Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
I've always "jimmyed " this up by hand with a apppropriate sym-link. Yes I know it is nasty, but it works, or at least did the last time I tried. WOrks with ALL the various linux distros I have tried it with. Bob Finch On Sunday 10 August 2003 11:24 am, Edward Tandi wrote: > Does anyone have the flash plugin working? > > I get the following error: > > error: Failed dependencies: > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > > Is libc6 still supported? > > Ed-T.
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
Thanks all, I've updated to the latest version and it works now. Beta 2 looks like the best Beta2 ever! Ed-T. On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 12:21, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 11:17, Buchan Milne wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:44, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > > > > >>On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: > > >> > > >>>error: Failed dependencies: > > >>>libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > > >> > > >>Install libstdc++2.10 > > > > > > You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it > > > uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend > > > on. > > > > ?? > > > > $ rpm -qa 'libstdc++*' > > libstdc++2.10-devel-2.96-0.82mdk > > libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.82mdk > > libstdc++5-devel-3.3.1-1mdk > > libstdc++5-3.3.1-1mdk > > Wow, weird. It works here now too. Last time I tried, urpmi wanted to > remove most of the system. Guess it's been fixed. That's handy!
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 12:21:32 +0100 Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 11:17, Buchan Milne wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:44, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > >>On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: > > >> > > >>>error: Failed dependencies: > > >>>libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > > >> > > >>Install libstdc++2.10 > > > > > > You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it > > > uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend > > > on. > > > > $ rpm -qa 'libstdc++*' > > libstdc++2.10-devel-2.96-0.82mdk > > libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.82mdk > > libstdc++5-devel-3.3.1-1mdk > > libstdc++5-3.3.1-1mdk > > Wow, weird. It works here now too. Last time I tried, urpmi wanted to > remove most of the system. Guess it's been fixed. That's handy! Ah, there was a bug in rpm-4.2 where it had problems with installing 2 packages with the same provides. Both packages provide libstdc++, so that's where things went wrong then. -- Marcel Pol
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
Adam Williamson wrote: You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend on. Actually, I was able to do it on current cooker, but not my "stable" cooker from May 18. On current cooker, you can force it on, and libstdc++5 doesn't get uninstalled. On the older cooker it did (and everything broke). Reinstalling libstdc++5 again left libstdc++2 in place, fixed the problems, and left a working Flash plugin. Someday I may actually understand this stuff.
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: > error: Failed dependencies: > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 Install libstdc++2.10
[Cooker] Flash plugin
Does anyone have the flash plugin working? I get the following error: error: Failed dependencies: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 Is libc6 still supported? Ed-T.
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 11:17, Buchan Milne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:44, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > > >>On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: > >> > >>>error: Failed dependencies: > >>>libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > >> > >>Install libstdc++2.10 > > > > You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it > > uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend > > on. > > ?? > > $ rpm -qa 'libstdc++*' > libstdc++2.10-devel-2.96-0.82mdk > libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.82mdk > libstdc++5-devel-3.3.1-1mdk > libstdc++5-3.3.1-1mdk Wow, weird. It works here now too. Last time I tried, urpmi wanted to remove most of the system. Guess it's been fixed. That's handy! -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:44, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > > Install libstdc++2.10 You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend on. -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Adam Williamson wrote: > You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it > uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend > on. No, it doesn't. Why would it?
