[Cooker] bochs installation halt entire installation process
Hi, bochs-1.4.1-2mdk Installation of bochs halt entire installation process, but killing su xfs -c xfs -port -1 -s /bin/sh (pid 10237 in this case) let installation continue... Here is what is running when this occur: PID RSS %CPU CMD 1 0 0.2 (swapper) 2 0 0.0 (keventd) 3 0 0.0 (ksoftirqd_CPU0) 4 0 0.1 (kswapd) 5 0 0.0 (bdflush) 6 0 1.1 (kupdated) 7 4 0.0 linuxrc 816 0.0 linuxrc 9 29600 3.8 /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/runinstall2 --method ftp 12 0 0.0 (eth0) 1376 0.0 /bin/sh 20 0 0.0 (khubd) 33 4324 0.7 XF86_FBDev -kb -dpms -s 240 -allowMouseOpenFail -xf86 35 560 0.0 aewm-drakx 58 0 0.0 (knodemgrd) 128 0 0.0 (pagebuf_daemon) 10212 33120 4.4 /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/runinstall2 --method ftp 10218 1260 0.0 /bin/sh /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.57174 1 10219 1324 0.0 /bin/sh /usr/bochs/1.4.1/install-x11-fonts 10231 1484 0.0 /bin/sh /etc/rc.d/init.d/xfs restart 10236 532 0.0 initlog -q -c su xfs -c xfs -port -1 -s /bin/sh 10237 908 0.0 su xfs -c xfs -port -1 -s /bin/sh 10238 3468 0.1 xfs -port -1 --juhani-- === Juhani Kurki, Acte Oy Network Administrator Tel. +358 (0)9 7527 6634 Fax +358 (0)9 7527 6659 Mobile +358 (0)40 522 1945 Emailmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet http://www.acte.fi ===
Re: [Cooker] Bochs
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris I think because of plex 86 project that is in work this week they was able to boot and use linux under a virtual machine !!! ;-)
Re: [Cooker] Bochs
Yo, On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Meir Faraj wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris I think because of plex 86 project that is in work this week they was able to boot and use linux under a virtual machine !!! ;-) Some days ago, I packaged plex86 for contribs. It's definitely not too stable for the main distribution. -- Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] §õªø· ~/.signature ¤¤¤åbig5 compliant. http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~snailtalk ftp://devel.mandrakesoft.com/pub/people/snailtalk "7 days of honeymoon makes one whole week."
Re: [Cooker] Bochs
Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-: -- I wouldn't touch ActiveX with a 10-foot polecat. I might, however, let one loose on the developers. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Bochs
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Yo, On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:39:55AM +0200, Meir Faraj wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris I think because of plex 86 project that is in work this week they was able to boot and use linux under a virtual machine !!! ;-) Some days ago, I packaged plex86 for contribs. It's definitely not too stable for the main distribution. maybe it will be for the 8.1 ;-) hopes that!
Re: [Cooker] Bochs
On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-: yeh;-)
Re: [Cooker] Bochs
From: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:40:12 +0200 On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-: yeh;-) Still, might it not be a good idea to include Bochs until plex86 is ready? It could be a while and if I recall correctly Bochs could be made to work reasonably well. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
RE: [Cooker] Bochs
-Original Message- From: C Y [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 2:21 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs From: Meir Faraj [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] Bochs Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 17:40:12 +0200 On Thu, 26 Oct 2000, you wrote: Chris Spencer wrote: Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? Because plex86 is on the way, and looks like doing some things better? (-: yeh;-) Still, might it not be a good idea to include Bochs until plex86 is ready? It could be a while and if I recall correctly Bochs could be made to work reasonably well. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
[Cooker] Bochs
Out of curiosity, why is Bochs, a product owned and released under the LGPL by Mandrakesoft, not included with the distro? -Chris
[Cooker] Bochs purchase
Hey! Ket me be the first to congratulate Mandrake on two fronts: 1. Buying Bochs 2. LPGL'ing Bochs for the benefit of Plex 86 and the Linux community. Way to go guys, it's great to see a distribution channel giving back to the OSS community in such a great manner. Makes me happy that I participate in Cooker all the more. John -- * Tell me and I may forget, Show me and I may remember, Involve me and I will understand. *
