Re: [Cooker] fonts in UTF8 sv-us
onsdagen den 5 mars 2003 17.42 skrev François Pons: > Le mer 05/03/2003 à 17:27, guran a écrit : > > Hi > > Hi, > > > Hd.img inst UTF8 sv-us version: > > Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20030304 21:21 > > /ChangeLog/1.801/Tue Mar 4 13:54:59 2003// > > > > This is the way it is. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --auto-select --auto > > allt är redan installerat > > ^^^ this should be ä. > > Can you check with 28mdk ? > > Can you check with urpmi --auto-select --auto | cat - too This is the very last one. [EMAIL PROTECTED] guran]# urpmi --auto-select --auto | cat allt är redan installerat Fine -> why? [EMAIL PROTECTED] guran]# rpm -qa urpmi urpmi-4.2-28mdk regards guran -- Mandrake Linux Cooker 9.1 'UTF8 sv-us' kernel-multimedia-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk Only in a society that has 'a priori' defined what is true can the evolution of life be defined false.
Re: [Cooker] fonts in UTF8 sv-us
Le mer 05/03/2003 à 17:27, guran a écrit : > Hi Hi, > Hd.img inst UTF8 sv-us version: > Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20030304 21:21 > /ChangeLog/1.801/Tue Mar 4 13:54:59 2003// > > This is the way it is. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --auto-select --auto > allt är redan installerat > ^^^ this should be ä. Can you check with 28mdk ? Can you check with urpmi --auto-select --auto | cat - too François.
[Cooker] fonts in UTF8 sv-us
Hi Hd.img inst UTF8 sv-us version: Mandrake Linux Cooker-i586 20030304 21:21 /ChangeLog/1.801/Tue Mar 4 13:54:59 2003// This is the way it is. [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# urpmi --auto-select --auto allt är redan installerat ^^^ this should be ä. [EMAIL PROTECTED] guran]$ locale LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_CTYPE=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_NUMERIC=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_TIME=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_COLLATE=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_MONETARY=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_PAPER=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_NAME=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_ADDRESS=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_TELEPHONE=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_MEASUREMENT=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_IDENTIFICATION=sv_SE.UTF-8 LC_ALL= regards guran -- Mandrake Linux Cooker 9.1 'UTF8 sv-us' kernel-multimedia-2.4.21.0.13mdk-1-1mdk Only in a society that has 'a priori' defined what is true can the evolution of life be defined false.
