[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: installing live into another device
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:43:50AM -0400, Pierre Fortin wrote: Brian, Hi Pierre, Sorry if Bochs is already known; but, this just hit the wires... http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6013 Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on what hardware you are running on), Bochs does not use processor virtualization but rather emulation. That means the speed sucks, compared to something like plex86 or vmware. Sadly it looks (from all appearances) that plex86 has died. :-( b. -- Brian J. Murrell msg63135/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] Re: Re: Re: installing live into another device
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002 04:30:17 +0200, Brian J. Murrell wrote : --pY3vCvL1qV+PayAL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 01:47:18AM +0200, Pixel wrote: =20 the big job of DrakX is to customize things to the users need, but this customization is not really necessary (eg: my box was first installed in = mid ^ Right! I was hoping to start with a nice new fresh install. With the complication that I want to install on an LVM LV which is why the live/online install would be nice. 99 and I only upgraded it since then with rpm/urpmi (ok I lost my database once, but these things can be somewhat restored with time)) This is how I have been operating for a long time now too. I think I have a lot of cruft now (old libs not in use anymore and not obsoleted by the same libs with newer version numbers in the name as in: libgal11-0.11.2-3mdk libgal12-0.12-1mdk libgal15-0.15-1mdk libgal18-0.18.1-1mdk libgal19-0.19-2mdk) We CAN't obsolete libraries, just to remove them.. This would mean a new library would provide binary compatibility with old one and it is not the case... -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
[Cooker] Re: Re: Re: installing live into another device
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 01:47:18AM +0200, Pixel wrote: the big job of DrakX is to customize things to the users need, but this customization is not really necessary (eg: my box was first installed in mid ^ Right! I was hoping to start with a nice new fresh install. With the complication that I want to install on an LVM LV which is why the live/online install would be nice. 99 and I only upgraded it since then with rpm/urpmi (ok I lost my database once, but these things can be somewhat restored with time)) This is how I have been operating for a long time now too. I think I have a lot of cruft now (old libs not in use anymore and not obsoleted by the same libs with newer version numbers in the name as in: libgal11-0.11.2-3mdk libgal12-0.12-1mdk libgal15-0.15-1mdk libgal18-0.18.1-1mdk libgal19-0.19-2mdk) and I obviously have a very rare incidence of Galeon/Mozilla haning that seems to escape diagnosis. b. -- Brian J. Murrell msg62469/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
