Re: [Cooker] Re: gtk+2.0-2.0.0-1mdk

2002-03-25 Thread Frederic Crozat

On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 04:12:47 +0100, Brian J. Murrell wrote:

 --DdkYHe1zOS6lRih+
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 05:38:58PM +0800, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
=20
 They REALLY cann't coexist for now. Try compiling both x11 target and
 linux-fb target seperately, and compare their gtk+-2.0.pc and
 gdk-2.0.pc.
 
 Fair enough.  What about mutually exclusive RPMs then?  Really, if one
 wants gtk-x11, one doesn't really want gtk-linux-fb and vice versa.
 
 I think libgtk+2-linuxfb with a Conflicts: libgtk+2-x11 (and vice
 versa) would be quite acceptable.

No way.. And I won't enable linuxfb support until GTK+ team says it is
officially supported..

-- 
Frédéric Crozat
MandrakeSoft




Re: [Cooker] Re: gtk+2.0-2.0.0-1mdk

2002-03-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 05:38:58PM +0800, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
 
 They REALLY cann't coexist for now. Try compiling both x11 target and
 linux-fb target seperately, and compare their gtk+-2.0.pc and gdk-2.0.pc.

Fair enough.  What about mutually exclusive RPMs then?  Really, if one
wants gtk-x11, one doesn't really want gtk-linux-fb and vice versa.

I think libgtk+2-linuxfb with a Conflicts: libgtk+2-x11 (and vice
versa) would be quite acceptable.

b.

-- 
Brian J. Murrell



msg61346/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [Cooker] Re: gtk+2.0-2.0.0-1mdk

2002-03-22 Thread Brian J. Murrell

On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 05:38:58PM +0800, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
 
 They REALLY cann't coexist for now. Try compiling both x11 target and
 linux-fb target seperately, and compare their gtk+-2.0.pc and gdk-2.0.pc.
 
 For gtk+ 1.3.1x package, the x11 copy of gtk+-2.0.pc overwrites the one
 from linux-fb target, that means any program linked against gtk+ would
 be unconditionally linked against libX11 as well.

I see.  Is this a known issue with the gtk developers?  Are they aware
of the conflict?  Have they just put it on the back burner for now?

 PS Actually, x11 is still the only 'blessed' target in gtk+ 2.0.0. You
 can't even compile the linux-fb target from vanilla source.

That must've changed since 1.3.1[3-5] then, because I have a box here
which I have successfully built a gtk app and run it on the
framebuffer.

b.

-- 
Brian J. Murrell



msg61222/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature