Re: [Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 Headers missing?
Erwin Prinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > All: > > I noticed that there is no kernel22-headers rpm on Cooker. I did a > rpm -Uhv kernel22-2.2.18-18mdk.i586.rpm > and > rpm -Uhv kernel22-source-2.2.18-18mdk.i586.rpm > rebooted into runlevel 3 with the 2.2.18 kernel, and tried to compile > the latest NVIDIA drivers. The NVdriver module compiled, but when I > tried to load it I got the following message: > size NVdriver >textdata bss dec hex filename > 466282 28160 19524 513966 7d7ae NVdriver > depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in > /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver > /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved symbol > tq_immediate_R0da0dc/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved > symbol register_chrdev_Rf0a/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: > unresolved symbol > inter_module_get_Rf6/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved > symbol > /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: insmod > /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: > insmod NVdriver failed > make: *** [package-install] Error 255 > > Has anyone been able to compile the NVIDIA drivers under the 2.2.18 > kernel without a kernel headers rpm? you got to compile the NVIDIA driver with : make KERNINC=/usr/src/linux22/include/ -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
[Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 Headers missing?
All: I noticed that there is no kernel22-headers rpm on Cooker. I did a rpm -Uhv kernel22-2.2.18-18mdk.i586.rpm and rpm -Uhv kernel22-source-2.2.18-18mdk.i586.rpm rebooted into runlevel 3 with the 2.2.18 kernel, and tried to compile the latest NVIDIA drivers. The NVdriver module compiled, but when I tried to load it I got the following message: size NVdriver textdata bss dec hex filename 466282 28160 19524 513966 7d7ae NVdriver depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved symbol tq_immediate_R0da0dc/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved symbol register_chrdev_Rf0a/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved symbol inter_module_get_Rf6/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: unresolved symbol /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: insmod /lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/lib/modules/2.2.18-18mdk/video/NVdriver: insmod NVdriver failed make: *** [package-install] Error 255 Has anyone been able to compile the NVIDIA drivers under the 2.2.18 kernel without a kernel headers rpm? Thanks for your help. Best regards, Erwin Prinz, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 for mandrake 7.2 ?
r j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello: > The Mandrake Security 'cookfire' distr uses kernel 2.2.18, albeit > compiled for i386. There is a source RPM that you can use to rebuild > for your arch. > kernel-2.2.18-1mdk.src.rpm can be found on the mirrors that contain > 'cookfire' SRPMS(of course). It might work for you-dunno. Check the > linux-manmdrake.com download page; cookfire security package locations > are at the bottom. it should also be available from my webpage : https://kenobi.mandrakesoft.com/~chmou/ -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
Re: [Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 for mandrake 7.2 ?
I haven't done this but i know there are packages for 2.2.18 in cooker, under the name kernel22. I haven't gotten down to actually trying it out but it seems the logical thing to do when all the 2.2.18 NFS issues are hammered out. On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Nicolas Pomarede wrote: > > > Hello, > > I know this is a little off-topic to strict cooker discussions, but I was > unable to find if there were RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 to replace the kernel > by the latest 2.2.18 version ? > > Is the only solution to grab the sources from kernel.org, or could I use > the 2.2.18 kernel available in cooker for the next mandrake release (won't > there be some libc problems or things like that) ? > > Thanx. > > > > Nicolas Pomarede e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "It said uses Windows 95 or better, so I loaded Linux!" > "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates ?" > > >
Re: [Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 for mandrake 7.2 ?
Hello: The Mandrake Security 'cookfire' distr uses kernel 2.2.18, albeit compiled for i386. There is a source RPM that you can use to rebuild for your arch. kernel-2.2.18-1mdk.src.rpm can be found on the mirrors that contain 'cookfire' SRPMS(of course). It might work for you-dunno. Check the linux-manmdrake.com download page; cookfire security package locations are at the bottom. Good Luck. rj Linux: Get it. Use it. Improve it. --- Nicolas Pomarede <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I know this is a little off-topic to strict cooker discussions, but I > was > unable to find if there were RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 to replace the > kernel > by the latest 2.2.18 version ? > > Is the only solution to grab the sources from kernel.org, or could I > use > the 2.2.18 kernel available in cooker for the next mandrake release > (won't > there be some libc problems or things like that) ? > > Thanx. > > > > Nicolas Pomarede e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "It said uses Windows 95 or better, so I loaded Linux!" > "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates ?" > > __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices! http://auctions.yahoo.com/
[Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18 for mandrake 7.2 ?
Hello, I know this is a little off-topic to strict cooker discussions, but I was unable to find if there were RPMs for Mandrake 7.2 to replace the kernel by the latest 2.2.18 version ? Is the only solution to grab the sources from kernel.org, or could I use the 2.2.18 kernel available in cooker for the next mandrake release (won't there be some libc problems or things like that) ? Thanx. Nicolas Pomarede e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It said uses Windows 95 or better, so I loaded Linux!" "In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates ?"
[Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18
Hey all! Anyone working on 2.2.18??? Or is the focus only on 2.4? Thanks, Patrick
Re: [Cooker] Kernel 2.2.18
Patrick Poncet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone working on 2.2.18??? no, nobody, i count the birds in the sky waiting for a god answer > Or is the focus only on 2.4? yes planned !!! -- MandrakeSoft Inc http://www.chmouel.org --Chmouel
