Re: [Cooker] Re: [Bug 5454] [iptables] iptables 1.2.7a-1.2.8a NAT/MASQUERADE bug

2003-09-11 Thread Marcel Pol 
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:30:14 +0300
"Thomas Backlund" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> "[mpol]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5454

> > Which kernel (uname -a) do you run with which version of iptables (rpm -q
> iptables)?
> > You should run the kernel and iptables that came with the distribution.
> Afaik,
> > iptables from 9.1 will not work on a 9.2 kernel, and probably the other
> way
> > around too. This is because of changes in netfilter itself.
> > Using the iptables of 9.2 on a 9.2 kernel works ok (except for the current
> > routing issue).
> >
> 
> Wich is fixed in my last kernel

which is being worked on.
Yes, I knew your kernel was already fixed, and I should have said it :-)



--
Marcel Pol

[Cooker] Re: [Bug 5454] [iptables] iptables 1.2.7a-1.2.8a NAT/MASQUERADE bug

2003-09-11 Thread Thomas Backlund 

"[mpol]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5454
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-11-09 13:21 ---
> Which kernel (uname -a) do you run with which version of iptables (rpm -q
iptables)?
> You should run the kernel and iptables that came with the distribution.
Afaik,
> iptables from 9.1 will not work on a 9.2 kernel, and probably the other
way
> around too. This is because of changes in netfilter itself.
> Using the iptables of 9.2 on a 9.2 kernel works ok (except for the current
> routing issue).
>

Wich is fixed in my last kernel

Thomas