RE: [Cooker] RPM(S) worst enemy but Mandrake's best friend...

2000-06-20 Thread Jose M. Sanchez




|Ahh! That's the point!
|You say: deb is easy to use (or easy to manage).
|Jose says: rpm is easy because it protects user from doing wrong.
|I say: Now we should define "easy"... :-)
|


Heh, good point...

From my point of view, I WANT a package manager that forces the user to go
out of their way when they attempt something potentially harmful to the
system. Or at the very least do exactly what RPM does, list what is about to
be affected.

Whereas he looks at this as a disadvantage, I perceive it as a distinct
advantage

If anything the novice needs to be made even more aware of the repercussions
of the usage of --force or --nodeps...

-JMS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Cooker] Does anyone *READ* postings on this list?

2000-06-17 Thread Jose M. Sanchez

Not to sound flippant... but maybe no one is answering because the question
is not "interesting" or makes sense...

Since this is a primarily a volunteer list, you should assume that there is
a reason you are not getting answered... which may include (not that this
pertains to you specifically).

a) You should do a bit more homework yourself
b) You should reword your question
c) You should reword your requests and drop any "attitude", people here
don't have to help you.
d) You should read the manual and post a specific question to a problem
e) You should not post general questions like "how do I set up my server".
This type of question indicates that you have not RTFM.

Etc.

Recently someone posted a "posting" guideline for newbies. I wish I had
saved a copy since it succinctly addressed why people were not getting
responses.

Re: Netatalk. Eh, it's downloadable; it's easily obtainable, not everyone
wants it.

-JMS


|-Original Message-
|From: Frank Meurer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 10:57 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [Cooker] Does anyone *READ* postings on this list?
|
|
|
|I'm asking this now the third time and I would be really, really
|glad if someone will answer my question.
|
|Linux Mandrake claims to be one of the most user-friendly OS's
|(as a Linux OS) and this is a relation to the user-friendly
|MacOS, but...
|
|
|  ... why is the netatalk package not included in Linux Mandrake?
|
|
|Linux Mandrake is therefore the *only* distribution *I* know
|which doesn't include netatalk!
|IMHO this is a bad reputation...
|
|BTW: I'm using Mandrake since 5.0 and 7.1 is very nice.
|
|
|regards,
|Frank Meurer
|




RE: [Cooker] Jet Direct Remote Printer

2000-06-06 Thread Jose M. Sanchez

It's probably a security problem...

Check /etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.deny /etc/hosts.lpd

Also check permissions on the spool directories.

You should really add the "name" of the printer into /etc/hosts (with the IP
of course) and use the printname when setting up the printer via
Drakeconfig...

Also, the queue normally DOES need to be filled in. This is dependant upon
your interface or machine...

I.E. the HP Jetdirects use RAW and TEXT as their queue names, the former
being preferable...

-JMS


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Danny W. Burdick
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 12:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] Jet Direct Remote Printer



Today at work we configured a remote printer running on our intranet
within Mandrake 7.0 (Air)
All we did was

1. Run Drakeconfig
2. Create a remote printer
3. Accepted all default values
4. For hostname gave it an  ip addr 192.168.1.8
5. Left Queue entry blank

The printer immediately started working fine!

When I got home I have the exact same setup and IT DOES NOT WORK!!!

Only difference is the remote printer at home is 192.168.1.150

and I am running Mandrake 7.1 b3 (Hydrogen3)


Any takers..?

Danny




RE: [Cooker] More default configs

2000-05-29 Thread Jose M. Sanchez

I second this!

-JMS


-Original Message-
From: Hoyt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2000 1:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Cooker] More default configs


How about disabling the core dump process by default? Those who understand
and need such information can always enable it on their machines. For the
new, less-aware user, all those core dumps can eat up a lot of disk space.

Hoyt