Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) Pardon ? -- http://www.chmouel.org/
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Ainsi parlait Han :
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder.
I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with more
succes ;) please lemme know, and I will bake a -4mdk.
Here is a better one, tough still not able to compete with zsh :-)
I submitted it to bash_completion file maintainer, off course, but until it
get merged, could you add it as a distinct patch ? Thanks.
# Mandrake urpmi functions
#
have urpmi
_urpmi.medias()
{
# return list of available urpmi medias
COMPREPLY=( $( cat /etc/urpmi/urpmi.cfg | awk '/{/ {print $1}' | grep ^$cur
) )
}
have urpmi
_urpmi()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local cur prev
cur=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}
prev=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD-1]}
case $prev in
--media)
_urpmi.medias
return 0;;
esac
if [[ $cur == -* ]]; then
# return list of available options
COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W '--help --update --media --auto \
--auto-select --complete --force --wget --curl --X \
--best-output -a -p -q -v' | grep ^$cur ) )
else
# return list of available packages
COMPREPLY=( $( gzip -dc /var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.* \
| awk 'BEGIN {FS=@} /info/ {print $1}' | grep ^$cur ) )
fi
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi urpmi
have urpmi.update
_urpmi.update()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local cur
cur=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}
if [[ $cur == -* ]]; then
# return list of available options
COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W '-a -c -f --curl --wget' | grep ^$cur ) )
else
# return list of available medias
_urpmi.medias
fi
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi.update urpmi.update
have urpmi.addmedia
_urpmi.addmedia()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local cur i args
cur=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}
if [[ $cur == -* ]]; then
# return list of available options
COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W '-c -h -f --wget --curl --update --distrib'
|
grep ^$cur ) )
else
# count number of mandatory args given sofar
args=$COMP_CWORD
for (( i=1; i COMP_CWORD; i++ )); do
if [[ ${COMP_WORDS[i]} == -* ]]; then
args=$(($args-1))
fi
done
case $args in
1)
# return list of available medias
_urpmi.medias
;;
2)
# return list of available protocols
COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W 'file:// http:// ftp://
removable://' | grep
^$cur ) )
;;
3)
# return word with
COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W 'with' ) )
;;
esac
fi
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi.addmedia urpmi.addmedia
have urpmi.removemedia
_urpmi.removemedia()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local cur
cur=${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}
if [[ $cur == -* ]]; then
# if word begins with a dash, return list of available options
COMPREPLY=( $( compgen -W '-a -c' | grep ^$cur ) )
else
# elsewhere, return list of available medias
_urpmi.medias
fi
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi.removemedia urpmi.removemedia
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Chmouel Boudjnah ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) Pardon ? Yes I forgive you. Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Han ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ainsi parlait Han : Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder. I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with more succes ;) please lemme know, and I will bake a -4mdk. Here is a better one, tough still not able to compete with zsh :-) I submitted it to bash_completion file maintainer, off course, but until it get merged, could you add it as a distinct patch ? Thanks. Not like a patch, I added theses lines to /etc/bash_completion (as a patch) :) # Mandrake urpmi completion file. [ -f /etc/bash_completion_for_urpmi ] . /etc/bash_completion_for_urpmi Even a bit different. Anyway: http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/bash-2.05a-4mdk.src.rpm Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
On Jan 27, 11:31am, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: } Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches } } On ÷ÓË, 2002-01-27 at 01:18, Liam Quin wrote: } Does anyone have completion that uses colour (like ls) and/or } bold, to indicate the prefix you have already typed, in matches? Zsh emits color codes only in completion listings (i.e., when more than one match is displayed simultaneously), not when there is only one match inserted on the line and not when doing menu completion (where matches are cycled on the command line, as opposed to menu selection where they're shown in columns). Even in listings/selection, there's no color change sequence emitted between the prefix and any suffixes; color codes are printed only before and after each entire match. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com Zsh: http://www.zsh.org | PHPerl Project: http://phperl.sourceforge.net
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
On ÷ÓË, 2002-01-27 at 01:18, Liam Quin wrote: Does anyone have completion that uses colour (like ls) and/or bold, to indicate the prefix you have already typed, in matches? I had a go at doing that with zsh a while ago, interactions between the output fo the scripts and the fomatting into columns made it hard. Zsh does use (can be configured to) colors in completion listing. I am not sure about specific color for prefix, because as it looks like most people switched to menu completion (even hardcore commandliners) that allows selection of (several) matches with normal cursor keys in full screen menu. Because you get list of matches anyway it is much faster. In any case I Cc to Zsh list in case I miss something. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
On ðÔÎ, 2002-01-25 at 20:31, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse :
Ainsi parlait Han :
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into
official mandrake bash package, or not until they are accepted by
bash developpers ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml
Check the rpm package in my url ;)
Thanks !
