Re: [Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
--- Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Uploaded yet another package. Can you test it and give me some (hopefully good) news? Yes, it is ok now. Thanks! = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
Uploaded yet another package. Can you test it and give me some (hopefully good) news? Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 14 May 2000, Eugenio Diaz wrote: There is still another error in line 14 of the "rpm -qp --scripts" grep -q class /etfc/ftpacce... ^ --- Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just fixed the package again. It should appear in cooker shortly. Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
There is still another error in line 14 of the "rpm -qp --scripts" grep -q class /etfc/ftpacce... ^ --- Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just fixed the package again. It should appear in cooker shortly. Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] = Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/
Re: [Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
Eugenio Diaz wrote: rpm -Uvh anonftp-3.0-4mdk.i586.rpm anonftp ## mv: missing file argument Try `mv --help' for more information. execution of script failed I have no problems with the new 3.0-4mdk version. In fact I think the problems you encountered are still from an older anonftp package. RPM can't do an correct update of the package, because it is unable to remove the old one because of script errors. What I did: first remove my old anonftp with `rpm -e --noscripts anonftp' and then installed the new one. No error messages for me. Cheers, ~Andreas
Re: [Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
Andreas Simon wrote: I have no problems with the new 3.0-4mdk version. Oops. Forget it. You're right, Eugenio. The error is still there. ~Andreas
[Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
How difficult is it to remove a single character in such an important package? Especially when the changelog says it is done [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# rpm -qp --changelog anonftp-3.0-4mdk.i586.rpm |head * Fri May 12 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.0-4mdk - Fix post scripts again. - Add libtermcap.so.2 for ls :\ * Mon May 08 2000 Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.0-3mdk - removed reference to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in post scripts (DOH!) * Sat Apr 22 2000 Chmouel Boudjnah [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.0-2mdk [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# rpm -Uvh anonftp-3.0-4mdk.i586.rpm anonftp ## mv: missing file argument Try `mv --help' for more information. execution of script failed [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# rpm -qp --scripts anonftp-3.0-4mdk.i586.rpm postinstall script (through /bin/sh): if [ -f /etc/ftpaccess ];then if ! grep -q "class.*anonymous.*" /etc/ftpaccess;then cat /etc/ftpaccess | grep -v class /etc/ftpaccess.mdk echo "class all real,guest,anonymous *" /etc/ftpaccess cat /etc/ftpaccess.mdk /etc/ftpaccess rm -f /etc/ftpaccess.mdk fi fi exit 0 preuninstall script (through /bin/sh): if [ -f /etc/ftpaccess ];then grep -q class /etfc/ftpaccess grep -v class /etc/ftpaccess /etc/ftpaccess.mdk if [ "$?" = "0" ];then mv -f /etc/ftpaccess.mdk /etc/ftpaccess H E R E ^ fi fi exit 0 [root@fulgore:/home/ftp/pub/linux/mandrake-devel/cooker/Mandrake/RPMS]# -- Eugenio Diaz, BSEE/BSCE Linux Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] anonftp scripts still broken!
I just fixed the package again. It should appear in cooker shortly. Jean-Michel Dault [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 13 May 2000, Andreas Simon wrote: Andreas Simon wrote: I have no problems with the new 3.0-4mdk version. Oops. Forget it. You're right, Eugenio. The error is still there. ~Andreas
