Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 22:32, Quel Qun wrote: On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:53, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: On 2003-01-02(Thu) 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. As libgnomedb RPM is already in /incoming, it can be put into cooker after some polishing. Fred here? Listening? One note though. Should the RPM be renamed to meageant? Yes, I put gda2 and libgnomedb2 in incoming a while ago. mergeant is a graphical ui and is separate. I have not packaged it since I did not need it at that time. I will try again. That's what I thought, it does not build, mainly because of a quite strong requirement of libgnomeprint-2.0 and libgnomeprintui-2.0. We are in versioning hell yet again. It tries to link over libgnomeprint-2.so and we only provide libgnomeprint-2-2.so. I don't know how to solve this. I actually had a dangling symlink on my system, surely coming from a previous version. -- Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 00:46, Frederic Crozat wrote: On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. Well, currently, there is no programs requiring libgda2/libgnomedb2 so there is no point updating to these versions.. I don't want to upload new libs just because they exists :)) I think I needed it for mono. It seems that you don't want to include it in contrib, that's fine, but it would be nice to provide up-to-date libs. -- Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. Well, currently, there is no programs requiring libgda2/libgnomedb2 so there is no point updating to these versions.. I don't want to upload new libs just because they exists :)) -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 01:50:53 -0800, Quel Qun wrote: --=-ziiqQFaEdnaY5p1m7eYY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 00:46, Frederic Crozat wrote: On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: =20 Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. =20 As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. =20 Well, currently, there is no programs requiring libgda2/libgnomedb2 so there is no point updating to these versions.. =20 I don't want to upload new libs just because they exists :)) I think I needed it for mono. It seems that you don't want to include it in contrib, that's fine, but it would be nice to provide up-to-date libs. It is not that I want or don't want to include mono.. I have absolutely no time to package or maintain it.. Feel free to package it and upload to contrib.. -- Frederic Crozat MandrakeSoft
Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
--- Original Message --- From: Frederic Crozat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2 On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 01:50:53 -0800, Quel Qun wrote: --=-ziiqQFaEdnaY5p1m7eYY Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 00:46, Frederic Crozat wrote: On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: =20 Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. =20 As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. =20 Well, currently, there is no programs requiring libgda2/libgnomedb2 so there is no point updating to these versions.. =20 I don't want to upload new libs just because they exists :)) I think I needed it for mono. It seems that you don't want to include it in contrib, that's fine, but it would be nice to provide up-to-date libs. It is not that I want or don't want to include mono.. I have absolutely no time to package or maintain it.. Feel free to package it and upload to contrib.. I did a while ago: http://www.mandrake.com/en/archives/cooker/2002-12/msg00772.php GTK# is still there, but mono has disappeared. I played a bit with GTK# and the C# compiler. The tutorial apps seem to build and run fine (under linux). In theory, console apps should be able to run under the MS .NET environment, but I haven't tried. I will try to find some time and refresh these packages this week-end. =o= kk1 =-= kk1
[Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. =-= kk1
Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
On 2003-01-02(Thu) 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. As libgnomedb RPM is already in /incoming, it can be put into cooker after some polishing. Fred here? Listening? One note though. Should the RPM be renamed to meageant? -- Abel Cheung GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc msg84880/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [Cooker] libgda2 and libgnomedb2
On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:53, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote: On 2003-01-02(Thu) 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote: Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed besides it. As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2 and provide full gnome support. As libgnomedb RPM is already in /incoming, it can be put into cooker after some polishing. Fred here? Listening? One note though. Should the RPM be renamed to meageant? Yes, I put gda2 and libgnomedb2 in incoming a while ago. mergeant is a graphical ui and is separate. I have not packaged it since I did not need it at that time. I will try again. -- Quel Qun [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
