Re: [Cooker] kernel ppSCSI patch

2002-06-06 Thread Tom Badran

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 06 Jun 2002 6:18 am, Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> 1. check the current kernel
> 2. if it not applied send a mail to quintela at mandrakesoft.com .
> Attaching your patch once more probably does not harm as well (he is
> busy enough ...)

Ok will do.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE8/o3VXCpWOla2mCcRAlWFAKDBb9Ug6XCFgmFURxpF5O6FSD7+OACgjlqH
0ieTf63LLNjQVxT4U5YZjZg=
=CgKI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





RE: [Cooker] kernel ppSCSI patch

2002-06-05 Thread Borsenkow Andrej


> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Has this been applied to the cooker kernel yet? It hadnt been last
time i
> checked, but the maintainer (forget your name sorry) said it was on
his todo
> list.

1. check the current kernel
2. if it not applied send a mail to quintela at mandrakesoft.com .
Attaching your patch once more probably does not harm as well (he is
busy enough ...)


-andrej




[Cooker] kernel ppSCSI patch

2002-06-05 Thread Tom Badran

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Has this been applied to the cooker kernel yet? It hadnt been last time i 
checked, but the maintainer (forget your name sorry) said it was on his todo 
list. Ive personally been using it with a 2.4.18 kernel of my own making, 
along with the preemption patch and it has worked great, and been the first 
time my scanner has worked in 3 years (last time i had windows). The mandrake 
rpm of sane fully supports the parallel port scanners without modification, 
so only the kernel requires patching. The ppSCSI patch seems to now support 
quite a large number of scanners, so i thought it would be a good inclusion, 
and everything can be compiled as modules, so as far as i know nothing else 
will be affected.

Thanks for listening

Tom

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE8/cobXCpWOla2mCcRAq0AAKCiUykZKWdoVsyyDszEHTeG4No3UQCgr2bi
vtj5H6c5aGKPQw6ShqoApFg=
=I2iO
-END PGP SIGNATURE-