesco.melo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] vete]#  userdrake
> Can't call method "set_active" on an undefined value at /usr/sbin/userdrake 
> line 81.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] vete]#

Could you test with userdrake-0.92-2mdk ?

[Cooker] new userdrake

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> FACORAT Fabrice wrote:
> 
> > Just a question : could userdrake allow to switch auth system ( files
> > <-> NIS <-> LDAP ) easily after installation ?
> >
> 
> No, but openldap-migration should help you to do most of it. I had hoped
> to have time to work on a GUI for openldap, but I don't think I will.

It's on my todo and i need your help for this as i don't know ldap
enough. 

new userdrake Was [Re: [Cooker] Announcement-Sp-m: New Userdrake to replace Vi-gr-. Check it out!]

[Daouda LO]

FACORAT Fabrice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Le lun 23/06/2003 à 16:18, Daouda LO a écrit :
> > Simon Oosthoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> 
> > > I'll see whether I have time to test it, some feature requests though:
> > > - NIS support (rebuilding maps when changing auth-files)
> > > - crypt/md5 switching on nis server (for solaris<9 nis clients)
> > > I'm sure I'll find some more when I try it...
> > > 
> > > does it work on 9.1?
> > 
> > It should, just grab and install libuser1-0.51.7-2mdk.i586.rpm.
> 
> What ? since when NIS support is in userdrake ?

Read carefully, FWIU, Simon is asking if the new userdrake is working
on 9.1. 

> Just a question : could userdrake allow to switch auth system (
> files <-> NIS <-> LDAP ) easily after installation ?

No feature of this kind at this time :(

Re: Userdrake Was (Re: [Cooker] Announcement: New userdrake to replace vi-gr-. Check it out!)

[Daouda LO]

andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tuesday 24 June 2003 10:42, Daouda LO wrote:
> > andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > On Monday 23 June 2003 19:00, Daouda LO wrote:
> > > > - Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group
> > >
> > > I can do Uid but how do you do Gid?
> >
> > To be clearer:
> > - You can choose manually an Uid for a user when adding him to the
> >   system
> >
> > - You can choose manually Gid when adding a group
> >[Add Group] -> [Specify Group ID manually]
> 
> But you can't select the Gid for the user.

Nope. 
I don't see "added value" for this feature.  

Userdrake Was (Re: [Cooker] Announcement: New userdrake to replace vi-gr-. Check it out!)

[Daouda LO]

andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Monday 23 June 2003 19:00, Daouda LO wrote:
> > - Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group
> 
> I can do Uid but how do you do Gid? 

To be clearer:
- You can choose manually an Uid for a user when adding him to the
  system

- You can choose manually Gid when adding a group 
   [Add Group] -> [Specify Group ID manually] 

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] userdrake-0.92-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Per Øyvind Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Monday 23 June 2003 17:30, Daouda LO wrote:
> >  %prep
> > -%setup -q
> > +rm -rf %{buildroot}
> ^^^
> > +%setup -q
> > +   
> >  %build
> > -%configure
> > -%make
> > -
> > -%install
> > -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> ^
> 
> that's wrong, you should never touch buildroot in neither %prep nor %build, 
> and you should rm -rf buildroot before anything else in %install...

You're right. It is fixed in cvs. Next build will correct the 'typo'. 

[Cooker] Announcement: New userdrake to replace viagra. Check it out!

[Daouda LO]

[ As most of mailers are cofigured to filter 'spam' word in subject, i resend this ]


[EMAIL PROTECTED] userdrake2]$ cat RELEASE_NOTES 
A new version of userdrake is released. It is completly
rewritten from C to Perl (More precisely Gui is now in perl-Gtk2
and backend is in XS). the XS part relies on libuser.
The new userdrake comes with many features and the Gui is now more
consistent (isn't it?). 
Some of the features are:

- Easy way to add/remove users in groups and vice versa
- Dialog box for deleting user's home and user mail spool when removing user
- libuser API (security/consistency when accessing users info files)
- No more /etc/{ptmp,gtmp} nightmares.
- Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group
- Change of the primary group of users
- 2 filters for system and normal users (pattern matching)
- Password aging
- Ability to lock user's account
- User's account expiration
...

