Re: [Cooker] Postings
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 06:13:54PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Veit Waltemath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:17:16PM +0100, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: > > > Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list??? > > Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This is the right way. > > Very funny. But it actually works, or at least it seems so. Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191 PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Postings
Veit Waltemath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:17:16PM +0100, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: > > Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list??? > Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This is the right way. Very funny. -- "Pixel, il faut mettre un peu de chaleur dans tes contacts humains" (c) Titi
RE: [Cooker] Postings
That's what I thought, I'm glad you mentioned it. And no, it doesn't make any bloody difference whether you use a c or a C!!! Read the RFC document on e-mail addresses and domain names. (Not sure which one it is). SO. Why do cooker, or Cooker postings take so damn long to appear? -Original Message- From: Alexander Skwar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 July 2000 4:50 To: cooker Subject: Re: [Cooker] Postings On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Veit Waltemath wrote: > Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This is the right way. You've gotta be kidding, aren't you? Mail adresses are supposed to be case insignifacant, so this should not make a difference (or does it make a difference?) Any official answers? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191
Re: [Cooker] Postings
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Veit Waltemath wrote: > Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > This is the right way. You've gotta be kidding, aren't you? Mail adresses are supposed to be case insignifacant, so this should not make a difference (or does it make a difference?) Any official answers? Alexander Skwar -- Homepage: http://www.digitalprojects.com Sichere Mail? Mail an [EMAIL PROTECTED] fuer GnuPG Keys ICQ:7328191 PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Postings
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 12:17:16PM +0100, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote: > Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list??? Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the right way. -- Veit Waltemath [EMAIL PROTECTED] **\ Linux-Mandrake 7.1 rocks /** \/
[Cooker] Postings
Why are postings taking a stupidly long time to appear on the list???
