[Cooker] snf-8.2 still in cooker tree
SNF 8.2 is still in the cooker tree and causes gendistrib to fail due to newt requirements. I thought SNF was phased out... -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Love lies in pools of questions. GPG Key Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538 4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD Currently playing: Monster Magnet - Powertrip Linux 2.4.19-16mdk 20:30:00 up 5 days, 20:31, 7 users, load average: 0.12, 0.24, 0.20
Re: [Cooker] snf-8.2 still in cooker tree
Levi Ramsey wrote: SNF 8.2 is still in the cooker tree and causes gendistrib to fail due to newt requirements. I thought SNF was phased out... SNF is, but the snf packages is just the lead in to install the pieces required for the MNF. Which at some point should actually be released in product form... -randy
[Cooker] SNF
Hi. Latest Cooker; urpmi snf Installation failed: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) [root@cooker RPMS]# urpmf Dumper.so perl-base:/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux/auto/Data/Dumper/Dumper.so -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks - http://d-srv.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - unusable with Konqueror
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: Using Konqueror (KDE3) you get unreadable pages because background color is almost exactly the same as text color. Mozilla/Galeon run just fine here. Given that KDE is preferred desktop on Mandrake it probably should be fixed (if it can be fixed in SNF, unforunately Konqueror as HTML browser is still far from being suitable for everyday use). -andrej Hi there, the only supported browsers are Mozilla/Galeon and Ie for the moment as the other are not standard compliant (konqueror is one of them). cheers, -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - mindterm crashes with J2SE on Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes:
Running with browser on Linux and using either J2SE eiter 1.3 or 1.4
mindterm.jar crashes after entering user password (that is accepted by
server). This is the case of local system without connection toLan,
Internet whatever.
{pts/1}% /usr/java/jre1.3.1_02/bin/java -jar /tmp/mindtermfull.jar
java.lang.VerifyError: (class: b7, method: lx signature: ()Z)
Incompatible object argument for invokespecial
at b5.ld(JAX)
at bq.run(JAX)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484)
Thank you for using MindTerm...
Could anybody test if it works using Windows browser with MS Java?
-andrej
Hello again,
it doesn't work with windows either ... I'll have a look at it as this was
a know mindterm prb.
cheers,
--
Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - number of displayed log entries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: Log viewers display about 20 last log entries which is not really useful in real life. Is it possible to configure number of displayed log entries? What is more important, is it possible to search (or, more generally, apply view filters)? -andrej we should add this in near future ... for the moment you cannot customize the log views. cheers, -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - most items require configuration of Internet Access
Hi there, Internet wan be understood here as the configuration of what happens after going out of the firewall. Of course, you can configure it to use your own intranet settings and reconfigure everything afterwards. The wan zone will be your intranet as you are isolated a network part behind the firewall. The default policies are all to REJECT as default and lots of traffic are allowed from lan to wan. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: To allow configuration of some items (WEB proxy, DNS server as example) SNF requires Internet Access. But SNF can be sensibly used in other environments as well - e.g. we often use firewall to temporarily connect some group of PCs to Intranet with different access policies (allow access to selected addresses only or allow only selected protocols etc). I do not think SNF should restrict users here. In environments where SNF just (inter-)connects several networks there is no Internet at all. While it is possible to define one of zones as Internet it is very misleading, because it has some implied semantics w.r.t. default access policy and in such configurations it is usually wrong. -andrej -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
[Cooker] SNF - analog modem configuration problem
SNF allows you to use only ttyS0 through ttyS3 (COM0 - COM3) for modem port. It makes it impossible to use PCI modems because serial driver assigns for them COMx numbers starting from 5 (COM5 etc) i.e. ttyS4, ... The same bug has been present in DrakX and has been fixed by allowing 8 COM ports instead of 4 (the correct fix is to check for available ports but the above would be O.K. for most users). -andrej
[Cooker] SNF - most items require configuration of Internet Access
To allow configuration of some items (WEB proxy, DNS server as example) SNF requires Internet Access. But SNF can be sensibly used in other environments as well - e.g. we often use firewall to temporarily connect some group of PCs to Intranet with different access policies (allow access to selected addresses only or allow only selected protocols etc). I do not think SNF should restrict users here. In environments where SNF just (inter-)connects several networks there is no Internet at all. While it is possible to define one of zones as Internet it is very misleading, because it has some implied semantics w.r.t. default access policy and in such configurations it is usually wrong. -andrej
[Cooker] SNF - mindterm crashes with J2SE on Linux
Running with browser on Linux and using either J2SE eiter 1.3 or 1.4
mindterm.jar crashes after entering user password (that is accepted by
server). This is the case of local system without connection toLan,
Internet whatever.
{pts/1}% /usr/java/jre1.3.1_02/bin/java -jar /tmp/mindtermfull.jar
java.lang.VerifyError: (class: b7, method: lx signature: ()Z)
Incompatible object argument for invokespecial
at b5.ld(JAX)
at bq.run(JAX)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:484)
Thank you for using MindTerm...
Could anybody test if it works using Windows browser with MS Java?
-andrej
[Cooker] SNF - unusable with Konqueror
Using Konqueror (KDE3) you get unreadable pages because background color is almost exactly the same as text color. Mozilla/Galeon run just fine here. Given that KDE is preferred desktop on Mandrake it probably should be fixed (if it can be fixed in SNF, unforunately Konqueror as HTML browser is still far from being suitable for everyday use). -andrej
[Cooker] SNF - number of displayed log entries
Log viewers display about 20 last log entries which is not really useful in real life. Is it possible to configure number of displayed log entries? What is more important, is it possible to search (or, more generally, apply view filters)? -andrej
Re: [Cooker] SNF - unusable with Konqueror
Le Saturday 22 June 2002 18:04, Borsenkow Andrej a écrit : Using Konqueror (KDE3) you get unreadable pages because background color is almost exactly the same as text color. Mozilla/Galeon run just fine here. Given that KDE is preferred desktop on Mandrake it probably should be fixed (if it can be fixed in SNF, unforunately Konqueror as HTML browser is still far from being suitable for everyday use). Do you updated your kdelibs ? David Faure fixed this problem. So I recreate kdelibs with his patch. Regards. -andrej
[Cooker] SNF comments
I got a look into new interface while waiting for kernel rebuild :-)
First of all - it is damn good! I'm loking forward for a new SNF
version.
Small glitches:
1.Can't connect with Konqueror. Entering user/password returns me to the
same login screen with a message No session found: Session file not
found. Cookies are enabled for what I can tell. Galeon works just fine.
2. System setup/Time - suggests some default time zone (Europe/Paris)
but it is already correctly configured here. Would be nice if it were
taken from system.
the same BTW applies to shorewall configuration. Existing entries are
silently ignored.
3.Internet access/Analog modem. If I press detection it does not find
anything (well, I did not actually expect :-) but then it suggests
press manual to configure a card manually - but there is no manual
button anywhere.
3. Services/summary. Press details and you got report (i.e. output of
service ... status) in Russian ... but using incorrect code page and
of course unreadable. Just to make you aware of the problem.
4. Monitoring - nothing ever works for me. I just get no output in
System usage/Network usage (or nonsensical output like 4GB/Day over
ppp0); pressing Logs show me available logs without any possibility to
select for viewing. May be I miss some packages.
5. Something strange goes with remote login (via localhost,
hosts.{allow,deny} are empty). I get terminal window, after entering
user name (any user name) I get
File operations disabled, server identity can;t be verified
after entering password window silently closes.
6. Formatting of most (empty) lists is not very nice - fields are way
too narrow - but this may be specific to galeon/gtk.