Missing features:
- LDAP configuration (coming up)

userdrake2 requires libuser1-0.51.7-2mdk.i586.rpm or higher to work properly

Please test and report bug. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] userdrake2]$

Re: [Cooker] Announcement-Spam: New Userdrake to replace Viagra. Check it out!

[Daouda LO]

Simon Oosthoek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 05:23:31PM +0200, Daouda LO wrote:
> > 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] userdrake2]$ cat RELEASE_NOTES 
> > A new version of userdrake is released. It is completly
> > rewritten from C to Perl (More precisely Gui is now in perl-Gtk2
> > and backend is in XS). the XS part relies on libuser.
> > The new userdrake comes with many features and the Gui is now more
> > consistent (isn't it?). 
> > Some of the features are:
> > 
> > - Easy way to add/remove users in groups and vice versa
> > - Dialog box for deleting user's home and user mail spool when removing user
> > - libuser API (security/consistency when accessing users info files)
> > - No more /etc/{ptmp,gtmp} nightmares.
> > - Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group
> > - Change of the primary group of users
> > - 2 filters for system and normal users (pattern matching)
> > - Password aging
> > - Ability to lock user's account
> > - User's account expiration
> > ...
> > 
> > Missing features:
> > - LDAP configuration (coming up)
> > 
> > userdrake2 requires libuser1-0.51.7-2mdk.i586.rpm or higher to work properly
> > 
> > Please test and report bug. 
> 
> I'll see whether I have time to test it, some feature requests though:
> - NIS support (rebuilding maps when changing auth-files)
> - crypt/md5 switching on nis server (for solaris<9 nis clients)
> I'm sure I'll find some more when I try it...
> 
> does it work on 9.1?

It should, just grab and install libuser1-0.51.7-2mdk.i586.rpm.

[Cooker] Announcement-Spam: New Userdrake to replace Viagra. Check it out!

[Daouda LO]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] userdrake2]$ cat RELEASE_NOTES 
A new version of userdrake is released. It is completly
rewritten from C to Perl (More precisely Gui is now in perl-Gtk2
and backend is in XS). the XS part relies on libuser.
The new userdrake comes with many features and the Gui is now more
consistent (isn't it?). 
Some of the features are:

- Easy way to add/remove users in groups and vice versa
- Dialog box for deleting user's home and user mail spool when removing user
- libuser API (security/consistency when accessing users info files)
- No more /etc/{ptmp,gtmp} nightmares.
- Ability to put Uid and Gid manually when adding user/group
- Change of the primary group of users
- 2 filters for system and normal users (pattern matching)
- Password aging
- Ability to lock user's account
- User's account expiration
...

Missing features:
- LDAP configuration (coming up)

userdrake2 requires libuser1-0.51.7-2mdk.i586.rpm or higher to work properly

Please test and report bug. 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] userdrake2]$

Re: [Cooker] wish list for 9.2

[Daouda LO]

Leon Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Saturday 29 March 2003 06:28, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
> > As it seems the correct moment:
> > - gpg-agent support
> > - mdadm support
> > - synaptic driver
> > - easy.urpmi better integration
> > - mirror mess sanitization
> 
> * One-click/one-command rebuild-the-distro-optimized command. This should
>   have the option of either rebuilding RPMs for everything it has an SRPM
>   to hand for, or rebuilding just the instaklled packages - and
>   consequently rebuild URPMI updates if need be.
> 
> * A working MS-DOS emulator.
> 
> * RDesktop.

Rfbdrake uses it for Window terminal Services.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ rpm -qpi /RPMS/rdesktop-1.2.0-1mdk.i586.rpm 
Name: rdesktop Relocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 1.2.0 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Mon Feb  3 19:15:49 2003
Install date: (not installed)   Build Host: no.mandrakesoft.com
Group   : Terminals Source RPM: rdesktop-1.2.0-1mdk.src.rpm
Size: 156706   License: GPL
Packager: Mandrake Linux Team 
URL : http://www.rdesktop.org/
Summary : RDP client
Description :
rdesktop is an open source client for Windows NT Terminal
Server and Windows 2000 Terminal Services, capable of
natively speaking Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) in order
to present the user's NT desktop. Unlike Citrix ICA, no
server extensions are required.

rdesktop currently runs on most UNIX based platforms with
the X Window System, and other ports should be fairly
straightforward.
rdesktop is used through rfbdrake.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] rpm]$ 

Re: [Cooker] Important remaining bugs

[Daouda LO]

