[Cooker] urpmi bug?
Hi, I'm updating one of the machines at the office what was running an early post-9.1 cooker, before the lib-ilization of KDE. When I tried to update of course it complained about all the dependencies.. so I'm updating with the command line: urpmi --auto-select --allow-nodeps --allow-force The program will download and install the first batch of packages, then report that the rest of them aren't downloaded and the program reports: Installation failed, some files are missing: And it lists the rest of the packages it hasn't installed yet. Re-running the command gets the next batch of files. V.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 14:25, François Pons wrote: Le mer 11/12/2002 à 14:07, Jesper Krogh a écrit : Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each packagename so it becomes human-readable? Even better sorted by alphabet too This sounds like not to be a bad idea, so look at 13mdk of urpmi. Thanks. ... but: [root@luke rpms]# urpmi gnome The following packages contain gnome: gnome-kerberos gnome-vfs-extras gnome-syst em-tools gnome-pilot-conduits libgnomeui2_0 libgnomemm-1.2_9-devel gnome-spell l ibgnome-db0-devel gnome-media gnomeicu libgnomeprint2 [root@luke rpms]# urpme GConf Using GConf as a substring, I found: libGConf2_4-1.2.1-2mdk GConf2-1.2.1-2mdk Remove them all? (y/N) y Could it be done here too? [root@luke rpms]# rpm -qa | grep urpmi urpmi-4.1-15mdk [root@luke rpms]# -- Jesper Krogh, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
Le mar 10/12/2002 à 22:27, Jesper Krogh a écrit : I really think this is a bug: [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (43 MB): XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-1.0-16mdk drakconf-9.0-6.1mdk X11R6-contrib-4.2.1- 3mdk drakcronat-0.1.2-9mdk XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk XFree86-4.2.1-3mdk xt erm-166-1mdk drakxtools-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk xinitrc-2.4 .4-69mdk harddrake-ui-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-Xvfb-4.2.1-3mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) Y [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (43 MB): XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-1.0-16mdk drakconf-9.0-6.1mdk X11R6-contrib-4.2.1- 3mdk drakcronat-0.1.2-9mdk XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk XFree86-4.2.1-3mdk xt erm-166-1mdk drakxtools-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk xinitrc-2.4 .4-69mdk harddrake-ui-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-Xvfb-4.2.1-3mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) [root@luke root]# If it really means that it cannot remove the packages, then it should tell me instead of letting me know which other packages it need to remove. Or what's wrong since it cannot remove the packages. I really think that it is total leagal to remove XFree86 :-) Yes it is legal, of course. There should be a problem removing package and this is not visible by default (just found the bug and it will be fixed soon). François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
On Wednesday 11 December 2002 10:43, François Pons wrote: Le mar 10/12/2002 à 22:27, Jesper Krogh a écrit : I really think this is a bug: [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (43 MB): XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-1.0-16mdk drakconf-9.0-6.1mdk X11R6-contrib-4.2.1- 3mdk drakcronat-0.1.2-9mdk XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk XFree86-4.2.1-3mdk xt erm-166-1mdk drakxtools-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk xinitrc-2.4 .4-69mdk harddrake-ui-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-Xvfb-4.2.1-3mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) Y Yes it is legal, of course. There should be a problem removing package and this is not visible by default (just found the bug and it will be fixed soon). Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each packagename so it becomes human-readable? Even better sorted by alphabet too -- Jesper Krogh, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
Le mer 11/12/2002 à 14:07, Jesper Krogh a écrit : Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each packagename so it becomes human-readable? Even better sorted by alphabet too This sounds like not to be a bad idea, so look at 13mdk of urpmi. François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote: Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each packagename so it becomes human-readable? Even better sorted by alphabet too I've always wished for that too... -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard enough. - Jim Nichols
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
Le jeu 12/12/2002 à 02:55, Ben Reser a écrit : On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:07:45PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote: Is it not possible to somewhere in this output insert a newline after each packagename so it becomes human-readable? Even better sorted by alphabet too I've always wished for that too... Sorry, too late, this is done now. François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 06:11:39AM +0100, François Pons wrote: Sorry, too late, this is done now. Good answer. :) -- Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ben.reser.org If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard enough. - Jim Nichols
[Cooker] urpmi bug.. package removal.