In general - very very good. Thank you
-andrej
Re: [Cooker] SNF update of httpd-naat-0.8-4mdk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Welch) writes: Got the following: Preparing packages for installation... /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5131: line 27: syntax error: unexpected end of file error: execution of 0re scriptlet from httpd-naat-0.8-4mdk failed, exit status 2 httpd-naat-0.8-4mdk naat-backend-0.8-11mdk symlink for /usr/sbin/httpd-naat is broken. -randy I'll check for that one ... -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF https connections.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:00:58 +0100, Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Randy Welch wrote: | In playing around with it I find that I can only connect with either | Konqueror or Opera. Mozilla ( 0.9.9 ) or Netscape 4.7X fails. | | -randy | Works for me to a RC1 box from Mozilla 0.9.9 (Mandrake 8.2beta4), Mozilla 0.9.8 (Mandrake 8.1) and IE 5.x (Windows 98 SE). Didn't bother to try Netscape This is probably because you have old certificates in Netscape/Mozilla for your SNF.. Remove them (using certificates manager in Netscape/Mozilla) and everything should be ok.. -- Frédéric Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] SNF https connections.
Frederic Crozat wrote: On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:00:58 +0100, Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Randy Welch wrote: | In playing around with it I find that I can only connect with either | Konqueror or Opera. Mozilla ( 0.9.9 ) or Netscape 4.7X fails. | | -randy | Works for me to a RC1 box from Mozilla 0.9.9 (Mandrake 8.2beta4), Mozilla 0.9.8 (Mandrake 8.1) and IE 5.x (Windows 98 SE). Didn't bother to try Netscape This is probably because you have old certificates in Netscape/Mozilla for your SNF.. Remove them (using certificates manager in Netscape/Mozilla) and everything should be ok.. Thanks! That worked. -randy
[Cooker] SNF Filtering!
I finally got it working by using dans guardian! The only thing I have to check is if the default works correctly. I set dansguardian to the default squid port and moved squid to listen to 8080. (which might be a good default that way one doesn't have to go and change browser settings...). I don't know for sure whether both dansguardian.conf and squid.conf are tweaked properly. (Might have to try a clean config this weekend just to check.) -randy
Re: [Cooker] SNF https connections.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Randy Welch wrote: | In playing around with it I find that I can only connect with either | Konqueror or Opera. Mozilla ( 0.9.9 ) or Netscape 4.7X fails. | | -randy | Works for me to a RC1 box from Mozilla 0.9.9 (Mandrake 8.2beta4), Mozilla 0.9.8 (Mandrake 8.1) and IE 5.x (Windows 98 SE). Didn't bother to try Netscape Buchan - -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/gpg.key -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE8l5j6rJK6UGDSBKcRAkp/AKC7wCoH8ljRJ4rEjhrUnD1AQaXSQACcCPsT biYUhjdfs0NmdviHcup3vHE= =5aLx -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] SNF https connections.
Le Mars 19, 2002 03:00 PM, vous avez écrit : Randy Welch wrote: | In playing around with it I find that I can only connect with either | Konqueror or Opera. Mozilla ( 0.9.9 ) or Netscape 4.7X fails. | | -randy Works for me to a RC1 box from Mozilla 0.9.9 (Mandrake 8.2beta4), Mozilla 0.9.8 (Mandrake 8.1) and IE 5.x (Windows 98 SE). Didn't bother to try Netscape Buchan Sometimes the site won't let you in if you are not at least 128-bit encrypted!
Re: [Cooker] SNF https connections.
Buchan Milne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Randy Welch wrote: | In playing around with it I find that I can only connect with either | Konqueror or Opera. Mozilla ( 0.9.9 ) or Netscape 4.7X fails. | | -randy | Works for me to a RC1 box from Mozilla 0.9.9 (Mandrake 8.2beta4), Mozilla 0.9.8 (Mandrake 8.1) and IE 5.x (Windows 98 SE). Didn't bother to try Netscape hmm... I did mine from 8.1 with 0.9.9. Might have to try with my 8.2 system. -randy
[Cooker] SNF update of httpd-naat-0.8-4mdk
Got the following: Preparing packages for installation... /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5131: line 27: syntax error: unexpected end of file error: execution of %pre scriptlet from httpd-naat-0.8-4mdk failed, exit status 2 httpd-naat-0.8-4mdk naat-backend-0.8-11mdk symlink for /usr/sbin/httpd-naat is broken. -randy
[Cooker] SNF https connections.