Reinout van Schouwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hello Daouda,
> 
> > AFAIR, i received mail from some cooker volunteers to help with this.
> 
> Yes, I was one of them. Many translators don't follow the cooker list though.
> 
> > None of this volunteers have reported bad issues, in fact there were
> > no report. No news, good news.
> 
> W.r.t. the mdkkdm issue, this was raised on the cooker-i18n list weeks
> ago, as well as put into bugzilla (bug 2769). No response whatsoever.
> 
> > Next time raise your hand before it's too late.
> 
> Oh please. If you're serious about this, the least you could have done was
> to send a heads-up mail to the volunteers who applied and the cooker-i18n
> list before going gold.

Right. Let me explain the context of the mail i sent after the release
of 9.0. There was a showstopper (app crashing) with drakconf in nl
locale. And the idea was to not release with this kind of big bugs in the
distro. Locale should not prevent using an app as critical as mcc.
Unfortunately, things have not been done in time for mdkkdm but this
is not a critical bug (Users can easily guess the meanings of 'login'
and 'passwd'). 

> That said, I have to say I believe 9.1 has less critical l10n issues than
> 9.0 did.

nice.

Re: [Cooker] Important remaining bugs

[Daouda LO]

Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Reinout van Schouwen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Buchan Milne wrote:
> > 
> > > There are a number of pretty serious bug still, and I would hate to see
> > > Mandrake 9.1 ship as cooker currently is. Some of them are trivial to
> > 
> > Hmm... what I'm wondering is if Mandrakesoft will make up on the promise
> > made after the 9.0 release, that a release will have to get a 'go' from
> > the l10n team before shipping[1].
> > 
> > As far as I'm concerned the distro isn't finished until mdkkdm is
> > localized[2] (or a well-localized login manager is taken as default).
> > 
> > [1] http://archives.mandrakelinux.com/cooker/2002-09/msg04914.php
> 
> Let Daouda back his own ideas..

AFAIR, i received mail from some cooker volunteers to help with this.
None of this volunteers have reported bad issues, in fact there were
no report. No news, good news. 
Next time raise your hand before it's too late.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [kdebase] log in as root

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:
> > Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Let say that the aim of drakclub which shares code with drakfirsttime,
> > is double. First it registers you at Mandrakeclub and second it adds a
> > source urpmi if you're root and pass through if not.
> >
> > As levi said, relaunching the drakclub wizard do the trick. An
> > confirmation email for Club will tell you to do so.
> >
> 
> Would be nice to have an option in the first-time wizard to add the
> urpmi source when run as normal user (prompting for root password to add
> it etc).

Agree, but it would be an additionnal dialog. And you should know that
shorter a wizard is, more often it is used. We didn't want to add
additionnal dialog. 

> In the meantime, a menu entry via kdesu or similar would be good enough,
> or an entry in MCC->Software Management or something.

It's in Configuration/Other.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [kdebase] log in as root

[Daouda LO]

Greg Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Monday 17 March 2003 01:17 am, Levi Ramsey wrote:
> > On Sun Mar 16 23:54 -0500, Greg Meyer wrote:
> > > Quote from Club announcement
> > >
> > > "In addition to this, the same program (drakclub) will happily add
> > > MandrakeClub "comm/9.1" directory as source of RPMs if started as root!
> > > :-) "
> > >
> > > great idea, but what good is it if I cannot log in as root.
> >
> > 1) start xterm
> > 2) sudo drakclub
> >
> > bada bing, bada boom
> 
> I thought it was a gui tool meant to be run at install, or first login as part 
> of drakfirsttime.

Let say that the aim of drakclub which shares code with drakfirsttime,
is double. First it registers you at Mandrakeclub and second it adds a
source urpmi if you're root and pass through if not. 

