Re: [Cooker] imap dependancies

2002-07-17 Thread Ben Reser

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:59:13PM +0200, Stefan van der Eijk wrote:
> Q: Shouldn't imap require xinetd (or inetd)?

The man page tells all:
imapd can also be accessed via rsh(1C) by many  Unix-based
clients.  To do this, the imapd binary must have a link to
/etc/rimapd since this is where this software expects  it
to be located.

rsh can be replaced with ssh in this case. :)

So the answer is no.

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

We tend to see all wars through the lens of the current conflict, and we
mine history for lessons convenient to the present purpose.
- Brian Hayes




[Cooker] imap dependancies

2002-07-17 Thread Stefan van der Eijk

Q: Shouldn't imap require xinetd (or inetd)?