[Cooker] dynamic required by devfs?

2003-10-28 Thread Greg Meyer
Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs?  Shouldn't it be the other way 
around, that dynamic requires devfs?

-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx



Re: [Cooker] dynamic required by devfs?

2003-10-28 Thread Olivier Thauvin
Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit :
 Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs?  Shouldn't it be the other way
 around, that dynamic requires devfs?

I allready asked, but never got an answer, worst, dynamic is still buggy on 
9.2 with usb key. Saturday, just before to start a conference about plf, I 
froze the 9.2 computer behind 75 guys. :(

-- 
Linux pour Mac !? Enfin le moyen de transformer
une pomme en véritable ordinateur. - JL.
Olivier Thauvin - http://nanardon.homelinux.org/




Re: [Cooker] dynamic required by devfs?

2003-10-28 Thread Greg Meyer
On Tuesday 28 October 2003 11:43 am, Olivier Thauvin wrote:
 Le Mardi 28 Octobre 2003 14:40, Greg Meyer a écrit :
  Why is dynamic desktop required by devfs?  Shouldn't it be the other way
  around, that dynamic requires devfs?

 I allready asked, but never got an answer, worst, dynamic is still buggy on
 9.2 with usb key. Saturday, just before to start a conference about plf, I
 froze the 9.2 computer behind 75 guys. :(

will anything be hurt if I rpm -e dynamic --nodeps ?
-- 
/g

Outside of a dog, a man's best friend is a book, inside
a dog it's too dark to read -Groucho Marx