Re: [Cooker] mosix

2003-06-21 Thread Gilles Mocellin
Le sam 21/06/2003 à 14:20, Per Øyvind Karlsen a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> mosix 1.10.0 for linux 2.4.21 is out..
> http://www.mosix.org/
> just thought I'd mention it..


Just wait for openmosix, really free :
http://openmosix.sourceforge.net/


> - -- 
> Regards,
> Per Øyvind Karlsen
> Sintrax Solutions
> http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
> - 
> GPG Key: http://sintrax.net/~hawkeye/key.asc
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE+9E12v8F7V9JOSuURAnSHAKDABkaj/L5JOM+xMoUU93CnLKbRwQCfQGSf
> RifDWO1UQj302kifxDUxxAs=
> =Ne/m
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
> 
> 



[Cooker] mosix

2003-06-21 Thread Per Øyvind Karlsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

mosix 1.10.0 for linux 2.4.21 is out..
http://www.mosix.org/
just thought I'd mention it..
- -- 
Regards,
Per Øyvind Karlsen
Sintrax Solutions
http://www.sintrax.net - +47 41681061
- 
GPG Key: http://sintrax.net/~hawkeye/key.asc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+9E12v8F7V9JOSuURAnSHAKDABkaj/L5JOM+xMoUU93CnLKbRwQCfQGSf
RifDWO1UQj302kifxDUxxAs=
=Ne/m
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [Cooker] mosix enabled mandrake kernel any chance

2003-01-10 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

At some point there was a mosix kernel enabled, you may got to ping
tvignaud to see with him.





[Cooker] mosix enabled mandrake kernel any chance

2003-01-09 Thread Lea Gris
This is a feature request:

Hi,

Mandrake already has :

libmosix0
libmosix0-devel
and
mosix-utils

Can we expect a mosix enabled kernel in the distro ?

I would enjoy sharing CPU power among our home network without having to 
recompile each kernel


--
 Léa Gris - http://www.noiraude.net/
()   Campagne du ruban texte brut contre les courriels en HTML,
/\   contre les pièces jointes Microsoft.




[Cooker] Mosix kernel

2002-04-22 Thread Dave Seff

Did I miss something? Where did it go?

-Dave




[Cooker] mosix 1.57 cannot be installed (urgent) !

2002-03-06 Thread Cosmic Flo

due of libmosix corruption in contrib (libmos.0 (the kernel module) is 
missing in the RPM) !
Can anyone repare this ?

Many thanks !

_
MSN Photos est le moyen le plus simple de partager, modifier et imprimer vos 
photos préférées. http://photos.msn.fr/Support/WorldWide.aspx





Re: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed

2002-03-03 Thread Chuck Shirley

On Sunday 03 March 2002 15:32, Blue Lizard wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 11:36, Cosmic Flo wrote:
>> It cannot be installed because kernel in Mdk is patched (it's not pure 
>> kernel.org's kernel).
>> Is anyone is working to do a Mosix package for Mandrake8.2 ?
>> 
>The latest from tvig is 1.5.2 for 2.4.13 and somewhat buggy.  There is
>no indication of a new one that I've seen.


What about this one from a while back:


> --=-=-=
> Name: kernel-mosix Relocations: (not relocateable)
> Version : 2.4.17Vendor: MandrakeSoft
> Release : 1mdk  Build Date: Wed Feb 13 15:04:39 2002

/.../

> - resync with main kernel config
> - reforce SMP
> - Mosix-1.5.7 for linux kernel 2.4.17


I asked about it from a week or so ago, but no one said anything about it.  
Rpmfind.net (and presumably other mirrors) have the srpm, but no pre-compiled except
the 2.4.13 version:::



*Found 4 RPM for kernel-mosix 
*
*Packagekernel-mosix-2.4.17-1mdk.src.html
*
*SummaryThe Linux kernel with the MOSIX patch (process migration).
*
*Distribution   Mandrake Cooker
*
*Download   kernel-mosix-2.4.17-1mdk.src.rpm


-Chuck




Re: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed (urgent)

