Re: [Cooker] New/fixed packages: gtk-sharp-0.8-1mdk,mono-0.23-3mdk, gnome-db-0.2.96-7mdk

2003-04-05 Thread Marcel Pol
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 12:51:01 -0800
Andi Payn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The mono-0.23-2mdk package installed broken scripts in /usr/bin/msc and 
 /usr/bin/mbas that pointed into the packager's build root. The problem is 
 that the script that generates these scripts expects to find the real 
 binaries in the install directory, which obviously isn't true when you're 
 packaging. This should probably be fixed properly with the mono people; for 
 now, I just added two lines to the specfile to overwrite these scripts.

Mono-0.23-3mdk should be fine.
The rest of these packages were already submitted by Quel Qun, but they needed
some work for the libpolicy, and I've been a bit slow on that. Do you have a
webspace where you can put these src.rpms? I don't have read access to
/incoming.

 The gnome-db-0.2.96-6mdk package didn't include pkgconfig support, and 
 wouldn't build without errors (because it installed but did not package the 
 help files). 
 
 The gtk-sharp package requires my updated mono and gnome-db devel packages
 to build, but binaries should install just fine with the existing versions.
 
 The mono packages don't install the monodoc tools or the mono documentation,
 
 so I didn't install the Gtk# docs either. This should probably be changed in
 
 the future (or maybe separate monodoc, mono-docs, and gtk-sharp-docs
 packages would be better?).
 
 Someone should package Qt# (especially given Mandrake's slight Qt/KDE 
 preference), but it might be a while before I get around to it (since I've 
 barely even looked at Qt#).
 
 



--
Marcel Pol





[Cooker] New/fixed packages: gtk-sharp-0.8-1mdk, mono-0.23-3mdk, gnome-db-0.2.96-7mdk

2003-04-04 Thread Andi Payn
Gtk# is a project to provide a GUI for portable ICS/.net applications, built 
with either mono or pnet (or Visual Studio.net, or that matter). Since 
WinForms support isn't there yet in mono, and may never be there for pnet, 
you pretty much need either this or Qt# for now if you want to do .net on 
linux. In fact, even when WinForms support is done, you may prefer Gtk# (or 
Qt#) because you're more comfortable with Gtk+/Glade (Qt/Qdesigner) 
development than Win32/VS, or because you want a truly free solution.

Gtk# should work with both pnet and mono, but I've only tested with mono, and 
only building a simple Hello World app.

I based this package on the Redhat 0.7 package from the Gtk# website; the 
description seems a little odd to me, but I left it alone.

In building Gtk#, I discovered problems with two existing packages, so I've 
submitted fixes for those as well. 

The mono-0.23-2mdk package installed broken scripts in /usr/bin/msc and 
/usr/bin/mbas that pointed into the packager's build root. The problem is 
that the script that generates these scripts expects to find the real 
binaries in the install directory, which obviously isn't true when you're 
packaging. This should probably be fixed properly with the mono people; for 
now, I just added two lines to the specfile to overwrite these scripts.

The gnome-db-0.2.96-6mdk package didn't include pkgconfig support, and 
wouldn't build without errors (because it installed but did not package the 
help files). 

The gtk-sharp package requires my updated mono and gnome-db devel packages to 
build, but binaries should install just fine with the existing versions.

The mono packages don't install the monodoc tools or the mono documentation, 
so I didn't install the Gtk# docs either. This should probably be changed in 
the future (or maybe separate monodoc, mono-docs, and gtk-sharp-docs packages 
would be better?).

Someone should package Qt# (especially given Mandrake's slight Qt/KDE 
preference), but it might be a while before I get around to it (since I've 
barely even looked at Qt#).