Re: [Cooker] cancel my last, re: fs.h, I see where the definition went...
Oops! Wrong mailing list... should have gone to the kernel list... *sigh* John Cavan wrote: > > linux/include/linux/fs.h or ipc/shm.c needs to include module.h to get > the correct definition. > > Given that the module check code used to be in fs.h, is the include for > module.h there or with shm.c? -- * Tell me and I may forget, Show me and I may remember, Involve me and I will understand. *
[Cooker] cancel my last, re: fs.h, I see where the definition went...
linux/include/linux/fs.h or ipc/shm.c needs to include module.h to get the correct definition. Given that the module check code used to be in fs.h, is the include for module.h there or with shm.c? John -- * Tell me and I may forget, Show me and I may remember, Involve me and I will understand. *
