Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla mail suggestion.

2002-12-02 Thread Felix Miata
David Walser wrote:
 
> --- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > > Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as
> > RESOLVED|INVALID or
> > > do not continue to send email to the list.
> > Whoever changed the state
> > > should still be receiving emails on it... so if it
> > needs to be changed
> > > they can handle it.

> > You want that closed and invalid bugs changes are
> > not any more
> > sent to cooker.

> > I must be able to do it.

> > Others, what do you think about that ?
 
> Someone made a good point about bugs being wrongly
> closed.  I say not change it unless it becomes a big problem.

At Mozilla "closed" does not equate to "resolved". Closed bugs should
not be sent to the list. Bugs simply "resolved" should continue to be
sent to the list until they are "closed", or at least until the
resolution is changed to "verified". Resolution and verification
bugmails need to go to the list to provide notification to interested
parties of the status change.
-- 
"If you are wise, your wisdom will reward you. . . ." Proverbs 9:12 NIV

 Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409

Felix Miata  ***  http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/





Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla mail suggestion.

2002-12-02 Thread David Walser
--- Warly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as
> RESOLVED|INVALID or
> > do not continue to send email to the list. 
> Whoever changed the state
> > should still be receiving emails on it... so if it
> needs to be changed
> > they can handle it.   
> 
> You want that closed and invalid bugs changes are
> not any more 
> sent to cooker.
> 
> I must be able to do it.
> 
> Others, what do you think about that ?

Someone made a good point about bugs being wrongly
closed.  I say not change it unless it becomes a big problem.

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com




Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla mail suggestion.

2002-12-02 Thread Warly
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
> do not continue to send email to the list.  Whoever changed the state
> should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
> they can handle it.   

You want that closed and invalid bugs changes are not any more 
sent to cooker.

I must be able to do it.

Others, what do you think about that ?

-- 
Warly




Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla mail suggestion.

2002-12-01 Thread Ben Reser
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 09:14:08PM -0800, Quel Qun wrote:
> Hmm, maybe the person who closed it was wrong...

Problem is a lot of these non-cooker bug report people keep going on
about their bug...  Which keeps filling the list with it...  

But yeah I can see the problem with wrongly closed bugs.  

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

"If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard
enough." - Jim Nichols




Re: [Cooker] Bugzilla mail suggestion.

2002-12-01 Thread Quel Qun
On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 19:33, Ben Reser wrote:
> Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
> do not continue to send email to the list.  Whoever changed the state
> should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
> they can handle it. 
>   
Hmm, maybe the person who closed it was wrong...
-- 
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Cooker] Bugzilla mail suggestion.

2002-12-01 Thread Ben Reser
Can we make it so that bugs that are marked as RESOLVED|INVALID or
do not continue to send email to the list.  Whoever changed the state
should still be receiving emails on it... so if it needs to be changed
they can handle it.   


-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

"If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard
enough." - Jim Nichols