Re: [Cooker] libtcl.so gone?
Garrick Staples [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning? [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX installing /usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm error: failed dependencies: libtcl.so is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk Installation failed Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so [root@polop root]# It's fixed now. From changelog * Thu Feb 28 2002 Geoffrey Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0-0.c17.13mdk - Don't make BitchX depend on a versionless tcl. * Wed Feb 27 2002 dam's [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.0-0.c17.12mdk - added tcl require
[Cooker] libtcl.so gone?
Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning? [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX installing /usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm error: failed dependencies: libtcl.so is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk Installation failed Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so [root@polop root]#
[Cooker] libtcl.so gone?
Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning? [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX installing /usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-+0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm error: failed dependencies: libtcl.so is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk Installation failed Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so [root@polop root]#
Re: [Cooker] libtcl.so gone?
huug wrote: Garrick Staples [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning? [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX installing /usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm error: failed dependencies: libtcl.so is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk Installation failed Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so [root@polop root]# and libtcl.so is needed by gnome-kerberos-0.2.2-1mdk [root@huug2001 urpmi]# cd /usr/lib [root@huug2001 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so should do. -- [root@u100n41 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so ln: `libtcl.so': File exists [root@u100n41 lib]#
Re: [Cooker] libtcl.so gone?
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 10:35:01PM -0400, JJ alleged: huug wrote: Garrick Staples [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Seems that libtcl.so disappeared this morning? [root@polop root]# urpmi BitchX installing /usr/local/garrick/mandrake/Mandrake-devel/cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS/BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk.i586.rpm error: failed dependencies: libtcl.so is needed by BitchX-1.0-0.c17.11mdk Installation failed Try installation without checking dependencies? (y/N) [root@polop root]# urpmf libtcl.so [root@polop root]# and libtcl.so is needed by gnome-kerberos-0.2.2-1mdk [root@huug2001 urpmi]# cd /usr/lib [root@huug2001 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so should do. -- [root@u100n41 lib]# ln -s libtcl8.3.so libtcl.so ln: `libtcl.so': File exists [root@u100n41 lib]# Manually creating the link is not the point. The point is to fix mandrake's packages. Why is it that every error I report is answered with how *I* should fix it? I know how to fix these problems... I am reporting bugs!
