Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mutt-1.3.27i-3mdk
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:14:38AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote: > On Jan 30, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > On Jan 28, Geoffrey Lee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > --=-=-= > > > Name: mutt Relocations: (not relocateable) > > [snip] > > It would be preferable to figure out what's wrong with building with > > ncurses and fix that. > > I see that this has already been discussed a lot, sorry. > > I'm sending a report to one of the ncurses maintainers who monitors the > mutt lists to see if he wants to get involved and help fix this. Ok, thanks! - G.
Re: [Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mutt-1.3.27i-3mdk
On Jan 30, Jeremy Blosser [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Jan 28, Geoffrey Lee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > --=-=-= > > Name: mutt Relocations: (not relocateable) > [snip] > It would be preferable to figure out what's wrong with building with > ncurses and fix that. I see that this has already been discussed a lot, sorry. I'm sending a report to one of the ncurses maintainers who monitors the mutt lists to see if he wants to get involved and help fix this. msg52902/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
[Cooker] Re: [CHRPM] mutt-1.3.27i-3mdk
On Jan 28, Geoffrey Lee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > --=-=-= > Name: mutt Relocations: (not relocateable) > * Tue Jan 29 2002 Geoffrey Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.3.27i-3mdk > > - Back to slang again. The reasoning is that mutt breaks with a terminfo > entry with color support and when ncurses is enabled. By using slang, > color doesn't break, and mono is fine as well. Please be aware that slang has it's own problems. For one, if you have a large number of 'color' entries (like, around 30+), slang will claim the terminal capabilities don't support it and start ignoring the color commands. In other words, it has a very low value for COLOR_PAIRS. It would be preferable to figure out what's wrong with building with ncurses and fix that. msg52894/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