I really think this is a bug: [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (43 MB): XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-1.0-16mdk drakconf-9.0-6.1mdk X11R6-contrib-4.2.1- 3mdk drakcronat-0.1.2-9mdk XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk XFree86-4.2.1-3mdk xt erm-166-1mdk drakxtools-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk xinitrc-2.4 .4-69mdk harddrake-ui-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-Xvfb-4.2.1-3mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) Y [root@luke root]# urpme XFree86 To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be removed (43 MB): XFree86-ISO8859-2-Type1-fonts-1.0-16mdk drakconf-9.0-6.1mdk X11R6-contrib-4.2.1- 3mdk drakcronat-0.1.2-9mdk XFree86-100dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk XFree86-4.2.1-3mdk xt erm-166-1mdk drakxtools-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-75dpi-fonts-4.2.1-3mdk xinitrc-2.4 .4-69mdk harddrake-ui-1.1.9-53.1mdk XFree86-Xvfb-4.2.1-3mdk Is this OK? (Y/n) [root@luke root]# If it really means that it cannot remove the packages, then it should tell me instead of letting me know which other packages it need to remove. Or what's wrong since it cannot remove the packages. I really think that it is total leagal to remove XFree86 :-) [root@luke root]# rpm -qa | grep rpm urpmi-4.1-9mdk rpm-4.0.4-21mdk rpmmon-0.5-0.beta.1mdk rpm-helper-0.6-1mdk rpmtools-4.5-2mdk [root@luke root]# -- Jesper Krogh, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Cooker] urpmi bug ?
Today upgrading my system like other days, I only have 6 packages to upgrade: # urpmi --auto-select Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être installés (53 Mo): kdetoys-2.2.2-8mdk.i586 kdebase-2.2.2-91mdk.i586 koffice-1.1.1-14mdk.i586 kdebase-devel-2.2.2-91mdk.i586 kdebase-nsplugins-2.2.2-91mdk.i586 kdegraphics-2.2.2-15mdk.i586 Est-ce correct ? (O/n) % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. Dload Upload TotalCurrent LeftSpeed 100 1000k 100 1000k0 0 56727 0 0:00:18 0:00:18 0:00:00 62494 100 15.7M 100 15.7M0 0 63102 0 0:04:21 0:04:21 0:00:00 62673 100 8461k 100 8461k0 0 61353 0 0:02:21 0:02:21 0:00:00 60279 100 101k 100 101k0 0 39961 0 0:00:02 0:00:02 0:00:00 57763 100 170k 100 170k0 0 45658 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 59525 100 1592k 100 1592k0 0 59103 0 0:00:27 0:00:27 0:00:00 67939 The size of total downloaded package is around 27Mo. But urpmi has calculed 53Mo. Why is a difference between these two numbers ? shouldn't be equal ? Emmanuel
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug ?
The size of total downloaded package is around 27Mo. But urpmi has calculed 53Mo. Why is a difference between these two numbers ? shouldn't be equal ? Size to download == 27Mo. Installed (and unpacked) Size == 53Mo. hope this is right... Jochen Schönfelder -- - Jochen Schönfelder Spannskamp 26 22527 Hamburg
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug ?
Jochen Schoenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The size of total downloaded package is around 27Mo. But urpmi has calculed 53Mo. Why is a difference between these two numbers ? shouldn't be equal ? Size to download == 27Mo. Installed (and unpacked) Size == 53Mo. hope this is right... This is right. urpmi counts size of package (but uncompressed) but there is a bug, it doesn't substract package size that will be removed (it let rpm do it for its checking), this means you don't have to wory about not having 53Mo of free space, but you need some free space for unpacking archive (old files not destroyed at this stage, for allowing rollback). François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug ?
On 11 Mar 2002, François Pons wrote: urpmi counts size of package (but uncompressed) but there is a bug, it doesn't substract package size that will be removed (it let rpm do it for its checking), this means you don't have to wory about not having 53Mo of free space, but you need some free space for unpacking archive (old files not destroyed at this stage, for allowing rollback). Hmm.. one really could fix that. I like debian apt-get's messages like after installation XYZ MB will be freed. Shouldn't be so hard to fix this in urpmi...!? Jochen Schönfelder -- - Jochen Schönfelder Spannskamp 26 22527 Hamburg
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug ?
