[Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread SI Reasoning

Since laptops seem to have the most peculiarities,
while at the same time being populated by quite a few
newbies... why not create an rpm with known specifics
for certain laptops.

For instance a Dell Inspiron rpm would include a
script that would place noapic on the append
statement, load the Dell modules for volume control
and maybe even enable the cdrom control with xmms or
some other such program.

Then during install you could ask a question along the
lines of laptop, server, desktop? and if laptop, they
could choose their laptop or even brand (like Dell) or
just a generic if not on the list. Then most issues
would be resolved up front. You also have the added
bonus of dedicated users doing fine tweaks for their
laptops that can make it into these rpms. Can I see a
Mandrake laptop users club? :-}


=
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change.  Creativity keeps
the creator alive.

-FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/




Re: [Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread Bill Kenworthy

Love the idea.  Having one of these beasts and just getting the
knowledge to set it up has been a long haul - but worth it in the long
run!  Too late for 8.2, but in the next release would allow Mandrake to
take over the laptop Linux market! - no competition in sight, a
perfect niche!

BillK

On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 17:10, SI Reasoning wrote:
 Since laptops seem to have the most peculiarities,
 while at the same time being populated by quite a few
 newbies... why not create an rpm with known specifics
 for certain laptops.
 
 For instance a Dell Inspiron rpm would include a
 script that would place noapic on the append
 statement, load the Dell modules for volume control
 and maybe even enable the cdrom control with xmms or
 some other such program.
 
 Then during install you could ask a question along the
 lines of laptop, server, desktop? and if laptop, they
 could choose their laptop or even brand (like Dell) or
 just a generic if not on the list. Then most issues
 would be resolved up front. You also have the added
 bonus of dedicated users doing fine tweaks for their
 laptops that can make it into these rpms. Can I see a
 Mandrake laptop users club? :-}
 
 
 =
 SI Reasoning
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change.  Creativity keeps
 the creator alive.
 
 -FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
 http://mail.yahoo.com/
 






Re: [Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread Levi Ramsey

On Fri Mar 08 17:44 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
 Love the idea.  Having one of these beasts and just getting the
 knowledge to set it up has been a long haul - but worth it in the long
 run!  Too late for 8.2, but in the next release would allow Mandrake to
 take over the laptop Linux market! - no competition in sight, a
 perfect niche!

A laptop-i-fied distro is also an idea I've toyed with.  You could put a
few packages that might enhance network client use, while not putting
servers besides an mta, maybe minimal apache.  Replace some more server
oriented modules with things like wireless lan out of the box.

Hell, sell it as a separate edition of the distro through Mandrake
Store.  Have every boxed retail version have a little card saying, if
you have a laptop, might we interest you in Mandrake Linux 9.0 Portable
Edition, which contains all sorts of packages that are tailored for the
requirements of the road warrior.  Some people would buy a desktop
edition, a server edition, and a portable edition.  That's three sales
where before there might have been 1 or 2.

-- 
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When it comes down to desperation,
You make the best of your situation.
Linux 2.4.17-20mdk
  5:01am  up 10 days, 14:43, 17 users,  load average: 0.20, 0.15, 0.19




Re: [Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread Keld Jørn Simonsen

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:40:49AM -0500, Levi Ramsey wrote:
 On Fri Mar 08 17:44 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
 
 A laptop-i-fied distro is also an idea I've toyed with.  You could put a
 few packages that might enhance network client use, while not putting
 servers besides an mta, maybe minimal apache.  Replace some more server
 oriented modules with things like wireless lan out of the box.

I am not sure what you mean here. My laptop is faster and has more
memory than my stationary, and I use it as a travelling server.
I would regret if Mandrakes laptop edition was not supporting
full server capabilities.

Keld




Re: [Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread Levi Ramsey

On Fri Mar 08 13:39 +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
 On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:40:49AM -0500, Levi Ramsey wrote:
  On Fri Mar 08 17:44 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
  
  A laptop-i-fied distro is also an idea I've toyed with.  You could put a
  few packages that might enhance network client use, while not putting
  servers besides an mta, maybe minimal apache.  Replace some more server
  oriented modules with things like wireless lan out of the box.
 