In playing around with it I find that I can only connect with either Konqueror or Opera. Mozilla ( 0.9.9 ) or Netscape 4.7X fails. -randy
[Cooker] SNF Comment.
from 8.2/(cooker 03-17-2002) The symlink for http-naat is broken again... ( was ok in RC1 ) But other than that I'm up and running on it! Pretty straight forward. My only future request is that more of it is written in a compiled language! Kind of slow on these 300Mhz machines... -randy
[Cooker] snf and one nic?
Hi, I wonder if I can use the snf stuff with just one nic? Currently it fails to detect my 3c905 nic... -- Kindest regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks/HFE Systems
Re: [Cooker] SNF/diald screwed up my networking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: I installed snf to see how is it going. On the next start I could not access internet (modem) anymore. It turned out, snf installs diald that starts up in default configuration, installs its own pseudo interface. With the result tha when I connect all IP goes with source address of this pseudo interface diald installs. Folks, I already reported it. In case of diald default configuration CAN NOT BE CREATED. There is none! It means, diald MUST NO BE STARTED by default. Service may be enabled, no problem, but diald itself must not be started unless valid configuration is created. It took me some time to find out what's going wrong. For a newbie it is almost impossible. I know about arguments if you have installed it you are assumed to use it. But when I install snf it installs many packages and not all of them are really used. Please, fix it. -andrej ok, thank you for your message. We will fix it ASAP. have a nice day, -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
[Cooker] SNF in 8.2 cooker.
Has anyone had any success with it? It get's stuck on my system doing the initial configuration, ie in retreiving the network and other information from the install I'd be happy to tweak it by hand ( got to figure out what/where it's looking for and putting this information) Any word on when the follow on product will be available? Thanks -randy
Re: [Cooker] SNF - no dependencies on shorewall
Borsenkow Andrej wrote: On ðÎÄ, 2002-02-25 at 14:15, Florin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: I installed SNF (using urpmi) it never asked me to install shorewall (I specifically removed Bastille). I went into Firewall Configuration said I want to start firewall - no problems, no errors, nothing. As if it has been successfully started. I guess if we rely on shorewall we should Require shorewall? (florin@penguin)[~]-% rpm -qpR snf-en-8.2-3mdk.noarch.rpm|grep shorewall shorewall Ahh ... O.K. sorry, it was naat-frontend-www-en I have installed. What is the difference between naat and snf then? Shuld not naat (frontend or backend - do not know) require snf? -andrej Other way around. snf-lang is a virtual package requiring all the rpms to be able to use snf, including naat-frontend-www-lang, naat-backend etc ... -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/gpg.key
Re: [Cooker] SNF - /usr/sbin/httpd-naat link is still wrong
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes:
for apache-perl at least ...
I known, one has to create the link itself for the moment. Already fixed
in the cvs.
{pts/2}% ll /usr/sbin/*naat*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root5 æÅ× 25 00:31
/usr/sbin/httpd-naat - httpd
{pts/2}% rpm -qa | grep naat
naat-backend-0.8-5mdk
naat-frontend-www-en-0.8-3mdk
httpd-naat-0.8-3mdk
{pts/2}% rpm -qa | grep apache
apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk
apache-conf-1.3.23-1mdk
apache-modules-1.3.23-1mdk
apache-common-1.3.23-1mdk
--
Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - irssi/perl-Text-Template conflict
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes:
it's fixed with the latest irssi
Yes, it seems weird, but:
{pts/2}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi naat-frontend-www-en
One of the following packages is needed:
1- apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586
2- apache-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 1
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (12 MB):
mod_php-4.1.1-2mdk.i586 SnortSnarf-010821.1-2mdk.i586
mod_auth_external-2.1.14-7mdk.i586 librrdtool0-1.0.33-9mdk.i586
dhcpstatus-0.60-1mdk.i586 mod_ssl-2.8.6-1mdk.i586
dhcp-common-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586 perl-Text-Template-1.31-2mdk.i586
php-gd-4.1.1-2mdk.i586 naat-frontend-www-en-0.8-3mdk.noarch
httpd-naat-0.8-3mdk.noarch naat-backend-0.8-5mdk.i586
dhcp-server-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586 libpcap0-0.6.2-3mdk.i586
libmm1-1.1.3-8mdk.i586 apache-conf-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
snort-1.8.3-4mdk.i586 php-common-4.1.1-3mdk.i586
mod_perl-common-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586 apache-common-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586 apache-modules-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
Is it OK? (Y/n)
installing
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_php-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/librrdtool0-1.0.33-9mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/SnortSnarf-010821.1-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_auth_external-2.1.14-7mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.8.6-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/dhcpstatus-0.60-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/dhcp-common-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/perl-Text-Template-1.31-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/php-gd-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/naat-frontend-www-en-0.8-3mdk.noarch.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/httpd-naat-0.8-3mdk.noarch.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/dhcp-server-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/naat-backend-0.8-5mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libpcap0-0.6.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libmm1-1.1.3-8mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-conf-1.3.23-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/php-common-4.1.1-3mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/snort-1!
.8!
!
.3-4mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_perl-common-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-common-1.3.23-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-modules-1.3.23-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...
##
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux/perllocal.pod from install of
perl-Text-Template-1.31-2mdk conflicts with file from package
irssi-0.8.1-1mdk
Installation failed
--
Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - no dependencies on shorewall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: I installed SNF (using urpmi) it never asked me to install shorewall (I specifically removed Bastille). I went into Firewall Configuration said I want to start firewall - no problems, no errors, nothing. As if it has been successfully started. I guess if we rely on shorewall we should Require shorewall? (florin@penguin)[~]-% rpm -qpR snf-en-8.2-3mdk.noarch.rpm|grep shorewall shorewall -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF does not work with apache-perl at all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes:
Actually the problem is not only httpd-naat link but
{pts/2}udo service httpd-naat start
Starting httpd-naat-perl: fopen: No such file or directory
httpd-naat-perl: could not open document config file
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd-naat-perl.conf
[ óâïê ]
fopen: No such file or directory
httpd-naat-perl: could not open document config file
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd-naat-perl.conf
[ óâïê ]
fopen: No such file or directory
httpd-naat-perl: could not open document config file
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd-naat-perl.conf
as root, create the following link:
ln -sf /usr/sbin/httpd-perl /usr/sbin/httpd-naat
--
Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF - no dependencies on shorewall
On ðÎÄ, 2002-02-25 at 14:15, Florin wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: I installed SNF (using urpmi) it never asked me to install shorewall (I specifically removed Bastille). I went into Firewall Configuration said I want to start firewall - no problems, no errors, nothing. As if it has been successfully started. I guess if we rely on shorewall we should Require shorewall? (florin@penguin)[~]-% rpm -qpR snf-en-8.2-3mdk.noarch.rpm|grep shorewall shorewall Ahh ... O.K. sorry, it was naat-frontend-www-en I have installed. What is the difference between naat and snf then? Shuld not naat (frontend or backend - do not know) require snf? -andrej
[Cooker] SNF - irssi/perl-Text-Template conflict
Yes, it seems weird, but:
{pts/2}% LANGUAGE=en sudo urpmi naat-frontend-www-en
One of the following packages is needed:
1- apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586
2- apache-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
What is your choice? (1-2) 1
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be
installed (12 MB):
mod_php-4.1.1-2mdk.i586 SnortSnarf-010821.1-2mdk.i586
mod_auth_external-2.1.14-7mdk.i586 librrdtool0-1.0.33-9mdk.i586
dhcpstatus-0.60-1mdk.i586 mod_ssl-2.8.6-1mdk.i586
dhcp-common-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586 perl-Text-Template-1.31-2mdk.i586
php-gd-4.1.1-2mdk.i586 naat-frontend-www-en-0.8-3mdk.noarch
httpd-naat-0.8-3mdk.noarch naat-backend-0.8-5mdk.i586
dhcp-server-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586 libpcap0-0.6.2-3mdk.i586
libmm1-1.1.3-8mdk.i586 apache-conf-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
snort-1.8.3-4mdk.i586 php-common-4.1.1-3mdk.i586
mod_perl-common-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586 apache-common-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586 apache-modules-1.3.23-1mdk.i586
Is it OK? (Y/n)
installing
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_php-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/librrdtool0-1.0.33-9mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/SnortSnarf-010821.1-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_auth_external-2.1.14-7mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_ssl-2.8.6-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/dhcpstatus-0.60-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/dhcp-common-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/perl-Text-Template-1.31-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/php-gd-4.1.1-2mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/naat-frontend-www-en-0.8-3mdk.noarch.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/httpd-naat-0.8-3mdk.noarch.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/dhcp-server-3.0-1rc7.1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/naat-backend-0.8-5mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libpcap0-0.6.2-3mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/libmm1-1.1.3-8mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-conf-1.3.23-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/php-common-4.1.1-3mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/snort-1.8!
