Re: [Cooker] acls
Since xfs supports acls and is in contrib, it would be really nice :) we don't support acl actually :p Correct me if I'm wront.. but wouldn't it be VERY nice to support ACL's for those that run large scale servers, etc. Definately a security plus.
Re: [Cooker] acls
Sebastian Dransfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is it possible to get fileutils with the acl patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ ? Since xfs supports acls and is in contrib, it would be really nice :) we don't support acl actually :p
Re: [Cooker] acls
Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Correct me if I'm wront.. but wouldn't it be VERY nice to support ACL's for those that run large scale servers, etc. Definately a security plus. the kernel code side is currently too early and we waiting that linus accept it..
Re: [Cooker] acls
On 21 Jun 2001, Chmouel Boudjnah wrote: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Correct me if I'm wront.. but wouldn't it be VERY nice to support ACL's for those that run large scale servers, etc. Definately a security plus. the kernel code side is currently too early and we waiting that linus accept it.. It seems like not everyone agrees on how to implement acls. So I agree on not supporting acls for now. seb
[Cooker] acls
Is it possible to get fileutils with the acl patch from http://acl.bestbits.at/ ? Since xfs supports acls and is in contrib, it would be really nice :) seb