As levi said, relaunching the drakclub wizard do the trick. An
confirmation email for Club will tell you to do so.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2804] [mdkonline] After installation not possible to get online

[Daouda LO]

thingi1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2804
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-07 03:03 ---
> 1. Configure a lan connection (use auto and it will find it).  
> 2. Your IP address will show under lan connections but won't work (can't connect). 
> 3. Install the DHCPCP rpm. 
> 4. As root run dhcpcd - (it's stored in / ) 
> 5. Now you will be able to connect to the internet :-) 

@assigned_to=flepied

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2792] [mdkonline] The Mandrake Galaxy welcome screen is not found (Swedish install)

[Daouda LO]

"kenneth.krekula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2792
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-06 19:26 ---
> Yes I have the latest mandrake-galaxy-9.1-15mdk installed. I have solved the problem 
> partly 
> now: It seems that I did not select to install the documentation... When adding it 
> now, it 
> almost works. If I tell KDE to use the index.html file, the Starter page comes up, 
> otherwise not 
> as the link points to a directory. 
>  
> In gnome I can't find such setting, so in Gnome it still does not work. 
>  
> Conclusion: The "documentation" link should be corrected to point to the index.html 
> file. 

@assigned_to=kde

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2106] [drakfirsttime] KDE Anti-Aliasing

[Daouda LO]

tbutler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
> 
>What|Removed |Added
> 
>  Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
>  Resolution||FIXED
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-05 21:38 ---
> Seems to be resolved. 
> 
> 
> 
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1741] [drakfirsttime] Configuration of the Mailler Failed

[Daouda LO]

"kenneth.krekula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-03-04 22:34 ---
> RC2 almost gets it right. Kmail is configured with the correct pop and smtp server 
> settings, 
> but my email address is not put in. (For KNode the email address is set correctly). 
> /Kenneth 

Could you send me your ~/.kde/share/config/kmailrc file ?

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 2309] [Installation] New: First time run: information entered is not used in kmail

[Daouda LO]

Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> "patrick.mayer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2309
> >
> >Product: Installation
> >  Component: Installation
> >Summary: First time run: information entered is not used in kmail
> >Version: 1.792
> >   Platform: PC
> > OS/Version: All
> > Status: UNCONFIRMED
> >   Severity: normal
> >   Priority: P2
> > AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > When running an account for the fist time, the user is prompted to enter
> > information for the mail client. This information is not passed along to kmail.
> > Mozilla was not tried.
> 
> @product=drakfirsttime

fixed in latest drakfirsttime-0.91-8mdk (6mdk and above) 

@resolution=fixed

[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] tightvnc-1.2.7-2mdk

[Daouda LO]

Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> --=-=-=
> Name: tightvnc Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 1.2.7 Vendor: MandrakeSoft

[...]

> Exclusivearch: i386 
> --=-=-=
> 
> * Mon Feb 24 2003 Vincent Danen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.2.7-2mdk
> 
> - fix some randomness issues

Could you be more explicit ?

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1993] [lftp] New: lftp needs rebuild for new openssl

[Daouda LO]

rrowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993
> 
>Product: lftp
>  Component: documentation
>Summary: lftp needs rebuild for new openssl
>Version: 2.6.4-1mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> lftp needs rebuild for new openssl

rebuilt

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1993] [lftp] New: lftp needs rebuild for new openssl

[Daouda LO]

rrowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1993
> 
>Product: lftp
>  Component: documentation
>Summary: lftp needs rebuild for new openssl
>Version: 2.6.4-1mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> lftp needs rebuild for new openssl
> 
> 
> 
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1741] [drakfirsttime] Configuration of the Mailler Failed

[Daouda LO]

rolfpedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-18 23:19 
>---
> Similar experience using First Time Wizard at first boot of 9.1 rc1.  Configured
> mail account for mozilla but no account existed when mozilla was started.

under work ( A bit complicated for Mozilla). 
wait for next version.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mandrake-galaxy-9.1-4mdk

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Han Boetes wrote:
> > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

[...]

> OK, how about:
> ===
> This package displays an html file allowing users to launch browsers to
> other html pages (Mandrake web sites or local html documentation) or to
> launch Mandrake applications such as the Mandrake Control Center.
> ===

Thanx Buchan,
Laurent, could you fix this please ?

Re: [Club-Volunteers] Re: [Cooker] urpmi.setup in main ?

[Daouda LO]

Narfi Stefansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Thursday 13 February 2003 05:33, Denis HAVLIK wrote:

[...]

> > FYI, "MandrakeFirsttime" will let folks declare that they are
> > Club members and even subscribe directly (trial accounts with
> > boxes) and automatically configure Club downloads in 9.1.
> >
> > cu
> > Denis
> 
> Then there have to be some changes made to MandrakeFirsttime.
> 
> The way MandrakeFirsttime is right now, it triggers my panic nerves: I see a 
> explanation which is too long to fit on one screenful: "we will not use this 
> data to ... we do use this data for ..." [too long for me to read] 

[...]