.3-4mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/mod_perl-common-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-common-1.3.23-1mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk.i586.rpm
/mnt/jaz/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/apache-modules-1.3.23-1mdk.i586.rpm
Preparing...
##
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux/perllocal.pod from install of
perl-Text-Template-1.31-2mdk conflicts with file from package
irssi-0.8.1-1mdk
Installation failed
[Cooker] SNF - no dependencies on shorewall
I installed SNF (using urpmi) it never asked me to install shorewall (I specifically removed Bastille). I went into Firewall Configuration said I want to start firewall - no problems, no errors, nothing. As if it has been successfully started. I guess if we rely on shorewall we should Require shorewall? -andrej
[Cooker] SNF - /usr/sbin/httpd-naat link is still wrong
for apache-perl at least ...
{pts/2}% ll /usr/sbin/*naat*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root5 æÅ× 25 00:31
/usr/sbin/httpd-naat - httpd
{pts/2}% rpm -qa | grep naat
naat-backend-0.8-5mdk
naat-frontend-www-en-0.8-3mdk
httpd-naat-0.8-3mdk
{pts/2}% rpm -qa | grep apache
apache-mod_perl-1.3.23_1.26-4mdk
apache-conf-1.3.23-1mdk
apache-modules-1.3.23-1mdk
apache-common-1.3.23-1mdk
[Cooker] SNF does not work with apache-perl at all
Actually the problem is not only httpd-naat link but
{pts/2}% sudo service httpd-naat start
Starting httpd-naat-perl: fopen: No such file or directory
httpd-naat-perl: could not open document config file
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd-naat-perl.conf
[ óâïê ]
fopen: No such file or directory
httpd-naat-perl: could not open document config file
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd-naat-perl.conf
[ óâïê ]
fopen: No such file or directory
httpd-naat-perl: could not open document config file
/etc/httpd/conf/httpd-naat-perl.conf
[Cooker] SNF - documentation (help) missing
Clicking on doc icon in SNF: Not Found The requested URL /admin/doc/ was not found on this server. -andrej
[Cooker] SNF (naat-backend) - no more Bastille?
* Mon Feb 18 2002 Philippe Libat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8-3mdk - New Version: shorewall, new services * Mon Feb 11 2002 Philippe Libat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8-2mdk - Add shorewall, fix lot of bugs
Re: [Cooker] SNF (naat-backend) - no more Bastille?
Not for SNF (name probably needs to change now, since with shorewall it's a real firewall, not just for a sinlge network), unless you want to hack Bastille so it supports real internal IPs, DMZ's, etc Borsenkow Andrej wrote: * Mon Feb 18 2002 Philippe Libat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8-3mdk - New Version: shorewall, new services * Mon Feb 11 2002 Philippe Libat [EMAIL PROTECTED] 0.8-2mdk - Add shorewall, fix lot of bugs -- |Registered Linux User #182071-| Buchan MilneMechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work+27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za GPG Key http://ranger.dnsalias.com/gpg.key
Re: [Cooker] SNF documentation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Salane King) writes: I can't seem to find out how to use snf. Is there documentation other that the out of date info on Mandrake web page. the new Mandrake Security has many common features with the old one. You can find documentation online. The major changin is shorewall instead of bastille. I can recommend you shorewall.net for that. cheers, -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
[Cooker] SNF documentation
I can't seem to find out how to use snf. Is there documentation other that the out of date info on Mandrake web page. -- If a man has talent and cannot use it, he has failed. -- Thomas Wolfe
Re: [Cooker] SNF
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tobias Marx) writes: Yura Gusev schrieb: If everything works dont touch. you´re of course right. but i would like to see the use of iptables which are far more powerfull than ipchains. at least for future systems. The actual SNF, the cooker version, uses iptables and not ipchains. -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
RE: [Cooker] SNF
Yura Gusev schrieb: If everything works dont touch. you´re of course right. but i would like to see the use of iptables which are far more powerfull than ipchains. at least for future systems. The actual SNF, the cooker version, uses iptables and not ipchains. Where can I download it?