And here is the urpmi completion for bash :-)
# Mandrake urpmi
#
have urpmi
_urpmi()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local gcmd
# if we have a partial word to complete, restrict completions to
# matches of that word
[ -n $2 ] gcmd='grep ^$2' || gcmd=cat
COMPREPLY=( $( gzip -dc /var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.* |\
awk 'BEGIN {FS=@} /info/ {print $1}' | sort -u | eval $gcmd ) )
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi urpmi
And you call *that* completion?! :-) Here is what I call completion:
{pts/3}% urpmi -aTAB
{pts/3}% urpmi --allow-medium-change
Completing option
--allow-medium-change -- allow change of removable media
--auto-- do not ask any questions
--auto-select -- select the packages to update
{pts/3}% u.uTAB
{pts/3}% urpmi.update TAB
{pts/3}% urpmi.update Contrib\ CD\ \(disk2\)
Completing available media
Contrib\ CD\ \(disk2\)Installation\ CD\ \(disk1\)
{pts/3}% urpmi g-c-cTAB
{pts/3}% urpmi gnome-control-center-1.5.11-4mdk
Completing urpmi RPMs to install
gnome-control-center-1.5.11-4mdk
gnome-control-center-plus-1.5.11-3mdk
And in all cases you can choose the match using cursor screen in full
screen menu; and can select several matches if you like (of course you
can always turn it off).
That is what I call completion :-)
-andrej
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
On Sat, 2002-01-26 at 05:50, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
And you call *that* completion?! :-) Here is what I call completion:
{pts/3}% urpmi -aTAB
{pts/3}% urpmi --allow-medium-change
Completing option
--allow-medium-change -- allow change of removable media
--auto-- do not ask any questions
--auto-select -- select the packages to update
{pts/3}% u.uTAB
{pts/3}% urpmi.update TAB
{pts/3}% urpmi.update Contrib\ CD\ \(disk2\)
Completing available media
Contrib\ CD\ \(disk2\)Installation\ CD\ \(disk1\)
{pts/3}% urpmi g-c-cTAB
{pts/3}% urpmi gnome-control-center-1.5.11-4mdk
Completing urpmi RPMs to install
gnome-control-center-1.5.11-4mdk
gnome-control-center-plus-1.5.11-3mdk
And in all cases you can choose the match using cursor screen in full
screen menu; and can select several matches if you like (of course you
can always turn it off).
That is what I call completion :-)
-andrej
Now, dat completion!
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: cd-ing into a dir with spaces. rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d but also some nonsence. Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) use zsh. -- Yves Duret [EMAIL PROTECTED] piouk toujours et meme apres !
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Yves Duret ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Han [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: cd-ing into a dir with spaces. rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d but also some nonsence. Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) use zsh. That is an option. :) Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Ainsi parlait Borsenkow Andrej :
On ðÔÎ, 2002-01-25 at 20:31, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse :
Ainsi parlait Han :
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into
official mandrake bash package, or not until they are accepted by
bash developpers ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml
Check the rpm package in my url ;)
Thanks !
And here is the urpmi completion for bash :-)
# Mandrake urpmi
#
have urpmi
_urpmi()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local gcmd
# if we have a partial word to complete, restrict completions to
# matches of that word
[ -n $2 ] gcmd='grep ^$2' || gcmd=cat
COMPREPLY=( $( gzip -dc /var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.* |\
awk 'BEGIN {FS=@} /info/ {print $1}' | sort -u | eval $gcmd ) )
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi urpmi
And you call *that* completion?! :-) Here is what I call completion:
Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder.