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 10:46:31 +0100 Adam Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:44, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > > On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: > > > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > > > > Install libstdc++2.10 > > You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it > uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend > on. No, the libraries are versioned, so they can coexist. # rpm -qa |grep libstd libstdc++5-3.3.1-1mdk libstdc++5-devel-3.3.1-1mdk libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.82mdk -- Marcel Pol
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
I went to Macromedia's page and tried to install their flash plugin and it didn't work with Mozillia1.4-2mdk. Macromedia's install said that a failed dependancy was missing of libXm.so.2 I solved the dependancy issue by doing a urpmi libXm.so.2 from the beta2 cd. -Joe Baker On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 11:24, Edward Tandi wrote: > Does anyone have the flash plugin working? > > I get the following error: > > error: Failed dependencies: > libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 > > Is libc6 still supported? > > Ed-T. > > >
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 09:44, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote: > >>On Sun, 10 Aug 2003, Edward Tandi wrote: >> >>>error: Failed dependencies: >>>libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 is needed by flash-plugin-6.0.79-1 >> >>Install libstdc++2.10 > > You can't do that without nuking most of your installation, as it > uninstalls the other version of libstdc++, which tons of packages depend > on. ?? $ rpm -qa 'libstdc++*' libstdc++2.10-devel-2.96-0.82mdk libstdc++2.10-2.96-0.82mdk libstdc++5-devel-3.3.1-1mdk libstdc++5-3.3.1-1mdk - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/N20drJK6UGDSBKcRAq/nAJ4kYYPRv8hpnt9TU7yVKK6zV/U62wCdFtSO ZvOau/RUkJikPVnWJmmtgpI= =GLRH -END PGP SIGNATURE- ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. **
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 23:43, w9ya wrote: > I've always "jimmyed " this up by hand with a apppropriate sym-link. Yes I > know it is nasty, but it works, or at least did the last time I tried. WOrks > with ALL the various linux distros I have tried it with. Yeah, I'm doing the same. Seems to work. -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin in konqueror
--- Frederic Crozat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Flash is proprietary software, so you will no longer > find it in the > download (ie Free Software) edition of the distro.. > It will be available > in boxes or on MandrakeClub (I'm not sure for this > one) Flash ships with Netscape, which is proprietary software, but Flash is open source (not that the community has really done anything with the source). __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin in konqueror
On Fri, 08 Mar 2002 00:07:08 +0100, Cosmic Flo wrote: > It was a great evolution in bêta3 ! > Why don't continue to include Flash player in bêta4 ? I hope it will be > in the final, it's important. Flash is proprietary software, so you will no longer find it in the download (ie Free Software) edition of the distro.. It will be available in boxes or on MandrakeClub (I'm not sure for this one) -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin in konqueror
I've never had it crash konqueror. for whatever that is worth. On Thursday 07 March 2002 10:54 pm, you wrote: > as long as it works... it crashed my galeon a bit too > often on one of my computers. > > --- Cosmic Flo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It was a great evolution in bêta3 ! > > Why don't continue to include Flash player in bêta4 > > ? > > I hope it will be in the final, it's important. > > _ > > > Téléchargez MSN Explorer gratuitement à l'adresse > > http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp. > > = > SI Reasoning > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change. Creativity > keeps the creator alive. > > -FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes > > __ > Do You Yahoo!? > Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! > http://mail.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin in konqueror
as long as it works... it crashed my galeon a bit too often on one of my computers. --- Cosmic Flo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was a great evolution in bêta3 ! > Why don't continue to include Flash player in bêta4 > ? > I hope it will be in the final, it's important. > > _ > Téléchargez MSN Explorer gratuitement à l'adresse > http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp. > > = SI Reasoning [EMAIL PROTECTED] A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change. Creativity keeps the creator alive. -FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes __ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/
[Cooker] Flash plugin in konqueror
It was a great evolution in bêta3 ! Why don't continue to include Flash player in bêta4 ? I hope it will be in the final, it's important. _ Téléchargez MSN Explorer gratuitement à l'adresse http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp.
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
Sebastian Dransfeld wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Sarang Lakare wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > When I installed 7.2, I had flash plugins installed by default. Why arn't > > they in LM8.0? I couldn't find a RPM for them either. > > netscape-plugins*rpm or something like that. > > seb No, you have to make sure to install the *plugger* package. It supports most Netscape MIME types (flash included), but not RealPlayer. Cheers, Elton Woo ;-) -- Have you been counted? See http://counter.li.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ#9984432 - Montreal, Quebec, CANADA. Registered Linux User #193975. AMD-K2 CPU on board. "You only live once, so let's make life easier for each other." S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [Cooker] Flash plugin
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Sarang Lakare wrote: > Hi, > > When I installed 7.2, I had flash plugins installed by default. Why arn't > they in LM8.0? I couldn't find a RPM for them either. netscape-plugins*rpm or something like that. seb
[Cooker] Flash plugin
Hi, When I installed 7.2, I had flash plugins installed by default. Why arn't they in LM8.0? I couldn't find a RPM for them either. sarang