2002-03-03 Thread Blue Lizard

oops, disregard my other message.
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 07:59, Buchan Milne wrote:
> Latest mosix is in cooker contribs:
> 
> 
>ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/kernel-mosix-2.4.17-1mdk.src.rpm
> 
> Unfortunately it seems Mandrake CVS
> (http://www.linux-mandrake.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/kernel-mosix/) has
> not been updated, so you will have to get the full srpm.
> 
> Buchan
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >The last Mosix (for Kernel 2.4.17) cannot apply his patch to kernel (I ha=
> >ve=20
> >a Mandrake8.2b=EAta3) to compile it.
> >Is anyone have an idea ?
> >Thanks
> >PS : her the output screen :
> >Begin installation...
> >Patch cannot be applied.
> >Compilation of kernel failed.  Cannot proceed!
> >_
> >T=E9l=E9chargez MSN Explorer gratuitement =E0 l'adresse=20
> >http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp.;
> 
> 





Re: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed

2002-03-03 Thread Blue Lizard

On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 11:36, Cosmic Flo wrote:
> It cannot be installed because kernel in Mdk is patched (it's not pure 
> kernel.org's kernel).
> Is anyone is working to do a Mosix package for Mandrake8.2 ?
> 
The latest from tvig is 1.5.2 for 2.4.13 and somewhat buggy.  There is
no indication of a new one that I've seen.
> Thanks
> 
> >From: "Cosmic Flo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed (urgent)
> >Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 12:45:03 +
> >
> >The last Mosix (for Kernel 2.4.17) cannot apply his patch to kernel (I have
> >a Mandrake8.2bêta3) to compile it.
> >Is anyone have an idea ?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >PS : her the output screen :
> >
> >Begin installation...
> >
> >Patch cannot be applied.
> >
> >Compilation of kernel failed.  Cannot proceed!
> 
> _
> MSN Photos est le moyen le plus simple de partager, modifier et imprimer vos 
> photos préférées. http://photos.msn.fr/Support/WorldWide.aspx
> 
> 





Re: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed

2002-03-03 Thread Cosmic Flo

It cannot be installed because kernel in Mdk is patched (it's not pure 
kernel.org's kernel).
Is anyone is working to do a Mosix package for Mandrake8.2 ?

Thanks

>From: "Cosmic Flo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed (urgent)
>Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 12:45:03 +
>
>The last Mosix (for Kernel 2.4.17) cannot apply his patch to kernel (I have
>a Mandrake8.2bêta3) to compile it.
>Is anyone have an idea ?
>
>Thanks
>
>PS : her the output screen :
>
>Begin installation...
>
>Patch cannot be applied.
>
>Compilation of kernel failed.  Cannot proceed!

_
MSN Photos est le moyen le plus simple de partager, modifier et imprimer vos 
photos préférées. http://photos.msn.fr/Support/WorldWide.aspx





Re: [Cooker] mosix cannot be installed (urgent)

2002-03-03 Thread Buchan Milne

Latest mosix is in cooker contribs:

ftp://mandrake.redbox.cz/Mandrake-devel/contrib/SRPMS/kernel-mosix-2.4.17-1mdk.src.rpm

Unfortunately it seems Mandrake CVS
(http://www.linux-mandrake.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/contrib-SPECS/kernel-mosix/) has
not been updated, so you will have to get the full srpm.

Buchan


[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>The last Mosix (for Kernel 2.4.17) cannot apply his patch to kernel (I ha=
>ve=20
>a Mandrake8.2b=EAta3) to compile it.
>Is anyone have an idea ?
>Thanks
>PS : her the output screen :
>Begin installation...
>Patch cannot be applied.
>Compilation of kernel failed.  Cannot proceed!
>_
>T=E9l=E9chargez MSN Explorer gratuitement =E0 l'adresse=20
>http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp.;





[Cooker] mosix cannot be installed (urgent)

2002-03-03 Thread Cosmic Flo

The last Mosix (for Kernel 2.4.17) cannot apply his patch to kernel (I have 
a Mandrake8.2bêta3) to compile it.
Is anyone have an idea ?

Thanks

PS : her the output screen :

Begin installation...

Patch cannot be applied.

Compilation of kernel failed.  Cannot proceed!



_
Téléchargez MSN Explorer gratuitement à l'adresse 
http://explorer.msn.fr/intl.asp.





[Cooker] Mosix 1.5.7 for kernel 2.4.17 is out

2002-03-02 Thread Cosmic Flo

Mosix is a tool for doing clusters.

_
Rejoignez le plus grand service de messagerie au monde avec MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com/fr





Re: [Cooker] Mosix

2002-02-22 Thread Thierry Vignaud

Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Sorry Thierry (sp?).

right

> Would you mind packing (post release i suppose) mosix 1.5.7?  Much
> appreciated.

it's there.
notice that a new one (resynced with main kernel spec) is in the queue.