> bugreports on Mandrakefirsttime in bugzilla,  one for the text and one for 
> the lack of a "share/do not share this info with mandrake" checkbox.

It was fixed now (try latest drakfirsttime/mdkonline).

Re: [Cooker] A new Mandrake Baby!

[Daouda LO]

Michael Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> > Name: Gabrielle Relocations: (not relocateable)
> > Version : 1.0   Vendor: Similac Advance with iron
> > Release : 1mdk  Build Date: wed 22 jan 2003 10:39:00 EST

[...]

> Congrats!  It's awesome to have a new little one in the house!

I hope that RMS isn't listening to this list. His answers to someone
who made the horrible mistake of posting a baby announcement to the
kabuki-west ml - for dinners and get-togethers in San Francisco Bay
area - were terrific.

Date: Sun, 21 Feb 93 15:14:50 -0500

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Stallman)

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]   

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Subject: Another mcuddy..  

   
  
Could people please not use this list to announce information of no
particular interest to the people on the list? Hundreds of thousands
of babies are born every day. While the whole phenomenon is menacing,
one of them by itself is not newsworthy. Nor is it a difficult
achievement--even some fish can do it. (Now, if you were a seahorse,
it would be more interesting, since it would be the male that gave
birth.)
 
Following your example, I might send the list an announcement whenever
a new GNU program is written. That happens less often than babies are
born, it does the world a lot more good, it reflects more conscious
creativity and hard work, and some of the readers might actually find
the information useful. Even so, I think most of the readers would
consider this outside the scope and purpose of the list. Clearly that
goes double for babies.
 
Of course, we have another place for announcements of new GNU
programs. If some people like to read birth announcements, perhaps you
should set up a suitable list or newsgroup.  Perhaps rec.births?
(While you're at it, start rec.deaths for obituaries--they're usually
more interesting to read.)
 
These birth announcements also spread the myth that having a baby is
something to be proud of, which fuels natalist pressure, which leads
to pollution, extinction of wildlife, poverty, and ultimately mass
starvation.
 
Perhaps the people who have decided to have no children should start
making proud announcements, so as to set a better example. I could
start. I'm sure everyone on this list will be glad to know I don't
plan to reproduce myself.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1571] [drakfirsttime] New: fw won't let user continue

[Daouda LO]

"[Bug 1571]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571
> 
>Product: drakfirsttime
>  Component: drakfw
>Summary: fw won't let user continue
>Version: 0.91-3mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

corrected in cvs.

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1643] [drakfirsttime] New: Next button has no effect

[Daouda LO]

narfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643
> 
>Product: drakfirsttime
>  Component: drakfirsttime
>Summary: Next button has no effect
>Version: 0.91-3mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1641] [drakfirsttime] New: incorrect text for 'Cancel' button.

[Daouda LO]

narfi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641
> 
>Product: drakfirsttime
>  Component: drakfirsttime
>Summary: incorrect text for 'Cancel' button.
>Version: 0.91-3mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] userdrake to stay gtk1 for 9.1?

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > Not related to the Gui. Is it?
> 
> It is the ui, but not significant work. But I haven't done much gtk, so
> it took me a while ... UIs should in most cases not have jargon or
> contractions of words. For example, "Enter your password" seems more
> proffesional than "Enter your passwd".

You're right.

> >>2)Add a feature to set smbpasswd, either a new entry in the menu (but
> >>there isn't space to write a decent entry, since 'set smbpasswd' is not
> >>the kind of thing a windows user would guess). Maybe a checkbox in the
> >>dialog to set a windows password for the user at the same time as the
> >>normal password, to the same one?
> > 
> > Why not add a modal window like the ldap one? Put an entry in
> > userdrake menu and create a sub window for Samba conf.
> 
> I though it might need to be more visible ...

How about the 95% of users that don't use Samba? 

> >>BTW, LDAP support isn't complete ... I haven't managed to actually use
> >>userdrake to modify ldap entries ... I use smbldaptools or ldapbrowser
> >>or gq.
> > 
> > I'm not good at Ldap thingies so i trust you.
> > 
> 
> Well, it would need to be tested, I didn't set debug levels on the LDAP
> server to catch what userdrake tried to do, but it failed ...

and what is the error message? What happens When you do it manually (without the
userdrake ui -> raw ldap command) ?

