Re: [Cooker] drakgw and the latest iptables
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 28, 2003 08:55 am, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 14:36, J.P. Pasnak wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On February 27, 2003 08:42 am, Florin wrote: > > > A simple rebuild of the iptables package fixes the masquerading > > > problem ... > > > make sure you get the latest iptables package and you won't get > > > the invalid command error message with the latest kernel ... > > > > Is it just me or did iptables-1.2.7a-2mdk not hit any of the > > mirrors? > > The .src.rpm did. Which is ironic =). I just grabbed that and rebuilt > it. Thanks. Thought I was going crazy - -- Live fast, die young, you're sucking up my bandwidth. - -- J.P. Pasnak, CD CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca Kernel version: 2.4.21pre4-6mdk Current Linux uptime: 18 hours 59 minutes. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+X6CRBMRgzmzdk08RAsNrAKDYuy7ztaBY0ZzJffCwxhQUQI0vkQCgng5n p43TQ5fIp0ApnDOPpx5shWM= =NB0k -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] drakgw and the latest iptables
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 14:36, J.P. Pasnak wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On February 27, 2003 08:42 am, Florin wrote: > > A simple rebuild of the iptables package fixes the masquerading > > problem ... > > make sure you get the latest iptables package and you won't get the > > invalid command error message with the latest kernel ... > > Is it just me or did iptables-1.2.7a-2mdk not hit any of the mirrors? The .src.rpm did. Which is ironic =). I just grabbed that and rebuilt it. -- adamw
Re: [Cooker] drakgw and the latest iptables
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 27, 2003 08:42 am, Florin wrote: > A simple rebuild of the iptables package fixes the masquerading > problem ... > make sure you get the latest iptables package and you won't get the > invalid command error message with the latest kernel ... Is it just me or did iptables-1.2.7a-2mdk not hit any of the mirrors? - -- Live fast, die young, you're sucking up my bandwidth. - -- J.P. Pasnak, CD CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca Kernel version: 2.4.21pre4-6mdk Current Linux uptime: 15 hours 48 minutes. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+X3PuBMRgzmzdk08RAuZiAJ9z7rWwR4TYUICCGQG1JYHycXPJxwCgnWaQ h70XQzWrmvEkGXRpOPfPpPM= =0s7D -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] drakgw and the latest iptables
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On February 27, 2003 08:42 am, Florin wrote: > A simple rebuild of the iptables package fixes the masquerading > problem ... > make sure you get the latest iptables package and you won't get the > invalid command error message with the latest kernel ... Excellent! I'll give it a burst... - -- Live fast, die young, you're sucking up my bandwidth. - -- J.P. Pasnak, CD CCNA [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.warpedsystems.sk.ca Kernel version: 2.4.21pre4-6mdk Current Linux uptime: 15 hours 0 minutes. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+XjNyBMRgzmzdk08RAhYtAKCCcj/sRWR2h09MHa1v0+qUT/RXxwCggj6H Pi0tD0LizIZv123a1SN8gQU= =7Fih -END PGP SIGNATURE-
[Cooker] drakgw and the latest iptables
A simple rebuild of the iptables package fixes the masquerading problem ... make sure you get the latest iptables package and you won't get the invalid command error message with the latest kernel ... -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~florin/