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002, 03:16:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: cd-ing into a dir with spaces. rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d but also some nonsence. Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) Hi, what bash version are you using? The completion package uses some features of bash 2.05a. The dir name with spaces-problem will disappear if you upgrade your bash package. CU -- Götz Waschk student of computer science university Rostock http://www.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key -- Logout Fascism! --
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Ainsi parlait Goetz Waschk : Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002, 03:16:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: cd-ing into a dir with spaces. rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d but also some nonsence. Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) Hi, what bash version are you using? The completion package uses some features of bash 2.05a. The dir name with spaces-problem will disappear if you upgrade your bash package. The bash version is ok (2.05a), but the bash_completion file provided is outdated (1.32, while current is 1.70) -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Ainsi parlait Goetz Waschk : Am Samstag, 26. Januar 2002, 03:16:19 Uhr MET, schrieb Han: I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example: cd-ing into a dir with spaces. rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d but also some nonsence. Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;) what bash version are you using? The completion package uses some features of bash 2.05a. The dir name with spaces-problem will disappear if you upgrade your bash package. The bash version is ok (2.05a), but the bash_completion file provided is outdated (1.32, while current is 1.70) Probably. I am so busy updating all the time I often forget to update things ;) No really. I thought nobody was interested in bash completion. But eh Guillaume Where can I download that latest rpm? Would save me a lot of time. :) Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Does anyone have completion that uses colour (like ls) and/or bold, to indicate the prefix you have already typed, in matches? I had a go at doing that with zsh a while ago, interactions between the output fo the scripts and the fomatting into columns made it hard. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Core staff contact, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net www.valinor.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org Author, Open Source XML Database Toolkit, Wiley August 2000 Co-author: The XML Specification Guide, Wiley 1999; Mastering XML, Sybex 2001
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Well, that was only a first quick try :-) I'll try harder. I included you're urpmi completion as well. But if you tried with more succes ;) please lemme know, and I will bake a -4mdk. http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software/bash-2.05a-3mdk.src.rpm Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
[Cooker] Bash completion patches
Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into official mandrake bash package, or not until they are accepted by bash developpers ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml -- Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into official mandrake bash package, or not until they are accepted by bash developpers ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml Check the rpm package in my url ;) Groetjes, Han. -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Ainsi parlait Han :
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into
official mandrake bash package, or not until they are accepted by
bash developpers ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml
Check the rpm package in my url ;)
Thanks !
I just had to apply this patch to fix a conflict with sh-utils
--- bash.spec Wed Dec 19 13:28:40 2001
+++ bash.spec.new Fri Jan 25 16:15:47 2002
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Summary: The GNU Bourne Again shell (bash).
Name: bash
Version: 2.05a
-Release: 2mdk
+Release: 3mdk
Group: Shells
BuildRequires: readline-devel libtermcap-devel autoconf2.5 = 2.52d
License: GPL
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
s/$/.1.bz2/
' ../man.pages
-perl -p -i -e 's\.*/(export|echo|pwd|test|kill).1.bz2\\' ../man.pages
+perl -p -i -e 's\.*/(export|echo|pwd|test|kill|printf).1.bz2\\' ../man.pages
mkdir -p %buildroot/etc/skel
install -c -m644 %{SOURCE2} %buildroot/etc/skel/.bashrc
@@ -202,7 +202,11 @@
%doc doc/*.ps doc/*.0 doc/*.html doc/article.txt
%changelog
-* Wed Dec 19 2001 Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.05a-1mdk
+* Fri Jan 25 2002 Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.05a-3mdk
+- removed printf man page conflicting with sh-utils
+- corrected changelog
+
+* Wed Dec 19 2001 Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.05a-2mdk
- Removed obsolete patches
* Tue Dec 18 2001 Han Boetes [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.05a-1mdk
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse :
Ainsi parlait Han :
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could the patches proposed here about completion be included into
official mandrake bash package, or not until they are accepted by
bash developpers ? http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml
Check the rpm package in my url ;)
Thanks !
And here is the urpmi completion for bash :-)
# Mandrake urpmi
#
have urpmi
_urpmi()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local gcmd
# if we have a partial word to complete, restrict completions to
# matches of that word
[ -n $2 ] gcmd='grep ^$2' || gcmd=cat
COMPREPLY=( $( gzip -dc /var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.* |\
awk 'BEGIN {FS=@} /info/ {print $1}' | sort -u | eval $gcmd ) )
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi urpmi
--
Guillaume Rousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key http://lis.snv.jussieu.fr/~rousse/gpgkey.html
Re: [Cooker] Bash completion patches
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ainsi parlait Guillaume Rousse :
Ainsi parlait Han :
Guillaume Rousse ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Could the patches proposed here about completion be included
into official mandrake bash package, or not until they are
accepted by bash developpers ?
http://www.caliban.org/bash/index.shtml
Check the rpm package in my url ;)
Thanks !
And here is the urpmi completion for bash :-)
# Mandrake urpmi
#
have urpmi
_urpmi()
{
COMPREPLY=()
local gcmd
# if we have a partial word to complete, restrict completions to
# matches of that word
[ -n $2 ] gcmd='grep ^$2' || gcmd=cat
COMPREPLY=( $( gzip -dc /var/lib/urpmi/synthesis.hdlist.* |\
awk 'BEGIN {FS=@} /info/ {print $1}' | sort -u | eval $gcmd ) )
}
[ $have ] complete -F _urpmi urpmi
I have been using the completion patches for a while now and sometimes
it works nice but lots of times it makes mistakes. For example:
cd-ing into a dir with spaces.
rpm -ba --clean f[tab] does not find foo.spec
man d[tab] shows all manpages with a d but also some nonsence.
Ie very nice but not ready for primetime. I agree with Chmouel on this
one. Though he is not the man to spend more than one line on this ;)
Groetjes, Han.
--
http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
