Re: [Cooker] 1 question about suspend scripts

2003-02-18 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Well,there's an acpid daemon, so I assume one does not need apmd if acpi
 works on the machine.

when acpi doen't work on some computers apm take the hand.





Re: [Cooker] 1 question about suspend scripts

2003-02-17 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi,

 I tried yesterday but it failed. Then I realized my swap partition is
 smaller than my RAM. Shouldn't the suspend refuse to work in that case,
 if that's the reason why it failed?

i added this check in latest.

 One last thing. Now that apmd is going away, will there be a day when we
 can remove it without breaking the dependency on kdeutils?

humm who say apmd is going away ?





Re: [Cooker] 1 question about suspend scripts

2003-02-17 Thread Quel Qun
On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 08:48, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote:
 Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Hi,
 
  I tried yesterday but it failed. Then I realized my swap partition is
  smaller than my RAM. Shouldn't the suspend refuse to work in that case,
  if that's the reason why it failed?
 
 i added this check in latest.
 
Cool.

  One last thing. Now that apmd is going away, will there be a day when we
  can remove it without breaking the dependency on kdeutils?
 
 humm who say apmd is going away ?

Well,there's an acpid daemon, so I assume one does not need apmd if acpi
works on the machine.
-- 
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Cooker] 1 question about suspend scripts

2003-02-16 Thread James Sparenberg
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 02:40, Quel Qun wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I tried yesterday but it failed. Then I realized my swap partition is
 smaller than my RAM. Shouldn't the suspend refuse to work in that case,
 if that's the reason why it failed?
 
 After it failed, I tried to reboot, but had to use mkswap to be able to
 use the swap partition again.
 
 One last thing. Now that apmd is going away, will there be a day when we
 can remove it without breaking the dependency on kdeutils?

PLEASE don't get rid of it for a while.  It is the only thing I can use.
(Compaq laptop) *james*

James





Re: [Cooker] 1 question about suspend scripts

2003-02-16 Thread Quel Qun
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 00:19, James Sparenberg wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 02:40, Quel Qun wrote:
  Hi,
  
  I tried yesterday but it failed. Then I realized my swap partition is
  smaller than my RAM. Shouldn't the suspend refuse to work in that case,
  if that's the reason why it failed?
  
  After it failed, I tried to reboot, but had to use mkswap to be able to
  use the swap partition again.
  
  One last thing. Now that apmd is going away, will there be a day when we
  can remove it without breaking the dependency on kdeutils?
 
 PLEASE don't get rid of it for a while.  It is the only thing I can use.
 (Compaq laptop) *james*
 
I just meant uninstall it from my machine.
-- 
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Cooker] 1 question about suspend scripts

2003-02-15 Thread Quel Qun
Hi,

I tried yesterday but it failed. Then I realized my swap partition is
smaller than my RAM. Shouldn't the suspend refuse to work in that case,
if that's the reason why it failed?

After it failed, I tried to reboot, but had to use mkswap to be able to
use the swap partition again.

One last thing. Now that apmd is going away, will there be a day when we
can remove it without breaking the dependency on kdeutils?
-- 
Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED]



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part