Re: [Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
> Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > mdadm should go into main > > > raidtools should go in contrib > > > > Only if initscripts are updated accordingly to support it. I've > > submitted a patch a long, long time ago for this. > > spam us once mdk9.2 is out until it get merged :-) is cooker unfrozen ? :-) schould we start ? setljo -- NEU FÜR ALLE - GMX MediaCenter - für Fotos, Musik, Dateien... Fotoalbum, File Sharing, MMS, Multimedia-Gruß, GMX FotoService Jetzt kostenlos anmelden unter http://www.gmx.net +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More! +++
Re: [Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Guillaume Rousse wrote: Ainsi parlait Luca Berra : hello, i updated mdadm with some fixes from Neil, you might want to update the one in contribs. http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2/ Uploaded mdadm should go into main raidtools should go in contrib Only if initscripts are updated accordingly to support it. I've submitted a patch a long, long time ago for this. can you check the initscripts patches at the same url? L. -- Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN XAGAINST HTML MAIL / \
Re: [Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
Ainsi parlait Oden Eriksson : > måndagen den 8 september 2003 11.35 skrev Guillaume Rousse: > > Ainsi parlait Luca Berra : > > > hello, i updated mdadm with some fixes from Neil, > > > you might want to update the one in contribs. > > > http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2/ > > > > Uploaded > > Huh? > > I would prefer you ask the maintainer (me) first. As it seems one of > the patches applied can possible break usage with 2.4 kernels, that > wouldn't be nice. > > "003MdSuperFix > Status: ok > > Make sure unused superblock descriptor entries aren't failed. > > This confuses 2.4 kernel code." Sorry. Feel free to remove the patch then if needed. -- Suppressive fire works on everything but the enemy -- Murphy's New Military Laws n°12
Re: [Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
måndagen den 8 september 2003 11.35 skrev Guillaume Rousse: > Ainsi parlait Luca Berra : > > hello, i updated mdadm with some fixes from Neil, > > you might want to update the one in contribs. > > http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2/ > > Uploaded Huh? I would prefer you ask the maintainer (me) first. As it seems one of the patches applied can possible break usage with 2.4 kernels, that wouldn't be nice. "003MdSuperFix Status: ok Make sure unused superblock descriptor entries aren't failed. This confuses 2.4 kernel code." -- Regards // Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT.com
Re: [Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
Guillaume Rousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > mdadm should go into main > > raidtools should go in contrib > > Only if initscripts are updated accordingly to support it. I've > submitted a patch a long, long time ago for this. spam us once mdk9.2 is out until it get merged :-)
Re: [Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
Ainsi parlait Luca Berra : > hello, i updated mdadm with some fixes from Neil, > you might want to update the one in contribs. > http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2/ Uploaded > mdadm should go into main > raidtools should go in contrib Only if initscripts are updated accordingly to support it. I've submitted a patch a long, long time ago for this. -- The only thing you didn't check for a malfunction, will be the source of the problem, but you won't find it until you are called back -- Murphy's Laws of Locksmithing n°3
[Cooker] mdadm-1.3.0-2mdk
hello, i updated mdadm with some fixes from Neil, you might want to update the one in contribs. http://percy.comedia.it/~bluca/cooker/lvm2/ mdadm should go into main raidtools should go in contrib if you ask a question on the linux-raid mailing list the first answer you get is: install mdadm and regards, L. -- Luca Berra -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Communication Media & Services S.r.l. /"\ \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN XAGAINST HTML MAIL / \