Blindauer Emmanuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Today upgrading my system like other days, I only have 6 packages to upgrade: # urpmi --auto-select Pour satisfaire les dépendances, les paquetages suivants vont être installés (53 Mo): kdetoys-2.2.2-8mdk.i586 kdebase-2.2.2-91mdk.i586 koffice-1.1.1-14mdk.i586 kdebase-devel-2.2.2-91mdk.i586 kdebase-nsplugins-2.2.2-91mdk.i586 kdegraphics-2.2.2-15mdk.i586 Est-ce correct ? (O/n) % Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Curr. Dload Upload TotalCurrent LeftSpeed 100 1000k 100 1000k0 0 56727 0 0:00:18 0:00:18 0:00:00 62494 100 15.7M 100 15.7M0 0 63102 0 0:04:21 0:04:21 0:00:00 62673 100 8461k 100 8461k0 0 61353 0 0:02:21 0:02:21 0:00:00 60279 100 101k 100 101k0 0 39961 0 0:00:02 0:00:02 0:00:00 57763 100 170k 100 170k0 0 45658 0 0:00:03 0:00:03 0:00:00 59525 100 1592k 100 1592k0 0 59103 0 0:00:27 0:00:27 0:00:00 67939 The size of total downloaded package is around 27Mo. But urpmi has calculed 53Mo. Why is a difference between these two numbers ? shouldn't be equal ? urpmi is reporting the size of the software once installed on your harddisk. -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://www.frozen-bubble.org/
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug ?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 02:55:40PM +0100, François Pons wrote: Jochen Schoenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The size of total downloaded package is around 27Mo. But urpmi has calculed 53Mo. Why is a difference between these two numbers ? shouldn't be equal ? Size to download == 27Mo. Installed (and unpacked) Size == 53Mo. hope this is right... This is right. urpmi counts size of package (but uncompressed) but there is a bug, it doesn't substract package size that will be removed (it let rpm do it for its checking), this means you don't have to wory about not having 53Mo of free space, but you need some free space for unpacking archive (old files not destroyed at this stage, for allowing rollback). It would be nice if urpmi could count both uncompressed and compressed. In that way I could see how much I need to download, and how much it would be on my harddisk. Keld
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug ?
Jochen Schoenfelder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 11 Mar 2002, François Pons wrote: urpmi counts size of package (but uncompressed) but there is a bug, it doesn't substract package size that will be removed (it let rpm do it for its checking), this means you don't have to wory about not having 53Mo of free space, but you need some free space for unpacking archive (old files not destroyed at this stage, for allowing rollback). Hmm.. one really could fix that. I like debian apt-get's messages like after installation XYZ MB will be freed. Shouldn't be so hard to fix this in urpmi...!? It is not so hard, but a bit late now, so next version. François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
Warly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Es schrieb Warly: does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb) on urpm.pm --- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002 +++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002 @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ #- remove any multiple /s or trailing /. #- then split all components of pathname. -$dir =~ s/\/+/\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; +$dir =~ s/([^:]+:\/)?\/+/$1\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; my @paths = split '/', $dir; #- reset $dir, recompose it, and clean trailing / added by algorithm. Indeed :-) It is fetching again now ... It seems, it's time for a new RPM ;-) Francois I let you check and apply if correct I fix it according to host and dir given (we cannot remove the 2 (or 3) / after http, ftp or file (this one for 3), and after the host too (for ftp using username). François.
[Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej: I try to add new local media. If I manually type in directory nmae it is ignored, like adding medium of type: Local: '/usr/sbin/urpmi.addmedia' '-h' 'test' 'file://export' added medium test unable to access medium test If I use file election dialog, /export is always appended to selected directory. Not sure I really understand what's going on. It's a bug in urpmi: - root@menhir[~] urpmi.update plf retrieving description file of plf... curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'http' retrieving source hdlist (or synthesis) of plf... curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'http' ...retrieving failed: curl failed: exited with 6 or signal 0 retrieve of source hdlist (or synthesis) failed no hdlist file found for medium plf - root@menhir[~] urpmi.update cooker retrieving description file of cooker@uninett... curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'ftp' retrieving source hdlist (or synthesis) of cooker@uninett... curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'ftp' ...retrieving failed: curl failed: exited with 6 or signal 0 retrieve of source hdlist (or synthesis) failed no hdlist file found for medium cooker@uninett - root@menhir[~] rpm -q urpmi rpmdrake curl urpmi-3.3-6mdk rpmdrake-1.4-12mdk curl-7.9.4-4mdk - -- _ Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt, _|_|_ () * Stefan /v\ / »( )« Penguin Powered! +(m-m)--+
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
On óÂÔ, 2002-02-16 at 19:37, Stefan Siegel wrote: It's a bug in urpmi: No it is brain damaged Gtk+ file selection dialog + bug in gtk+mdk directory selection dialog. -andrej
