Re: [Cooker] groff-for-man missing requires ?
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > > > > it seems like the new man use nroff. Adding files > > > > > > 1757 /usr/bin/nroff > > > 4295 /usr/share/groff/tmac/tmac.tty-char > > > > > > to groff-for-man make man work again, those files are small enough. > > > Is that a solution? > > as for now, i've it. i meant: as for now, i've done it.
Re: [Cooker] groff-for-man missing requires ?
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > > it seems like the new man use nroff. Adding files > > > > 1757 /usr/bin/nroff > > 4295 /usr/share/groff/tmac/tmac.tty-char > > > > to groff-for-man make man work again, those files are small enough. > > Is that a solution? as for now, i've it.
Re: [Cooker] groff-for-man missing requires ?
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Failing to browse a man page (no /usr/bin/nroff), i find i had groff-for-man > > > installed, but not groff itself. Maybe just a missing requires on > > > groff-for-man ? > > > > with the new dependence from pablo we had maybe now to find how to do > > a light package (purpose of groff-for-man), pablo and titi you find a > > solution ? > > it seems like the new man use nroff. Adding files > > 1757 /usr/bin/nroff > 4295 /usr/share/groff/tmac/tmac.tty-char > > to groff-for-man make man work again, those files are small enough. > Is that a solution? i bet, titi ?
Re: [Cooker] groff-for-man missing requires ?
Chmouel Boudjnah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Failing to browse a man page (no /usr/bin/nroff), i find i had groff-for-man > > installed, but not groff itself. Maybe just a missing requires on > > groff-for-man ? > > with the new dependence from pablo we had maybe now to find how to do > a light package (purpose of groff-for-man), pablo and titi you find a > solution ? it seems like the new man use nroff. Adding files 1757 /usr/bin/nroff 4295 /usr/share/groff/tmac/tmac.tty-char to groff-for-man make man work again, those files are small enough. Is that a solution?
[Cooker] groff-for-man missing requires ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Failing to browse a man page (no /usr/bin/nroff), i find i had groff-for-man installed, but not groff itself. Maybe just a missing requires on groff-for-man ? - -- Guillaume Rousse Murphy's law : If anything can go wrong, it will. O'Tool's commentary : Murphy was an optimist. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE68u/jbkD45ZWqj1IRAjiAAJwKAzm0k8tJuMiaZJNJ9xgEQByLswCfdBfe hF5FwFCcjrZi0mdLMulAnAI= =KGi5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [Cooker] groff-for-man missing requires ?
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Failing to browse a man page (no /usr/bin/nroff), i find i had groff-for-man > installed, but not groff itself. Maybe just a missing requires on > groff-for-man ? with the new dependence from pablo we had maybe now to find how to do a light package (purpose of groff-for-man), pablo and titi you find a solution ?
