Re: [Cooker] RE:Problem with Beta 3 ISO

2000-05-30 Thread Warly


It seems to have a problem on the extension CD images, a new
one is going to be uploaded.

-- 
Warly




Re: [Cooker] RE:Problem with Beta 3 ISO

2000-05-30 Thread Jeroen Janssen

Warly wrote:
 
 It seems to have a problem on the extension CD images, a new
 one is going to be uploaded.

will it stil be beta3? (any idea *when* it's uploaded? + don't forget to
update the md5sum)

btw... should I be able to install with only the 1st CD (assuming only
the extension CD is wrong)?
-- 
Best regards,

Jeroen Janssen

+++
People whose concept of ancient history is the first series of Star Trek
may be treated with patience, because it's usually not their fault they
were reduced to getting their education from school.
-- (Terry Pratchett, alt.books.pratchett)
+++




Re: [Cooker] RE:Problem with Beta 3 ISO

2000-05-30 Thread Daniel Hammer

BS''D

 It seems to have a problem on the extension CD images, a new
 one is going to be uploaded.

you have an idea when ???

Best,

Daniel.
   ___
  |   \   
  |\  
  | | 
  |_| 
 |_ |  
/ _)|  
   / /__|
 _/ () 
()
 _  ()
  \_()  
 |  |  
 \__/ 




[Cooker] RE:Problem with Beta 3 ISO

2000-05-29 Thread root

I downloaded the 2 isos of mdk 7.1beta3 from ftp.free.fr
   I got some problems : the install program failed to read
   my second CD. At first i thought of a burning error, but
   the second time the same bug did appear.
   So i took a further look at some files on the ext cd.
   For example xxgdb-1.12-15mdk.i586.rpm was not found to
   be a valid rpm archive by rpm. I downloaded the same file
   from an ftp archive, and it looked correct. The 2 files
   had exactly the same size, but when i edited the iso
   version with hexedit, i found that it was completelly filled
   with null bytes !
   I looked at many other files, and found the same problem, but
not
   on all. The same behaviour occured also when i mounted the
iso
   as loopback, so i think it is not a burning problem. I
redownloaded
   the iso a second time, and the md5sum test was correct.

   Has anybody else met the same problem ?

   Pascal Grosse

I had the same problem, as well.  During the install I walked away from
the
machine.  I came back later and it was asking for the 2nd CD.  I
inserted it
waited until it got started, and left the room again.  Apparently none
of the
packages were installed off this bad CD.  On the other hand, I received
no
error message.  I didn't even realize that there was a problem until
I started
missing stuff.  It seems like if rpm fails, it should notice the problem
and ask
what to do..

RC