[Cooker] 8.0 Beta and Oracle9i

2001-03-19 Thread Lonnie Cumberland

Hello All,

I just wanted to let you all know that I have very large problems trying to get
the Oracle9i, which I downloaded from Oracle and is about 1.4Gig in size, to
install. 

I was never able to do it because Jave would complain about threads and crash
out.

Finally I had to back my distribution down to Linux 7.2 and everything seems to
be much better.

Also, could some one please tell me how to change the permissions of a group
and user that I created for Oracle called "oinstall" (group) and "oracle"
(user) such that they have root permissions and are able to make changes to the
/etc directory?

Oracle needs this account only for install purposes, but also needs it to have
root level permissions.

Cheers,
Lonnie


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail. 
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/




Re: [Cooker] 8.0 Beta and Oracle9i

2001-03-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Lonnie Cumberland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hello All,
 
 I just wanted to let you all know that I have very large problems trying to get
 the Oracle9i, which I downloaded from Oracle and is about 1.4Gig in size, to
 install. 
 
 I was never able to do it because Jave would complain about threads and crash
 out.
 
 Finally I had to back my distribution down to Linux 7.2 and everything seems to
 be much better.
 
 Also, could some one please tell me how to change the permissions of a group
 and user that I created for Oracle called "oinstall" (group) and "oracle"
 (user) such that they have root permissions and are able to make changes to the
 /etc directory?
 
 Oracle needs this account only for install purposes, but also needs it to have
 root level permissions.

thnaks for reporting we'll have some people to test that soon

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
  --Chmouel




Re: [Cooker] 8.0 Beta and Oracle9i

2001-03-19 Thread Guillaume Rousse

Le 2001.03.19 20:07:34 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a crit :
 Eric MC D [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  /etc/init.d/fontastic  (from photopaint) conflict with this package !
 
[..]
 and BTW: we don't support photopaint...

Le 2001.03.19 20:08:04 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a crit :
 Lonnie Cumberland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[..]
  Oracle needs this account only for install purposes, but also needs it
 to have
  root level permissions.
 
 thnaks for reporting we'll have some people to test that soon

Cause you're supporting Oracle and not photopaint ? Surely a subtile
licence issue i didn't caught.
-- 
Guillaume Rousse

Murphy's law : If anything can go wrong, it will.
O'Tool's commentary : Murphy was an optimist.




Re: [Cooker] 8.0 Beta and Oracle9i

2001-03-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Le 2001.03.19 20:07:34 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a crit :
  Eric MC D [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   /etc/init.d/fontastic  (from photopaint) conflict with this package !
  
 [..]
  and BTW: we don't support photopaint...
 
 Le 2001.03.19 20:08:04 +0400, Chmouel Boudjnah a crit :
  Lonnie Cumberland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 [..]
   Oracle needs this account only for install purposes, but also needs it
  to have
   root level permissions.
  
  thnaks for reporting we'll have some people to test that soon
 
 Cause you're supporting Oracle and not photopaint ? Surely a subtile
 licence issue i didn't caught.

Oracle is mainly because it is a kernel|glibc|gcc problem in our(my)
side, photopaint is something because of the pacakging of the
applications.

-- 
MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org
  --Chmouel