Re: [Cooker] Junkbuster and HTTP/1.1

2001-10-23 Thread Kevin Maciunas

On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 20:21, Stefan Siegel wrote:
> Es schrieb Kevin Maciunas:
> > A!  I must admit I never suspected that!  I guess this is just a
> > documentation issue now :-)  I've changed to HTTP/1.0 and (so far) the
> > problem has not re-appeared!
> > 
> > I guess I'm not entirely alone in using the Junkbuster proxy, so it
> > might be as well to somehow make this more obvious to the user - maybe
> > it would even be sensible for moz to default to 1.0 behaviour?  Just a
> > thought!
> 
> I don't think so. As we have a newer and better standard, why stay with the 
> old one? If I would continue wih your argumentation, I'd suggest staying 
> with Netscape 3 or even Mosaic (this was the original web browser created 
> by the Cern, BTW this was long before Java or JavaScript).
> 
> It should be the other way around: contact the maintainer of JunkBuster 
> and ask him if he can add HTTP/1.1 support to its product.
> 

I QUITE agree, the point I was making is that there is a released
product (LM8,1) which when bolted together in a certain way does not
work correctly.  The quick pro-tem fix is to set the moz default. 
Wearing my "Open Source is good" hat, this simple incompatibility, like
many others, is what the general press takes as "Linux/BSD/... is not
yet ready for prime time".  

I'm personally disappointed that I didn't pick this one and flag it
during the RC phase... Unfortunately, I was a bit busy attending to
other things at the time :-(

/Kevin

-- 
Kevin J. Maciunas  Net: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dept. of Computer Science  Ph : +61 8 8303 5845
University of Adelaide Fax: +61 8 8303 4366
Adelaide 5005 SOUTH AUSTRALIA  Web: http://www.cs.adelaide.edu.au/~kevin





Re: [Cooker] Junkbuster and HTTP/1.1

2001-10-23 Thread Stefan Siegel

Es schrieb Kevin Maciunas:
> A!  I must admit I never suspected that!  I guess this is just a
> documentation issue now :-)  I've changed to HTTP/1.0 and (so far) the
> problem has not re-appeared!
> 
> I guess I'm not entirely alone in using the Junkbuster proxy, so it
> might be as well to somehow make this more obvious to the user - maybe
> it would even be sensible for moz to default to 1.0 behaviour?  Just a
> thought!

I don't think so. As we have a newer and better standard, why stay with the 
old one? If I would continue wih your argumentation, I'd suggest staying 
with Netscape 3 or even Mosaic (this was the original web browser created 
by the Cern, BTW this was long before Java or JavaScript).

It should be the other way around: contact the maintainer of JunkBuster 
and ask him if he can add HTTP/1.1 support to its product.

-- 
_ 
Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt,  _|_|_   
   (")   *
Stefan /v\  / 
 »(   )«  Penguin Powered!
 +(m-m)--+