[...]

> > Meanwhile, you can work on actual Gtk1 userdrake -> Gtk2 segfaults all
> > the time and is time consuming. 
> 
> I know as much about perl as I do about gtk (ie I can hack, but not much
> more) ... but debugging segfaults probably ain't so much fun. Plus pixel
> wants me to rework the diskdrake resize ui ;-).
> 
> But I would guess a rewrite would probably not make 9.1?

Who knows ? :-) 

> And, while rewriting, it might be an idea to look at something like
> win2k's user manager ... 

It's too hard to find a win2k box around here :p. Will see.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] tripwire-2.3.1.2-5mdk

[Daouda LO]

Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 05:20:21PM +0100, Daouda LO wrote:
> > Yes the only constraints to use mkstemp is that the last 6 characters
> > of the target file should end with XX (to ensure the temporary
> > file will be unique).  I double checked this. Besides this, the patch
> > was stolen from Redhat :p
> 
> That and the mktemp function returns the file name.   While the mkstemp
> returns the file descriptor.  Making switching any program using it to
> be a non-trivial situation.  Because without changing the program you
> will run into a double open situation.
>
> 
> But I would presume RedHat knows this.

definately.

Re: [Cooker] userdrake to stay gtk1 for 9.1?

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:
> > Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > 
> >>I have some issues with userdrake, and I have actually started on some
> >>work on it,
> > 
> > 
> > What do you want to do exactly?
> 
> 1) s/passwd/Password (I think this is done, just need to test it again
> and make a patch) and similar issues.

Not related to the Gui. Is it?

> 2)Add a feature to set smbpasswd, either a new entry in the menu (but
> there isn't space to write a decent entry, since 'set smbpasswd' is not
> the kind of thing a windows user would guess). Maybe a checkbox in the
> dialog to set a windows password for the user at the same time as the
> normal password, to the same one?

Why not add a modal window like the ldap one? Put an entry in
userdrake menu and create a sub window for Samba conf.

> There are complications for this with ldap.
> 
> BTW, LDAP support isn't complete ... I haven't managed to actually use
> userdrake to modify ldap entries ... I use smbldaptools or ldapbrowser
> or gq.

I'm not good at Ldap thingies so i trust you.

> >>but before I proceed, I would like to know whether it will be wasted
> >>effort or not.
> > 
> > 
> > Definately not. It was halfly ported (some segfaulting remains due to presence
> > of gobject in the code). The port was delayed due to lack of time.
> > 
> > 
> >>Is userdrake going to be updated to gtk2 for 9.1?
> > 
> > Normand response, Maybe yes and maybe no :-) 
> 
> So should I work from a cvs copy?

The question is should we go this way or rewrite userdrake in perl by
adding features to adduserdrake ? 
Meanwhile, you can work on actual Gtk1 userdrake -> Gtk2 segfaults all
the time and is time consuming. 

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] tripwire-2.3.1.2-5mdk

[Daouda LO]

Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 11:45:57PM +0100, Daouda LO wrote:
> > --=-=-=

[...]

> > database.
> > 
> > Exclusivearch: i386 
> > --=-=-=
> > 
> > * Sat Feb 01 2003 Daouda LO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2.3.1.2-5mdk
> > 
> > - rebuild 
> > - add patch for gcc3 support (bug # 1182)
> > - synced with rh patches.
> > - use mkstemp, not mktemp
> > - source from cvs.
> 
> I hope the mktemp to mkstemp transition was made properly.  Last time
> when snailtalk decided to go through and patch a bunch of apps (mutt for
> example) to use mkstemp he didn't bother to notice they have different
> interfaces and can't be used interchangeably.

Yes the only constraints to use mkstemp is that the last 6 characters
of the target file should end with XX (to ensure the temporary
file will be unique).
I double checked this. Besides this, the patch was stolen from Redhat :p
 

Re: [Cooker] userdrake to stay gtk1 for 9.1?

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have some issues with userdrake, and I have actually started on some
> work on it,

What do you want to do exactly?

> but before I proceed, I would like to know whether it will be wasted
> effort or not.

Definately not. It was halfly ported (some segfaulting remains due to presence
of gobject in the code). The port was delayed due to lack of time.

> Is userdrake going to be updated to gtk2 for 9.1?

Normand response, Maybe yes and maybe no :-) 

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 212] [linuxconf] Call to /etc/init.d/network with non-existant "probe" parameter

[Daouda LO]

"[Bug 212]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-04 16:18 ---
> This bug remains in Linux Mandrake 9.1 beta 3 and it has been there since MDK 8.x.
> 
> 
> 
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> 
> 
> 
> --- Reminder: ---
> assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> description: 
> Every time when I've finished with using linuxconf,
> it wants to perform some tasks before leaving (sorry it's in French :-):

fixed in initscripts cvs. 

@resolution=fixed

Re: [Cooker] rdesktop

[Daouda LO]

Serge Plüss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> The -P switch allows to specify in percentage how big the rdesktop window is 
> compared to your screen. It was added and enable in Patch 19-2
> 
>   U-PATCH19-2-1:
>   * hack: enabled the -P flag code, two lowest bits on width is cleared 
>   to make it an even 32-bit word.
>   Peter Bystrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
>   U-PATCH19-2:
> * fix: NEED_ALIGN is needed for alpha
> Per Kristian Hove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * added: -P flag -- rdesktop gets a size in % of screen size. 
>   [There are some problems yielded through this code, but not directly 
>   related to this patch. The code will remain disabled till fixed in some way.]
> Norbert Federa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Patch 19-9 comes in one big chunk with most of the features in it
already applied. the -P option isn't :(
Anyway ,i put it in my todo list.

> Also, the latest stable version is 1.2.0 according to http://www.rdesktop.org/

It's packaged.

Thanx.

Re: [Cooker] rdesktop-1.1.0-7mdk segfaults

[Daouda LO]

Bjørn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> No it aint the kernel.. 
> 
> [bjorn@localhost bjorn]$ rdesktop -F 192.168.0.1
> rdesktop: A Remote Desktop Protocol client.
> Version 1.1.0-pl19-9-0 . Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Matt Chapman.
> See http://www.rdesktop.org/ for more information.
> 
> See http://bibl4.oru.se/projects/rdesktop for information
> on the patches you are running
> 
> Segmentation fault
> 
> [bjorn@localhost bjorn]$ uname -a
> Linux localhost.localdomain 2.5.59 #2 Sat Jan 25 20:15:52 CET 2003 i686 
> unknown unknown GNU/Linux

fixed in 8mdk. 

Thanx.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1187] [kdebase] New: Cancelling "First time wizard" causes log-out

[Daouda LO]

"[Bug 1187]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187
> 
>Product: kdebase
>  Component: kdebase
>Summary: Cancelling "First time wizard" causes log-out
>Version: 3.1-8mdk
>   Platform: PC
> OS/Version: All
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
>   Severity: normal
>   Priority: P2
> AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> Starting with a fresh cooker install, logging in (as a regular user) for the
> first time, with the KDE desktop, I get the 'First time login wizard' (or
> whatever it's called).  Pressing Cancel, I'm logged out, and get the login
> screen again.  The next time I log in, everything's fine: I get the KDE desktop,
> without the first-time wizard.

corrected in cvs. New package comin' soon.
Thanx. 

> I would think hitting cancel on the First-time-wizard would not log you out.

you're right.

@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Cooker] rdesktop

[Daouda LO]

Bjørn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> $ rdesktop -F 192.168.0.1
> rdesktop: A Remote Desktop Protocol client.
> Version 1.1.0-pl19-9-0 . Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Matt Chapman.
> See http://www.rdesktop.org/ for more information.
> 
> See http://bibl4.oru.se/projects/rdesktop for information
> on the patches you are running
> 
> Segmentation fault

Could you test with latest rdesktop (1.1.0-8mdk) uploaded in cooker ?

Thanx.

Re: [Cooker] rdesktop

[Daouda LO]

Bjørn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> $ rdesktop -F 192.168.0.1
> rdesktop: A Remote Desktop Protocol client.
> Version 1.1.0-pl19-9-0 . Copyright (C) 1999-2001 Matt Chapman.
> See http://www.rdesktop.org/ for more information.
> 
> See http://bibl4.oru.se/projects/rdesktop for information
> on the patches you are running
> 
> Segmentation fault

reproductible here. I'll investigate. Please fill a bug report.

Thanx.

Re: [Cooker] [Bug 1093] [mdkonline] New: Always segfaults

[Daouda LO]

"[Bug 1093]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093

[...]