 I am not sure what you mean here. My laptop is faster and has more
 memory than my stationary, and I use it as a travelling server.
 I would regret if Mandrakes laptop edition was not supporting
 full server capabilities.

In which case, since the laptop and desktop versions would only differ
in some configuration details (like how the kernel was compiled) and
which packages make the CDs, the hypothetical 9.0 Desktop and 9.0 Laptop
(and in theory, the 9.0 Server, though there could be more room for
differences there...) would be effectively the same distribution.  So
you could snag the server rpms from Cooker (or from desktop CD's) and
install those.

There is no intrinsic reason why a Portable Edition couldn't have
servers.  But there's a finite number of packages which can be squeezed
on to 2-3 CDs.  There are probably a good number of packages in contrib
that are marginally useful on a desktop (and so are not high priority
and get relegated to the 3rd CD or not included), but are very useful on
a laptop.  Conversely, in general, I would assume that very few laptops
are running bind or dhcp server.

-- 
Levi Ramsey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When it comes down to desperation,
You make the best of your situation.
Linux 2.4.17-20mdk
  8:01am  up 10 days, 17:43, 16 users,  load average: 0.37, 0.27, 0.21




Re: [Cooker] laptop config rpm?

2002-03-08 Thread SI Reasoning

I was thinking of something a bit more scaled back,
with maybe contribs offering more extravagent
offerings. I just know that there are a few tweaks
specific to each laptop, vanilla tweaks like extra
keys, workarounds for things like apic, stuff like
that. This would make it easy to have the laptop
running with the core expected basics working
properly. 

Maybe if Mandrake had a laptop specific page then
people could share their .config files for those who
wish to compile an optimised kernel, and things such
as that. Maybe even offer auto-install disks that can
be downloaded for optimised quick and easy installs
for newbies. They could be like themes...

--- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri Mar 08 13:39 +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote:
  On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:40:49AM -0500, Levi
 Ramsey wrote:
   On Fri Mar 08 17:44 +0800, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
   
   A laptop-i-fied distro is also an idea I've
 toyed with.  You could put a
   few packages that might enhance network client
 use, while not putting
   servers besides an mta, maybe minimal apache. 
 Replace some more server
   oriented modules with things like wireless lan
 out of the box.
  
  I am not sure what you mean here. My laptop is
 faster and has more
  memory than my stationary, and I use it as a
 travelling server.
  I would regret if Mandrakes laptop edition was not
 supporting
  full server capabilities.
 
 In which case, since the laptop and desktop versions
 would only differ
 in some configuration details (like how the kernel
 was compiled) and
 which packages make the CDs, the hypothetical 9.0
 Desktop and 9.0 Laptop
 (and in theory, the 9.0 Server, though there could
 be more room for
 differences there...) would be effectively the same
 distribution.  So
 you could snag the server rpms from Cooker (or from
 desktop CD's) and
 install those.
 
 There is no intrinsic reason why a Portable Edition
 couldn't have
 servers.  But there's a finite number of packages
 which can be squeezed
 on to 2-3 CDs.  There are probably a good number of
 packages in contrib
 that are marginally useful on a desktop (and so are
 not high priority
 and get relegated to the 3rd CD or not included),
 but are very useful on
 a laptop.  Conversely, in general, I would assume
 that very few laptops
 are running bind or dhcp server.
 
 -- 
 Levi Ramsey
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 When it comes down to desperation,
 You make the best of your situation.
 Linux 2.4.17-20mdk
   8:01am  up 10 days, 17:43, 16 users,  load
 average: 0.37, 0.27, 0.21
 


=
SI Reasoning
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

A requirement of creativity is that it contributes to change.  Creativity keeps
the creator alive.

-FRANK HERBERT, unpublished notes

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/