Re: [Cooker] Proper specfile syntax

[e70]

 me on to susse it rocks
- Original Message -
From: "Blue Lizard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: [Cooker] Proper specfile syntax


> Something occured to me (and a collective uh-oh arises from the crowd ;).
> Whenever I write specs (now-a-days, anyway), I use License.  I went back
> to look at the old mdk-rpm howto for a proper group and noticed that
> chm*uel's skeleton.spec uses Copyright.
>
> It seems almost all official mdk rpms are using License.  Is it safe to
> go with that and assume that's fine for all rpm or hybrid rpm based
distros?
>
>

Re: [Cooker] Proper specfile syntax

[Chmouel Boudjnah]

Blue Lizard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Something occured to me (and a collective uh-oh arises from the crowd ;).
> Whenever I write specs (now-a-days, anyway), I use License.  I went
> back to look at the old mdk-rpm howto for a proper group and noticed
> that chm*uel's skeleton.spec uses Copyright.

it was a really very very long time ago.

Re: [Cooker] Proper specfile syntax

[Blue Lizard]

Blue Lizard wrote: something stupid probably

HAHA!  Guess what I just found?

"This tag (superseding Copyright) defines the license chosen by the 
copyright holder that will apply to the software being packed."
Sorry.

Regards.

[Cooker] Proper specfile syntax

[Blue Lizard]

Something occured to me (and a collective uh-oh arises from the crowd ;).
Whenever I write specs (now-a-days, anyway), I use License.  I went back 
to look at the old mdk-rpm howto for a proper group and noticed that 
chm*uel's skeleton.spec uses Copyright.

It seems almost all official mdk rpms are using License.  Is it safe to 
go with that and assume that's fine for all rpm or hybrid rpm based distros?