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Es schrieb Borsenkow Andrej: I try to add new local media. If I manually type in directory nmae it is ignored, like adding medium of type: Local: '/usr/sbin/urpmi.addmedia' '-h' 'test' 'file://export' added medium test unable to access medium test If I use file election dialog, /export is always appended to selected directory. Not sure I really understand what's going on. It's a bug in urpmi: - root@menhir[~] urpmi.update plf retrieving description file of plf... curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'http' retrieving source hdlist (or synthesis) of plf... curl: (6) Couldn't resolve host 'http' ...retrieving failed: curl failed: exited with 6 or signal 0 retrieve of source hdlist (or synthesis) failed no hdlist file found for medium plf does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb) on urpm.pm --- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002 +++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002 @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ #- remove any multiple /s or trailing /. #- then split all components of pathname. -$dir =~ s/\/+/\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; +$dir =~ s/([^:]+:\/)?\/+/$1\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; my @paths = split '/', $dir; #- reset $dir, recompose it, and clean trailing / added by algorithm. -- Warly
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
Es schrieb Warly: does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb) on urpm.pm --- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002 +++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002 @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ #- remove any multiple /s or trailing /. #- then split all components of pathname. -$dir =~ s/\/+/\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; +$dir =~ s/([^:]+:\/)?\/+/$1\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; my @paths = split '/', $dir; #- reset $dir, recompose it, and clean trailing / added by algorithm. Indeed :-) It is fetching again now ... It seems, it's time for a new RPM ;-) -- _ Tschüss und bis demnächst/à bientôt, _|_|_ () * Stefan /v\ / »( )« Penguin Powered! +(m-m)--+
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Es schrieb Warly: does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb) on urpm.pm --- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002 +++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002 @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ #- remove any multiple /s or trailing /. #- then split all components of pathname. -$dir =~ s/\/+/\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; +$dir =~ s/([^:]+:\/)?\/+/$1\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; my @paths = split '/', $dir; #- reset $dir, recompose it, and clean trailing / added by algorithm. Indeed :-) It is fetching again now ... It seems, it's time for a new RPM ;-) Francois I let you check and apply if correct -- Warly
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug [Was: rpmdrake - can't add new local media]
Warly wrote: Stefan Siegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Es schrieb Warly: does this fixed the pb ? (for urpmi not rpmdrake gtk pb) on urpm.pm --- urpm.pm.warly Sat Feb 16 19:57:51 2002 +++ urpm.pm Sat Feb 16 19:57:21 2002 @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ #- remove any multiple /s or trailing /. #- then split all components of pathname. -$dir =~ s/\/+/\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; +$dir =~ s/([^:]+:\/)?\/+/$1\//g; $dir =~ s/\/$//; my @paths = split '/', $dir; #- reset $dir, recompose it, and clean trailing / added by algorithm. Indeed :-) It is fetching again now ... It seems, it's time for a new RPM ;-) Francois I let you check and apply if correct -- Warly Fixed mine too, many thanks!!
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
Curt Siffert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly. What gives urpmi only ? François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit : Curt Siffert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly. What gives urpmi only ? urpmi package : works urpmi --auto-select : break, try to do a rpm -ivh on all the packages rpmdrake by default seems to call urpmi but with rpm -ivh -- http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html - La vie est un travail qu'il faut faire debout. Emile Chartier, dit Alain, Propos d'un Normand
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
Fabrice FACORAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit : Curt Siffert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly. What gives urpmi only ? urpmi package : works urpmi --auto-select : break, try to do a rpm -ivh on all the packages rpmdrake by default seems to call urpmi but with rpm -ivh Can you check you version (urpmi-2.0-7mdk) as I have no such problem here, everything seems correct ! François.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
On 26 Nov 2001 13:56:26 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote: Fabrice FACORAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit : Curt Siffert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly. What gives urpmi only ? urpmi package : works urpmi --auto-select : break, try to do a rpm -ivh on all the packages rpmdrake by default seems to call urpmi but with rpm -ivh Can you check you version (urpmi-2.0-7mdk) as I have no such problem here, everything seems correct ! I posted having same problem yesterday. On my systems the problem has existed several days and still exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk. Charles
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On my systems the problem has existed several days and still exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk. Can you check your /etc/urpmi/inst.list ? The package listed into this file will be installed instead of upgraded, does other packages have been installed instead of those listed in this file ? François.
