[Cooker] dynamic required by devfs?
Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way around, that dynamic requires devfs? -- /g Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx
Re: [Cooker] dynamic required by devfs?
Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit : Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way around, that dynamic requires devfs? I allready asked, but never got an answer, worst, dynamic is still buggy on 9.2 with usb key. Saturday, just before to start a conference about plf, I froze the 9.2 computer behind 75 guys. :( -- Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL. Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/
Re: [Cooker] dynamic required by devfs?
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11:43 am, Olivier Thauvin wrote: Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit : Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs? Shouldn't it be the other way around, that dynamic requires devfs? I allready asked, but never got an answer, worst, dynamic is still buggy on 9.2 with usb key. Saturday, just before to start a conference about plf, I froze the 9.2 computer behind 75 guys. :( will anything be hurt if I rpm -e dynamic --nodeps ? -- /g Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx