Re: [Cooker] Re: kernel-2.2.15-0.8mdk

2000-02-25 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

Roger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 have your guys implemented the patch for the ls120 diskette drive in this
 kernel?  (using the ide-floppy module)

no.

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



Re: [Cooker] Re: kernel-2.2.15-0.8mdk

2000-02-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah

"Brian J. Murrell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 SOURCES himself, just so making it build is easier.  Better than having
 to patch the spec file every time a new kernel comes out methinks.

ok, i currently try to find a solution.

-- 
MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
 --Chmouel



Re: [Cooker] Re: kernel-2.2.15-0.8mdk

2000-02-24 Thread Roger

have your guys implemented the patch for the ls120 diskette drive in this
kernel?  (using the ide-floppy module)



On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, you wrote:
 "Brian J. Murrell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  SOURCES himself, just so making it build is easier.  Better than having
  to patch the spec file every time a new kernel comes out methinks.
 
 ok, i currently try to find a solution.
 
 -- 
 MandrakeSoft  http://www.mandrakesoft.com/
--Chmouel
-- 



Sent from:

Lattitude (deg):32.7130
Longitude (deg):-117.1530
Altitude (ft):  410.0
GMT to Local (hrs): -8.0 (daylight savings enabled)



Created with Linux-Mandrake 7.0!

http://www.linux-mandrake.com/

Currently Beta Testing Mandrake Ver 7.0



Re: [Cooker] Re: kernel-2.2.15-0.8mdk

2000-02-24 Thread Brian J. Murrell

from the quill of Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] on scroll
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 You know the problems, freeswan is not exportable i can't do a kernel
 from here(US) and export to another countrib.

Actually I think technically, under the new US export regs, it is
exportable.  I belive the Mozilla crew are already going ahead and
putting crypto back into Mozilla under the new regs.

Besides which, why not have it built it outside the US and bring the
exportable parts (all but the freeswan package/ipsec.o module) back in
for distro on the Mandrake mirrors?  Those procedures must already be
getting done with the crypto site offshore anyway right?

Or have switches in the spec file to build the "freeswan" package
(including kernel module ipsec.o) or not.  The in US builder -- you can
turn the switch off to not make a freeswan package, and somebody
offshore in charge of doing the crypto can build with freeswan and only
post the resulting freeswan package on the crypto site.

In any case, it would be nice to have it in the spec file, even if one
did have to go retrieve the package from freeswan.org and put it into
SOURCES himself, just so making it build is easier.  Better than having
to patch the spec file every time a new kernel comes out methinks.

b.


--
Brian J. Murrell  InterLinx Support Services, Inc.
North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX
Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD