Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:12, Pierre Jarillon wrote: Le Jeudi 7 Août 2003 11:47, Robert Fox a écrit : Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) I have tested 1.1 RC1 which is far better than 1.0.3. It would be a non-sense to don't use OpenOffice 1.1 in Mdk 9.2. so, Gwenole, made up your decision yet? people have asked several times without no answer. at least OpenOffice.org needs to be fixed for 9.2 anyways..:) - -- Regards, Per Øyvind Karlsen Sintrax Solutions http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061 - GPG Key: http://sintrax.net/~hawkeye/key.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/Micev8F7V9JOSuURAtKyAKCErPq6owNvB9BgnrRgjdNf2uQukQCfVYNj I7FV9E/5kJ2620HWqkHJTMM= =Y2uj -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 11:38, Michael Scherer wrote: On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:47, Robert Fox wrote: Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) beta 2, not rc2 this is not the same. It isn't, but according to the openoffice web site, they're indeed at RC2. Wouter --
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:47, Robert Fox wrote: Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) beta 2, not rc2 this is not the same. -- Mickaël Scherer
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 00:37, Eric Fernandez wrote: Then why not switching : OpenOffice 1.1 in the main, and leave 1.0.3 in contrib. And maybe the 1.1 final will be out before the Mandrake 9.2 final deadline ? I think this is the correct solution. 1.1 works and works very, very well. I've been using it as 1.0.3 verges of the useless. Even though it is a RC, it has more polish than 1.0.3! /Kevin -- Kevin J. Maciunas Net: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Computer Science Ph : +61 8 8303 5845 University of Adelaide Fax: +61 8 8303 4366 Adelaide 5005 SOUTH AUSTRALIA Web: http://www.cs.adelaide.edu.au/~kevin Fingerprint = 7E5A A0C2 22BC 5993 17F2 93CE B1FD DEC6 D0C0 50CD
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
Le Jeudi 7 Août 2003 11:47, Robert Fox a écrit : Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) I have tested 1.1 RC1 which is far better than 1.0.3. It would be a non-sense to don't use OpenOffice 1.1 in Mdk 9.2. -- Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/ Vice-président de l'ABUL : http://abul.org/
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:51, Wouter Lagerweij wrote: On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 11:38, Michael Scherer wrote: On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:47, Robert Fox wrote: Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) beta 2, not rc2 this is not the same. It isn't, but according to the openoffice web site, they're indeed at RC2. sorry, i was talking of mandrake linux 9.2, i didn't understand that rc2 was openoffice, and not mandrake. -- Mickaël Scherer
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Per [utf-8] Øyvind Karlsen wrote: so, Gwenole, made up your decision yet? people have asked several times without no answer. at least OpenOffice.org needs to be fixed for 9.2 anyways..:) To make it more stimulating, someone on club offered $25 if you include wordperfect import:) d.
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
+1 I use it on coocker without any problem ... Le Thu, 7 Aug 2003 11:12:19 +0200 Pierre Jarillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Le Jeudi 7 Août 2003 11:47, Robert Fox a écrit : Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) I have tested 1.1 RC1 which is far better than 1.0.3. It would be a non-sense to don't use OpenOffice 1.1 in Mdk 9.2. -- Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/ Vice-président de l'ABUL : http://abul.org/
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
Le Jeudi 7 Août 2003 12:17, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit : Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) I have tested 1.1 RC1 which is far better than 1.0.3. It would be a non-sense to don't use OpenOffice 1.1 in Mdk 9.2. Kevin Maciunas [EMAIL PROTECTED] said : 1.1 works and works very, very well. I've been using it as 1.0.3 verges of the useless. Even though it is a RC, it has more polish than 1.0.3 so, Gwenole, made up your decision yet? people have asked several times without no answer. at least OpenOffice.org needs to be fixed for 9.2 anyways..:) I just receive a good new from Sophie Gautier (OOo french team) She said that the localized version of Open Office 1.1 is planned for the end of August. There should not be problem to include OOo 1.1 in Mdk 9.2 which is planned 2 or 3 weeks later. -- Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/ Vice-président de l'ABUL : http://abul.org/
[Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) Thx, R.Fox -- Robert Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fox Consulting Services
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Scherer wrote: On Thursday 07 August 2003 11:47, Robert Fox wrote: Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) beta 2, not rc2 this is not the same. RC2, see: http://www.openoffice.org/dev_docs/source/1.1rc2/ and from http://www.openoffice.org/ : Download OpenOffice.org 1.1 RC2 OpenOffice.org 1.1 RC2 OpenOffice.org 1.1 RC2 provides some minor updates to OpenOffice.org RC. Windows 98 users will find the installation procedure easier. OpenOffice.org 1.1 replaces our legacy build, OpenOffice.org 1.0.3.1. OpenOffice.org 1.1 RC not only includes features such as export to PDF, SWF, DocBook, and improved on-line Help, but also: # Existing single-user installation update capability # Integrated Bitstream Vera fonts # Built-in proofing tools and hyphenation for many languages # Better Microsoft Office filters Regards, Buchan - -- |--Another happy Mandrake Club member--| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc 1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE/MiGorJK6UGDSBKcRAq8vAKCWFWzCfJtEjGe6A8i3Nl3Bcltj5wCgy9qB JazN4pQJn410zc73xvlVceU= =8rWS -END PGP SIGNATURE- ** Please click on http://www.cae.co.za/disclaimer.htm to read our e-mail disclaimer or send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a copy. **
Re: [Cooker] Just asking- Open Office 1.1
Le Jeudi 7 Août 2003 11:47, Robert Fox a écrit : Is there any reason why OpenOffice 1.1 is not in Cooker? I see lot's of people asking about it for 9.2 - and it's supposed to be quite stable (RC2) I have tested 1.1 RC1 which is far better than 1.0.3. It would be a non-sense to don't use OpenOffice 1.1 in Mdk 9.2. -- Pierre Jarillon - http://pjarillon.free.fr/ Vice-président de l'ABUL : http://abul.org/ Then why not switching : OpenOffice 1.1 in the main, and leave 1.0.3 in contrib. And maybe the 1.1 final will be out before the Mandrake 9.2 final deadline ? Eric