Re: [Cooker] Mosix

2002-02-21 Thread Blue Lizard

Sorry Thierry (sp?).
Would you mind packing (post release i suppose) mosix 1.5.7?  Much
appreciated.

Thanks
-MG

On Mon, 2002-02-18 at 20:52, Blue Lizard wrote:
> Hallo TV.
> Koennen Sie der Mosix 1.5.7 machen bitte?
> 
> Danke
> -MG (erm...ich spreche Deutsch nicht so gut)
> 
> 
> 





Re: [Cooker] Mosix

2002-02-19 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hallo TV.
> Koennen Sie der Mosix 1.5.7 machen bitte?
>
> Danke
> -MG (erm...ich spreche Deutsch nicht so gut)

TV doen't spreche Deutsch.

-- 
http://www.chmouel.org/




[Cooker] Mosix

2002-02-18 Thread Blue Lizard

Hallo TV.
Koennen Sie der Mosix 1.5.7 machen bitte?

Danke
-MG (erm...ich spreche Deutsch nicht so gut)






[Cooker] Mosix kernel

2002-01-06 Thread Blue Lizard

is this tvignaud's domain?
There are massive unresolved symbol messages, and the thing wont even
detect my scsi.  Insmod fails...I checked my lilo.conf, rebuilt it,
everything seemed right but it cant find init without scsi :).

Please, pretty please, a rebuild/update?
I dunno if i missed it (dont think so).
My package is 2.4.13-1mdk.

Anyway...thanks.




Re: [Cooker] mosix & Q.C.

2001-02-07 Thread Frederic Lepied

"Mark B Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> can someone please tell me if / when mosix is going to be properly upported
> in mandrake? I got it working by brute force with kernel 2.2.18 (which
> incidently seemingly got lost in all the hurah over 2.4) bit this kernel
> never compiled properly, the make menuconfig was broke & some weird disk
> errors started apearing afterwards.
> 

The mosix kernel for 2.2.18 and utils are in the contrib area.
-- 
Fred - May the source be with you





[Cooker] mosix & Q.C.

2001-01-29 Thread Mark B Berger

can someone please tell me if / when mosix is going to be properly upported
in mandrake? I got it working by brute force with kernel 2.2.18 (which
incidently seemingly got lost in all the hurah over 2.4) bit this kernel
never compiled properly, the make menuconfig was broke & some weird disk
errors started apearing afterwards.

What we need is some serious clustering capabilities built right into the
system from word go. I have 50+ 500+mz machines on a fast lan - only a few
of those are heavyly tasked at any one time, however if those resouces could
be shared properly & easily it would be a real breeze to handle the peaks on
ALL the machines.

AS for Q.C. in Mandrake - it seems to be deteriorating fast

In general our experience of 7.0 was good, 7.1 was better but we have had
very mixed results with 7.2 ( the upgrade does not work at all, ( often
results in an unusable & trashed system! requiring re-format!)  neither does
the network install ( also a samba install is missing ) the real install
leaves out many of the packages at random even when 100% is chosen it just
goes its own way & generaly needs several attempts just to get a working
system - also th mandrake update progam is K**p it always fails & cannot
handle the dependencies set out in the upgrade dir - just crashes or offers
to either force all packages or just quit!

Mandrake is a good system, just hope more attention can be paid to detail &
quality otherwise we are just re-inventing MS's mistakes - too fast to
market with too buggy & unfinished software, then onto the next pice of
junk!

My other big bitch is that with so many Linux packages being realy hot of
the press & required as fixes, it is disconcerting & potentially dangerous
to be forced to patch a production system with files from cooker or the next
version simply because no-one had bothered to add the tested updates to the
update dir. ( take the upgrades released for MySQL / netscape / PHP3 to PHP4
etc for example & there are LOTS more

Come on guys how hard can it be to have a HOT ( i.e. run a script from the
command line NOT X-win that downloads & installs all the latest & greatest
(or as required) then (perhaps at most one ) simple reboot to init the new
kernel etc) upgrade to a working system to keep it bang up to date? for
server systems taht would be MUCH easier to handle than a day of downtime &
the risk that it will trash everything. To follow from that theme if the
same script can then update all the other machines on the lan then life
would be better, the mirrors would have better use of the bandwith & you
would have more much happier customers.

Hope someone will take note of the above. I realise there are other agendas
etc. but if we cannot easyly keep current, have polished software ( that
thought no doubt will earn me a flame! ) & utilise the benefits of the
latest technology then are we not missing the (linux) plot in a big way?


Thanks & Regards,

Mark Berger
[EMAIL PROTECTED]