Re[2]: [Cooker] urpmi bug
Hello François, Monday, November 26, 2001, 2:18:42 PM, you wrote: FP Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On my systems the problem has existed several days and still exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk. FP Can you check your /etc/urpmi/inst.list ? FP The package listed into this file will be installed instead of upgraded, does FP other packages have been installed instead of those listed in this file ? FP François. urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails and does installations instead of updates where required. Rainer
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
le lun 26-11-2001 à 14:18, François Pons a écrit : Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On my systems the problem has existed several days and still exist even with urpmi-2.0-7mdk. Can you check your /etc/urpmi/inst.list ? The package listed into this file will be installed instead of upgraded, does other packages have been installed instead of those listed in this file ? [root@bastard root]# rpm -q urpmi urpmi-2.0-7mdk [root@bastard root]# rpm -q rpmtools rpmtools-3.1-7mdk [root@bastard root]# rpm -q rpmdrake rpmdrake-1.3-106mdk [root@bastard root]# more /etc/urpmi/inst.list kernel kernel-smp kernel-secure kernel-enterprise kernel-linus2.2 kernel-linus2.4 kernel22 kernel22-secure kernel22-smp hackkernel -- http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html - Un concerné n'est pas obligatoirement un imbécile encerclé. Pierre DAC %Le féminin de président, c'est la femme du président. Pierre Desproges.
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug
le lun 26-11-2001 à 13:56, François Pons a écrit : Fabrice FACORAT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: le lun 26-11-2001 à 10:55, François Pons a écrit : Curt Siffert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And then when I quit out of rpmdrake and go find the downloaded rpm in /var/cache/urpmi/rpms and rpm -Uvh it, it installs perfectly. What gives urpmi only ? urpmi package : works urpmi --auto-select : break, try to do a rpm -ivh on all the packages rpmdrake by default seems to call urpmi but with rpm -ivh Can you check you version (urpmi-2.0-7mdk) as I have no such problem here, everything seems correct ! a --auto-select works for u ? if yes whick kernel version do u have ? [root@bastard root]# rpm -q kernel kernel-2.4.13-6mdk kernel-2.4.13-10mdk as u can see i need to installed -11mdk when i have a --auto-select, so I wonder if it is not the bug. Would mind installed an older cooker kernel ( -10mdk for example ), remove the rpms of -11mdk, update source and redo an --auto-select ? on my side I will install -11mdk kernel and see if it works -- http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html - Le mari qui veut un mariage heureux doit apprendre à garder sa bouche fermée, et son carnet de chèques grand ouvert. Groucho Marx
Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] urpmi bug
Rainer Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails and does installations instead of updates where required. Ok, I will take a look at grpmi so. Thanks, François.
Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] urpmi bug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: Rainer Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails and does installations instead of updates where required. Ok, I will take a look at grpmi so. grpmi was not called correctly, this is now fixed in next urpmi. François.
Re: Re[2]: [Cooker] urpmi bug
On 26 Nov 2001 15:25:05 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (François Pons) writes: Rainer Koschnick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: urpmi works. if called as gurpmi (from rpmdrake) it fails and does installations instead of updates where required. Ok, I will take a look at grpmi so. grpmi was not called correctly, this is now fixed in next urpmi. François. Installed urpmi-2.1-1 and Rrpmdrke now performs properly. Thanks Charles
[Cooker] urpmi bug with package comparison routine... still
There is still a bug with urpmi's version comparison code. It fails to recognize that compat-glibc-5.3-2.0.7.5mdk is already installed on my machine and attempts to install it, of course causing an error and aborting the urpmi "update" session. Thanx, b. -- Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc. North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug with package comparison routine... still
"Brian J. Murrell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is still a bug with urpmi's version comparison code. It fails to recognize that compat-glibc-5.3-2.0.7.5mdk is already installed on my machine and attempts to install it, of course causing an error and aborting the urpmi "update" session. i'd say: kill the guy you chose that release number! alas, it wouldn't save you...
Re: [Cooker] urpmi bug in Oxygen fixed!!
"Brian J. Murrell" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: -next if /^--$/; i don't see why you need such a fix, can you tell more about it?
[Cooker] urpmi bug in Oxygen fixed!!
I had to add the following patch to make urpmi work on my box. I have
the latest urpmi package installed:
Name: urpmiRelocations: (not relocateable)
Version : 0.9 Vendor: MandrakeSoft
Release : 37mdk Build Date: Thu 06 Jan 2000 08:13:59
--- /tmp/urpmi Sat Jan 8 19:38:42 2000
+++ /usr/bin/urpmi Sat Jan 8 19:38:48 2000
@@ -155,7 +155,6 @@
sub closure_deps {
my $to_install = shift;
foreach (@_) {
-next if /^--$/;
exists $to_install-{$_} and next;
my ($name, $v, $r) = /(.*)-([^-]+)-([^-.]+)/;
exists $installed{$name} le_version([$v, $r], $installed{$name}) and next;
Thots?
b.
--
Brian J. Murrell InterLinx Support Services, Inc.
North Vancouver, B.C. 604 983 UNIX
Platform and Brand Independent UNIX Support - R3.2 - R4 - BSD