Re: [Cooker] SNF
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: Yura Gusev schrieb: If everything works dont touch. you´re of course right. but i would like to see the use of iptables which are far more powerfull than ipchains. at least for future systems. The actual SNF, the cooker version, uses iptables and not ipchains. Where can I download it? it's in cooker ... the snf-language packages and all the zilions required packages ... (florin@mylinux)[~]-% rpm -qpR /RPMS/snf-en-8.1-2mdk.noarch.rpm httpd-naat naat-frontend-www-en naat-backend naat-monitoring curl squid squidGuard sarg dhcp-server ipvsadm Bastille iptoip iptables diald prelude snort locales-en pump dhcpcd dhcp-client dhcpxd openssh openssh-server openssh-clients rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1 -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Minimal install (was: RE: [Cooker] SNF)
The actual SNF, the cooker version, uses iptables and not ipchains. Where can I download it? it's in cooker ... the snf-language packages and all the zilions required packages ... (florin@mylinux)[~]-% rpm -qpR /RPMS/snf-en-8.1-2mdk.noarch.rpm httpd-naat ... Good. Is it possible to select SNF during installation? Else how can I make minimal install? -andrej
Re: Minimal install (was: RE: [Cooker] SNF)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Borsenkow Andrej) writes: The actual SNF, the cooker version, uses iptables and not ipchains. Where can I download it? it's in cooker ... the snf-language packages and all the zilions required packages ... (florin@mylinux)[~]-% rpm -qpR /RPMS/snf-en-8.1-2mdk.noarch.rpm httpd-naat ... Good. Is it possible to select SNF during installation? Else how can I make minimal install? -andrej Hi again, - expert mode - unselect all the categories AND chose to select the packages - chose the snf-language package and then all the required packages will be selected too. cheers, -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com
Re: [Cooker] SNF
Yura Gusev schrieb: If everything works dont touch. you´re of course right. but i would like to see the use of iptables which are far more powerfull than ipchains. at least for future systems.
[Cooker] SNF
hi! are there any plans to release a new version of the single network firewall? this is a very nice tool, but ipchains are a bit outdated. bye, Tobias
Re: [Cooker] SNF
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Tobias Marx wrote:
hi!
are there any plans to release a new version of the single network
firewall? this is a very nice tool, but ipchains are a bit outdated.
bye,
Tobias
Actually you can test it now. Cooker has all new SNF packages.
--
11:02am up 10 days, 22:13, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
O //
==-} -.--._.-^-(.}
)'/{( \d
./\, ) -._.-
/ / `\/' GNU -=LFS*1482=-
I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0
Re: [Cooker] SNF
Yura Gusev schrieb: Actually you can test it now. Cooker has all new SNF packages. ähem, do you meen to update all snf packages to cooker ones? that´ll work for sure, but i still will be using ipchains unless i alter everything by hand, won´t i? or am i mistaken?
Re: [Cooker] SNF
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002, Tobias Marx wrote:
Yura Gusev schrieb:
Actually you can test it now. Cooker has all new SNF packages.
ähem, do you meen to update all snf packages to cooker ones? that´ll work
for sure, but i still will be using ipchains unless i alter everything by
hand, won´t i? or am i mistaken?
If everything works dont touch.
--
6:10pm up 11 days, 5:21, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
O //
==-} -.--._.-^-(.}
)'/{( \d
./\, ) -._.-
/ / `\/' GNU -=LFS*1482=-
I am not 31337. But I can use the Vi editor... ;-0
