[Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-30 Thread danny
On 30 Aug 2003, Pixel wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  On 28 Aug 2003, Pixel wrote:
  
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
   
Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; 
udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers most common cases.
 
 oops, in fact i've put udf:iso9660 for CDs too. Is that bad?
 
no, not bad, udf is a bit slow in checking if it is really an udf fs. But 
perhaps it is safer because I think iso9660 can also mount some udf 
filesystems. Normally CDs are iso9660, and dvds udf, so that is ok. But I 
think packet-written cds are udf as well, and I have no clue if they 
work if they are mounted with iso9660.
untill someone can test this well(hint!), it is perhaps best to 
leave it as it is now.

d.





Re: [Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-29 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Andre Lourenco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 udf:iso9660 for CD too IMO

kernel only sees cdrom device anyway so it's already the case.

-- 
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/



[Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-29 Thread Pixel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On 28 Aug 2003, Pixel wrote:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; 
   udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers most common cases.

oops, in fact i've put udf:iso9660 for CDs too. Is that bad?



[Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-29 Thread Pixel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 On 28 Aug 2003, Pixel wrote:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; 
   udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers most common cases.
  
  done.
  

 Could someone who has/can burn udf CDs (not DVDs) test if they get 
 mounted correctly if these options are in fstab?
 
 d.



[Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-28 Thread Pixel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; 
 udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers most common cases.

done.



Re: [Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-28 Thread Andre Lourenco
udf:iso9660 for CD too IMO

 --- Pixel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; 
  udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers
 most common cases.
 
 done.
  

=
On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section, it said 
'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux.

--
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
- http://andyrock.no.sapo.pt -
- http://linuxinside.com.sapo.pt -
--


Want to chat instantly with your online friends?  Get the FREE Yahoo!
Messenger http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/



[Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-28 Thread danny
On 28 Aug 2003, Pixel wrote:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy; 
  udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers most common cases.
 
 done.
 
thanks Pixel!

Could someone who has/can burn udf CDs (not DVDs) test if they get 
mounted correctly if these options are in fstab?

d.





[Cooker] Re: things to improve now we finally have supermount-ng

2003-08-23 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Saturday 23 August 2003 23:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 Use ext2:vfat for floppies and Jaz/ZIP/ide-flopy;
 udf:iso9660 for DVD; iso9660 for CD. This covers most common cases.

 [Andrey: I know iso9660 can mount some udf as well, but if it is a real
 cdrom drive, it can only be packet writing cds, is it a problem when
 these are mounted with iso9660?]


I am not sure I actually understand the question ... I am no expert in CD 
writing after all :)
[...]
 Another thing is that some drives are _very_ slow when trying to autoclose
 the device (see bug 20, there are probably more, since I often saw reports
 about slow cdrom responses). I would prefer that autoclose is
 disabled, or at least that it is made custumizable (sysctl -w
 dev.cdrom.autoclose=0).


it is customizable :) the question is what should be default upon install. 
Sometimes I miss autoclose  but you can't have 'em all.

 Andrey, another thing we talked about was sysctl -w
 dev.cdrom.check_media=1. But I currently forgot what it was good for :(


mostly to speed up things and to not interfere with CD players. Without this 
setting attempt to mount will try to really mount (incl. media access) that 
may result in skips during playing audio CD. With it attempt to mount does 
not even touch CD because it already knows it is audio and returns EMEDIATYPE 
error.

-andrey