@[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Cooker] Re: [QA] cooker main changes

[Daouda LO]

David Walser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


[...]

> > going to be removed (0 MB):
> > glibc-utils-2.3.1-6mdk
> > libgd1-1.8.4-8mdk
> > Is this OK? (Y/n) n
> 
> You can definately add apcupsd and linuxconf to that
> list, and maybe also php-gd.

linuxconf is now linked to libgd2.

Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] xchat-1.8.11-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Yves Duret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Steve Fox wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 09:02, Daouda LO wrote:
> >
> >>--=-=-=
> >>Name: xchatRelocations: (not relocateable)
> >>Version : 1.8.11Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> > Is there a reason for not moving up to 1.9.8 in Cooker? I have been
> > using it since it was released and have found it to be even more stable
> > than the 1.8.x series (especially under heavy disk activity).
> 
> do you have some rpm to share ?
> or we can upload an hackxchat in contrib for those who wants to try it..

Better solution i think. 1.9.8 was tagged "under development" and it
was enough to not include it at this stage. Maybe a post 9.1 update.

Re: [Cooker] Xfig bug report (2 problems)

[Daouda LO]

"Dean S. Messing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I just built the xfig rpm from the .src.rpm on cooker.
> Compilation and installation went fine.

[...]

> So a patch or a configuration option needs to be put
> in  xfig.spec  to tell xfig where the (very excellent!!) HTML
> documentation is.  This is one of the best documented tools
> in Linuxdom and it would be a shame for the newbie looking
> for a great 2D figure-drawing tool to miss it.

Fixed. 
Thank you. 

Re: [Cooker] linuxconf-1.29r3-1mdk

[Daouda LO]

Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Daouda LO wrote:
> > Oden Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 
> > 
> >>Hi.
> >>
> >>Here's some fixes to get linuxconf-1.29r3-1mdk going.
> > 
> > 
> > Awesome!
> > But, i wonder how you succeed in building it without the quota patch (
> > linuxconf use mem_dqblk which is protected by a #ifdef __KERNEL__) 
> > We have to use  instead of 
> 
> Ahh, so this is why I can't build samba3, it fails compiling
> source/smbd/quota.c ...

I dunno if it's the same problem but you can take a look at patch 44
in linuxconf srpms and try to do the same.

> What is the official method here, or are we waiting for a fix??

I don't know if this should be the better way to fix thing but it
works in my case ...

Try and tell me.

Ps: I want someone to test quota configuration in linuxconf. any volunteer?

Re: [Cooker] gcombust - wrong written amount bad directories in image

[Daouda LO]

"John Danielson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Lyall Pearce wrote:

[...]

> Yes, my gCombust does similar things. The third digit (1s digit) of
> the MBs burn of is missing, and the second digit (10s digit) of the
> total is missing-- but only on the dialog=type child window. The lower
> layer messages in the message pane in the main window show the right
> figures when things are complete. And the burns are great. This
> happens in both KDE and Gnome on my box.

Well, i ugraded current gcombust to 0.1.53.
Could you test and tell me if it fixes the digit crunch.

Thanx.

Re: [Cooker] Incorrect focus on install root password dialog

[Daouda LO]

"H.J.Bathoorn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wednesday 15 January 2003 19:01, Daouda LO wrote:
> > Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > When the root password dialog comes up, the password field does not
> > > have the focus.
> >
> > Not reproductible here :(
> > Is it kdesu or consolehelper ? what window manager are you running ?
> 
> I can confirm that. 
> During the install when the root password is asked the field is not focused.
> Clicking with mouse focusses, moving mouse away unfocusses again.

Misread it, sorry. I thought it was at post install. 

Re: [Cooker] Re: [9.1beta1} First Graphical Login fails

[Daouda LO]

Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I think you are correct about this having to do with drakfirsttime.
> It did not happen the first time I logged in as root, and firsttime
> doesn't run for root.  Then I added a new user and logged in as that,
> and it did happen. 

Yes, first time is under Gtk2 port + some rewritings. 
It will be available soon.

Re: [Cooker] Incorrect focus on install root password dialog

[Daouda LO]

Frank Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> When the root password dialog comes up, the password field does not
> have the focus.

Not reproductible here :(
Is it kdesu or consolehelper ? what window manager are you running ?