[Cooker] shorewall error?

2003-06-20 Thread Ji ern
Hi,

after upgrading of shorewall to shorewall-1.4.4b-1mdk I got this error 
(important part of it):

Masqueraded Subnets and Hosts:
iptables: Invalid argument
Processing /etc/shorewall/stop ...
Processing /etc/shorewall/stopped ...
/sbin/service: line 148: 17950 Terminated  $debug 
$servicedir/$service $options

this is caused by line eth0 eth1 in masq file. Do you know where s 
problem?

thanks,
Jiri Cerny



Re: [Cooker] shorewall error?

2003-06-20 Thread Ji ern
Thanks for giving me direction, I will try it when I will be back in 
work after weekend.
(I have remote connection but I think that I would try it only once, 
because of automatic shorewall stop :-)

thanks
Jiri Cerny
Florin wrote:

have you tried shorewall check ? 
 





Re: [Cooker] Enterprise kernel and memory over 960Meg

2003-01-14 Thread Ji ern
Robert Fox wrote:


I just got a new (old) machine with a P4 1.5Ghz and I bumped the memory
to 1.25 Gig because 512M stick are so cheap (PC133 SD-RAM)

This is the first time I've dealt with a machine with over 768M memory
and I noticed that it only recognizes 960M of the 1.25Gig

I know that the Enterprise kernel supports the larger memory - but I
have heard that there are stability problems with it.  I have seen
recommendations to stick with the standard Mandrake Kernel and forget
the memory over the 960M mark.

Could someone explain WHY does one need the enterprise kernel (with
additional security features) for large memory?  Where can I get a
detailed list of differences between the regular Mandrake kernel and the
Enterprise version?  Will the stock Mandrake kernel eventually support
more memory?  

I know Linux handles memory better than Winblows, but WinXP has no
problem seeing the 1.25G  . . . .

Many thanks in advance,
R.Fox




 


Hi,

enterprise is not needed for higmem, I have lot of machines
with 1,5-4 G RAM (mdk or rh) with custom kernels.
Custom = standard distribution kernel recompiled with higmem
support. Only bad thing WAS speed penalty of higmem, but with
2.4.20 is all OK (with IO patch enabled).

Jiri Cerny





Re: [Cooker] VMWare on Mandrake 9.0

2002-10-07 Thread Ji ern

o beckles wrote:

 VMWare's bridged networking does not work properly on my Toshiba Sat. 
 Pro 6100.  It works on my desktop.

 Can anyone help me diagnose this problem?  These are the facts I've 
 collected so far:

 1. If I downgrade the kernel to 2.4.18-6 it works fine.
 2. If I used RedHat 8.0 is works fine.  The kernel in RH is 2.4.18-14.
 3. Its works on my desktop which is Mandrake 9.0.
 4. VMWare is version 3.2.
 .

 What can I provide to make diagnosis easier?



On my 9.0/3.2 is this problem caused by firewall (shorewall). VMWare NAT 
network works but host only packets are droped - see dmesg.

Jiri Cerny





Re: [Cooker] Any pointer to sue lm_sensors ?

2002-10-04 Thread Ji ern

Stphane Teletcha wrote:

I used on 9.0 sensors-detect to check the sensors i have on my ABIT KX333-R 
and it found some. I put the detected modules in /etc/modules.conf.

Now, i want to check what is the speed of the fans, temperature and so on, 
but i don't see anything in gkrellm (i installed plugins).

Any pointer/indication of what i did wrong ?

I've read about sensors detection problem in 9.0, is it true or just a 
misconfiguration.

Stef


  

Package lm_sensors contained in 9.0 is IMHO too old (2.6.4) for this 
motherboard and sensors are misdetected. Solution to this problem is 
instalation (compilation) of new version of lm_sensors from their page. 
(today http://home.attbi.com/~edelbrp/lm_sensors-2.6.5.tar.gz)

Jiri Cerny






[Cooker] wine and keyboard

2002-02-27 Thread Ji ern



Hi,

it is possible to add "all" keymaps defined and 
used in mandrake linux to winedistributed with mdk? (8.2 and/or 
cooker)

thanks
Jiri Cerny